islands and proximity domains
play

Islands and proximity domains Eszter K. Horv ath, Szeged - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Islands and proximity domains Eszter K. Horv ath, Szeged Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S andor Radeleczki, Tam as Waldhauser Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. Eszter K. Horv ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes,


  1. Islands and proximity domains Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ as Waldhauser Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 1 / 22

  2. Island domain U ∈ C ⊆ K ⊆ P ( U ) Let h : U → R be a height function and let S ∈ C be a nonempty set. We denote the cover relation of the poset ( K , ⊆ ) by ≺ , and we write K 1 � K 2 if K 1 ≺ K 2 or K 1 = K 2 . We say that S is a island with respect to the triple ( C , K , h ), if every K ∈ K with S ≺ K satisfies h ( u ) < min h ( S ) for all u ∈ K \ S . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 2 / 22

  3. Island domain U ∈ C ⊆ K ⊆ P ( U ) Let h : U → R be a height function and let S ∈ C be a nonempty set. We denote the cover relation of the poset ( K , ⊆ ) by ≺ , and we write K 1 � K 2 if K 1 ≺ K 2 or K 1 = K 2 . We say that S is a island with respect to the triple ( C , K , h ), if every K ∈ K with S ≺ K satisfies h ( u ) < min h ( S ) for all u ∈ K \ S . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 2 / 22

  4. Island domain U ∈ C ⊆ K ⊆ P ( U ) Let h : U → R be a height function and let S ∈ C be a nonempty set. We denote the cover relation of the poset ( K , ⊆ ) by ≺ , and we write K 1 � K 2 if K 1 ≺ K 2 or K 1 = K 2 . We say that S is a island with respect to the triple ( C , K , h ), if every K ∈ K with S ≺ K satisfies h ( u ) < min h ( S ) for all u ∈ K \ S . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 2 / 22

  5. ,,Closeness” relation ( C , K ) δ ⊆ C × C A δ B ⇔ ∃ K ∈ K : A � K and K ∩ B � = ∅ . (1) It is easy to verify that relation δ satisfies the following properties for all A , B , C ∈ C whenever B ∪ C ∈ C : A δ B ⇒ B � = ∅ ; A ∩ B � = ∅ ⇒ A δ B ; A δ ( B ∪ C ) ⇔ ( A δ B or A δ C ) . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 3 / 22

  6. ,,Closeness” relation ( C , K ) δ ⊆ C × C A δ B ⇔ ∃ K ∈ K : A � K and K ∩ B � = ∅ . (1) It is easy to verify that relation δ satisfies the following properties for all A , B , C ∈ C whenever B ∪ C ∈ C : A δ B ⇒ B � = ∅ ; A ∩ B � = ∅ ⇒ A δ B ; A δ ( B ∪ C ) ⇔ ( A δ B or A δ C ) . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 3 / 22

  7. ,,Closeness” relation ( C , K ) δ ⊆ C × C A δ B ⇔ ∃ K ∈ K : A � K and K ∩ B � = ∅ . (1) It is easy to verify that relation δ satisfies the following properties for all A , B , C ∈ C whenever B ∪ C ∈ C : A δ B ⇒ B � = ∅ ; A ∩ B � = ∅ ⇒ A δ B ; A δ ( B ∪ C ) ⇔ ( A δ B or A δ C ) . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 3 / 22

  8. ,,Closeness” relation ( C , K ) δ ⊆ C × C A δ B ⇔ ∃ K ∈ K : A � K and K ∩ B � = ∅ . (1) It is easy to verify that relation δ satisfies the following properties for all A , B , C ∈ C whenever B ∪ C ∈ C : A δ B ⇒ B � = ∅ ; A ∩ B � = ∅ ⇒ A δ B ; A δ ( B ∪ C ) ⇔ ( A δ B or A δ C ) . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 3 / 22

  9. Distant families We say that A , B ∈ C are distant if neither A δ B nor B δ A holds. It is easy to see that in this case A and B are also incomparable (in fact, disjoint), whenever A , B � = ∅ . A nonempty family H ⊆ C will be called a distant family , if any two incomparable members of H are distant. Lemma If H ⊆ C is a distant family, then H is CDW-independent. Moreover, if U ∈ H , then U is admissible. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 4 / 22

  10. Distant families We say that A , B ∈ C are distant if neither A δ B nor B δ A holds. It is easy to see that in this case A and B are also incomparable (in fact, disjoint), whenever A , B � = ∅ . A nonempty family H ⊆ C will be called a distant family , if any two incomparable members of H are distant. Lemma If H ⊆ C is a distant family, then H is CDW-independent. Moreover, if U ∈ H , then U is admissible. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 4 / 22

  11. Distant families We say that A , B ∈ C are distant if neither A δ B nor B δ A holds. It is easy to see that in this case A and B are also incomparable (in fact, disjoint), whenever A , B � = ∅ . A nonempty family H ⊆ C will be called a distant family , if any two incomparable members of H are distant. Lemma If H ⊆ C is a distant family, then H is CDW-independent. Moreover, if U ∈ H , then U is admissible. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 4 / 22

  12. Distant families We say that A , B ∈ C are distant if neither A δ B nor B δ A holds. It is easy to see that in this case A and B are also incomparable (in fact, disjoint), whenever A , B � = ∅ . A nonempty family H ⊆ C will be called a distant family , if any two incomparable members of H are distant. Lemma If H ⊆ C is a distant family, then H is CDW-independent. Moreover, if U ∈ H , then U is admissible. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 4 / 22

  13. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  14. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  15. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  16. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  17. CD-independent subsets in posets Definitions Let P = ( P , ≤ ) be a partially ordered set and a , b ∈ P . The elements a and b are called disjoint and we write a ⊥ b if either P has least element 0 ∈ P and inf { a , b } = 0 , or if P is without 0 , then a and b have no common lowerbound. A nonempty set X ⊆ P is called CD-independent if for any x , y ∈ X , x ≤ y or y ≤ x or x ⊥ y holds. Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 5 / 22

  18. CDW-independence Definition A family H ⊆ P ( U ) is weakly independent if � H ⊆ ⇒ ∃ i ∈ I : H ⊆ H i H i = (2) i ∈ I holds for all H ∈ H , H i ∈ H ( i ∈ I ) . If H is both CD-independent and weakly independent, then we say that H is CDW-independent . Eszter K. Horv´ ath, Szeged Islands and proximity domains Co-authors: Stephan Foldes, S´ andor Radeleczki, Tam´ Novi Sad, 2013, June 5. as Waldhauser () 6 / 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend