IPM Evaluation Tools for Fruit and Field Crops Peter Werts
Project Assistant IPM Institute of North America NRCS & IPM Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM pwerts@ipminstitute.org
1
IPM Evaluation Tools for Fruit and Field Crops Peter Werts Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
IPM Evaluation Tools for Fruit and Field Crops Peter Werts Project Assistant IPM Institute of North America NRCS & IPM Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM pwerts@ipminstitute.org 1 IPM Reduces Pesticide Risk and Exposure IPM is a
1
IPM is a systems-based approach: – Reduces environmental, health and economic risks. – Implemented as an ongoing series of science-based, pest management evaluations, decisions and interventions.
Conventional pesticide sales down 3% per year between 1999 and 2006. (Crop Life, 2007) Long road ahead…
94% of fish, 94% of surface water and 33% of ground water samples collected from 1992 and 2001 showed contamination with one or more
Bald eagle nesting pairs increase from 417 to 5,748 after DDT ban.
2
3
Funded by North Central IPM Center since 2006; additional support from
Northeastern IPM Center for IPM CAPs work in 2009-2010.
128 members from within and outside of region. Goal: Increase grower awareness and participation in NRCS programs
including EQIP for IPM.
Outputs include:
Field crop, vegetable and fruit IPM guidelines; Compiled EQIP financial assistance contract numbers; http://www.nrcs.ipm.msu.edu/nrcs/state_resources Mini-grants and outreach to engage NRCS and create new 595 options in:
IN, OH, IA, KS and MN;
Networking, resource sharing other working groups and national NRCS
staff.
4
NE Vegetable IPM Tool developed 2008
Adapted to North Central Region, 2009.
Current revisions in-progress to adapt
5
6
Identify IPM Strategies for 595 Practice Standard:
Qualify producers for cost-share and technical
Assess and identify IPM and other conservation
Identify practices with low adoption. Template for local IPM Elements and Guidelines.
7
8
MS Word:
MS Excel with macros:
Contents:
9
10
11
12
– Tom Green, IPM Institute of North America and Curt Petzoldt, Cornell University, 2009.
13
Thanks to:
North Central and North East IPM Centers NRCS & IPM Working Group: Grower Incentives for
The following working group members provided comments
Green, Kathy Murray.
Additional comments: Patty McManus, UW Madison Plant pathology. 14