innovation in models of care for older adults living with
play

Innovation in models of care for older adults living with frailty: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Innovation in models of care for older adults living with frailty: What can Canada learn from Australia? Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research Faculty of Medicine


  1. Innovation in models of care for older adults living with frailty: What can Canada learn from Australia? Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  2. Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  3. The application of the frailty concept to clinical practice in acute care Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  4. Why consider frailty in clinical practice? • Predict clinical outcomes • Guide clinical decision-making • Support communication among health professionals • Workload analysis • Offer interventions that reverse frailty Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  5. Approaches to measurement • Phenotype approach (Fried) • Fried LP, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146-56. • Deficit accumulation approach (Rockwood) • Mitniski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci World J. 2001;1. Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  6. Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  7. The challenges • System immaturity • Absent or incomplete digital records • Lack of access to community records • Resource intensive • Extensive data collection • Documentation & task burden • Impractical • Not all patients can perform tasks Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  8. Our challenge: To measure frailty in the acute care setting Our challenge: Measurement of frailty in the hospital population Our opportunity: Efficient assessment using the interRAI Acute Care Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  9. Building a frailty index Demographics Medications Frailty index Functional & psychosocial Diagnoses observations Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  10. 11 Nursing assessment: A jigsaw of fra observations, screeners & forms Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  11. Current nursing assessment forms Victorian Documentation Study • 11 hospitals studied • Admission assessment = Massive burden • 8-27 (median 11) forms • 150-586 (median 345) items + Poor compliance • 2482 data items universal • 1283 data items selective Source: Redley, B. Risk screening and assessment for avoiding preventable harm to older people in hospitals. Deakin University. 2016 Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  12. 13 A jigsaw of observations, screeners & forms Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  13. Building the interRAI AC: System aspirations 2014…  Reduce nursing documentation burden  Integrate assessment into the care delivery process  Improve the quality, availability and value of nurse generated data  Create consistency across the continuum of care Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  14. The interRAI AC Development strategy Expert panel 2014 Design specifications CDHB NZ Expert panel 2014 Draft item set & outputs interRAI Psychometric properties Field testing 2015-16 Resource requirements 4 sites / 900 cases International launch interRAI 2017 Manuals / vendor specs. Review / publishing 2018 Implementation trial Acceptability QEII Workflow Software enhancements Implementation trials 2019 Tasmania + others Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  15. The interRAI Acute Care System Problems Cognition Mood Delirium Communication Diagnostic Dementia Vision / hearing Depression screeners Sleep Under-nutrition ADL Medication Delirium management Clinical Risk assessment Pressure ulcer Falls Falls observations Dyspnoea [56 items] Pain Cognition Under-nutrition Communication Swallowing Severity measures Mood Traumatic injury ADL Pressure injury Nutrition Other skin conditions Continence Self care, mobility, Bowel/bladder issues IDC, falls, pressure Quality indicators Smoking & alcohol ulcer, institutional placement, prolonged stay, delirium, pain Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  16. Functional syndromes: Age-related 80% Cognitive impairment 18-29 70% Delirium 30-39 60% 40-49 ADL 50-59 50% Mobility 60-69 40% Balance 70-79 30% 80-89 Bladder incontinence ≥90 20% Skin integrity 10% 0% Cognitive Dependent in ADL Mobility impairment Falls (prior 90 days) Bladder Impairment incontinence Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  17. Functional syndromes: Non-age related 90.0% 18-29 Self reported 30-39 80.0% depression 40-49 70.0% 50-59 Pain 60-69 60.0% 70-79 Sleep disturbance 80-89 50.0% Oral health problem ≥90 40.0% Unintended weight 30.0% loss 20.0% Substance abuse 10.0% Housebound? 0.0% Self-reported depression Pain Unintended weight loss Substance abuse Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  18. The interRAI Hospital Systems …integrated assessment across the hospital continuum 19 www.interrai.org

  19. C OMMUNITY S YSTEMS interRAI Community Health Assessment I NSTITUTIONAL S YSTEMS H OSPITAL S YSTEMS interRAI Long Term interRAI Home Care GENERAL SPECIALIST GERIATRIC Care Facility ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT interRAI ED Screener interRAI ED CA interRAI Community interRAI Mental Health Mental Health Ward Admission interRAI AC Assessment interRAI Intellectual General ward interRAI AC-PAC geriatric care interRAI Palliative Care Disability interRAI Palliative Care 20 www.interrai.org

