insulator based dielectrophoresis dielectrophoresis idep
play

Insulator Based Dielectrophoresis Dielectrophoresis ( (iDEP iDEP): - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Insulator Based Dielectrophoresis Dielectrophoresis ( (iDEP iDEP): ): Insulator Based A Tool to Detect, Separate and Concentrate A Tool to Detect, Separate and Concentrate Aerosolized Biological Particles Aerosolized Biological Particles


  1. Insulator Based Dielectrophoresis Dielectrophoresis ( (iDEP iDEP): ): Insulator Based A Tool to Detect, Separate and Concentrate A Tool to Detect, Separate and Concentrate Aerosolized Biological Particles Aerosolized Biological Particles Morales a a , William D. Munslow b b , Alfredo M. Morales , William D. Munslow , Alfredo M. b , Blake A. a Scott M. Maurer Maurer b , Blake A. Simmons Simmons a Scott M. a Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550 a Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550 b Lockheed Martin MS2, Manassas, VA 20110 b Lockheed Martin MS2, Manassas, VA 20110 Authorized for Unlimited Public Release by SNL SAND2009- -3326C 3326C Authorized for Unlimited Public Release by SNL SAND2009 And by LMC BAL200902002- -02 02 And by LMC BAL200902002 NBC 2009 Symposium NBC 2009 Symposium Jyvä Jyv äskyl skylä ä, Finland , Finland 8 – – 11 June 2009 11 June 2009 8

  2. Biological Sensor Requirements Biological Sensor Requirements • Requirements and Performance Measures: • Requirements and Performance Measures: Affordability - - Early detection Early detection - - Low false alarm rate Low false alarm rate Affordability • Current Biological Detection System Deficiencies: Current Biological Detection System Deficiencies: • Expensive - - Hours/days for analysis Hours/days for analysis - - Sensitivity Sensitivity vs vs false alarm rate false alarm rate Expensive • Desirable Characteristics of Typical Detect Desirable Characteristics of Typical Detect- -to to- -Warn Sensor: Warn Sensor: • Spider Charts: metrics shown by length of legs Spider Charts: metrics shown by length of legs Detection Confidence Detection Confidence Detection Confidence Ideal Biological Detection System: Ideal Biological Detection System: 98 98 98 Sensitivity Sensitivity Sensitivity Response Time (min) Response Time (min) Response Time (min) (ACPLA) (ACPLA) (ACPLA) 95 95 95 • Low cost, low consumables and simple • Low cost, low consumables and simple 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 , , , 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 90 90 0 0 0 operation operation 1 1 1 4 4 4 0 0 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Operational flexibility: Configurable as either Operational flexibility: Configurable as either • 1000 1000 1000 100 100 100 10 10 10 Size (m 3 ) Size (m 3 ) Size (m 3 ) FAR (per year) FAR (per year) FAR (per year) 1 1 1 .1 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 detect- -to to- -warn or as a detect warn or as a detect- -to to- -treat system treat system detect 1 1 1 . . . 5 5 5 4 4 4 • Expensive bioassays may be used if • Expensive bioassays may be used if 1 1 1 1000 1000 1000 . . . 0 0 0 26 26 26 0 0 0 . . . 5 5 5 inexpensive orthogonal triggers limit the inexpensive orthogonal triggers limit the 500 500 500 52 52 52 Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Unit Cost ($M) Unit Cost ($M) Unit Cost ($M) Interval (wks) Interval (wks) Interval (wks) 100 100 100 number of times bioassays are run number of times bioassays are run Operating Cost ($/year) Operating Cost ($/year) Operating Cost ($/year) 2

  3. Why an iDEP iDEP Approach? Approach? Why an - + 1000 VDC 750 VDC 500 VDC Flow Separation by size: 2 μ m (green) and 1 μ m (red) Time Flow Bacillus subtilis - + spores (red) trapped. 1 μ m polystyrene Time beads (green) pass. Lapizco-Encinas, B. H.; Simmons, B.A., et al. , Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 1571-1579 iDEP Selectively Traps Particles and May be Used as a Trigger iDEP Selectively Traps Particles and May be Used as a Trigger 3

  4. iDEP Can Concentrate Bacteria Selectively Can Concentrate Bacteria Selectively iDEP • iDEP iDEP Separation of Live B. Separation of Live B. subtilis subtilis and B. cereus (similar bacteria) and B. cereus (similar bacteria) • • Mechanism: Different Size and Shape • Mechanism: Different Size and Shape • Also Separated E. coli, B. cereus, B. • Also Separated E. coli, B. cereus, B. subtilis subtilis, B. , B. megaterium megaterium, B. , B. subtilis subtilis spores, TMV virus, and polystyrene particles of various sizes spores, TMV virus, and polystyrene particles of various sizes 80 Minimum E required for DEP trapping (V/mm) medium conductivity = 2.2 microS/mm Solution Conductivity=2.2microS/cm Solution Conductivity=2.2microS/cm 70 medium conductivity = 10.4 microS/mm Solution Conductivity=10microS/cm Solution Conductivity=10microS/cm 60 50 40 - + 30 20 10 0 E. coli B. megaterium B. subtilis B.cereus E. coli < B. megaterium < B. subtilis < B. cereus Selectively trapping B. cereus (green) Lapizco-Encinas, B. H.; Simmons, B.A., et al. , while passing B. subtilis (red) Electrophoresis 2004, 25,1695-1704. 4

  5. iDEP is a Physically Selective Phenomenon is a Physically Selective Phenomenon iDEP • DEP: Motion of Conductive Object Toward • DEP: Motion of Conductive Object Toward (away from) High Electric Field (away from) High Electric Field + + Nonuniform electric field Nonuniform electric field – – Along electric field gradients Along electric field gradients – – Nonlinear in the applied electric field Nonlinear in the applied electric field Electrode Electrode Electrode Electrode - - - - • DEP Force Proportional to: DEP Force Proportional to: • + + - - + + + + - - – – Particle volume Particle volume Higher charge density – Conductivity + polarizability polarizability difference difference – Conductivity + Net movement Net movement between particle and liquid between particle and liquid     Lower charge density Lower charge density ~ ~       3 2 F 2 r Re f , E DEP o m p m              For Vdc, f ( , ) 2 p m p m p m Sabounchi, P.; Morales, A.M. et al. Biomed Microdevices, 2008, 10, 661–670. • DEP Force depend on: • DEP Force depend on:  p Conductivity of the particle,  – – Conductivity of the particle, p Conductivity of the medium,   m – – Conductivity of the medium, m iDEP Uses Insulating Post Uses Insulating Post iDEP Size of the particle, r r – – Size of the particle, Features to Shape E- -field field Features to Shape E 5

  6. iDEP with Pressure Driven Flow with Pressure Driven Flow iDEP • Large Sample Volumes Must be Processed for Many Clinical Applica • Large Sample Volumes Must be Processed for Many Clinical Applications tions • Only Pressure Driven Flow can Process Such Volumes Only Pressure Driven Flow can Process Such Volumes • du      particle Pressure Driven m - ( u U ) F particle Flow Profile dt Force due to flow        u U E E E ( ) particle EK DEP iDEP Force Electrokinetic Electrokinetic Dielectrophoretic Dielectrophoretic Fluid Flow Fluid Flow Velocity Velocity Velocity Velocity Electrokinetic Flow • Potential Attributes of Biological • Potential Attributes of Biological Profile Sensor Incorporating iDEP Sensor Incorporating iDEP: : – – Affordability: iDEP iDEP trigger for bioassay trigger for bioassay Affordability: – – Early Detection: Response within Early Detection: Response within A Significant Amount of Work A Significant Amount of Work seconds of turning on seconds of turning on Done in the Lab. Done in the Lab. – Low False Alarm Rate: Orthogonal – Low False Alarm Rate: Orthogonal iDEP trigger trigger iDEP What Will it Take to Field iDEP iDEP? ? What Will it Take to Field 6

  7. Micro- -molded molded iDEP iDEP Zeonor Zeonor Chips Chips Micro • Polymer Polymer iDEP iDEP Chips: Chips: • – Low Cost & Ease of Manufacture Low Cost & Ease of Manufacture – x y – Amenable to Large Scale Production – Amenable to Large Scale Production R 1 R 2 R 3 R 4 7

  8. Chip Surface and Buffer Chemistry Is Critical Chip Surface and Buffer Chemistry Is Critical • Surface & buffer chemistry enable repeatable trapping with press Surface & buffer chemistry enable repeatable trapping with pressure driven flow ure driven flow • OR O O OH O + NaIO 4 + OH O O 8 MOPA “Chip polymer” Functionalized “chip polymer” (Methoxy polyethylene glycol acrylates) Without MOPA • MOPA Treatment Lowers Contact angle, • MOPA Treatment Lowers Contact angle,  2  4 90  65  2° ° w/o MOPA w/o MOPA vs vs 65 4° ° w/ MOPA w/ MOPA 90 • Background Buffer pH Adjusted to 8 • Background Buffer pH Adjusted to 8 While Keeping Conductivity Low While Keeping Conductivity Low With • Compatible with TWEEN used in • Compatible with TWEEN used in MOPA Aerosol Sample Collector Aerosol Sample Collector 8

  9. System Layout and Architecture System Layout and Architecture Aerosol Collector Test Sample Aerosol Collector Test Sample Background Buffer Background Buffer Waste Manifold Waste Manifold iDEP Chip Chip iDEP 9

  10. Robust Automated iDEP iDEP System System Robust Automated • Designed a Robust System Capable of Operating in the Field • Designed a Robust System Capable of Operating in the Field • Both Software & Hardware were Simplified and Optimized with • Both Software & Hardware were Simplified and Optimized with Reliability and Safety in Mind Reliability and Safety in Mind • Prototype Field Test Unit Fabricated, Integrated and Tested Prototype Field Test Unit Fabricated, Integrated and Tested • Modular iDEP chip holder 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend