Insitu Treatment of Contaminated Fill in a Former Cove Saves - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Insitu Treatment of Contaminated Fill in a Former Cove Saves - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Insitu Treatment of Contaminated Fill in a Former Cove Saves Millions in Remediation Costs Charles M. Wilk ALLU Group Inc. What is S/S Treatment for Remediation? Involves mixing a binding/reaction agent(s) into contaminated media such as
What is S/S Treatment for Remediation?
Involves mixing a binding/reaction agent(s) into contaminated media such as soil, sediment, sludge or industrial waste. S/S treatment protects human health and the environment by immobilizing hazardous constituents within treated material. Physical (solidification) and chemical (stabilization) changes to the treated material. Mobility Reduction Terms: Stabilisation (UK), Inertage (France), Immobilization (EU).
Solidification/ Stabilization 217 17 18 13 13 16 7 20 35 180
EPA-542-R-07-012
Types of Sites Applied
- Wood Preserving Sites
- Dredged Material
- Herbicide and Pesticide Sites
- Oil Refinery Sludge Lagoons
- Manufactured Gas Plants
- Sediment including PCB
- Metal Refining, Smelting, Plating, Recycling
- Residual Ash
What is S/S Treatment for Remediation?
Involves mixing a binding/reaction agent(s) into contaminated media such as soil, sediment, sludge or industrial waste. S/S treatment protects human health and the environment by immobilizing hazardous constituents within treated material. Physical (solidification) and chemical (stabilization) changes to the treated material. Mobility Reduction Terms: Stabilisation (UK), Inertage (France), Immobilization (EU).
Efficient Use of Binders Matters
Binders do matter!
Most of the cost in a mass stabilization project comes from the binder, which represents about 50-70 % of the total project cost.
Efficiencies (Cost Savings) are
improved by:
- Thorough mixing (mixing shear &
energy) resulting in intimate contact of binder and subject material.
- Introduction of binder at mixing
point.
- Locating and metering of binder
to avoid under-dose and
- verdose.
- Use of dry binders in wet
materials to conserve drying capacity of binders.
Binding Agent Pricing
- Priced by transportation costs:
− Industrial waste/byproducts, finely divided materials
available on site, e.g. spent fullers earth, ash
- Priced per ton:
− Common construction materials:
- portland cement, blended cements, Class C or F fly ash,
GGBFS, lime.
- Priced per pound:
− Specialized materials, sorptive, reactive, or
compounding
- Carbons, organophilic clays, oxidizers, reducers
VS
Mixing Energy & Shear
SPOON FOLDING ACTION
25-100 RPM0 FT-LBS Torque Providing Mixing 25-100 RPM 12000 Nm (9000 ft-lb) torque per drum. Provides Mixing Energy and Shear Folding Mixing Action dependent on Operator’s “Stroke”
Bench-Scale to Full-Scale
Canadian Forces Base Esquimalt, Victoria, BC
POST IN-SITU DRILLING PROGRAM TO IDENTIFY "KIDNEY"
e
LEGEND
LIMI T OF CONSTRUCTION (FENCED FOR WORK PACKAGE 17A PHASE II) TRUCK ROUTE CONSTRUCTION H O A . R D ING FENCE (5') DRAINAGE FLOW (OVERLAND) PROPOSED TE ST PIT
SOIL CLASSIFICATION THROUGH EX-SITU SOIL SAMPLING FROM TEST PITS TO EST ABLISH BINDER RECIPE
0-
- 15
r m I
3J
MBillm
SCALE 1:5:>0
- COllTAMINATED SOIL
HOl.DIHC CW.. AREA
·
- ·
PA';!;D ASPHALT (SLOPED TOWARDS EXCAVATION)
DY2 50
OFflCf; 6mx12mI
: K
I
J 17A P _ ' J COICRETE P R O C E S S I NG AH O REBAR EXTRACTION SCANSA OfnCE
Blasted Bedrock Scrap Metal Shipyard Waste Welding Slag
Cove Fill Materials
Geo Technical & Environmental
Leachable Heavy Metals Hydrocarbons PCBs
1 1
'
Harbour M < ' I J l l
. £ u u 1 1 1
[ 1Mm
- :1
kglmA3 kg m '3 5% 97% 5%
62%
103% 101% 106% 97" ){, 100% 99'}(, yl Tank 1 level: x 1 Y"'1 Accept 11.; 3 y ; 1
I
Accept -
- 6 ' - - -- - ' - - -
Set zero l evel
- '
Machine heading: O" Number Of Sa: ellites: 14 lncimalion- O "
J
RYZUK GEOTECHNICAL
28 Crease A venue V icloria, 8.C. 7A-C05 · .5 2 -J I· 5 1 1.0 2 3.0 11-Jul·14 15·Jul·14 3 7 100.0 99.5 203.0 203.0 3820 6304 78 17A C063-l.5 77 11-Jul-14 15·Jul·14 9-Jul-14 16-Jul-14 3 7 5 7 101.5 203.0 203.0 203.0 203.0 3860 5504 14304 24568 80 17A-C068-0.5 5 10 0 .0 9 9 .0 10 1.S 203.0 203.0 203.0 98.0 75 17A-C068-0.5 80 17A-C068-0.5 8 101.5 28 101.0 80 9-Jul-14 5 100.0 203.0 16652 7854 2121 17A·C068 2.0 17A-C068-2.0 28 Jul·14 31-Jul-14 20-Aug-14 25-Jul-14 29-Jul -14 25·Jul·14 29-Jul-14 25-Jul-14 5 8 28 3 7 3 100.0 101.0 100.0 101.5 101.5 101.5 101.5 203.0 205.0 203.0 203.0 203.0 203.0 203.0 16-Jul-14 7 101.5 18704 8091 3680 4600 2948 5000 4820 8012 7854 8091 8091 8091 8091 5 100.0 10112 7854 3 7 203.0 2376 1 1-Jul-14 7 18-Jul-14 22 Jul 14 18-Jul-1 4 4 8 4 101.0 100.0 101.0 203.0 203.0 203.0 10820 14388 10480 5 7 ENGINEERING & MATERIALS TESTING VSZ 1S3 Tel: 250-475-3131 1 7A-C052 0.5 24-Jul-1 4 7 1 01.0 203.0
Fax:250-475-3611
1 7A·COS2-1 .S 22-Jul-14
s
1 01. 203.0
mai1@ryzuk.com
17A-C052-1.S 24-Jul-1 4 7 1 00.5 203.0
Soilcrete Test Summary Report
1 7A·C052 2.5 22-Jul -1 4 5 1 00.0 203.0 207 11 996 1 4052 8012 1 5156 7933 9080 7854 Project No.: 8 · 613 4 25 1 7A·C052 2.5 24 Jul· 1 4 7 1 00.0 203.0 9288 7854 Project : In-Situ Soil Mixing · WP17A , CFB Esquimalt 17A-C057-0.S 22-Jul-14 6 1 00.0 203.0 7232 7854 Client: Allterra Construction 1 7A C057 0.5 23 Jul·1 4 7 1 00.5 203.0 8040 7933 Contact: Mr.Derek Killburn 1 7A C057 1 .S 22 Jul· 1 4 6 1 00.0 203.0 9040 7854 Emai I Fax No .: derek@allterraconstruct ion.ca 1 7A-C057-1.S 23-Jul-14 7 1 00.0 203.0 9204 7854 Date: September 5, 2014 1 7A C057 2.5 22 Jul·1 4 6 1 00.5 203.0 6432 7933 1 7A-C057-2.5 23-Jul-1 4 7 1 01. 5 203.0 8752 8091 Copy to:
Copyto:
17A-C063 · 0.S 1 8
- Jul-14
3 101.0 203.0 1 6440 8012 1 7A·C063 · 0.5 22 Jul-1 4 7 1 01. 5 203.0 27808 8091 1 7A·C063· 1 .0 1 8-Jul-14 3 1 01.0 203.0 1 0564 8012 Average 1 7A·C063· 1 .0 22-Jul-1 4 7 1 01. 5 203.0 1 7832 8091 Sample Specimen Diameter Length Corrected 1 7A·C063· 1 .5 1 8 Jul-1 4 3 1 01.0 203.0 9368 8012 Identification Break Date Age (Days) (mm) (mm) Load (N) Area (mm2
) Strength (kPa)22-Jul-14 8 1 01.0 203.0 1 8948 80 1 7A-C080-0.S 1 8-Jul-14 4 1 01. 203.0 1 5632 80 22-Jul-14 8 1 01.0 203.0 1 8744 8012 11lUl·1 4 3 1 01. 5 203.0 8420 8091 1 8 Jul 1 4 7 1 01. 203.0 1 3412 8012 11-Jul-14 3 1 01. 5 203. 1 8420 8091 2275 1 8-Jul-14 7 1 01. 203.0 33960 8012 4239 3 Sample Spec,imen Diameter Length Identification Break Date Age (Days) (mm) (mm) load (N)
WP 17A - FMF Cape Breton, Esquimalt, BC July 2014, AE Project No. 648
Table 1: Analytlcal Results for Metals In Soll - WP17A - Solldlfication & Stabilization Samples Sample Description
t7a-C63-0.5· 17a-063• 1 , C >- 17a-C63 1.S· 17a-057 0.5· 17a
- C52•
D
- Y
3
Dav3 O; w3 Oav3 Onvo Oav3 Oav:! 0ay3 DaY3D
- Y
3
Oa"3 Oa"3 Corrected StrenathlkPal CCME(IL)1 CSR (IL )' SRA3 Date Samaledlm m l d c J Jm 07/t5/20 14 07/15/2014 07/ 15/2014 07/16'2014 0711612(114 07/16J2014 07/ 17/2014 0 7117 12014 07/ 17/2014 07/17 12014 07117/2014 07117/2014 t l .6 1 1. 4 11. 5 1 1. 5 11. 5 11.2 11. 5 11.7 11. 8 10.9 11. 5 11.7 07f22J2014 07/22/2014 07122!2014 pH 1: 2 610811.9 11. 8 11. 8 Metals
An1monv (Sb)- 2-0
40.4 01.0 43 47.5 09.0 40.4 00.S 07 . 1 02.0
- c.s
07.9 05.4 02.1 02.0 09.0 Arsenic Asl 12 25 15 30.3 26 . 3 27.7 21.9 25 17 . 3 13.7 16. 6 14.7 19.4 23.2 20.9 16.8 K • 20 . 4
K -
19 . 7 Barium! Ba l 2000 1500 400
· -
496 662 754 761 521 621 -- 857 782 832
K K 4Bervllium !Bel 8 8 4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 Boron! B l Hot Water So l ublel Cadmium (C
< : I ) pH< 7.0
1.5 1.3 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.4 1. 3 2.1 1.5 1.7 1.0 1.0 1.1 2 3.5 eH 7.0 -< 7.5
- -
- -
- -
- -
5.9 - pH 7.5·< 8.0
- H >= 8.0
35 200 7.1 6.4 10.4 7.5 22.9 5.9 2.85 3.2 2.9 6.3 5.3 2.8 3.4 2.9 Chromium (Cd) 87 60 60
so
103 274 72 70 61 56 47 43 41 54 61 55 44 59
85
CobaltI Crl 300 300 17. 8 15.4 15. 14.9 15. 6 14.8 11 3 12.0 11.1 12.1 13 . 2 12.9 12.5 12. 9 13.3 Cop r Cu) pH < 5.0 pH 5.0-<5.5
- -
90 100
- -
- - - -
1480 1040 >
- -
- -
91 90 .5 -<6.0
- H > - 6.0
200
2 5
- 1760
93400 1040 926 519 793 1500 1110 1250 950 572 1100 737 Lead(Pb) _pH<5.5 eH 5.5 - .6.0 150 250
- -
600 100 PH » 6.0 2000 1940 1460 1350 1300 1150 734 623 755 627 1350 1240 1200 691 707 867 Mercurv !Hal 50 150 15 4 . 3.2 3.0 1.7 1 9 1.4 1. 3 1.6 1.3 5.9 3.3 2.6 1.4 1. 7 1.4 Molybdenum (Mo) 40 40 10 14. 6 12 4
14
9.0 13 8.1 5.4 6.3 5.5 9.9 10.6 8.5 6.7 7.1 7 Ni<:kel !Nil 50 500 100 132 206 99.8 79.9 85 64.9 49 51.8 54 . 1 82.3 93.9 77.5 50.3 60.4 63.6 Sel enium rSel 2.9 10 3 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.5 . 6 Silver Aol 40 40 20 1. 2.1 1.6 0.6 0.6 0.8 <0.5 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.5 Thallium (T i) 1 . 1 m
...
0.1 0.1 0.1 . 2 0.1 . 1 0.1 . 1 an.a 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2
- A
. 1 0.1 Tin lSnl 300 300 50 319
A 4177 75.1 79.3 57 . 2 135 163 144 67.1 127 Uranium Ul 300 130 200 1.5 68.0 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.5 58.0 1.1 1.2 64.0 1.3 56.0 1. 2 62.0 1.3 60.0 1.4 1. 3 56.0 Vamtdium l V\ 20 0 55 . 68.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 50.0 63.0 66.0 Zinc(Zn) pH< 6.5 _j>_H 6.5 -< 7.0 PH >• 7.0 150 300 600 360 150 3730 2660 3290 2150 2420 1620 1210 1310 1120 2090 2520 2250 1230 1450 1260 Notes:
A$$0Cla!edAGATflles: 14V8$4334, 14\1865$5$. 14V865746, 14V8$7519 Alwncentralions h mg/kg unless olhefv.ise no!ed. "<"loss 1 hll.fl the JabOtatorydOteictiOn lmh indiea.lOd. · means not analyzed°' no standard orguide!Wle appries. ' RPOs are nolnorrnatf calcula1 ed wf'l•H one or mote concentrations are less than frvel imes MOL (1)Canadian So Qi.'*YGuiclOlinO$ (CEOG) tor 1 h e Pl'Olo ctJOO 01 En ..t'on rner'tal and Human H- alh,C a n
Counc•
- t
Minlsiers °*the EnWooment (C C M E ). 1999 , lnck. d nguPdatt:S 1 02014.GuidelntsI Of
!nduSJ1a1 Land use Surlkla!- Sols. The e
- f
- r aquatic lile
'groun<twator now
10 sunacewa.
10tusedby marlne aquatic lilo.h:lus 1 r i 01(I L)
Landuse.
(3) SC COntami\a. Od Silos RegulatiOn (CSR BC Reg,375196 includes amendments up 10 BC Rog. 28612010) Standards TriggoMg Conlaminate<t Soil Rol0e31.ion Agroome1'l$ (SohOdV't 7) f0t Soi RelOCalion to NonAgtlcullutal lands (Col.lmn I ). If sols e:xOMdthose siandan:ts, a SoU Relocation Agroemont 1$requi-e <J to dispose of soilsott-She.w i t h
- ut a
u l h
- r
i z a t i
- n
.
I
Concentrabon greater than CCMEI ndustrial Land Use(IL).s1an< 1w
: = : = = = = = = = = = = = = ==
I
Concentration 91'eaterl han CSRI ndustrial Land Use( I L).s t a n c 1 a r
- :
= : = = = = = = = = = = = = ==
L _: U : = nd = er :l : l : ne, : G :'. 'r .: e :y : =S :: h :a : = c! l :na - - _Jleoncentraliln >CSR SRA S!andard.
BOLD, BLUE SHADING BOLD, RED SHADING
WP 17A • FMF Cape Breton. Esquimalt. BC July 2014. AE Project No. 648 Tab l e 2: Analytical Results for Leachable Meta ls in Soil WP17A · Soli dif cation & Stabilization Samp l es
Notes: A$$0Ckl:O d AG .A T Fies; 14V$643J.1. t4V865SS8. 14\1865746, 14V867$19 All oonoentralioo$ In mgll.. e:x- p
I
Concenltation g.roat0r than HatarOous- - - - - - - - - - -
- Waste(HW) Standafd$
"< IOSS than tho
labOt'al<>l'y me1 h0d O O t- c
- •• means n
- c
- 07
TCLP MetalsI ma/LI AntimonvI Sbl-Leachabl e 0. 02 0.02 0. 02 0.07 <0.01 . 03 0.05 0. 05 0.03 O . t 1 0. 02 0. 02 0-01 0.02 <0.01 ArsenicI Asl-Leachabl e 2.5 <0 . 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 < 0. 02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 Barium I Ba Leachabl e 100.0 0.49 0.43 0.37 0. 31 <0. 05 0.34 0. 36 0. 52 0.68 0.17 0. 67 0.58 0.71 0. 60 1. 01 BervlliumI Be · Leachab l e <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0. 02 < 0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 < 0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 Boron tBl Leachabl e 500.0 <0.5 <0.5 <0. 5 <0. 5 <0.5 <0.5 < 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.70 < 0. 5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Cadmi um (Cdl Leachab l e 0.5 <0.01 <0.01 < 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 Ch rom i um I Crl-Leachab l e 5 . 0.02 0. 01 < 0.01 0.02 <0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 . 02 <0.01 O.Q2 0. 02 0.02 0.03 0. 02 Cobalt tCoH eachable <0.05 <0.05 <0. 05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0. 05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0. 05 <0.05 Cooner /Cul
- Leachable
100. 0.20 0. 14 0. 10 0.10 <0.05 0. 11 0.22 0.15 0.19 0.10 0.14 0.16 0.07 0.10 0.08 I ronI Fe -Leachable 2.00 4.00 2. 00 <1 <1 <1 5. 00 <1 2.00 3. 00 <1 1.00 <1 1.00 <1 Lead tPb · Leachabl e 5.0 0.16 0.17 0. 06 0. 04 <0.01 0.02 0.16 0. 05 0.10 0.11 0. 06 0.05 0.03 0. 05 0. 30 M ercurv n-r' " eachabl e . 1 <0.01 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 Nickel Ni Leachab l e <0.05 <0. 05 <0. 05 <0.05 <0.05 < 0. 05 <0.05 <0.05 <0. 05 <0. 05 <0.05 <0. 05 < 0. 05 <0.05 <0.05 Sele n i um (Sel Leachabl e 1 . <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Silver I Aa Leachable 5.0 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 < 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 Thallium ITl -l eachable <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 Urani um (Ul 1 0.0 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0.01 < 0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 Vanadi um IVl-l eachabl e <0.05 <0.05 <0. 05 <0.05 <0. 05 <0.05 <0. 05 <0.05 <0.05 <0. 05 <0.05 <0 . 05 <0. 05 <0.05 <0 . 05 Zinc ! Zn Leachabl e 500.0 0.10 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.10 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Zirconiu m <0-01 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 < 0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 < 0. 01 <0.01 <0.01
Projected Cost $22 Million
Questions - Contact
Chuck Wilk
Manager of Stabilization and Remediation Applications
WEDA Booth 55 (847) 714-2754 charlesw@allu.net www.allu.net www.stamix.net
Todd Mizuik Construction Manager, Principal ALLTERRA Construction Ltd 2158 Millstream Road Victoria, B.C. V9B 6H4 Office:(250) 658-3772 Cell: (250) 589-4041 Email Todd@allterraconstruction.ca