inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

inaccessible well areas
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reperforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially DALLAS - FORT WORTH. AUGUST 5-6, 2019. displaced tubulars: Gunstring design & selection 2019-NAPS-6.4 AUTHORS: Max Maouche, Archer. Re-Perforating


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars:

Gunstring design & selection

2019-NAPS-6.4

AUTHORS: Max Maouche, Archer. DALLAS - FORT WORTH. AUGUST 5-6, 2019.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Re-Perforating beneath axially displaced tubulars

Agenda

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Background
  • Tubular Axial Displacement type and shape
  • Flexible Perforating system requirement & design
  • Pre-Operation Flexible Perforating system test
  • Flexible Perforating system selection system selection
  • Conclusion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

Subsidence and Geoformation impact on downhole tubulars

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Some of the most famous Norwegian Field have been

suffering from formation faulting or compaction.

  • North-Sea chalk pore pressure dropping lead to subsidence

in many fields

  • 1987 “Great Jack-Up” Operation lifted 6 meters, 5 out of 7

platforms

  • Localized formation movement due to intensive reservoir

treatment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Tubular Axial Displacement

2 Main types of axially displaced completion

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Tubular Axial Displacement

2 Main types of axially displaced completion

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Flexible Perforating system design

Prerequisite for Perforating System

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • As Slim as possible
  • Highly Flexible and easily interchangeable offshore
  • Multiple intervals should be perforated in one run
  • Minimum exit hole diameter of 0.18 inch through

expectionally thick liner ( wall thickness ˃ 1.1”)

  • Target : 6 5/8” Liner #65.8lbs/ft _ ID:4,375 ”
  • Orientation of perforated holes to be at 6 o’clock.
  • All perforating guns and accessories should be easily

interchangeable offshore to ease gunstring selection

  • Quickly available for Offshore Operation
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Flexible Perforating system design

Selected Single and Multishot Perforating solutions

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Maximum Outer Diameter : 2 inch
  • Single-Shot or Multi-Shot guns
  • Reduced gun length
  • Integrated addressable firing system
  • Self-Orienting Guns to minimize perforating accessories.
  • Charges selected exit holes exceeded the requirements

through the heavy 6 5/8” Liner (#65.8lbs/ft)

  • Bolted Gun system to increase flexible capacity
  • All feed-through subsystems compatible and

interchangeable : Knuckle Joint, Rotating Swivel, Variball Roller,eccentralizer,etc…

  • Alignment tested and verified.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Pre-Operation Flexible Perforating system test

3D modelling data sets from S-shaped collapses

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Thermal process of polymer shaping to recreate axial

displacement measured downhole.

  • Transparent matrix material to facilitate understanding

Gunstring behaviour.

  • Identical Internal Diameter as tubular target
  • Flanged short tubular section to create an interchangeable

interlocking set up.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Pre-Operation Flexible Perforating system test

3D modelling a data set from a C-shaped collapse

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Background
  • Tubular Axial Displacement
  • Flexible Perforating system design
  • Pre-Operation Flexible Perforating system test
  • Conclusion
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Pre-Operation Flexible Perforating system test

Single Shot Mono Carrier through C-shape displacement

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Insert VIDEO
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pre-Operation Flexible Perforating system test

Single Shot Mono Carrier through S-shape displacement

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Insert VIDEO
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pre-Operation Flexible Perforating system test

Single Shot Dual Carrier through C-shape displacement

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Insert VIDEO
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Flexible Perforating system selection

Gunstring selection for Wireline and electrical Carbon Rod/Coiled Tubing

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Primary factor : Flexi-Point to Flexi-Point distance
  • Secondary factor : Maximum Gun String OD
  • Wireline conveyed : 60% of Total Gunstring weight should

be located on the lower part of it.

  • Carbon Rod conveyed : uniform spread of articulated

points to avoid «push and lock» situation

  • Depending on conveyance review Knuckle Joint design
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusion

Maximizing success rate of re-perforation beneath axial displacement

2019-NAPS-6.4 Re‐perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubulars

  • Collecting Well Completion, Geological and field history

information

  • Identifying through study or pre-perforation investigation

runs the type and shape of the deformed area

  • Reducing Maximum Flexi-Point to Flexi-Point distance
  • Reducing Gunstring OD
  • Recommended use of Addressable firing system
  • For Electrical Wire conveyance the gunstring should be

“bottom heavy”

  • For Carbon Rod/Coiled Tubing conveyance, Rollers and

articulated subsystem should be spreading along the gunstring to avoid both early buckling and “push and lock”

  • Pre-Operation system test and review of Gunstring

movement and behaviour

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2019-NAPS-6.4

AUTHORS: Max Maouche, Archer. DALLAS - FORT WORTH. AUGUST 5-6, 2019.

QUESTIONS? THANK YOU