International Training Programme on Ageing 17 19 September 2013 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

international training programme on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

International Training Programme on Ageing 17 19 September 2013 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

International Training Programme on Ageing 17 19 September 2013 Trinity Biomedical Science Institute Brendan Murtagh Queens University Belfast Measuring Impact The discourses of research impact Lack of public confidence; is it


slide-1
SLIDE 1

International Training Programme on Ageing

17 – 19 September 2013

Trinity Biomedical Science Institute

Brendan Murtagh Queens University Belfast Measuring Impact

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • The discourses of

research impact

  • Lack of public confidence; is

it really independent?

  • Waste of public money
  • Unnecessarily complicated

academia

  • Irrelevant and self-serving
  • Disconnected from ‘the

user’

  • Unaccountable and

deliberately mysterious

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Impact as part of the research value chain

  • Equally neglected is

the relationship between research and policy and practice and how the involvement

  • f these groups in the

research process might improve the impact of knowledge translation.

FUTUREAGE: [http://futurage.group.shef.ac.uk /user-involvement.html]

http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Resources

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Defining impact: ESRC

  • Academic impact is the

demonstrable contribution that excellent social and economic research makes to scientific advances, across and within disciplines, including significant advances in understanding, method, theory and application.

  • Economic and societal impact

is the demonstrable contribution that excellent social and economic research makes to society and the economy, of benefit to individuals, organisations and nations.

  • The impact of social science

research can be categorised as:

  • Instrumental: influencing the

development of policy, practice

  • r service provision, shaping

legislation, altering behaviour

  • Conceptual: contributing to the

understanding of policy issues, reframing debates

  • Capacity building: through

technical and personal skill development.

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Planning research impact

  • Identify your key

stakeholders

  • Identify how they will

benefit from your research

  • Identify how you will

ensure they have the

  • pportunity to

benefit

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Toolkits and resources across disciplines

https://becker.wustl.edu/impact-assessment

Washington University in St Louis Medicine

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

REF Review of Impact Pilot

  • Committed to a case study approach
  • Impact should be defined broadly to

include social, economic, cultural, environmental, health and quality of life benefits.

  • Impacts from research typically develop
  • ver extended periods of time
  • The REF should include benefits arising

from engaging the public with research

  • The two criteria for assessing impact –

‘reach’ and ‘significance’ are applicable across all disciplines.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

RCUK: implications for best practice

  • Keep it simple
  • Make it targeted – do the right things; don't try to do

everything

  • Involve the whole research team – gather ideas and build
  • wnership
  • Communicate it effectively within the team and externally
  • Build in review mechanisms to measure effectiveness and plan

ahead

  • Update it regularly in the light of experience and
  • pportunities
  • Share successes and knowledge about what works and what

doesn't

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Benefits of impact strategies

  • Stay focused on the useful outputs from your research –

making it more likely that your research will make a difference to people’s lives;

  • Get the language and approach right; throughout your project

– in your recruitment material, research tools and reports;

  • Get better quality data, a more-rounded and informed

interpretation of the data and findings that have greater credibility with your funders and other key stakeholders;

  • Gain personally from new relationships and a greater

knowledge and understanding of the people you work with;

  • Reach a much wider audience with your reports and

presentations – in particular reaching the people who are most likely to make use of your results;

  • Identify research gaps or follow on studies.

Blackman et al (2010, p.37)

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Problems with research impact

  • Whose impact
  • The politics of research
  • Impact is determined by

the consumer as well as the producer

  • How is reach and

significance measured

  • What metrics are valid
  • Inappropriate impact and

tokenism

  • Attribution, causality and

time

  • Ethics and disclosure
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Implications

  • Impact is critical but not

new to researchers

  • Plan impact at the

design stage

  • Good practical tools and

resources

  • Pragmatism in funding

but also ethical

  • Defining the researchers

understanding of impact and the value of research