Investigation of Mesospheric Gravity Waves over South Pole and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investigation of mesospheric gravity
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Investigation of Mesospheric Gravity Waves over South Pole and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Investigation of Mesospheric Gravity Waves over South Pole and McMurdo Stations Using two Advanced Mesospheric Temperature Mappers P-D Pautet 1 , MJ Taylor 1 , and Y. Zhao 1 1 Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences (CASS), Utah State


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Investigation of Mesospheric Gravity Waves over South Pole and McMurdo Stations Using two Advanced Mesospheric Temperature Mappers

P-D Pautet1, MJ Taylor1, and Y. Zhao1

1Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences (CASS), Utah

State University, Logan, UT, USA

4th ANGWIN Workshop – Sao Jose dos Campos - 24-26 April, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

International ANGWIN Instrument Network

~1300 km

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Advanced Mesospheric Temperature Mapper (AMTM)

  • Capability: High-resolution

mapping of gravity wave intensity and temperature field at ~87 km and wave phase relationship.

  • Temperature precision/pix

~1-2 K in ~30 sec.

  • High-latitude capability as

emission lines avoid auroral contamination.

AMTM at South Pole since 2010. Operates from mid-April to end

  • f August

AMTM at McMurdo since 2017. Operates from mid-March to end of September

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Nightly Temperature Averages

McMurdo South Pole 3-day smoothing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Nightly Temperature Averages

Similar temperatures and large scale (planetary waves?) perturbations Are large scale waves also observed over both sites?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Long-Period (2-12hrs) Waves over Antarctica

May, 2011

Temperature precision: 1K

  • Continuous large amplitude
  • scillations (>10K) during the

whole winter!

slide-7
SLIDE 7

12 24 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Normailzed Power Period (hour) 2012

12 24 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Normalized Power Period (hour) 2013

Spectral Analysis

Semi- Diurnal? Diurnal?

12 24 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Normailzed Power Period (hour) 2011 2011

Lomb Scargle Periodograms 5-9 hour

120 150 180 210 240

  • 20
  • 10

10 20

Temperature (K) Date

2011 Band pass filtered (5-9 hrs) DOY

  • Continuous strong wave activity throughout winter each year to year
  • Dominant wave periods between 5-9 hrs
  • Diurnal and semi-diurnal signatures are not strong.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fe Lidar Observations at McMurdo (Chen et al., 2013; 2016)

Continuous 50-hr temperature Fe lidar measurements showing persistent 4-9 hr waves

  • Identified as inertia-gravity waves (waves

with frequency close the to inertial frequency and therefore affected by the rotation of the Earth)

  • Periods from ~3 to ~11 h
  • Lasting up to 45 h
  • Dominant vertical wavelength 20-30 km
  • Horizontal wavelength 1000-2200 km
  • Sometimes several long-period waves

simultaneously

  • Shallow angle of propagation (~1-2°)
  • Possible sources: unbalanced flows at

stratospheric altitude

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Can we see the same waves

  • ver both sites?

Inertia-gravity waves observed 1360km apart?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Courtesy X. Chu

Comparison Between McMurdo and South Pole

Distance ~1360 km

slide-11
SLIDE 11

MCM Lidar/SP AMTM Temperature Comparison - Jun 29th, 2011

Courtesy X. Chu Δt~3hrs

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Collaborative Study: Fe Lidar (X. Chu) at Murdo with AMTM at South Pole

slide-13
SLIDE 13

AMTM Datasets Comparison June 16-30, 2017

slide-14
SLIDE 14

AMTM Datasets Comparison June 16-30, 2017

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Comparison Example

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Comparison Example

Cross correlation between MCM and SP temperature data Position of maximum correlation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Summary - Future Work

  • Several periods of simultaneous observations between McMurdo

and South Pole have been identified for the 2017 winter season

  • They show a permanent display of IGWs at both site with strong

similarities Future work:

  • Identification of the different IGWs within the observation period

(wavelet)

  • Cross-correlation between the SP and MCM data sets
  • Measurements of the time difference between the two sites
  • Determination of the IGW parameters
  • Comparison with the Fe lidar data when simultaneous

measurements occurred

  • Assessment of the possible sources?