  20. 21 Transforming nursing documentation …from this… Supplement Supplement MDS 350+ items 56 items 30% compliance 100% compliance …to this 1 hour+ 15 minutes Supplement Supplement Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  21. Derivation of FI from interRAI Acute Care • Large amount of information across functional, cognitive, sensory, medical domains • We chose “core” items in interRAI AC -CGA common to most interRAI instruments • 39 variables selected adding to 56 possible deficits • 15 potential deficits allowed for comorbidities; 4 for polypharmacy categories Hubbard RE, Peel NM, Samanta M, et al. Derivation of a frailty index from the interRAI acute care instrument. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:27. Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  22. Results: FI-AC Distribution N=1418 Mean (SD)=0.32 (0.14) Median (IQR)=0.31 (0.22-0.41) 99 th percentile= 0.69 Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  23. Results: FI-AC vs Discharge Destination Discharge Destination n (%) FI-AC Mean (SD) Community 917 (64.7%) 0.28 (0.12) Continuing inpatient care including 237 (16.7%) 0.39 (0.13) rehabilitation Residential Aged Care 207 (14.6%) 0.41 (0.13) Died 57 (4.0%) 0.47 (0.16) Comparison of mean FI-AC between groups (ANOVA) significant at p<0.001 Ordinal regression showed progressive frailty OR: 1.93 (1.77-2.12) Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  24. Predictive and discriminative capacity of FI for adverse events At FI>0.4 Adverse Event OR* (95% CI) AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Inpatient falls 1.29 (1.10-1.50) 0.61 (0.55-0.67) 43% 74% 9% 95% Inpatient 2.34 (2.08-2.63) 0.79 (0.76-0.82) 61% 83% 52% 88% delirium Inpatient 1.51 (1.23-1.87) 0.72 (0.66-0.78) 55% 76% 7% 98% pressure injury Composite 2.21 (1.98-2.46) 0.77 (0.74-0.80) 57% 84% 58% 84% adverse event * OR associated with 0.1 FI increments; adjusted for age and gender Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  25. Predictive and discriminative capacity of FI for adverse outcomes Adverse At FI>0.4 OR* (95% CI) AUC (95% CI) Outcome Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Length of 1.29 (1.10-1.52) 0.62 (0.56-0.69) 45% 74% 9% 96% Stay>28 days New discharge 1.31 (1.10-1.57) 0.65 (0.58-0.71) 44% 75% 8% 96% to RAC Inpatient 2.01 (1.66-2.42) 0.76 (0.69-0.83) 67% 75% 10% 98% mortality Died within 28 1.66 (1.35-2.03) 0.71 (0.64-0.78) 55% 76% 8% 98% days discharge Composite adverse 1.67 (1.48-1.88) 0.71 (0.67-0.75) 55% 77% 24% 93% outcome * OR associated with 0.1 FI increments; adjusted for age and gender Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  26. FI and Polypharmacy Proportion of cases with at least one adverse outcome 50 0-0.25 40 0.26-0.39 0.40-1 30 20 0.40-1 10 FI 0.26-0.39 0 Poudel A, et al. Adverse 0-0.25 Outcomes in Relation to 0-4 meds Polypharmacy in Robust and 5 - 9 meds ≥ 10 meds Frail Older Hospital Patients. Polypharmacy category J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(8):767.e9-.e13. Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

  27. The interRAI Acute Care System Problems Cognition Mood Delirium Communication Diagnostic Dementia Vision / hearing Depression screeners Sleep Under-nutrition ADL Medication Delirium management Clinical Risk assessment Pressure ulcer Falls Falls observations Frailty index Dyspnoea [56 items] Pain Cognition Under-nutrition Communication Swallowing Severity measures Mood Traumatic injury ADL Pressure injury Nutrition Other skin conditions Continence Self care, mobility, Bowel/bladder issues IDC, falls, pressure Quality indicators Smoking & alcohol ulcer, institutional placement, prolonged stay, delirium, pain Faculty of Medicine Centre for Health Services Research

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend