insectj a generic instrumentation framework for
play

InsectJ: A Generic Instrumentation Framework for Collecting Dynamic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

InsectJ: A Generic Instrumentation Framework for Collecting Dynamic Information within Eclipse Arjan Seesing and Alessandro Orso Georgia Institute of Technology This work was supported in part by an IBM Eclipse Innovation Grant.


  1. InsectJ: A Generic Instrumentation Framework for Collecting Dynamic Information within Eclipse Arjan Seesing and Alessandro Orso Georgia Institute of Technology This work was supported in part by an IBM Eclipse Innovation Grant.

  2. Instrumentation Overview P’ P … … int i=4; int i=4; <probe1> Instrumenter o.foo(i); o.foo(i); i++ <probe2> … i++ … Monitor Log Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  3. Motivation Increasing interest in programs’ dynamic behavior Instrumentation commonly used for supporting dynamic analyses • Coverage • Program tracing • Profiling • Runtime checking • Mixed static and dynamic analyses • … Many issues to address Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  4. Key Instrumentation Challenges Overhead => Number of probes => Cost of probes Complexity => User unfriendliness => Low level details Non-customizability => Ad-hoc solutions => Difficult to modify and adapt Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  5. What is InsECT-J? INS trumentation, E xecution, and C ollection T ool for J ava Flexible, efficient bytecode instrumentation tool for collecting dynamic information • GUI-based instrumentation (static and on the fly) • GUI-based monitor creation • Support for collection of new kinds of data Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  6. GUI-based Instrumentation P Probe void foo { … } void bar { Monitor … } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  7. GUI-based Instrumentation Method exit P Method entry Probe void foo { … } void bar { Monitor … } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  8. GUI-based Instrumentation Method exit P Method entry Probe void foo { … Method profiling } void bar { Monitor … } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  9. GUI-based Instrumentation Method exit P Method entry Probe void foo { … Method profiling } void bar { Monitor … } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  10. GUI-based Instrumentation Method exit P’ Method entry Probe void foo { <m.en.probe> … Method profiling <m.ex.probe> } Monitor void bar { Method profiling … monitor } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  11. GUI-based Instrumentation Let users select 1. Which information to collect 2. How to process the information 3. Which parts of the program to instrument Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  12. GUI-based Instrumentation Extensible probe library Extensible monitor library Let users select • Basic block • Block coverage 1. Which information • Branch • Block profiling to collect • Cast • Branch coverage • Call 2. How to process • Branch profiling • Return the information • Method profiling • Field read/write 3. Which parts of the • Cast monitoring (down- • Method entry/exit program to casting) • Throw instrument • DefUse tracing • Catch • Throw/catch coverage • Acyclic paths (WIP) • … • … Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  13. GUI-based Monitor Creation Field Def P Field Use Probe void foo { … } void bar { Monitor … } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  14. GUI-based Monitor Creation Field Def P Field Use Probe void foo { … } New DefUse Monitor void bar { … Monitor } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  15. GUI-based Monitor Creation Automated monitor stub creation through a wizard • Monitors implement interfaces for the corresponding probe(s) • Monitor wizard creates monitor stub classes Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  16. GUI-based Monitor Creation Automated monitor stub creation through a wizard • Monitors implement public final class MyMonitor interfaces for the extends AbstractMonitorObject implements MonitorObject, corresponding DefMonitorInterface probe(s) UseMonitorInterface { … • Monitor wizard creates public void processData() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub monitor stub classes } public void reportDef(Object newValue, Object oldValue, int srcLine, int probeId) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub } public void reportUse(Object value, int srcLine, int probeId) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub } … } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  17. Support for Collection of New Kinds of Data P Probe void foo { … } void bar { Monitor … } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  18. Support for Collection of New Kinds of Data P Probe void foo { … } void bar { Monitor … } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  19. Support for Collection of New Kinds of Data P New Cast Probe Probe void foo { … } void bar { Monitor … } Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  20. Support for Collection of New Kinds of Data • Allow for easier creation of new types of instrumentation • Create extension to Probe plug-in • Define monitor interface • Implement probe inserter that (1) collects information of interest and (2) calls monitor • Provide higher-level abstractions for common operations • Simple instrumentations require only a few lines of code (e.g., cast probe is 6 lines of code) Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  21. InsectJ Architecture InsectJ implemented as a set of plug-ins • Core plugin: • Instruments based on a configuration file • Provides common functionality for monitors and probe inserters • Probe inserter plug-ins: • Collect different kinds of dynamic data • Monitor Classes: • Predefined • User-defined Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  22. How Did Eclipse Help (or Did not) The good : The bad : • Powerful java parser • Complicated API • Extensible • Hard to reuse some high-level elements • Extensive, high-quality (JDT-UI) documentation • Error prone plug-in build • Developer friendly process • Deployment/technology transfer Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  23. Future Work • Instrumentation at lower granularity • Statements • Context • … • Addition of new probes (e.g., local defs and uses, assignments) • Use of analysis to optimize (e.g., points-to analysis) • Tighter integration with Eclipse • Visualization • Navigation • Information report Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

  24. For More Information • InsectJ’s web site http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~orso/software/insectj • See demo and poster tonight • Send us email {orso|zeikerd}@cc.gatech.edu ? Arjan Seesing and Alex Orso – eTX 2005

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend