ipm evaluation tools for fruit and field crops peter werts
play

IPM Evaluation Tools for Fruit and Field Crops Peter Werts Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IPM Evaluation Tools for Fruit and Field Crops Peter Werts Project Assistant IPM Institute of North America NRCS & IPM Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM pwerts@ipminstitute.org 1 IPM Reduces Pesticide Risk and Exposure IPM is a


  1. IPM Evaluation Tools for Fruit and Field Crops Peter Werts Project Assistant IPM Institute of North America NRCS & IPM Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM pwerts@ipminstitute.org 1

  2. IPM Reduces Pesticide Risk and Exposure IPM is a systems-based approach:  – Reduces environmental, health and economic risks. – Implemented as an ongoing series of science-based, pest management evaluations, decisions and interventions. Conventional pesticide sales down 3% per year  between 1999 and 2006. (Crop Life, 2007) Bald eagle nesting pairs increase Long road ahead… from 417 to 5,748 after DDT ban. - Fish & Wildlife Service, 2003 94% of fish, 94% of surface water and 33% of  ground water samples collected from 1992 and 2001 showed contamination with one or more pesticides. (2006 U.S. Geological Survey) 2

  3. Presentation Overview  NRCS & IPM working group  IPM Tool background  Use in 595 Practice Standard  IPM Tool demo  Additional Resources  Questions? 3

  4. North Central Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM http://www.nrcs.ipm.msu.edu/  Funded by North Central IPM Center since 2006; additional support from Northeastern IPM Center for IPM CAPs work in 2009-2010.  128 members from within and outside of region.  Goal: Increase grower awareness and participation in NRCS programs including EQIP for IPM.  Outputs include:  Field crop, vegetable and fruit IPM guidelines;  Compiled EQIP financial assistance contract numbers;  http://www.nrcs.ipm.msu.edu/nrcs/state_resources  Mini-grants and outreach to engage NRCS and create new 595 options in: IN, OH, IA, KS and MN;  Networking, resource sharing other working groups and national NRCS staff. 4

  5. IPM Tool Background  NE Vegetable IPM Tool developed 2008 – Kathy Murray, Maine Department of Ag. – Alice Begin and Autumn Birt, NRCS.  Adapted to North Central Region, 2009. – Fruit and field crops. – Funded by North Central IPM Center.  Current revisions in-progress to adapt vegetable tool for North Central Region. 5

  6. Why IPM Tools?  Help IPM planning become: – Site specific; – Crop specific.  Catalogue of IPM practices  Compliment production guides 6

  7. How do they help NRCS?  Identify IPM Strategies for 595 Practice Standard: – PAMS (Prevention, Avoidance, Monitoring, Suppression).  Qualify producers for cost-share and technical assistance programs.  Assess and identify IPM and other conservation practices.  Identify practices with low adoption.  Template for local IPM Elements and Guidelines. 7

  8. IPM Planning for NRCS The foundation of all NRCS pest management planning is based on utilizing environmentally sensitive prevention , avoidance , monitoring and suppression (PAMS) strategies to manage weeds, insects, diseases, animals and other organisms that directly or indirectly cause damage or annoyance to agricultural crops. 8

  9. North Central IPM Tools Format  MS Word: – Fruit and field crops.  MS Excel with macros: – Fruit crop only.  Contents: – Guide Sheet; – PAMS strategies; – Resource list. 9

  10. 10 Field and Fruit Crop Tool: MS Word

  11. 11 Fruit Crop Tool: MS Excel Click Here

  12. Accessing the IPM Tools  Available for down from NRCS & IPM Working Group website: http://www.nrcs.ipm.msu.edu/ 12

  13. Additional Resources  Guide to IPM Elements and Guide lines – Tom Green, IPM Institute of North America and Curt Petzoldt, Cornell University, 2009. http://www.ipm.msu.edu/work- group/pdf/IPMElementsGuidelines09.pdf  Ohio IPM Elements and Guidelines – http://www.ipm.osu.edu/default.asp 13

  14. Thank You…Questions?  Thanks to:  North Central and North East IPM Centers  NRCS & IPM Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM The following working group members provided comments  on the tools: Bill Kuenstler, Dave Epstein, Bryan Jensen, Tom Green, Kathy Murray. Additional comments: Patty McManus, UW Madison Plant  pathology. 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend