increasingly
play

Increasingly Loud Anti Voice Play the Game Conference 2011, Kln Dr - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sports Mega-Events and the Increasingly Loud Anti Voice Play the Game Conference 2011, Kln Dr John Beech Current IOC bidding procedures 2020 CANDIDATURE ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE PUBLIC SUPPORT Q 10.11 What is the general public opinion in


  1. Sports Mega-Events and the Increasingly Loud ‘Anti’ Voice Play the Game Conference 2011, Köln Dr John Beech

  2. Current IOC bidding procedures 2020 CANDIDATURE ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE PUBLIC SUPPORT Q 10.11 What is the general public opinion in your city/region and country towards your project of hosting the Olympic Games? If you carry out opinion polls, please specify the following: · Questions asked · Area covered · Dates of opinion poll field work · Sample size Q 10.12 What, if any, opposition is there to your project? Please detail.

  3. TWO KEY TRENDS 1. An increasing awareness that against the predictions of economic benefits from Olympic Games needs to be set a more difficult to calculate set of economic costs See, for example, Blake (2005) 2. The growing development of web-based social journalism, which can facilitate an anti-bid voice Broader context of ‘people power’ internet campaigns: fair trade; consumer groups; anti-planning abuse; conservation of built- environment heritage; anti-vivisection and anti pharmaceutical company; etc. To what extent and in what ways have social journalists given an effective voice to anti-Olympic bid campaigns?

  4. A three-phase research design 1. Comprehensive identification of anti-bid websites 2. Systematic survey of how they are/have been used, and analysis of the results 3. Deeper researcher into case studies selected from the results of phase 2, to include interviews with the social journalists involved Second and third phases to be conducted with Prof Dr Ariane Bagusat , Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften

  5. Bid-specific anti-Olympics websites identified so far 1998 Nagano, Japan [defunct] 2000 Sydney, Australia [2, both defunct] 2006 Helsinki, Finland 2006 Torino, Italy 2008 Toronto, Canada [defunct] 2008 Osaka, Japan 2008 Beijing (boycott websites) 2010 Vancouver, Canada 2012 London, UK 2014 Sochi, Russia 2016 Chicago, USA 2018 München, Germany 2018 Annecy, France 2020 Madrid, Spain Any offers of others?

  6. Some of the emergent variables Location Platform Design sophistication Multilingualism Duration Start-up lead Variety of contributors No. of hits; hits per month Ancillary webpages Petition? Extent of linkage with other lobbying groups (other bids/Games; indirectly-linked causes) Concentration/unity Sub-causes (e.g. anti-part of the bid only)

  7. ANTIOLYMPIAKOMITEA (Helsinki 2006)

  8. Nolimpiadi (Torino, 2006)

  9. Anti-Osaka Olympics (2008)

  10. Boycott Beijing Olympics (2008)

  11. No To Vancouver 2010 Olympic Bid

  12. Say No to London 2012

  13. NOGOE (No to Greenwich Olympic Equestrian Events) 2012

  14. No Sochi (2014)

  15. No Games Chicago (2016)

  16. Nolympia (2018)

  17. Comité Anti- Olympique d’Annecy (2018)

  18. No queremos Madrid 2020

  19. No queremos Madrid 2020

  20. No a Madrid 2020

  21. Dr John Beech J.Beech@coventry.ac.uk

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend