A case study of Ruby Tuesday (RT)
Ben Claremon Cove Street Capital
A case study of Ruby Tuesday (RT) Ben Claremon Cove Street Capital - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A case study of Ruby Tuesday (RT) Ben Claremon Cove Street Capital Safe Harbor The opinions expressed herein are those of Cove Street Capital, LLC and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of
Ben Claremon Cove Street Capital
The opinions expressed herein are those of Cove Street Capital, LLC and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future
The information in this presentation should not be considered as a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security and should not be considered as investment advice of any kind. You should not assume that the security discussed in this report is or will be profitable, or that recommendations we make in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the security discussed in this presentation. The report is based on data
does not purport to be a complete summary of the available data. Recommendations for the past twelve months are available upon request. In addition to clients, partners and employees or their family members may have a position in security mentioned herein. Cove Street Capital, LLC is a registered investment advisor. More information about us is located in our ADV Part 2, which is available upon request.
Source: Company presentation
Source: Yahoo Finance
Five Year Stock Price Chart
Source: Capital IQ, CSC estimates
same store sales
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 $1 in SSS $1 $0.99 $0.89 $0.82 $0.81 $0.82 $0.78
Sources: CSC estimates, Capital IQ, company filings
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 $2.13 $1.92 $1.78 $1.79 $1.79 $1.80
Source: Yahoo Finance
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EBITDAR Margin 19.7% 15.1% 14.6% 15.3% 14.0% 11.8%
Historical Stock Chart
Source: http://www.restaurantnews.com
Source: Company presentation
FY 2008
Sources: CSC estimates, Capital IQ and company filings
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EBITDAR Margin 19.7% 15.1% 14.6% 15.3% 14.0% 11.8% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EBITDAR Margin 15.1% 14.4% 14.4% 15.1% 16.0% 15.5%
to its peers
below its cost of capital
Sources: Capital IQ and company filings
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EBITDAR Margin 11.9% 11.2% 11.2% 12.2% 12.2% 12.6% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EBITDAR Margin 14.9% 13.7% 14.1% 15.1% 15.3% 14.7%
estimate of $325-350 million on television in calendar 2008, compared to our total
crowded advertising market.”
would say that on the extreme, if we were 100% reliant upon coupons, that would be dangerous. On the other hand, to totally walk away from price incentives like coupons in such a competitive environment, in such a challenging consumer environment, would be a foolish decision. So one of the things that we continue to work on is what's the right balance between couponing and the other tools we have in our marketing arsenal. ”
Sources: Capital IQ and company filings
Sources: Capital IQ and company presentation
Source: Company presentation
Source: Company website
upside
Margins by FY 2016
EBITDA margins by FY 2016, reduced share count due to buybacks, discounted back at 9.8% WACC
meaningfully outspent by larger competitors
Chipotle and will always be too small to move the needle
turnaround and will push margin improvement targets out a number of years
attract new, younger customers
franchise base and given that same store sales increases will be elusive in a strained consumer environment
Source: www.greatpriceshere.com
*Please read in conjunction with the Safe Harbor statement located on Slide 2 of this presentation