Inve In vestor stor Presentat sentation ion USD 225 25-275 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

inve in vestor stor presentat sentation ion
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Inve In vestor stor Presentat sentation ion USD 225 25-275 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Inve In vestor stor Presentat sentation ion USD 225 25-275 75m m Senior r Secured d Bond Issue Septemb mber r 2013 THIS DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE DISTRIBUTED IN, OR TO ANY PERSON RESIDENT IN THE U.S.,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

In Inve vestor stor Presentat sentation ion

USD 225 25-275 75m m Senior r Secured d Bond Issue

THIS DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE DISTRIBUTED IN, OR TO ANY PERSON RESIDENT IN THE U.S., CANADA, AUSTRALIA OR JAPAN OR TO ANY AMERICAN CITIZEN EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR OTHER APPLICABLE EXEMPTIONS AS REGARDS NON-US RESIDENTS. ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE RESTRICTIONS MAY CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE SECURITIES LEGISLATION.

Septemb mber r 2013

STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Page 2 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013 NO NOT FOR RE RELE LEASE, PUB UBLIC LICATIO ION OR OR DIS DISTRIB RIBUT UTIO ION IN, IN, INT NTO OR OR FRO ROM THE UNIT NITED STATES, AUSTRA RALIA LIA, JAPAN OR OR THE RE REPUB UBLIC LIC OF OF SOUTH AFRIC ICA

This presentation (the "Presentation") has been produced by Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited (the "Issuer" or the "Company"), solely for information purposes in connection with a proposed issuance of bonds (the "Bonds") by the Issuer (the "Bond Issue"), as further described herein. Further details regarding the Issuer, the Bonds and the Bond Issue is provided in an offering memorandum (the "OM" or the "Offering Memorandum"), the term sheet (the "Term Sheet") and an agreement for applications to participate in the Bond Issue (the "Application Agreement") (this Presentation, the OM, the Term Sheet and the Application Agreement taken together, the "Bond Issue Materials"). Any decision to invest should be based on a consideration of the Bond Issue Materials as a whole by the investor and their own evaluation of the Company solely in connection with their consideration of the purchase of the Bonds. The Presentation does not in any way purport to be exhaustive or to contain all information that prospective investors may desire or that may be required in order to properly evaluate the business, prospects or value of the

  • Company. Any and all interested parties should conduct their own independent investigation and analysis of the Company and the investment opportunity contemplated herein. They should

carefully consider all of the information set forth in the more extensive Offering Memorandum presented by the Company, including all assumptions, reservations, qualifications and risk factors included therein. Neither this Presentation nor the Offering Memorandum contains all of the information that might otherwise appear in a prospectus under applicable securities laws. Pareto Securities AS (the “Manager”) has been retained by the Company as arrangers in connection with the transaction. Neither the Manager nor the Company, its parent company, subsidiaries or affiliates, advisors or representatives provides any undertakings, representations or warranties, express or implied, to the recipient regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information (whether written or oral and whether included in this presentation or elsewhere), concerning the Company or the other matters described herein received by the recipient, whether such information was received through the Manager or otherwise. Any and all liability whatsoever towards the recipient in connection with the matters described herein is hereby expressly disclaimed. For the purposes of the Bond Issue, the Manager's advisors have reviewed certain key documents pertaining to the Company and the Bond Issue. For this purpose, the Manager and its advisors have relied on information furnished solely by representatives of the Company. Neither the Manager, nor any advisor appointed by the Manager, has not conducted any legal, financial

  • r technical due diligence of the Company, nor any other third party verification of the information furnished by the Company.

Neither this Presentation nor the Bond Issue have not been reviewed or registered with any public authority or stock exchange. It has been furnished to recipients on a strictly confidential basis and such recipients may not reproduce, redistribute or otherwise pass on, in whole or in part, other than their professional advisors, if any, the Presentation or any information disclosed herein, in meetings or through oral presentations or discussions to any other person without the Company’s explicit approval. This Presentation does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities of the Company mentioned herein within the United States of America (the "United States"). The securities of the Company mentioned herein have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act"), or any state securities laws. Accordingly, such securities may not be offered or sold in the United States except in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. This Presentation is only being and may only be distributed to and directed at: (i) persons outside the United Kingdom; or (ii) persons in the United Kingdom who are: (a) a "qualified investor" within the meaning of Section 86(7) of the United Kingdom Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended (the "FSMA"), acting as principal or in circumstances where Section 86(2) of FSMA applies; and (b) also within the categories of persons referred to in Article 19 (investment professionals) or Article 49 (high net worth companies, unincorporated associations, etc.) of the United Kingdom Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the "Financial Promotion Order") (all such persons together being referred to as "relevant persons"). This Presentation does not constitute, or form a part of, and should not be construed as any offer or invitation to sell, allot or issue, or any solicitation of any offer to purchase or subscribe for, any securities, nor shall it (or any part of it or anything contained or referred to in it) or the fact of its distribution form the basis of, or be relied upon in connection with, or act as any inducement in relation to a decision to purchase or subscribe for or to enter into, any contract or commitment whatsoever for securities in any jurisdiction. The distribution of this Presentation may also in

  • ther jurisdictions be restricted by law. Accordingly, this Presentation may not be distributed in any jurisdiction except under circumstances that will result in compliance with applicable laws

and regulations. The Issuer and the Manager require persons in possession of this Presentation to inform themselves about, and to observe, any such restrictions.

Di Discla laimer imer

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Page 3 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Forward-looking statemen ments Some of the statements and information contained in this Presentation are forward-looking, including statements regarding the Company's plans with respect to development of its properties, expected drilling results and production levels from the Company's properties, statements regarding sources of financing for the Company and its development plans, estimates of the quantities of proved reserves, probable reserves, possible reserves and contingent resources, as well as estimates of the net present value of future net revenue of proved reserves, probable reserves, and possible reserves. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding the intent, belief and current expectations of Iona or its officers with respect to various matters, including reserves, production, first oil, drilling activity or otherwise. When used in this Presentation, the words "expects," "believes," "anticipate," "plans," "may," "will," "should", "scheduled", "targeted", "estimated" and similar expressions, and the negatives thereof, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are not promises or guarantees, are based on various assumptions deemed to be reasonable by the Company's management. Some of the key assumptions include: management's anticipated development timelines (which may be different from those contained in the Company's independent reserves reports), production profiles for the Company's properties, and estimated cash flow from the Company's properties. Information concerning reserves and resources are deemed to be forward-looking statements, as such estimates involve the implied assessments that the reserves or resources can be profitably produced in the future. The production profiles and cash flow estimates from the Company's existing properties are based upon the Company's independent reserves reports. Such profiles and estimates involve numerous assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond the Company's control, that contribute to the possibility that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will prove inaccurate and which could cause actual results to differ from those anticipated. The forward-looking statements in this Presentation are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes to differ materially from those suggested by any such statements, including without limitation: the risk that the Company's development plans and timelines for its core properties change as a result of new information or events, the risk that drilling results differ materially from management's current estimates, reliance on key personnel, general economic conditions, industry conditions, volatility of commodity prices, currency fluctuations, environmental risks, the risk that future terms of anticipated financings are different from those disclosed herein, competition from other industry participants, the risk that transactions identified herein do not close in a timely matter or at all, the lack of availability of qualified personnel or management, and the ability to access additional sufficient capital from internal and external sources for the Company to complete the development programs described in this document. The information contained in this Presentation may identify additional factors that could affect the

  • perating results and performance of the Company.

This Presentation also contains future-oriented financial information and financial outlook information (collectively, "FOFI") about prospective results of operations, future net revenue, cash flows, and components thereof, all of which are subject to the same assumptions, risk factors, limitations, and qualifications as set forth in the above paragraphs. FOFI contained in this Presentation was made as of the date of this document and was provided for the purpose of providing information about management's current expectations and plans relating to the future. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward looking statements or FOFI contained in this Presentation, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required pursuant to applicable securities law. Readers are cautioned that the forward looking statements and FOFI contained in this Presentation should not be used for purposes other than for which it is disclosed herein. The forward looking statements and FOFI contained in this Presentation are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Included in this Presentation are estimates of the Company's 2013-2018 cash flow which are based on various assumptions as to production levels, commodity prices and other assumptions and in the case of the years other than 2012 are provided for illustration only and are based on budgets and forecasts that have not been finalized and are subject to a variety of contingencies including prior years' results. To the extent such estimates constitute FOFI, they were approved by management of the Company in May 2013 and are included to provide readers with an understanding of the Company's anticipated cash flow based on the capital expenditures and other assumptions described and readers are cautioned that the information may not be appropriate for other purposes.

Di Discla laimer imer cont nt.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Page 4 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Summa mmary ry of

  • f risk

sk facto ctors rs

Orlando do and Kells field developm

  • pment

nt

The Orlando, Kells and to a lesser extent the West Wick fields are development assets and not currently in production. The FDPs have not been sanctioned by the DECC, which is a pre-requisite for moving forward with the development towards a producing field. The estimated costs of development and the planned progress for development may therefore be revised significantly before production can commence. In the event production does commence, the size and volume of the reserves of the Orlando, Kells and West Wick fields may be lower than anticipated. Any failure in the development of these fields, delays in start- up of production, failure to reach the estimated production volumes, inaccuracies in the estimated reserves and revenues and increases in the development costs may have material impact on the Issuer's financial situation, results and/or prospects.

Structur tured Energy rgy Derivative tive

The Issuer has entered into a series of cash-settled call options with Britannic Trading Limited (“BTL”) (a subsidiary of BP International Limited) pursuant to which the Issuer received an up-front premium of USD 60m in exchange for granting BTL the option to purchase in total slightly in excess of 8.1 MMbbl of Brent blend crude from the Issuer's Orlando, Kells and Huntington fields over a period of five years at an average price of USD 95.84. The effect of the options is that if the price of Brent blend crude increases beyond the levels set in the options, the Issuer will not benefit from such increases on the associated volumes. There is a risk that some or all of the costs associated with the call options may not be deductible against the Issuer's production income, which may have an adverse tax effect on the Issuer. In addition, any shortfall in production below the volumes set out in the Structured Energy Derivative may expose the Issuer to additional losses which may have a material adverse effect on the business and operations of the Issuer.

Huntingt gton

  • n ramp-up

up

The Huntington field is the main producing asset of the Issuer. The field has just established peak design rate through the facilities and is nearing completion of commissioning operations. The Issuer relies on production from the Huntington field to service its obligation including the Bonds. Any failure in the development of the Huntington field, delays in establishing stable dual compression operations, inaccuracies in the estimated reserves and increases in the development costs may have a material adverse effect on the Group's ability to service its obligations, cash flow, liquidity, financial situation and results.

Oil P Price

The revenues, profitability and cash flow of the Group’s operations will be dependent upon the market price of oil and gas. Historically, the price has been volatile and is subject to a wide number of factors beyond the Issuer's control, such as global and regional supply and demand, and expectations regarding future supply and demand for oil and petroleum products; geopolitical uncertainty; access to pipelines, tanker ships and other means of transporting oil, gas and petroleum products; prices, availability and government subsidies of alternative fuels; prices and availability of new technologies, global and regional political developments, natural disasters and international conflicts. A reduction in the price of oil may have a significant material effect on the Issuer's ability to service its obligations, including the Bonds.

Estimated d Reserves

The reserves and resources of the Issuer have been estimated by GCA. Such estimates of the quantity and value of economically recoverable oil and gas reserves and the possible future net cash flows are based upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as, ultimate reserves recovery, interpretation of geological and geophysical data, timing and amount of capital expenditures, marketability of oil and gas, royalty rates, continuity of current fiscal policies and regulatory regimes, future oil and gas prices, operating costs, development and production costs and workover and remedial costs, all of which may vary significantly from actual results.

Operat ational

  • nal Risk

The Issuer's oil and natural gas exploration and development activities are focused on existing producing or discovered oil and natural gas fields. The business

  • f exploration and production of oil and gas involves a high degree of risk which a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be

able to prevent. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing oil and gas fields. The Issuer will have no earnings to support it should the wells drilled or its properties prove not to be commercially viable.

Liquidi dity y and Financi ncing

The Issuer has sufficient, but limited unrestricted capital to meet its near term liabilities. Its access to unrestricted liquidity up and until the settlement of the Bond Issue and the release of the Bond Issue is limited and may continue to be limited until strengthened by cash flow from the Issuer Group's producing

  • assets. Any future revenues from the Issuer Group's reserves may not provide the necessary capital for the issuer Group to replace its reserves or to maintain

its production, and the Issuer Group may need to obtain external financing to pursue and develop producing assets, which may not be available to the Issuer Group.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Page 5 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Agenda enda

  • The

e Bond d Issu sue

  • Overview

erview of Iona a Ener ergy gy

  • Asse

set overview erview

  • Fin

inancials ncials

  • Ap

Appen endix dix

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Page 6 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Bond nd Issue: ue: Principal ncipal terms rms and d condi nditions tions

Issuer er: Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited Guarantors: Iona Energy Inc. (the “Parent”) and Iona UK Huntington Limited (the “Huntington Subsidiary”) Restricted ed Group: p: Means the Issuer, the Huntington Subsidiary and any other (directly or indirectly owned) subsidiaries of the Issuer from time to time Issue Amount: USD 225-275m Use of

  • f Procee

eeds ds: Net proceeds to be employed to (i) refinance the approx. USD 143m outstanding under the existing USD 250m senior secured borrowing base facility, (ii) fund an escrow account with USD 35m where such amount shall be used to retire Tranche 1 Call Options under the BP Structured Energy Derivative, (iii) fund up to USD 25m which will be applied to retire Tranche 2 Call Options under the BP Structured Energy Derivative, (iv) general corporate purposes of USD 3m, and (v) finance development capex on the Orlando and Kells fields Tenor: 5 years Status us of the Bond: Senior secured Issue Price: e: 97.50% of par value Coupon: [●]% p.a., semi-annual interest payments Amortisation: (i) 5 semi-annual instalments each of 15% of the Issue Amount commencing 30 months after the Settlement Date at 105%, 104%, 104%, 103% and 103% of par value, respectively, and (ii) the residual amount at the Maturity Date at 102% of par value. Instalments to be increased if sale of working interest in Orlando and/or Kells prior to start-up of commercial production. Call Options (American): Make whole year 1-2 @ T+50bps, @ 105.00% after 24 months, @ 104.00% after 36 months, @ 103.00% after 48 months, @ 102.00% last 6 months Settlement Date: Expected to be on or about 27 September 2013 Final Matur urity Date: 27 September 2018 (5 years after the Settlement Date) Security: From the Parent: on-demand guarantee, pledge over shares in Issuer, assignment of intra-group loans to Issuer. From the Issuer: Debenture over the Issuer’s assets (comprising i.a. fixed charge over the Licences, assignment of insurances and other material agreements related to the Licences, floating charge, goodwill charge, earnings account charge), charge over shares in Huntington Subsidiary, assignment of intragroup loans to Huntington Subsidiary, account pledges (escrow account, debt service retention account charge, BP structured energy derivative escrow account), etc. From the Huntington Subsidiary: on-demand guarantee, debenture over the Huntington Subsidiary’s assets (similar to the debenture over the Issuer’s assets (as set out above)), assignment of intra-group loans to Issuer. Similar security to be established for any future Restricted Group Companies and future Development Licences and Production Licences. Licences: Means the Huntington, Huntington Deep, Trent & Tyne, Orlando, Kells and Ronan & Oran licences, and any future hydrocarbon licences owned by the Restricted Group Paren ent Covenants: : No dividends, maintenance of ownership to Issuer, negative pledge on shares in Issuer and loans to the Issuer, subordination of claims on the Issuer, insurance provisions, reporting requirements, etc. Issuer er and Subsidi diary Covenants: Dividend restrictions, disposal of licences provisions (incl. mandatory prepayment clause for sale/disposal of any production licence), financial indebtedness restrictions, negative pledge, no additional security, financial support restrictions, subordination of intra-group loans from Parent, Huntington Subsidiary and any other subsidiary of the Issuer, capex restrictions (maximum USD 210m on Orlando/Kells and maximum USD 12m in aggregate on Huntington Deep/West Wick/Ronan & Oran/new licences/acquisitions/appraisal/exploration (whereof USD 6m exclusively for Huntington Deep) (however no capex limitations on Trent & Tyne and Huntington, and on Huntington Deep after FDP approval) until first oil from either Orlando or Kells), exploration spending restrictions, hedging policy requirement, tax loss provisions, reporting requirements, licence cancellation information covenant, provisions for retiring call options under the BP structured energy derivative, etc. Financial Covenants: Issuer: (i) Liquidity of minimum USD 30m, (ii) Restricted Group Capital Employed Ratio of minimum 40% until 31 Dec 2016, and minimum 50% thereafter, (iii) Restricted Group Leverage Ratio of maximum 3.0x. Parent: Group Capital Employed Ratio of minimum 40% until 31 Dec 2016, and minimum 50% thereafter Listing: The Issuer will apply for the Bonds to be listed on Nordic ABM or Oslo Børs Trustee ee: Norsk Tillitsmann ASA Governing Law: Norwegian for Bond Agreement, pre-settlement security documents and guarantees, English law and Scottish law for first-disbursement security documents Manager er: Pareto Securities AS Please refer to the Term Sheet for further details

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Page 7 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Corpo rporate rate structure ucture and d secur curity ity package ckage

Issuer uer & Guarant antors

Asse sets ts to be part t of security ty pack ckage ge Subsi sidiar iaries es not t part t of security ty pack ckage ge Asse sets ts not t part t of security ty pack ckage ge

Legend: Security applicable to Restricted Group:

  • Charge/pledge over

shares in Issuer and Huntington Subsidiary

  • Fixed charge over the

Licences

  • Assignment of insurances

and other material agreements relating to the Licences

  • Floating charges
  • Goodwill charges
  • Assignment of intra-group

loans

  • Charge/pledge over

earnings accounts, debt service retention account, escrow account and BP structured energy derivative escrow account

Non-ple ledged Alas aska a asset: et: 1 offshore licence

Iona Energy gy Compan pany (US) ) Limit ited ed

(Incorporated in Delaware) Char arge ged UK assets(1) : Fixed charge over 6 offshore licences Trent & Tyne: P.609 & P.685 Orlando: P.1606 Kells: P.1607 Huntington Fulmar: P.1801 Ronan & Oran: P.1971 Other(2) Char arge ged UK assets(1) : Fixed charge over 1 offshore licence: Huntington: P.1114

Restricted Group

(1) As per Settlement Date of the Bond Issue. Please refer to the Term Sheet for further details (2) Other assets includes inter alia interest in Esmond Transport System

Iona a UK Huntin ington

  • n Limit

ited ed

(Incorporated in England and Wales) GUARANTOR

Iona a Ener ergy Inc.

(Incorporated in Alberta) GUARANTOR

Iona a Ener ergy Compan any (UK) ) Limit ited ed

(Incorporated in Scotland) ISSUER

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Page 8 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Us Use of procee

  • ceeds

ds

  • Costs to prepay credit facility totals USD

143m, whereof USD 139.3m principal and USD 3.5m accrued interest and waiver fees. There are no fees payable associated with the early termination of the credit facility

  • Up to USD 35m to be spent on retiring
  • approx. 3.1 MMbbl call options at USD 95/bbl

due October 2014 – September 2016 held by BTL(4) Sources es: USDm New bond d issue (1) 250 50m Uses: USDm Repay bank facility (incl. related costs) 143 BP Structured Energy Derivative 35 Orlando and Kells development(2) 62 General and Corporate Purposes(5) 3 Transaction costs 7 Sum 250m

Sources s and uses Fundin ing situatio ation after er bond d financi ancing

USDm Group cash on balance sheet (01.09.2013)(3) 74.1 Outstanding bond loan(1) 250.0 Net t intere rest-bearing earing debt(3) 175.9 .9

  • Group cash as of 01.09.2013 of USD 11.4m
  • Cash balance adjusted for final Huntington

payment to Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. (“Carrizo”)

  • f USD 2.3m and net proceeds from bond

issue

(1) Based on the mid-point in the USD 225-275m range (2) Up to USD 25m from the Escrow Account that is intended to fund Orlando and Kells development, may be temporarily used to retire call options outstanding under Tranche 2. Following such retirement and temporarily release of funds, Iona shall subject to a waterfall structure transfer 75% of any earnings to the Escrow Account to fund Orlando and Kells development cost and thereby offset any capital spent from this account to retire calls under Tranche 2. Please refer to the Term Sheet and the Offering Memorandum for a detailed description of the BP Call option buyback (3) Adjusted for net proceeds of the bond issue post repayment of debt facilities and final Huntington payment to Carrizo (4) Britannic Trading Limited, a subsidiary of BP International Limited (5) USD 3m to be transferred to the Parent’s Canadian bank account

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Page 9 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Ring-fenced bond structure - no cash leakages outside security package and strict restrictions
  • n capital expenditures as well as exploration spending
  • USD ~303m UK tax loss(2) provides ultimate downside protection – no tax payable until mid

2017 due to re-investment in developments and 10% annual RFES(3) uplift

  • Loan to Value(1) through the lifetime of the loan of less than 60% (assuming USD 275m bond)

Invest vestme ment nt highli ghligh ghts

  • Pure play UK North Sea exposure towards a diversified portfolio of production and near-term

development assets close to existing infrastructure

  • Conservative business profile – no exploration exposure
  • Highly experienced management team with strong asset knowledge and a strong track record

UK in indep epen ende dent t foc focused ed on deve evelop

  • pme

ment t and prod roduc uction

  • n

Sig ignificant ant cash fl flow from rom prod roduc ucing g assets ts

  • Expected net production of 8,500 boe/day in Q4 2013 increasing to 17,000 boe/day end 2016(1)
  • Cash flow from producing assets Huntington, Trent & Tyne funds upcoming development

projects, debt service and strong cash balance build up

  • Expected cash flows of USD ~400m from Huntington and Trent & Tyne during 2013-15(1)

Solid d and lo long-term erm reser erve e base

  • 36.0 MMboe net 2P reserves, whereof ~75% from assets in production or under development(1)
  • Ninian Area – a core development area well understood by management with net 2P reserves of

18.1 MMboe(1) and Contingent Resources of 51.9 MMboe(R)

  • Standardized subsea development systems ensures low costs and reduces timing/capex risk

Attr tract active e bond d struc ructur ure and Loan to Valu lue

(1) Based on independent reserve estimates performed by GCA, Loan to Value excluding significant cash balances. See GCA CUR. (2) As of 31.03.2013 (3) Ring Fence Expenditure Supplement

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Page 10 10 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Agenda enda

  • The

e Bond d Issu sue

  • Overview

erview of Iona a Ener ergy gy

  • Asse

set overview erview

  • Fin

inancials ncials

  • Ap

Appen endix dix

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Page 11 11 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Canadian corporation listed on TSX Venture Exchange

(TSX-V:INA) with operational headquarters in Aberdeen

  • Market cap of CAD ~220m – 367m shares outstanding
  • Pure play UK development and production focused

company

  • Huntington commissioning nearing completion with peak

rates in excess of ~34,500 boe/day. Stable production expected in September

  • Trent & Tyne WI increase upon commitment to future

drilling campaign increases production and reserves(1)

  • Orlando development sanctioned, first oil expected Q4‘15
  • Kells first oil expected 12 months after Orlando first oil
  • 36.0 MMboe 2P reserves(GCA CUR) and 56.9 MMboe net 2C

Contingent Resources(R) (2)

  • Expected Q4 2013 production of ~8,500 boe/day, ramping

up to ~17,000 boe/day exiting 2016 post-development of Orlando and Kells(3)

  • Experienced management team with strong track record
  • f value creation and in-depth asset knowledge
  • Strong institutional shareholder base, more than CAD

185m equity raised since 2010

Intro troduc duction tion to Iona na Energy ergy Inc.

(1) Increasing working interest from 20% to 37.5% (2) Based on Trent & Tyne WI of 37.5% (3) Based on Trent & Tyne WI of 37.5% and Huntington production including 0.75% Differential Lifting Entitlement and 1.8% royalty

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Page 12 12 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • 4

8 12 16 20 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 HUN HUNTING INGTON TRE RENT NT & & TY TYNE NE ORLA RLAND NDO KELLS LS WEST W WICK ICK

Sign gnif ifican icant prod

  • ducti

uction growt

  • wth in

in comi

  • ming

ng years ears

AVERAGE ANNUALIZED KBOE/DAY

  • Huntington reached full

capacity in early September

  • Long-term gas production

from Trent & Tyne

  • Further Tyne

development in ‘14

  • Orlando first oil

scheduled Q4 ‘15

  • Kells first oil Q4 ’16
  • Potential tie-in of

Huntington deep in 2016 and beyond

  • Long-term production

potential from West Wick

  • Ronan & Oran are

additional development candidates

Notes:

  • Production profile based on Gaffney Cline & Associates («GCA») 2P reserves as of December 31st, 2012(GCA CUR)
  • Based on Trent & Tyne WI of 37.5% and Huntington production including 0.75% Differential Lifting Entitlement and 1.8% royalty
  • 2013 and beyond provided for illustration only. Budgets and forecasts beyond 2013 have not been finalized and are subject to a variety of factors including prior year's results.

PRODUCTION DEVELOPMENT

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Page 13 13 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Graham aham Heath ath – CFO (Inter erim im) ) and VP Corpor

  • rate

e Developmen lopment

  • 15 years experience in Oil & Gas Finance, Risk, Corporate Development at EnCana and Cenovus
  • Has been key in Iona’s capital raising efforts since joining in 2010: raised CAD 185 million in equity, public

listing of INA on the TSX-V, closed USD 250m in Senior Secured Credit Facilities, structured Call sale to BP

  • B. Comm from University of Calgary

Hi Highly ghly qualified lified mana anagem gement nt team am

Neill ll Carso rson – CEO, O, Execut ecutiv ive Direc recto tor

  • Founder of Iona in 2008, co-founder and former COO of Ithaca Energy Inc.
  • 32 years experience from the North Sea, Bolivia and Pakistan with Amoco Corporation, BP and Ithaca
  • Responsible for building Ithaca’s reserve base from zero to 35+ MMboe in three years from 2004
  • Geophysicist, M. Sc. from Birmingham University

Alan an Curran an – COO

  • 30 years oil and gas experience with significant senior management experience. Joined Iona in March 2012
  • Former CEO of Wood Group Engineering (North Sea) and Managing Director of Lundin Petroleum UK
  • Mid-career with Oryx and Kerr-McGee - several years with senior responsibility for Ninian Area operations
  • Chemical Engineer, B.Sc. From Edinburgh University. First 10 years with Shell as Petroleum Engineer

Othe her r key manag agem ement ent team am

  • Peter Campbell – VP Asset Management (Engineer, 30 years in E&P. Business Development Manager at Kerr-McGee North Sea, Maersk Oil)
  • John Baillie – VP Developments (Reservoir engineer – 28 years Dana Petroleum, Enterprise Oil, Total and Marathon)
  • Colin Tannock – VP Subsurface (Geologist, 30 years Former Exploration Manager for Talisman, Geoscience Manager for TAQA)
  • Robin Baxter – VP Business Development (Lawyer, 37 years Legal Counsel Procurement, and Commercial Manager Kerr-McGee North Sea, Maersk Oil)
  • Dave Sherrard – Reserves Advisor (Reservoir engineer – 32 years Chevron & BP. Co-founder RML/Senergy Group Limited)
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Page 14 14 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Busin iness ss mode del l – ridin ding g the e value lue creation eation curve ve

Monetize Screen & Acquire

  • Dual license strategy:

– License rounds: existing discoveries – Acquisitions: discoveries and producing assets

  • Identifying opportunities neglected by larger

companies minimizes acquisition costs

– Undeveloped discoveries – Producing assets with upside / redevelopment potential

  • Identifying “Hungry Hosts” minimizes

development and operating costs

– Infrastructure owners that wants/needs new production to extend life of infrastructure

  • Utilize strong organization to

commercialize hydrocarbons

– Mature Contingent Resources into 2P reserves – Mature undeveloped reserves into production

  • Key work streams

– Appraisal – Engineering & FDP planning – Development drilling – Subsea / topside installation & modification

  • No exploration
  • Dual monetization strategy:

– Produce: harvest cash flow – Divest: sell assets at full value following significant de-risking

  • Fully utilize significant tax pools
  • Next step: reinvest cash in new

development and production projects

Commercialize

dril ill develo elop proven undev. . oil il & & gas produ

  • ductio

tion with h upside de pot

  • ten

entia ial productio

  • duction

re re-in investm estmen ent

(1) Undeveloped proven reserves and resources

  • USD 1 - 5/

5/bbl bbl acqu quisit isition ion cost st(1)

  • USD 15 - 25/bb

bbl l capit ital l cost

  • USD 15 - 17/bbl

bl opera erati ting ng costs ts

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Page 15 15 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Established 2008
  • Raised CAD 1m
  • Screened “Starter

Pack” assets

  • DECC Accreditation

Hi Histor tory of Iona na

2008 Inception

2012

Strong reserves growth

2013 13 >> >>

Material producer

2009 2009-11 11

Creating platform for growth

  • Acquired assets

– Trent & Tyne gas production – 35% WI in Orlando

  • Raised CAD 73m equity
  • Completed TSX-V Qualifying

Transaction

  • YE 2011 2P reserves of 5.9

MMboe(GCA 2011)

  • Exit 2011 production of 550

boe/day

  • Approved exploration
  • perator
  • Acquired Orlando and Kells

(100%), West Wick (~59%)

  • Raised CAD 92m equity
  • YE 2012 2P reserves of 35.8

MMboe(GCA 2012)

  • 2012 production of 310

boe/day

  • Orlando – drilled well,

submitted FDP, reserves upgrade

  • Kells – submitted FDP,

reserves upgrade

  • Acquisition of Huntington
  • 27th round awards Ronan &

Oran

  • Negotiated USD 130m RBL
  • Approved production
  • perator
  • Divested 25% of Orlando and

Kells, Orlando FDP approved

  • T&T T6 well successfully drilled,

strong production

  • Huntington on-stream
  • Significant financing activity

– CAD 23m equity – USD 250m Credit Facility – USD 60m structured derivative – Raising USD 225-275m in senior secured bond loan

  • 36.0 MMboe 2P reserves (GCA CUR) (1)
  • Q4 2013E production of 8,500(1)(2)

boe/day

  • Set for production of 17,000

boe/day exiting 2016

(1) Based on Iona’s net WI post-election to drill Tyne NW (2) Includes 0.75% DLE and 1.8% royalty on Huntington

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Page 16 16 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

36.0 MMBOE 56.9 MMBOE 2P RESERVES (GCA CUR) 2C CONTINGENT (R) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 HUNTINGTON TRENT & TYNE ORLANDO KELLS WEST WICK RONAN & ORAN 2P RESERVES (GCA CUR) 2C CONTINGENT (R) 28.5 MMBOE 7.5 MMBOE OIL GAS

Reserves (31. . Dec 2012 12) 1P 1P MMboe 2P 2P MMboe 2P ATAX NPV10 ($m)

Trent & Tyne (37.5% non-op)(T) 0.6(1) 3.6(1) $81.2(1) Huntington (15.0% non-op)(H) 3.7(2) 4.6(2) $198.9(2) Orlando Oil (75.0% op)(O) 5.9 11.5 $210.3 Kells Oil (75.0% op)(K) 3.9 6.6 $66.2 West Wick (58.0% op)(W) 5.1 9.7 $236.6

Reserves es 19.1 36.0 .0 $793.2 .2 Continge ngent nt Resources urces 1C 1C MMboe 2C 2C MMboe 2C ATAX NPV10 ($m)

Assets with reserves (R) 3.4 7.6 UNDER ENGINEERING REVIEW Ronan, Oran (operator) (R) 34.6 49.2

Continge ingent nt Resources es(R) 38.0 .0 56.9 .9 $TBD

Larg rge certi rtified ied reserve serve and d resou source rce base se

(1) All figures based on Iona’s net WI of 37.5% post-election to drill Tyne NW (2) All figures including 0.75% DLE, but excluding 1.8% royalty

MMBOE P50 SPLIT 2P RESERVES SPLIT

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Page 17 17 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 2013YE 2014YE 2015YE 2016YE 2017YE

USDm

EXCESS CASH FLOW

  • CUM. PRE-TAX CF EXCL. CAPEX
  • CUM. CAPEX
  • 150
  • 100
  • 50

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

USDm

HUNTINGTON TRENT & TYNE ORLANDO KELLS

Cash sh flow

  • w fundi

nding ng upcoming coming developm velopmen ents ts

  • Strong cash flow from Huntington and Trent & Tyne provides a solid backbone for the Company going forward

– Pre tax cash flow of USD ~360m(1) prior to Orlando first oil

  • Orlando and Kells developments are fully funded by pre-tax cash flow from Huntington alone

– Estimated net capex of USD 172m(2) to first-oil at Orlando (USD 364m to fund full development programme at both fields) – Development solution with subsea tie-back to the existing Ninian platform effectively reduces capex risk significantly

  • No taxes expected payable until after Kells comes on production

– Tax loss carry forward of USD ~303m coupled with substantial investment program to bring Orlando and Kells on stream provides effective tax shelter

  • Self financed and repeatable business model – once Orlando and Kells are on stream cash flow from these fields will finance new

developments which again will shelter Iona from paying tax

Field ld by field d pre tax cash h flow

  • w profil

ile(1

(1)

Ac Accumu mulat lated d operational tional cash flow

  • w vs. capex(1)

Orlando 1st Oil Q4‘15 Kells 1st Oil Q4’16 (1) Cash flows based on GCA economic profiles with Trent and Tyne adjusted for 37.5% WI and GBP 23m cost of Tyne NW well. Not adjusted for minor effect of slower than expected ramp-up of Huntington (2) Capex based on GCA estimate

Free cash h flow

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Page 18 18 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Agenda enda

  • The

e Bond d Issu sue

  • Overview

erview of Iona a Ener ergy gy

  • Asse

set overview erview

  • Fin

inancials ncials

  • Ap

Appen endix dix

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Page 19 19 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Hu Huntington tington - Field ld summa mmary ry

(1) Disproportionate Lifting Entitlement, (2) Includes DLE, (3) 7 Sept 2013

Huntin ingt gton

  • n - License

se P.1114 CNS, , Block 22/14b

Iona working interest 15% (+ 2.55% DLE(1) and royalty) Partners E.ON (25%, op.), Premier (40%), Noreco (20%) 2P reserves (GCA CUR) Gross Net Iona(2) 29.1 MMboe; 26.3 MMbbl oil, 16.8 Bcf gas 4.6 MMboe; 4.1 MMbbl oil, 2.6 Bcf gas Current production (gross)(3) ~34,500 boe/day Expected peak production 34,500 boe/day (reached September, 2013)

  • Producing oil field located in the Central North Sea

– Located in 90m water depth 230 kilometres east of Aberdeen – Developed with a leased stand alone FPSO (Voyageur Spirit) – Production start April 2013, commissioning nearing completion with peak design rates of 34,500 boe/day achieved in early September

  • Discovered in 2007, FDP approved 2010

– Significant appraisal program carried out in 2007-08, including three appraisal wells and multiple appraisal sidetracks – High quality Paleocene Forties sandstone with approx. 100 ft oil column

  • verlying strong aquifer

– Strong results from development drilling campaign reinforces pre drill resource estimates

  • Iona acquired its interest in December 2012

– Acquired from Carrizo for USD 203.6m, transaction closed Feb. ‘13 – Acquisition included tax balance of GBP 80.1m and 2.55% DLE(1) and royalties, increasing economic interest to 17.55%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Page 20 20 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Hu Huntington tington field eld deve velopm lopment ent overv erview iew

  • Development wells and subsea facilities

– Developed with four production and two water injector wells – Development drilling showed thicker than expected reservoirs and better than expected reservoir characteristics – All wells tied back to FPSO via central production manifold – Producers equipped with sand control & gas lift

  • Topside facilities

– Voyageur Spirit FPSO – leased from Teekay, day-rate of USD 215k, declining by USD 5k/day/year, 5-year contract with extension

  • ptions

– 30 Mbbl/day and 27 MMcf/day (approx. 34.5 Mboe/day) production capacity (debottlenecking study outlines scope for increase to 40 Mboe/day) – Vessel oil storage capacity of 285 Mbbl – Average technical uptime of 99% for Voyageur Spirit achieved on previous assignments (excl. first month) and >97% for design class

  • Hydrocarbon export and marketing

– Crude oil exported via shuttle tankers (Knutsen NYK Offshore) - expected to be sold at a small premium to Brent – Gas export via CATS pipeline to TGPP for sale at spot market

  • Total gross investments forecast of GBP 344.5m (99% complete)

– Wells: GBP 149m – FPSO: GBP 57m – Subsea facilities and installations: GBP 95m – Project management: GBP 44m

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Page 21 21 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

1 2 3 4 5 6 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Mboe/ e/d net product ction to Iona 15% WI 2.55% DLE/ROY.

(1) Stock Tank Oil Initially In Place, (2) High Resistivity Zone, (3) Not adjusted for slower than expected ramp-up on Huntington. Including 0.75% DLE and 1.8% royalty, (4) Calculated from field tests

Hu Huntington tington prod

  • ducti

uction n ramp mp-up up complet mplete

  • Positive results from the drilling campaign

– All four horizontal producers came in shallower than prognosis, encountering thicker than expected reservoir columns, achieved longer than expected horizontal sections and tested significantly above expectations – Estimated production capacity from the four wells of 80,000 bbl/day – Reservoir characteristics more favorable than expected – Operator calculated STOIIP(1) gain of 4% and HRZ(2) gain of 16% through drilling – Combined 2-well water injection capacity of 23,000 bpd meets produced water disposal needs

  • Commissioning nearing completion and production in line with

expectations

– Following first production on 12 April oil rate restricted to 7,000 to 10,000 bpd for three months by flaring consent – Initial gas export established on 5 June. Persistent vibration in

  • ne of two parallel compression trains delayed ramp up – resolved

during August – Commissioning of primary oil storage tank blanket system in late August removed dependence on higher wind speeds – Peak design rate of 34,500 boe/day achieved with stable dual compression operations expected during September – Six oil cargoes lifted since commencement on 16 May – Water injection commenced in late May

Completion Top Forties es (ft ft, , TVDSS) Gross interval (ft ft) Test result boe/day(4

(4)

Well 22/14b-H4 11 Aug 2011 Prognosed Actual 8,621 8,611 2,483 3,010 10,000 23,000 Well 22/14b-H2 19 Dec 2011 Prognosed Actual 8,615 8,601 2,142 2,745 10,000 23,000 Well 22/14B-H3 12 Feb 2012 Prognosed Actual 8,629 8,604 2,300 2,935 10,000 23,000 Well 22/14B-H5 28 July 2012 Prognosed Actual 8,646 8,639 3,193 3,298 10,000 10,685

(3)

Develop lopmen ent drilli lling g results lts Huntingt ington

  • n produ

duction ion (Net et to Iona)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Page 22 22 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Sign gnif ifican icant resources sources in deeper eeper Hu Hunti ntingto ngton n hori rizons zons(R)

Jurassic ‘Fulmar’ and Trias assic ic ‘Skagerrak’ Reservoir

  • irs

Jurassic ‘Fulmar’ Reser servoi

  • ir (R)

Triassic ‘Skager agerrak’ Reser servoir ir (R)

  • Northern Area segment was discovered by well 22/14b-5 in May 2007,

testing 39° API oil at up to ~4,600 bbl/day

– Significant oil in place – May be developed through the existing FPSO through use of horizontal wells and/or water injection

  • Further upside potential in the Central Area (15% WI) and Southern

Area (100% WI) segments

– Contingent Resources of 5.8 MMbbl gross(R) – Prospective Resources of 12.6 MMbbl gross(R)

  • Opportunity to develop Fulmar in a phased approach as capacity

becomes available in the Huntington facilities

– Existing options to extend the five-year fixed term FPSO lease – Fulmar will benefit from low development and operating costs – Forties field life would be extended through incremental production

  • The 1987 discovery well proved a large column of light oil with

substantial in-place volumes in the Triassic formation

  • Contingent Resources of 3.1 MMbbl net (21 MMbbl gross)(R)
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Page 23 23 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Trent ent & Tyne ne - Field ld summary mmary

Iona working interest 20% at present, 37.5% post Tyne NW election Partners Perenco (80%, op.) 2P reserves (GCA CUR) Gross: Net to Iona: 9.6 MMboe: 57.2 Bcf 3.6 MMboe: 21.4 Bcf(1) Production start / peak In production since 1996, 119 MMcf/day Current production (gross) 44 MMcf/day

  • Two producing gas fields acquired by Iona in 2011

– Located in the UK Southern Gas Basin in 20-48m water depth – Developed by ARCo in 1995-96 using a NUI(2) platform on each field with gas export to the Bacton onshore terminal through ETS(3) – Paid GBP 21.2m for Tyne T6 development well to earn 20% WI in Trent & Tyne

  • Both fields are comprised of Carboniferous reservoirs

– Tyne consists of three developed fault blocks, Tyne North, Tyne South and Tyne West and two undeveloped fault blocks (Tyne North West and Tyne East) – Trent consists of a single structure – The two fields have produced 264 Bcf with 57.2 Bcf remaining(4)

  • Substantial short-term production increase

– Iona will increase its interest to 37.5% after committing to drilling of a second well(5) – Will increase net production from current levels of 8.7 MMcf/day to 16.3 MMcf/day (2.7 Mboe/day) based on intended increased working interest only – Tyne NW expected to add further net 9.4 MMcf/day given success

(1) Assuming exercise of option to increase ownership to 37.5% WI , (2) Normally Unmanned Installation, (3) Esmond Transportation System owned 12.5% by Trent and Tyne joint ventures providing Iona with a 2.5% indirect stake (to be increased to 4.6875% following acquisition of additional 17.5% of Trent & Tyne, (4) GCA CUR, (5) Cost capped at GBP 23m

Trent t & Tyne - License ense P609 & P685 SNS, Block k 44/18 18

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Page 24 24 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

5 10 15 20 25 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Trent Tyne Mboe/day gross production

Tyne field ld structure

Trent ent & Tyne ne – Redev develo elopmen pment to to boost

  • st production
  • duction
  • Significant redevelopment potential identified

– Assets virtually untouched since 1996

  • Substantial success since Iona entered in 2011

– The T6 well was sidetracked up-dip and away from advancing water in December 2012 and brought on-stream in January following quick well tie-in engineering. Current production of 25 MMcf/day

  • Two further drilling opportunities planned

– Tyne NW new estimated to add 52 Bcf & 25 MMcf/day given discovery (prospective resources)(R) - Iona’s WI to increase to 37.5% with effect of 1 January 2013 – T1Z sidetrack expected to add 25 Bcf & 18 MMcf/day production (GCA 2P)

  • Contingent Tyne East development estimated to add 17 Bcf

& 15 MMcf/day (contingent resources)(R)

  • Further opportunities under evaluation

– Three drillable structures identified for further work: i) West of T2, ii) West of Tyne NW and iii) older reservoirs below the platform – Other new development wells, sidetracks, development of undeveloped fault blocks, low risk infrastructure led exploration

  • Annual tariff incomes from TORS and Cygnus gas fields of

USD 2-4m per year expected over next ten years

Iona acquired 20% WI

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Page 25 25 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Established hydrocarbon area in the Northern North Sea

containing multiple producing fields and significant infrastructure

– Centralized around the giant Ninian oil field (>1 billion bbl recovered) – Located approx. 150 kilometres east of Shetland Islands in 140m water depth

  • Iona has operatorship in four proven accumulations in the area

with combined discovered resources of more than 75 MMboe of which 70 MMboe net to Iona(R)

  • Orlando and Kells is a “twin” development project of two satellite

fields

– Acquired by Iona through several transactions during 2011-12 – Combined reserves of 18.1 MMboe net (24.2 MMboe gross) (R) – Will be tied back to the Ninian Central Platform (“NCP”) – a long term hub for oil and gas export – Planned to be developed in a phased approach with production start planned 2015 and 2016 for Orlando and Kells respectively

  • Significant follow-up potential in the area from the Ronan and

Oran discoveries

– Recently awarded in the 27th Round – Significant appraisal upside and strong development and

  • perational synergies with the Orlando and Kells field

developments

Nini nian an area ea deve velopm lopments ents – Intro troducti uction

NCP

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Page 26 26 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Iona working interest 75%, operator Partner Atlantic Petroleum (25%) 2P reserves (GCA CUR) Gross Net to Iona 15.4 MMbbl 11.5 MMbbl Expected production start 4Q 2015 Expected peak production 11,000 bbls/day (October 2015)

Nini nian an area ea – Orlando lando field eld summa mmary ry

Orlan ando do - Licen ense se P.1606 06 NNS, , Block k 3/3b

  • Small oil field located approx. 10 kilometres north-east of the

Ninian Central Platform

– Original 35% WI acquired from Wintershall in 2010 for USD 3.15m – Acquired remaining 65% from MPX and Sorgenia in 2011-12 for USD 48.3m plus USD 29m over first three years of production (pre farm-down) – Sold 25% WI to Atlantic Petroleum in Dec. 2012 for USD 30 million plus share of future payments (USD 7.25m)

  • Well delineated field following successful appraisal program

– Originally discovered by Chevron in 1988, Orlando was re-awarded in the 25th round in 2009 – Successful two well (3/3b-13 and 3/3b-13z) appraisal program in 2011-12 confirmed reservoir quality and resulted in reserve upgrade

  • Reservoir with strong production characteristics

– Orlando, like other fields in the area, consists of a high quality Brent reservoir (18% porosity, 50mD permeability) with a high quality oil (32O API) and a large underlying aquifer for pressure support

NCP

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Page 27 27 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Orlan lando

  • – De

Develo elopme pment nt program

  • gram
  • Current field development plan approved in April 2013

– To be developed as a subsea tie-back to the NCP with one firm horizontal well – One contingent well subject to reservoir performance and prevailing economic conditions

  • Straight forward development based on well known technology

– First well will utilise suspended appraisal well and be completed near-horizontal with dual Electric Submersible Pumps – The subsea facilities will comprise Pipeline End Manifold, an insulated, trenched and buried 8” pipeline to NCP and a trenched and buried umbilical for power, controls and chemical injection

  • All long lead procurement contracts have been tendered and all

contracts are expected to be in place by 4Q 2013

  • Remaining net capex of USD 182m(1) whereof USD 139m prior

to first oil

– Flowline manufactured and subsea Xmas trees almost complete

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Kboe/ e/d net product ction to Iona

(1) Issuer’s latest project view based on current supply chain estimates

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Page 28 28 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Iona working interest 75%, operator Partner Atlantic Petroleum (25%) 2P reserves(1) (GCA CUR) Gross Net to Iona 8.8 MMboe: 4.2 MMbbl oil, 27.5 Bcf gas 6.6 MMboe: 3.2 MMbbl oil, 20.1 Bcf gas Expected production start 4Q 2016 Expected peak production 10,400 boe/day (October 2016)

Kells ls – License ense P.1607 7 NNS, , Block 3/8d

Nini nian an area ea – Kells ls field eld summa mmary ry

  • Small field located approx. 13km south-east of the NCP

– Acquired from Fairfield in Oct. 2011 for USD 8.6m plus a contingent payment of USD 5m on FDP approval and royalty of USD 2.50/boe of production – Sold 25% WI to Atlantic Petroleum in Feb, 2013 for USD 4 million plus share of future payments(2)

  • Re-development of the old Staffa field

– Discovered by BP in 1985 and developed as a subsea tie-back to NSP by Lasmo, Staffa produced 5.3 MMboe during 1992-94, with an initial rate of ~14,000 boe/day, before it was decommissioned due to pipeline blockages (uninsulated pipeline) and low oil prices – Strong reservoir control due to four reservoir penetrations and detailed production history from the Staffa field

  • Twin of Orlando development – subsea tie-back to NCP
  • Subsea development of high quality Brent reservoir

– Brent reservoir (11% porosity, 10-100mD permeability) with a high quality (40O API) oil

(1) Plus 2.0 MMboe (1.5 Mmboe net) 2C resources from water injection (2) Pro-rata share of both USD 5m at FDP approval and USD 2.5/boe royalty to Fairfield

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Page 29 29 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Kells ls – De Develo elopmen pment t program

  • gram
  • FDP agreed and held by DECC pending final submission in 2014

– Subsea tie-back to NCP – Two production wells – one pre first oil and second 12 to 18 months later as producer with scope for later conversion to water injection – Near-vertical wells penetrating the Tarbert and Upper Ness zones. – Pre first oil subsea facilities will comprise Pipeline End Manifold, an insulated, trenched and buried 6” in 10” diameter pipe-in-pipe pipeline to NCP and a trenched and buried umbilical to provide controls and chemical injection

  • Flow assurance blockage issues addressed by pipeline insulation

(pipe-in-pipe) and chemical injection – both proven technologies

  • Contracts are in place for two subsea xmas trees - balance of the

work program will be tendered in 2014

– Xmas trees near completion

  • Total remaining net capex: USD 154m(1)
  • Issuer contemplating pursuit of water flood development

– Second well could be converted for water injection – Anticipated to yield additional net 3.0 MMbbl over 2P oil reserves (R) – Requiring installation of WI flowline in 2017

1 2 3 4 5 6 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Kboe/ e/d net product ction to Iona

(1) Capex based on GCA estimate

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Page 30 30 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Agenda enda

  • The

e Bond d Issu sue

  • Overview

erview of Iona a Ener ergy gy

  • Asse

set overview erview

  • Fin

inancials ncials

  • Ap

Appen endix dix

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Page 31 31 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Proposed new bond issue to replace existing financing arrangements and partly finance the development of Orlando and

Kells fields to first oil – Refinance approximately USD 143m of existing bank debt and retire parts of the BP call structure for an estimated USD 35m – Retain USD 3m for general and corporate purposes of the Parent – Remaining net proceeds of USD 62m(1) to be spent on the Orlando and Kells development

  • Iona will through the bond issue and cash flow from producing assets be fully financed for all its committed and planned

investment activities – Comfortable funding situation post bond issue due to strong cash flow from producing fields – Compared to the existing bank facility, the bond provides added flexibility for the company to spend cash flow from the Huntington and Trent & Tyne fields on its Orlando and Kells development projects – Tenor and amortization profile of the bond tailor made to match cash flow from Iona’s core assets

  • Conservative use of cash flow for other purposes going forward

– Iona is an appraisal and development company – exploration risk is not a part of the business model – USD 210m capital expenditure limit on Orlando and Kells before first oil at either of the fields – Limitations on exploration spending is part of the bond agreement and ensures a comfortable cash flow buffer for unforeseen capital expenditures as well as production delays and shortfall

  • Capital commitments solely related to acquisition, appraisal, and development projects

– USD 2.3m Huntington Deferred Payment, USD 34m on increased WI at Trent & Tyne and USD 7m for T1z sidetrack, USD 173m(2) at Orlando and Kells prior to 1st oil at Orlando

Iona na Energy ergy finan nancing cing

(1) Based on mid point in the USD 225-275m range (2) Issuer’s latest project view based on current supply chain estimates

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Page 32 32 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CAPEX & Acq. cost Debt service G&A Exploration costs Taxes

  • CAPEX at Orlando, Trent & Tyne, and

Kells of USD 172m(2), USD 41m, USD 154m(2) respectively (from 1.1.2013)

  • ~USD 303m existing tax pools
  • Exchange rate 1.6 USD/GBP

Stron rong g finan nancial cial position sition post st bond nd issue ue

Pot Potential ntial expendit diture ure profile ile(1) (USD SDm) Operat ating ing cash flow profil ile (USD SDm)

  • Huntington reached full capacity in early

September ‘13

  • Long-term gas production from Trent &

Tyne at 37.5% WI

  • Orlando first oil scheduled Q4 ‘15
  • Kells first oil Q4 ’16
  • Oil price: USD 100/bbl (nominal)
  • Gas price: USD 10/MMcf
  • Based on independent reserve estimates

performed by GCA (1) Appraisal activities included in CAPEX, exploration investments based on maximum exploration spending according to term sheet (2) Capex based on GCA estimate

  • Solid operational cash flow ensures

comfortable funding situation post bond issue

  • No taxes estimated payable until 2017

due to utilization of USD ~303m tax loss and substantial investments related to Orlando and Kells field development

  • Bond structure will provide flexibility for

development projects, unlocking value potential and cash flows from Orlando and Kells

  • Strong support from global oil prices and

UK gas prices

− Go-forward hedging that protects projected capital requirements − Bi-annual policy review

  • Exploration spending not a part of

corporate strategy and limited through bond agreement

  • Low G&A due to cost effective
  • rganisation

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Huntington Trent & Tyne Orlando Kells

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Page 33 33 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Gr Group up and d issu suer er balan lance ce sheet eet

  • Pro forma group cash position

as of 01.09.2013 of USD 74.1 million(1)

  • Issuer pro forma cash position

as of 01.09.2013 of USD 70.8 million(1)

Key balanc ance e sheet t figur ures es

(1) Adjusted for net proceeds of the bond issue post repayment

  • f debt facilities and final payment to Carrizo for acquisition of

Huntington GROUP BALANCE SHEET, CADm Q2 2013 YE 2012 YE 2011 Cash and cash equivalents 11.5 15.5 41.6 Other current assets 14.6 5.2 1.9 Non-current assets 490.6 182.8 28.6 Total Assets 516.6 203.5 72.1 Liabilities Current liabilities 181.4 55.4 7.0 Interest bearing loans

  • Derivative liabilities

59.9

  • Other non-current assets

107.4 0.7 0.2 Total Liabilities 348.7 56.1 7.2 Total Equity 167.9 147.5 64.9 Total Liabilities & Equity 516.6 203.5 72.1 ISSUER GROUP BALANCE SHEET, GBPm Q2 2013 YE 2012 YE 2011 Cash and cash equivalents 6.1 4.4 19.4 Other current assets 9.0 7.4 1.0 Non-current assets 306.2 108.1 17.5 Total Assets 321.3 119.9 37.9 Liabilities Current liabilities 113.1 34.0 4.1 Interest bearing loans

  • 89.2

34.6 Derivative liabilities 37.5

  • Inter-company advances

106.3

  • Other non-current liabilities

67.2 0.4 0.1 Total Liabilities 324.0 123.6 38.8 Total Equity (2.7) (3.7) (0.9) Total Liabilities & Equity 321.3 119.9 37.9

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Page 34 34 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Conservative business profile - development and production oriented company
  • Significant UKCS asset base with 36.0 MMboe 2P reserves (GCA CUR)
  • Current production of 7,500 boe/day expected to increase to 8,500 boe/day in Q4 2013(1)
  • Exit 2016 production of 17,000 boe/day with both Orlando and Kells in production
  • Orlando and Kells developments funded through bond issue and operating cash flow –

expected 2013-15 cash flow of USD ~400m from Huntington and Trent & Tyne

  • USD ~303 million of tax losses in the UK - no taxes payable until 2017 due to existing tax

loss coupled with significant investments

  • Self-financing and repeatable business model – once Orlando and Kells are on stream cash

flow from these fields will finance new developments which again will shelter Iona from paying tax

  • Bond issue provides greater flexibility to spend cash flow on development projects compared

to existing bank borrowing base facility

  • Exploration spending not part of company strategy

Executive ecutive summa mmary ry

(1) Based on Trent & Tyne WI of 37.5% and Huntington production including 0.75% Differential Lifting Entitlement and 1.8% royalty

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Page 35 35 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Agenda enda

  • The

e Bond d Issu sue

  • Overview

erview of Iona a Ener ergy gy

  • Asse

set overview erview

  • Fin

inancials ncials

  • Ap

Appen endix dix

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Page 36 36 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Appendi pendix

  • Iona

a Ener ergy gy Compa mpany ny (UK) K) Lim imite ited d

  • Hunt

ntingt ington

  • n
  • Trent

ent & Tyne ne

  • Nin

inia ian are rea a ass ssets ets

  • Other

er assets sets and d in inform rmat ation ion

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Page 37 37 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Complet mplete e licen ense se overv ervie iew w Restri trict cted ed Gr Group

  • up

Block

  • ck

Inter erest est License cense No. Entit ity Main in Asset set Operator ator 3/3b 75% P.1606 Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited Orlando Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited 3/8d 75% P.1607 Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited Kells Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited 3/7c (part) 100% P.1971 Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited Oran Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited 3/8c 100% P.1971 Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited Oran Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited 3/12 (part) 100% P.1971 Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited Ronan Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited 13/21a 58.73% P.185 Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited West Wick Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited 22/14b 15% P.1114 Iona UK Huntington Limited Huntington Forties E.ON Rhurgas 22/14d 100% P.1801 Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited Huntington Fulmar Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited 43/24a 20% P.685 Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited Trent Perenco UK Ltd. 44/18a Area A and B 20% P.609 Iona Energy Company (UK) Limited Tyne Perenco UK Ltd.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Page 38 38 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Iona na acqui uisit sition ion and d divest vestme ment nt histo tory ry

Acqui uisit sitions ions Worki king ng Inter eres est Seller ler Acqui uisit sition ion Date Acqui uisit sition ion Price ce Notes es Orlando 35 % Wintershall Mar 2011 USD 3m Plus 42.5% cost share of appraisal well Trent & Tyne 20 % Perenco May 2011 GBP 21.2m Paid 100% of cost-capped T6 development well to earn 20% WI Kells 100 % Fairfield Jan 2012 USD 5m Payable upon FDP approval USD 2.5/boe Royalty payment West Wick 58.73% Centrica Feb 2012 USD 8.15m Orlando 65% (to 100%) MPX/Sorgenia June 2012 USD 48m Reimbursement of past costs USD 29m Staged payments related to production(1) Huntington 15%(2) Carrizo Dec 2012 USD 203.6m Includes tax pools of GBP 80.1m(3) Trent & Tyne (pending) 17.5% (to 37.5%) Perenco 2013 GBP 23m Pay 100% of cost-capped NW Tyne well to earn additional 17.5% WI Dives estments ents Working king Inter eres est Buyer er Dives estmen ment Date Dives estmen ment Price ice Notes es Orlando & Kells 25 % Atlantic Pet.

  • Dec. 2012

USD 34m Upfront consideration USD 7.25m Staged payments related to Orlando production(4) USD 1.25m Payable upon Kells FDP approval USD 2.5/boe Proportionate share of Kells royalty payable to Fairfield

(1) Staged payments commencing six months after first production from Orlando of USD 7m, USD 7m, USD 7m, USD 4m and USD 4m made every six months thereafter respectively (2) Including 0.75% Disproportionate Lifting Entitlement and 1.8% Royalties (3) Effective date 1.7.2012 (4) Staged payments commencing six months after first production from Orlando of USD 1.8m, USD 1.8m, USD 1.8m, USD 0.925m and USD 0.925m made every six months thereafter respectively

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Page 39 39 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Hi High gh activ tivity ity level vel goin ing g forward rward

Firm activ ivit ity Conting ingent ent activ ivit ity

Provided for illustration only. Budgets and forecasts beyond 2013 have not been finalized and are subject to a variety of factors including prior year's results

2013 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 2018

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Huntingt tington Production Appraisal drilling

  • Hunt. Deep production

Trent t & Tyne Tyne NW election – new W.I. of 37.5% * Drill Tyne NW Tyne 1z side track Production from TNW and T1z Orla lando Field Development Plan Platform modifications Drilling 1st well Subsea installation (production) Production Drilling 2nd well Subsea installation (2nd well) Kells Field Development Plan Platform modifications Drilling 1st well Subsea installation (production) Production Drilling 2nd well Subsea installation (2nd well)

First oil

*

Approval al

*

First oil: Q4 ‘15

*

Approval al

*

First oil Q4 ‘16

*

Approval al Commit it to TNW First gas: Q4 ‘14 Increas ased WI to 37.5%

* *

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Page 40 40 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Appendi pendix

  • Iona

a Ener ergy gy Compa mpany ny (UK) K) Lim imite ited d

  • Hunt

ntingt ington

  • n
  • Trent

ent & Tyne ne

  • Nin

inia ian are rea a ass ssets ets

  • Other

er assets sets and d in inform rmat ation ion

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Page 41 41 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Huntington tington – De Develop velopme ment nt schem hematics atics

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Page 42 42 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Vessel statistics

– Sevan 300 unit previously on UKCS Shelley field – Accommodation for 57 personnel – Hydrocarbon processing, gas compression, water injection and

  • il storage and offloading

– Storage for 285,000 bbl of oil (effective capacity 235,000) – Max capacity:

  • Oil: 30,000 bbl/day
  • Gas: 38 MMcf/day
  • Produced water: 42,000 bw/day
  • Total liquids: 60,000 bbl/day
  • Water injection: 48,000 bwi/day

– Voyageur Spirit and sister vessels Piranema and Hummingbird have consistently displayed technical uptimes in excess of 97%

  • Key contract terms

– Five year fixed term with Teekay – Initial day rate USD 215k declining by USD 5 kpd per year – After 5 year fixed term joint venture has evergreen option to extend contract each year by 12 months

Hu Huntington tington: Vo Voyageur yageur Spir irit it FPSO

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Page 43 43 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Iona has a 15% WI
  • Additionally Iona has Royalty interests from its partners, totaling 2.55%

– E.ON 0.75% “Disproportionate Lifting Entitlement”

  • Capex and decommissioning costs are carried
  • FPSO dayrate is carried
  • All other opex is not carried

– Premier 1.2% and Noreco 0.6% Royalties

  • Capex and decommissioning costs are carried
  • No opex is carried
  • Iona percentage interests

– Production revenues: 17.55% – Lifting entitlement: 15.75% – Capex, decommissioning costs: 15% – FPSO dayrate: 16.8% – Other opex: 17.55%

Hu Huntington tington – roya yalty lty summa mmary ry

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Page 44 44 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Hu Huntington tington deep: eep: Jurass assic ic and d Triass assic ic prospectivit

  • spectivity

Triassic Skagerak and Forties Jurassic Fulmar and Forties

  • Potential satellite development tie-backs to Voyageur FPSO
  • Iona 15% and 100% WI, opportunity to rationalize interest and commercialize

FPSO FPSO

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Page 45 45 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Hu Huntington tington upsid side (third hird party rty busin iness) ss)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Page 46 46 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Appendi pendix

  • Iona

a Ener ergy gy Compa mpany ny (UK) K) Lim imite ited d

  • Hunt

ntingt ington

  • n
  • Trent

ent & Tyne ne

  • Nin

inia ian are rea a ass ssets ets

  • Other

er assets sets and d in inform rmat ation ion

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Page 47 47 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Trent ent & Tyne ne facilit cilities ies

  • Production facilities

– Both the Trent and the Tyne fields have been developed using a NUI(1) platform – A MOAB(2) bridge-linked to the Trent platform was installed in 2005 to provide compression facilities for Trent and Tyne as well as third party developments

  • Development wells and subsea facilities

– All production wells have dry trees (no subsea wells)

  • Trent: three wells (excludes abandoned wells)
  • Tyne five wells (excludes abandoned wells)

– A 56km dedicated gas pipeline transports gas from the Tyne field to the Trent platform for processing

  • Hydrocarbon export solutions

– From Trent, gas is shipped 165km onshore to the Bacton terminal through ETS – Tariffs payable to ETS (Iona owns 2.5% of system, rising to 4.69% following WI increase on Trent & Tyne) and the Bacton Terminal (no ownership) – Gas sold via Perenco at spot price minus a nominal management fee

  • Third party business through infrastructure ownership

– Tors currently producing ~20 MMcf/day with remaining reserve of more than 30 Bcf to be produced over next 10 years (utilizes both ETS and the compression facilities at Trent)(3) – As contemplated contractually between Perenco and GDF Suez, more than 550 Bcf of gas may be produced from Cygnus and processed at the facility (utilizes ETS) – Tariff revenues are included in GCA analysis and make up ca.15% of field value

(1) Normally Unmanned Installation, (2) Mobile Offshore Applications Barge (3) Source Wood Mackenzie

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Page 48 48 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Appendi pendix

  • Iona

a Ener ergy gy Compa mpany ny (UK) K) Lim imite ited d

  • Hunt

ntingt ington

  • n
  • Trent

ent & Tyne ne

  • Nin

inia ian are rea a ass ssets ets

  • Other

er assets sets and d in inform rmat ation ion

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Page 49 49 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Orlan lando

  • developm

velopment nt schem hematic atic

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Page 50 50 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Nini nian an Centr ntral l Platf tform

  • rm – Minor

nor brownfield

  • wnfield mods
  • ds
  • Essential Isolation

work completed in 2012 shutdown

  • Dominant utilisation
  • f existing unused

and certified vessels and pipework

  • Catenary Platform

(IRHS) for tie-in of Orlando and Kells

  • Minimum flowline

and controls modifications in module at edge of platform

  • Well defined

75,000 manhour workscope

  • Less than 10% of

platform manpower (beds) required

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Page 51 51 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Kells ls developm velopment nt schem hemati atic

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Page 52 52 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Kboe/ e/d net product ction to Iona Orlando Kells

Kells ls – flow

  • w assur

urance nce is well ll unders derstoo

  • od

d

  • Kells, formerly Staffa, was originally developed using an

uninsulated pipeline

  • As one of the first subsea tie-backs in the North Sea, flow

assurance issues were not well understood

  • The pipeline became blocked after about 15 months of production

due to wax build-up at a “cold point” on the pipeline where the pipeline was untrenched at a pipeline crossing

  • The blocked section of pipe was removed and replaced and

production resumed with more careful monitoring

  • The pipeline became partially blocked again after a year and in an

effort to clear the blockage by “bull-heading” from the well the pipeline was blocked by hydrates

  • Prevailing low oil prices (USD 10-14/bbl) made further repairs

uneconomical and the field was fully abandoned in 1995

  • Samples of Staffa crude were kept and laboratory testing has been

performed to confirm wax appearance temperature and other properties

  • Tests confirm that, with adequate insulation provided by a pipe-in-

pipe system and some chemical usage, the pipeline can operate for the life of Kells

  • The wax content of Staffa/Kells oil is similar to other Brent crudes at

around 5%

  • Pipe-in-pipe systems provide a very high level of insulation and are

now commonplace in the North Sea Staffa fa histori torical al product uction ion

2 4 6 8 10 12

  • Jan. '92
  • Jul. '92
  • Jan. '93
  • Jul. '93
  • Jan. '94
  • Jul. '94
  • Jan. '95

Kbbl/d /d product ction n (100% 00% WI) blockage blockage Pipe replaced

Orlando ndo & Kells ls expected ed combined ined product uction ion

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Page 53 53 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Nini nian an Area a - Up Upside ide

  • Ronan & Oran are two oil discoveries located 14 km south of

the NCP and 14 km south west of Kells

– Acquired through the 27th License Round – 1C – 2C – 3C Contingent Resource range of 31 – 49 – 71 MMbbl (R) – Work obligation: i) re-process 3D data and ii) by end 2014 commit to well to be drilled by end 2016 or drop licence – Likely well to test eastern extent of Oran in 2016 with possible FDP in 2017 and first oil in 2018 – Subject to further work the discoveries are expected to be developed as a cluster development with potential tie-in to the NCP via the Kells manifold and pipeline

  • Ronan discovery (3/7-3 well, Chevron 1977)

– Brent oil discovery - appraised in 1978 (3/12-2) – OWC not encountered – upside to current resource estimates – 2C Contingent Resources of 30.9 MMbbl (R)

  • Oran discovery (well 3/7-8, CNR 2005)

– Brent oil discovery – OWC not encountered – upside to current resource estimates – 2C Contingent Resources of 18.3 MMbbl (R)

Ronan n & Oran (100% 0% int nterest) rest)

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Page 54 54 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Appendi pendix

  • Iona

a Ener ergy gy Compa mpany ny (UK) K) Lim imite ited d

  • Hunt

ntingt ington

  • n
  • Trent

ent & Tyne ne

  • Nin

inia ian are rea a ass ssets ets

  • Other

er assets sets and d in inform rmat ation ion

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Page 55 55 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Small heavy oil field (17o API) located 5 km west of Captain

– Acquired from Centrica in August 2012 for USD 8.2m

  • Well delineated field, but not yet flow tested

– Discovered in 1990 by Amoco well 13/21a-1A – Appraised in 1996 and 2001 with two + two wells – Lower Cretaceous Upper Captain Reservoir (30% porosity) – Analogue to nearby producing Captain field - following 10 year production history Captain has a projected 33% recovery factor

  • Several development options being screened

– Drill from Captain field – Subsea tie back to Captain – Joint development with other regional discoveries – Regardless of development option, the concept will be waterflood with two producers and a single injector – Wells will be ~6,000 foot horizontals with sand control and artificial lift anticipated to give initial rates of 10,000 bbl/day (by analogy with Captain)

  • Decision on export route targeted in 2014, plan to proceed to FDP

thereafter

West st Wick

Iona working interest 58.73%, operator Partner Idemitsu (41.27%, op.) 2P reserves (GCA CUR) Gross Net to Iona 16.5 MMbbl 9.7 MMbbl Possible production start 2017 Possible peak production 10,000 boe/day

West Wick k – License ense P.18 185 CNS, , Block k 13 13/21a

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Page 56 56 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • The BP Structured Energy Derivative was entered into in conjunction with the existing credit facility and comprised a series of cash-settled call
  • ptions with BTL (a subsidiary of BP)
  • Under the BP Structured Energy Derivative the Issuer received USD 60m up front by granting BTL an option to purchase a total of about 8.1MMbbl of

Brent blend crude from the Orlando, Kells and Huntington fields over a period of five years for an average price of USD 95.84/bbl

  • In relation to the bond issue, the BP Structured Energy Derivative is being amended to allow for early termination of Tranche 1 Call Options and

Tranche 2 Call Options (please refer to the Term Sheet for further details)

  • Up to USD 35m of the bond proceeds can be used to retire the Tranche 1 Call Options and up to USD 25m (plus any remaining balance from the

funds available to retire the Tranche 1 Call Options) on the Escrow Account can be used to retire the Tranche 2 Call Options. The Issuer shall compensate for any amount spent to retire Tranche 2 Call Options by transferring 75% of every dollar paid into its or Iona Huntington's earnings account, up to 25m, to the Escrow Account. Some, but not all of the call options may be retired on a pro rata basis to the relevant maximum amount permitted for that tranche, calculated per barrel and subject to the maximum caps

  • The Issuer shall on a monthly basis obtain from BTL an indicative calculation of the early termination amount payable by the Issuer. If (i) the Issuer

and BTL mutually agree an early termination amount based on a fair value lower than USD 35m to retire the entire Tranche 1 Call Options or lower than USD 25m (plus any remaining balance after the retirement of the Tranche 1 Call Options) to retire the entire Tranche 2 Call Options or (ii) BTL accept an early termination subject to such maximum caps even though the early termination amount based on a mutually agreed fair value is higher, the Issuer and BTL shall proceed with the early termination

  • The Issuer shall first retire all of the Tranche 1 Call Options, thereafter the Tranche 2 Call Options or both at the same time
  • In order to retire Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 Call Options, the Issuer may use proceeds allocated to this purpose under the Bond Issue, New Equity

provided by the Parent, or up to 10% of its Free Cashflow in the relevant six month period under the BP Structured Energy Derivative. Furthermore, the Issuer may service ordinary cash settlements relating to the calculation periods from the Settlement Date to 31 March 2014 and, during the term

  • f the Bonds by using up to 10% of its Free Cashflow in the relevant six month period under the BP Structured Energy Derivatives (such 10% limit for

retiring of Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 Call Options and servicing of ordinary cash settlements to apply in aggregate). Otherwise the Issuer may not settle call options during the term of the Bonds

  • Outstanding obligations to BTL under the BP Structured Energy Derivative, any novated existing hedging transactions and certain other hedging

transactions entered into or to be entered into with BTL are secured in favor of BTL by second-ranking security. The Issuer, BTL and the Trustee will enter into an intercreditor agreement allowing for such second-ranking security and providing that any claims or right to payment BTL may have under the BP Structured Energy Derivative is subordinated to any claims the bondholders may have in relation to the Bond Issue so that no payment can be made by the Issuer under the BP Structured Energy Derivative other than those described in the preceding bullet. Any payments due but not paid under the BP Structured Energy Derivative will accrue a default interest of 15% until payment is made.

  • The Issuer is in the process of entering into an amendment to the BP Structured Energy Derivative reflecting the above and the execution of the

amendments is a condition precedent for the Settlement of the bonds.

Summa mmary y BP Stru ructured ctured Ener nergy gy De Deriv ivativ ative

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Page 57 57 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 BP call options Series4 Series5 Hunt 1P Series3

BP Call l Option tion Retir ireme ment nt

Tranche 2

Iona’s main exposure to the BP Call structure lies within Tranche 1 – Iona will use up to USD 35m of the Bond Issue to retire this risk 3.1m Call Options to be retired with USD 35m held in BP SED escrow account

Tranche 1

barrels per month

Huntington 1P risked at 80% Huntington + Orlando 1P risked at 80% and 12 months delay of 1st oil

Tranche 2 BP Call volumes low risk to Iona due to sufficient production from Orlando 3.7m Call Options to be retired with USD 25m from Cash Flows 0.8m Call Options offset by put options

Unaffected calls

Hunt+Orl 1P x 0.8 + 12m delay Hunt 1P x 0.8 Tranche 2 Tranche 1

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Page 58 58 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • Huntington field

– Sub-bareboat charter party in respect of the FPSO Sevan Voyageur, relating to the lease and sub-charter of the FPSO Sevan Voyageur, and related service agreement – Joint marketing agreement relating to the lifting, marketing and sale of Huntington field crude oil authorising Premier UK Oil Limited to act on the other parties’ behalf – Transportation and processing agreement for the transportation and processing of Huntington gas in the CATS system – Agreement for the sale and purchase of natural gas with E.On Energy Trading SE relating to the sale of natural gas

  • Trent and Tyne fields

– Transportation agreement for transport of gas in the ETS to the Bacton Terminal. – Agreement for processing at the Bacton Terminal, currently operated by Perenco. – Agreement with Perenco for the sale and purchase of natural gas.

  • Orlando field

– Agreements for the tie-in and processing of Orlando production at the Ninian Central Platform – Sales agreement relating to the sale of Issuers share of Orlando Gas to the Ninian field owners – Key commercial terms for the transportation of Orlando oil through the Ninian Pipeline System and the redelivery to export tankers at Sullom Voe Terminal are agreed, agreements to be signed Q4 2013 – Sales agreement with BP Oil International Ltd for Issuer's share of crude oil of "Brent/Ninian Blend" grade from the Orlando and Kells fields delivered by pipeline at the Sullom Voe Terminal

  • Kells field

– Sales agreement with BP Oil International Ltd for Issuer's share of crude oil of "Brent/Ninian Blend" grade from the Orlando and Kells fields delivered by pipeline at the Sullom Voe Terminal

De Descrip cription ion of key ey commercial

  • mmercial contr

ntract acts

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Page 59 59 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

GENERAL Investing in the Bonds involves inherent risks. Prospective investors should carefully consider, among other things, the risk factors set out below before making an investment decision. This section is not intended to be exhaustive – additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Issuer, or that it currently deems immaterial, may also impair the Issuer’s business

  • perations or the value of the Bonds. Investors should also read and familiarize themselves with the more extensive description of risk factors included in the Offering Memorandum. The Issuer

and the Parent including to some extent its subsidiaries from time to time, together referred to as the Group. RISK SKS S SPEC ECIFIC TO THE ISSU SUER ER AND THE INDUST STRY Y IN WHICH IT OPER ERATE ATES Hunt ntingt ngton

  • n fiel

eld d is in an earl arly stag age e of prod

  • duction
  • n

The Issuer’s main producing asset, the Huntington field, as of the date of this presentation has just established peak design rate through the facilities and is nearing completion of commissioning operations. The Group is dependent on the expected cash flow from the Huntington field to service its obligations, including the Bonds. The estimated future production is uncertain due to the uncertainty involved in estimating reserves, as described below, and the risk in connection with the operation and development of the field. Any failure in the development of the Huntington field, delays in establishing stable dual compression operations, inaccuracies in the estimated reserves and increases in the development costs may have a material adverse effect on the Group's ability to service its obligations, cash flow, liquidity, financial situation and results. Future ure rev even enues es to come e from

  • m fields

ds not curre urrent ntly in prod

  • duc

uction

  • n

Based on the current portfolio of the Issuer, revenues and income for the Issuer will, towards the Maturity Date of the Bond to an increasing extent be dependent on the performance of fields not currently in production and certain fields where an FDP has as of the date of this OM not been sanctioned by DECC. Project delays may delay expected revenues from operations and cost over-runs could make a project uneconomic. Specifically, this relates to the Orlando, Kells and potentially West Wick fields, in addition to potential future license awards and asset acquisitions as the Issuer may conduct at their discretion, as well as maturing of existing licenses within the Issuer’s current portfolio, through the lifetime of the Bonds. The FDPs have not been sanctioned by the DECC, which is a pre-requisite for moving forward with the development towards a producing field. The estimated costs of development and the planned progress for development may therefore be revised before production can commence. In the event production does commence, the size and volume of the reserves of the Orlando and Kells fields may be lower than anticipated. Any failure in the development of the Orlando and Kells fields, delays in start-up of production, failure to reach the estimated production volumes, inaccuracies in the estimated reveres and increases in the development costs may have a material adverse effect on the Group's ability to service its obligations, cash flow, liquidity, financial situation and results. Res eserv erves and nd res esou

  • urc

rces es infor

  • rmat

ation

  • n repre

epresents estimates which h may be inac accurat rate e or incorre

  • rrect

Estimates of the quantity and value of economically recoverable oil and gas reserves and resources and the possible future net cash flows are based upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as, ultimate reserves recovery, interpretation of geological and geophysical data, timing and amount of capital expenditures, marketability of oil and gas, royalty rates, continuity of current fiscal policies and regulatory regimes, future oil and gas prices, operating costs, development and production costs and workover and remedial costs, all of which may vary from actual results. Chan anges es to Develop

  • pmen

ent Plans ans Development plans for the Company's properties are based on management's best estimates and information as of the date of this Presentation. Development plans may change as a result of new information, events or as a result of business decisions. Any such changes could have a material effect on the Company's proposed capital expenditures and the timelines associated with the development of the Company's properties. Prod

  • duc

uction

  • n will be

be conc

  • ncen

entra rated in in a smal all numbe ber of

  • f fields

ds The Issuer’s production of oil and gas will be concentrated in a small number of offshore fields. Any regularity issues at these fields will therefore have substantial negative impacts on the Group's total

  • production. If mechanical problems, storms or other events curtail a substantial portion of the Group's production or if the actual reserves associated with any one of the Group's producing fields are less than

the Group's estimated reserves, the Group's results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. Stag age of Dev evel elop

  • pment

nt An investment in the Issuer is subject to certain risks related to the nature of the Issuer's business in the acquisition, exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas and its early stage of

  • development. The Issuer has a limited history of operations and earnings generation and there can be no assurance that the Issuer's business will continue to be successful or profitable. The Issuer may be

subject to growth-related risks, capacity constraints and pressure on its internal systems and controls, particularly given the early stage of the Issuer's development. The inability of Issuer to deal with this growth could have a material adverse impact on its business, operations and prospects.

Summa mmary ry of risk sk facto ctors rs

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Page 60 60 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Struc ructure red Ener ergy gy Deri rivative The Issuer entered into a Structured Energy Derivative comprised of a series of cash-settled call options with BTL pursuant to which the Issuer received an up-front premium of USD 60m in exchange for granting BTL the option to purchase in total slightly in excess of 8.1 MMbbl of Brent blend crude from the Issuer's Orlando, Kells and Huntington fields over a period of five years at an average price of USD 95.84/bbl. The effect of the Structured Energy Derivative is that if the price of Brent blend crude increases beyond the levels set in the Structured Energy Derivative, the Issuer will not benefit from such

  • increases. The effect of the options is that if the price of Brent blend crude increases beyond the levels set in the options, the Issuer will not benefit from such increases. There is a risk that some or all of the

costs associated with the call options may not be deductible against the Issuer's production income , which may have an adverse tax effect on the Issuer. In addition, any shortfall in production below the volumes of set out in the Structured Energy Derivative may expose the Issuer to additional losses which may have a material adverse effect on the business and operations of the Issuer. Finan ancing ng Requ quire remen ents and nd Liqui quidi dity The Company has sufficient, but limited unrestricted capital to meet its near term liabilities. Therefore, its access to unrestricted liquidity up and until the settlement of the Bond Issue and the release of the Bond Issue proceeds from the escrow account and to the Company is limited and may continue to be limited until strengthened by cash flow from the Issuer Group's producing assets. Such limited liquidity may have material adverse effects on the Company and its operations. It may take many years and substantial cash expenditures to pursue exploration activities on the Group's existing undeveloped

  • properties. Accordingly, the Group is likely to need to raise additional funds from outside sources in order to explore and develop its properties in a timely manner. Any future revenues from the Group's

reserves may not provide the necessary capital for the Group to replace its reserves or to maintain its production. If the Group's cash flow from operations is not sufficient to satisfy its capital expenditure requirements, there can be no assurance that additional debt or equity financing will be available to meet these requirements on favourable terms or at all. Risks relat ating ng to the e price of oil and nd gas as The profitability and cash flow of the Group’s operations will be dependent upon the market price of oil and gas, which is known to fluctuate. Historically, oil prices have fluctuated widely for many reasons, including global and regional supply and demand, and expectations regarding future supply and demand for oil and petroleum products; geopolitical uncertainty; access to pipelines, tanker ships and other means of transporting oil, gas and petroleum products; prices, availability and government subsidies of alternative fuels; prices and availability of new technologies; the ability of the members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) and other oil-producing nations to set and maintain specified levels of production and prices; political, economic and military developments in oil producing regions, particularly the Middle East; domestic and foreign governmental regulations and actions, including export restrictions, taxes, repatriations and nationalisations; global and regional economic conditions; and weather conditions and natural disasters. It is impossible to predict accurately future oil and gas price movements. Expl plora

  • ration
  • n, Drilling

ng and nd Opera eration

  • nal Risks

The Issuer's oil and natural gas exploration and development activities are focused on existing producing or discovered oil and natural gas fields. The business of exploration and production of oil and gas involves a high degree of risk which a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to prevent. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing oil and gas fields. The Issuer will have no earnings to support it should the wells drilled or its properties prove not to be commercially viable. The Issuer's rights to exploit its oil and gas assets are limited in time. There is no guarantee or assurance that such rights can be extended or that new rights can be obtained to replace any rights that expire. Significant expenditure is required to establish the extent of oil and gas reserves through seismic surveys and drilling and there can be no certainty that oil and gas reserves will be found. There are numerous risks inherent in drilling and operating wells, many of which are beyond the Issuer's control. The Issuer's exploration, development and operations of oil and gas assets may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of unusual and unexpected geological, formation pressures, oceanic conditions, weather conditions, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, occupational and health hazards, technical or operational failures, shortage or delays in the delivery of rigs and/or other equipment, labour disputes and compliance with governmental requirements. It is difficult to project the costs of implementing drilling programs due to the inherent uncertainties of drilling in unknown formations, the costs associated with encountering various drilling conditions such as over-pressured zones and tools lost in the hole, and changes in drilling plans and locations as a result of prior wells or additional seismic data and interpretations thereof. Unexpected delays may result in significant increases in the capital expenditures required to develop projects. Risk relat ating ng to to tran ansport rtation

  • n of
  • f hydro

drocarb arbons ns prov roving ng more re difficult or

  • r cos
  • stly

All modes of transportation of hydrocarbons involve inherent risks. Hydrocarbons are by their nature hazardous and the Issuer is exposed to risk arising from possible major accident hazards with potential impact of a release on the environment and people and given the high volumes involved. The Group is dependent on third party transport providers to transport its hydrocarbons to the point of sale and has entered into transportation agreements for the transport of hydrocarbon. However, there is a risk that the transport capacity may be disrupted, unavailable or insufficient. Such event may lead to the Group being unable to perform under its agreements to sell hydrocarbons and may have a material adverse effect on the Group's financial condition, business, prospects and results. Risk of

  • f liabi

bility from rom cont

  • ntra

ractors rs' opera peration

  • ns

The Group carries out the majority of its activities through the use of contractors. Contractors and other service providers may cause losses or third party liability or losses for the Group by their performance. The Group may be subject to liability claims due to the inherently hazardous nature of its business or for act and omissions of sub-contractors and other service providers. The Group may also be liable for the operations of its contractors towards governmental authorities, licence partners or other third parties. Any indemnities the Group may receive from such parties may be inadequate and/or difficult to enforce, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group's financial condition, business, prospects and results.

Summa mmary ry of risk sk facto ctors rs

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Page 61 61 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Relian ance e on serv ervice e prov

  • vider

ders, opera perators rs and nd other her stak akeho holde ders rs The Group does not its properties or licenses and consequently relies on the expertise of other operators, service providers and other third/party suppliers. To the extent the Group is not the operator of its oil and gas properties, including in the UK, it will be dependent on such operators for the timing of activities related to such properties and will be largely unable to direct or control the activities of the operators or the costs of production and exploration of such operations. In addition, the success of the Group will be largely dependent upon the performance of the operator's key employees. The Group's oil and gas exploration and production projects may rely on the availability of equipment such as drilling equipment, drilling services and access to third party owned and operated infrastructure on reasonable commercial terms. Such services may be scarce and may not be readily available at the times and places required. Risk relat ated ed to effec ecting ng the he assign gnmen ent of the he Issue uer' r's right ghts under nder its cont

  • ntra

racts and nd fixed ed charg harges The Issuer has undertaken to assign all of its rights, title and interest in and to various material contracts, licenses and permits to the extent this can be effected. In the event the Issuer is unable to effect such assignment, a first priority fixed charge shall be granted by the Issuer over its rights, title and interest arising under or in relation to such contracts. There is a risk that some of the counterparties to these contracts will not consent to such assignment, that governmental regulations prohibits certain contractual positions from being assigned, or that other third-party restrictions are in place so that the Issuer will not be able assign its rights in respect thereof. There is also a risk that the nature of the contract or asset being charged prohibits the Issuer from effectively establishing a fixed charge under English law. The total value of the security available to the Bondholders both in respect of the assignments and the fixed charge may therefore vary, and/or be reduced to a lower value than the full value of the security to be assigned. Risk of

  • f joint

nt and nd sev ever eral al liabi bilities es with its licenc ence part rtne ners rs Under each licence, the Issuer is liable on a joint and several basis together with its licence partners for the liabilities of the licence group (including but not limited to decommissioning liabilities). Whilst such joint and several liability is regulated among the licence group through the joint operating agreement, ultimately failure by a licence partner to fulfill its financial obligations may result in the other licence partners (including the Issuer) being liable for such failure and therefore increase the Issuer's exposure related to the licence in question. As a consequence of joint and several liabilities, any failure by a licence partner to fulfill any significant financial obligations may have a material adverse effect on the Issuer's business, financial condition, operating results and/or cash flow. Heal alth, Saf afet ety and nd Env nviro ronm nmental risks All phases of the oil business present environmental risks and hazards and are subject to environmental regulation pursuant to numerous international conventions and state and municipal laws and regulations, concerning health, safety and environmental (“HSE SE”) matters including, but not limited to, those relating to the health and safety of employees, discharges of hazardous substances into the environment and the handling and disposal of waste. The technical requirements of these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly complex, stringently enforced and expensive to comply with and this trend is likely to continue. Risks relat ated to to future re dec ecommissioni

  • ning

ng liabi bilities es The Issuer, through its licence interests, is expected to assume additional decommissioning liabilities in respect of its future operations. These liabilities are derived from legislative and regulatory requirements concerning the decommissioning of installations, e.g. wells and production facilities, and require the Issuer to make provisions for and/or underwrite the liabilities relating to such decommissioning. The indus dustry in in which the he Group

  • up opera

perates is is high ghly com

  • mpe

petitive There is strong competition for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. The Group competes with other exploration and production companies, many of which include major international oil and gas companies which may have greater financial resources, staff and facilities than those of the Group. Risk relat ated ed to to attrac racting and nd retai aini ning ng the he exec ecutive mana nage gement nt and nd other her pers rsonn nnel el The Group is substantially dependent on the services of a few key personnel and the loss of the services of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on the business of the Group. In addition, the competition for qualified personnel in the oil and gas industry is intense. There can be no assurance that the Group will be able to continue to attract and retain all personnel necessary for the development and

  • peration of its business.

Risks associat ated with lega gal dispu putes The Group may from time to time be involved in legal disputes and legal proceedings related to the Group’s operations or otherwise. Such disputes and legal proceedings may be expensive and time-consuming, and could divert management’s attention from the Group’s business. Risk of

  • f insuf

ufficien ent insuran rance cov

  • ver

erag age Although the Group has obtained insurance in accordance with industry standards to address such risks, such insurance has limitations on liability that may not be sufficient to cover the full extent of such

  • liabilities. In addition, such risks may not, in all circumstances be insurable or, in certain circumstances the Group may elect not to obtain insurance to deal with specific risks due to the high premiums associated

with such insurance or for other reasons.

Summa mmary ry of risk sk facto ctors rs

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Page 62 62 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Political and nd regu gulat atory ry risks The petroleum industry is subject to regulation and intervention by governments in such matters as the awarding of exploration and production interests, the imposition of specific drilling obligations, environmental protection and pollution controls, health and safety aspects of on and off shore drilling activity, control over the development, decommissioning and abandonment of fields (including restrictions

  • n production) and possibly expropriation or cancellation of contract rights. As well, governments may regulate or intervene with respect to price, taxes, royalties and the exportation of oil and natural gas.

Such regulations may be changed from time to time in response to economic or political conditions. The implementation of new regulations or the modification of existing regulations affecting the oil and gas industry could reduce demand for natural gas and crude oil, increase costs and may have a material adverse impact on the Issuer. Env nviro ronmen ental Risks and and Regu gulat ation

  • ns

All phases of the oil and gas industry present environmental risks and are subject to environmental regulation pursuant to a variety of international conventions, federal, regional, national, state and local laws and regulations. Such legislation provides for, among other things, restrictions and prohibitions on spills, the release or emissions and discharges of various substances produced in association with certain

  • il and gas industry operations. In addition, such legislation requires that well and facility sites are operated, maintained, decommissioned, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable
  • authorities. Compliance with such legislation can require significant expenditures and a breach of such requirements may result in suspension or revocation of necessary licences and authorizations, civil

liability for pollution damage, and the imposition of fines and penalties which may be material. Environmental legislation is becoming increasingly stringent and the costs of regulatory compliance are

  • increasing. Existing and possible future environmental legislation, regulations and actions could cause additional expense, capital expenditure, restrictions and delays in the activities of the Issuer, the extent
  • f which cannot be predicted. Before exploration and/or production activities can commence, the Issuer must obtain regulatory approval and relevant licenses and there is no assurance that such approvals or

licenses will be obtained. Cyclical and nd Seas asona nal Impac pact of

  • f Indu

dustry ry The Issuer's operational results and financial condition are dependent on the prices received for oil and natural gas production. Oil and natural gas prices have fluctuated widely during recent years and are determined by global supply and demand factors, including weather and general economic conditions, as well as conditions in other oil and natural gas regions most of which are beyond the Issuer's control. A decline in oil and natural gas prices could have an adverse effect on the Issuer's financial condition. Sub-sea tiebacks in the UK North Sea, while common, are affected by weather conditions in the UK North Sea, and potential pipeline tie-back installations can be more challenging in winter months. Relian ance on

  • n Indus

ndustry Part rtner ers The Issuer relies on industry partners with respect to the evaluation, acquisition and development of, and future production from, its properties and a failure or inability to perform by such partners could materially affect the prospects of the Issuer. Regu gulat atory ry Appro pprovals The further development of the Issuer's properties requires the approval of applicable regulatory authorities to the plans of the Issuer with respect to the drilling and development of such properties. A failure to obtain such approval on a timely basis or material conditions imposed by such authority in connection with the approval would materially affect the prospects of the Issuer. RISKS SKS RELAT LATED ED TO THE GROUP'S 'S FINAN ANCIAL AL POSI SITION ON AND LIQU QUIDITY Forei reign gn Excha hange ge Rate Risk A significant portion of the Group's activities are transacted in or referenced to United States dollars, Canadian dollars or British pounds sterling. The Group's operating costs and certain of the Group's payments, in order to maintain property interests, are incurred in the local currency of the jurisdiction where the applicable property is located. As a result, fluctuations in the Canadian dollar and British pounds sterling against the US dollar, and each of those currencies against any other local currencies in jurisdictions where properties of the Group are located, could result in unanticipated fluctuations in the Group's financial results which are denominated in Canadian dollars. The Group has not entered into any risk management contracts to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange rates. Acces ess to to Addi dition

  • nal

al Finan ancing ng The Company may find it necessary in the future to obtain debt or additional equity to support ongoing operations, to undertake capital expenditures or to undertake acquisitions or other business combination

  • transactions. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to the Company when needed or on terms acceptable to the Company. The Company's inability to raise financing to support
  • ngoing operations or to fund capital expenditures or acquisitions could limit the Company's growth and may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of
  • perations and cash flows.

Summa mmary ry of risk sk facto ctors rs

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Page 63 63 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Mark rket Risk The marketability of any oil and gas which may be produced or acquired by the Group will be affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Group. These factors include market fluctuations, proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines and processing equipment, availability of transportation capacity, and government regulations including regulations relating to price, taxation, royalties, production levels, imports and exports, land tenure and the environment, the effect of which cannot be accurately predicted. The Group will be affected by the differential between the price paid by refiners for light quality oil and the grades of oil that may in the future be produced by the Group. The Group has no direct experience in the marketing of oil and natural gas. Commod

  • dity Hedg

dging ng Under the Credit Facility, the Issuer is required to have in place hedging measures for prudent treasury purposes and cover commercial exposure. Under such arrangements the Issuer may agree to receive fixed prices on its oil and natural gas production to offset the risk of revenue losses if commodity prices decline. A prudent hedging program could include hedging by way of transactions such as collars, which in exchange for limiting the Issuer's or the Group Company's downside oil and gas price exposure, cap the benefit it would receive from higher oil and gas prices. The Issuer or the Group Company, as applicable, may nevertheless be obligated to pay royalties on such higher prices, even though such higher prices are not received by it as a result of such transactions. Res estri rictive e cov

  • ven

enant nts The Bond Agreement will provide certain general restrictions on the Parent and the Issuer from certain actions which they believe are in the Group's best interest. Such restrictive covenants include, but are not limited to, restrictions on asset sales and acquisitions, investments, the ability to pay dividends or other capital distributions, enter into certain financing transactions with affiliates, and the possibility to raise additional financial indebtedness. RISKS SKS RELAT LATED ED TO THE BONDS Risk of being ng unabl nable to repay epay the he Bonds

  • nds

If the cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund the debt obligations, the Group may be forced to sell assets, seek additional equity or debt capital or restructure its debt. In addition, any failure to make scheduled payments of interest and principal on outstanding indebtedness is likely to result in a reduction of credit rating, which could harm the ability to incur additional indebtedness on acceptable

  • terms. The cash flow and capital resources may be insufficient for payment of interest and principal of the debt in the future, including payments on the Bonds, and any such alternative measures may be

unsuccessful or may not permit the Group to meet scheduled debt service obligations, which could cause it to default on its obligations and impair its liquidity, which again could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial conditions or results of operation s of the Group. Risks relat ated to the he mark rket et for r the he Bonds

  • nds

The Bonds are a new issue of securities with no established trading history. Even though the Issuer will apply for listing of the Bonds, the Issuer has not entered into any market-making scheme to ensure liquidity of the Bonds. A liquid trading market for the Bonds may not develop or be maintained and investors may not being able to sell the Bonds quickly or at a favourable price. This may have a material adverse effect on the price of the Bonds. The Group cannot assure investors as to the future liquidity of the Bonds and as a result, investors bear the financial risk of their investment in the Bonds. Risks relat ated to tran ansfer r res estri rictions

  • ns on the

e Bond nds The Group is relying upon exemptions from registration under the U.S. Securities Act, applicable state securities laws, Canadian securities law and UK and EU securities laws in the placement of the Bonds. As a result, in the future the Bonds may be transferred or resold only in a transaction registered under or exempt from the registration requirements of such legislation. Therefore, investors may not be able to sell their Bonds at their preferred time or price. The Group cannot assure investors as to the future liquidity of the Bonds and as a result, investors bear the financial risk of their investment in the Bonds. The e trad ading ng price e of the e Bond nds may be vol

  • lat

atile Historically, the market for non-investment grade debt has been subject to disruptions that have caused substantial volatility in the prices of securities similar to the Bonds. Any such disruptions could adversely affect the prices at which investors may sell their Bonds. In addition, subsequent to their initial issuance, the Bonds may trade at a discount from their initial placement, depending on the prevailing interest rates, the market for similar notes, performance of the Group and other factors, many of which are beyond the Group's control. Pros

  • spec

ective investor

  • rs may not
  • t be able

e to recover r in civil proc

  • ceed

eding ngs for r U.S.

  • S. sec

ecur urities es laws viol

  • lat

ation

  • ns

The Bonds will be issued by the Issuer, which is incorporated under the laws of England and Wales. All of the Issuer's members of senior management and Directors and executives currently reside outside the United States and all of its assets are currently located outside the United States. As a result, prospective investors may be unable to effect service of process within the United States, or to recover on judgments of U.S. courts in any civil proceedings under the U.S. federal securities laws. In addition, original actions or actions for the enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts with respect to civil liabilities solely under the federal securities laws of the United States are not enforceable in England and Wales.

Summa mmary ry of risk sk facto ctors rs

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Page 64 64 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Risk of insuf ufficien ent amou

  • unt upon

pon fore reclosure re If the Issuer defaults on its obligations to make payments in respect of the Bonds, the amount of proceeds that ultimately would be distributed in respect of the Bonds upon a foreclosure or other enforcement action may not be sufficient to satisfy the obligation under the Bonds. Risk of insuf ufficien ent amou

  • unt upon

pon fore reclosure re If the Issuer defaults on its obligations to make payments in respect of the Bonds, the amount of proceeds that ultimately would be distributed in respect of the Bonds upon a foreclosure or other enforcement action may not be sufficient to satisfy the obligation under the Bonds. NOTE TES REGARD GARDING G OIL AND GAS DISCLOSUR OSURE The reserves and resource estimates contained herein, including the corresponding estimates of future net revenues, are estimates only and the actual results may be greater than or less than the estimates provided herein. Boes may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A BOE conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl, utilizing a conversion ratio at 6 Mcf: 1 bbl may be misleading as an indication of value. The estimated values of future net revenue disclosed in this presentation, whether calculated with or without a discount rate, do not represent fair market value. The estimates of reserves and

future net revenue for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves and future net revenue for all properties, due to the effects of aggregation. As used in this presentation, "possible reserves" are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves. There is a 10% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum of proved plus probable plus possible reserves. In this presentation, information has been provided with respect to certain reserves information for other companies with oil and gas properties in the U.K. North Sea which is "analogous informa mation" as defined in applicable securities laws. This analogous information is derived from publicly available information sources which Iona believes are predominantly independent in

  • nature. Some of this data may not have been prepared by qualified reserves evaluators or auditors and the preparation of any estimates may not be in strict accordance with Canadian Oil &

Gas Evaluation Handbook. Regardless, estimates by engineering and geotechnical practitioners may vary and the differences may be significant. Iona believes that the provision of this analogous information is relevant to Iona's activities, given its positions and operations (either ongoing or planned) in the area in question, however, readers are cautioned that there is no certainty that any of the development on Iona's properties will be successful to the extent in which operations on the lands in which the analogous reserves information is derived from were successful, or at all. "Contingent Resources" is defined in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook as those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies. Contingencies may include factors such as economic, legal, environmental, political, and regulatory matters, or a lack of markets. It is also appropriate to classify as contingent resources the estimated discovered recoverable quantities associated with a project in the early evaluation stage. Contingent Resources are further classified in accordance with the level of certainty associated with the estimates and may be subclassified based on project maturity and/or characterized by their economic status. 1C, 2C and 3C refer to the low estimate, best estimate, and high estimate, respectively, of contingent resources. The Oran, Ronan, Fulmar and Huntington fields are currently at an early stage

  • f evaluation and require further analysis to confirm their economic viability. Additionally, the resources in each of these fields are currently classified as Contingent Resources rather than

reserves due to the current lack of access to infrastructure in the region for each field. Additional drilling and testing are required to confirm volumetric estimates and reservoir productivity for the Contingent Resources to be classified as reserves. The Contingent Resources estimates are estimates only and the actual results may be greater than or less than the estimates provided herein. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable or technically feasible to produce any portion of the resources. The well test results disclosed in this presentation represent short-term results, which may not necessarily be indicative of long-term well performance or ultimate hydrocarbon recovery

  • therefrom. In this presentation, “working interest” reserves are calculated as the Corporation's share of reserves, excluding royalty interest reserves and before the deduction of royalty burdens
  • payable. The reserves report was prepared utilizing definitions as set out under NI 51-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities.

Summa mmary ry of risk sk facto ctors rs

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Page 65 65 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

  • “GCA" means Gaffney Cline & Associates Ltd.
  • “GCA 2011” means Orlando and Trent & Tyne reserves and net present value information prepared by GCA (using forecast prices and costs)

effective as of December 31, 2011.

  • "GCA 2012" means O + T + W + K reserves and net present value information prepared by GCA (using forecast prices and costs) effective as of 31

December 2012.

  • "GCA CUR" means O + T + W + K + H reserves and net present value information prepared by GCA (using forecast prices and costs) effective as of

31 December 2012, assuming T WI of 37.5%.

  • “R” means internal Corporation estimate prepared by a non-independent qualified reserves evaluator, effective 31 December, 2013
  • "O" means Orlando reserves and net present value information prepared by GCA (using forecast prices and costs) effective as of December 31,

2012.

  • "T" means Trent & Tyne reserves and net present value information prepared by GCA (using forecast prices and costs) effective as of December 31,

2012.

  • "W

"W" means West Wick reserves and net present value information prepared by GCA (using forecast prices and costs) effective as of December 31, 2012.

  • "K" means Kells reserves and net present value information prepared by GCA (using forecast prices and costs) effective as of December 31, 2012.
  • "H" means Huntington reserves and net present value information (and where applicable, contingent resources estimates) prepared by GCA (using

forecast prices and costs) effective as of December 31, 2012.

Endnote dnotes

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Page 66 66 Senior Secured ed Bond Issue ue – Corporat ate Present ntat ation ion September er 2013

Securities legislation in certain of the Canadian provinces provides purchasers of securities pursuant to an offering memorandum (such as this presentation) with a remedy for damages or rescission, or both, in addition to any other rights they may have at law, where the offering memorandum and any amendment to it contains a "Misrepresentation". Where used herein, "Misrepresentation" means an untrue statement of a material fact or an omission to state a material fact that is required to be stated or that is necessary to make any statement not misleading in light of the circumstances in which it was made. These remedies, or notice with respect to these remedies, must be exercised or delivered, as the case may be, by the purchaser within the time limits prescribed by applicable securities legislation. Ontario Section 130.1 of the Securities Act (Ontario) provides that every purchaser of securities pursuant to an offering memorandum (such as this presentation) shall have a statutory right of action for damages or rescission against the issuer and any selling security holder in the event that the offering memorandum contains a Misrepresentation. A purchaser who purchases securities

  • ffered by the offering memorandum during the period of distribution has, without regard to whether the purchaser relied upon the Misrepresentation, a right of action for damages or,

alternatively, while still the owner of the securities, for rescission against the issuer and any selling security holder provided that: (a) if the purchaser exercises its right of rescission, it shall cease to have a right of action for damages as against the issuer and the selling security holders, if any; (b) the issuer and the selling security holders, if any, will not be liable if they prove that the purchaser purchased the securities with knowledge of the Misrepresentation; (c) the issuer and the selling security holders, if any, will not be liable for all or any portion of damages that it proves do not represent the depreciation in value of the securities as a result of the Misrepresentation relied upon; and (d) in no case shall the amount recoverable exceed the price at which the securities were offered. Section 138 of the Securities Act (Ontario) provides that no action shall be commenced to enforce these rights more than: (a) in the case of an action for rescission, 180 days after the date of the transaction that gave rise to the cause of action; or (b) in the case of an action for damages, the earlier of: (i) 180 days after the date that the purchaser first had knowledge of the facts giving rise to the cause of action; or (ii) three years after the date of the transaction that gave rise to the cause of action. This presentation is being delivered in reliance on the exemption from the prospectus requirements contained under section 2.3 of NI 45-106 (the "accredited investor exempt mption"). The rights referred to in section 130.1 of the Securities Act (Ontario) do not apply in respect of an offering memorandum (such as this Offering Memorandum) delivered to a prospective purchaser in connection with a distribution made in reliance on the accredited investor exemption if the prospective purchaser is: (a) a Canadian financial institution or a Schedule III bank (each as defined in NI 45-106; b) the Business Development Bank of Canada incorporated under the Business Development Bank of Canada Act (Canada); or (c) a subsidiary of any person referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b), if the person owns all of the voting securities of the subsidiary, except the voting securities required by law to be owned by directors of that subsidiary. Québec Securities legislation in Québec provides that purchasers of securities are entitled to rights of action for rescission, price revision or damages where an offering memorandum or any amendment to it contains a misrepresentation. If there is a misrepresentation in an offering memorandum, purchasers have a statutory right of action against: (a) the issuer, for rescission or a price revision, without prejudice to a claim for damages; or (b) the issuer, its officers or directors, or any dealer retained by issuer for damages. This statutory right of action is available to the purchaser whether or not the purchaser relied on the misrepresentation. However, there are various defenses available to the persons or companies against whom the purchaser has a right of action. In particular, they have a defense if the purchaser knew of the misrepresentation when the purchaser purchased the securities. If the purchaser intends to rely on the rights described in (a) or (b) above, it must do so within strict time limitations. The purchaser must commence its action for rescission or price revision within three years from the date of the transaction and, for an action for damages, in the case of damages, within three years of the date on which the purchaser acquired knowledge of the facts giving rise to the action, except upon proof that the plaintiff acquired such knowledge more than three years after the date of the transaction as a result of the negligence of the plaintiff, subject to a maximum period of five years from the date of the filing of an offering memorandum with the Autorité des marchés financiers du Québec. Alberta and British Columb mbia Notwithstanding that the Securities Act (British Columbia) and the Securities Act (Alberta) do not provide, or require the Issuer to provide, to purchasers resident in these jurisdictions any rights

  • f action in circumstances where this Offering Memorandum or an amendment hereto contains a Misrepresentation, the Issuer hereby grants to such purchasers contractual rights of action that

are equivalent to the statutory rights of action set forth above with respect to purchasers resident in Ontario.

Rights ghts of action ion and d resciss cission ion