improving graduate education
play

Improving graduate education Patterns of change masters, doctoral - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The changing nature of graduate education Improving graduate education Patterns of change masters, doctoral & relationships between degrees national & international collaboration The value of networks A


  1. • The changing nature of ‘graduate education’ Improving graduate education – • Patterns of change – masters, doctoral & relationships between degrees national & international collaboration • The value of networks • A fundamental tension for graduate schools Dr. Barbara Evans • My philosophy…. Dean of Graduate Studies • & in the Workshop – effective roles & goals for graduate The University of British Columbia schools, the big issues in Canada & elsewhere, global Canada challenges & some solutions…… ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 Graduate education Patterns of change Masters degrees From an international perspective….. • research masters was normal entry to PhD (eg in Canada) • Is ‘Graduate Education’ a useful grouping? – It now includes Increasingly…. such a huge diversity of programs • trend towards ‘direct’ entry to PhD - particularly in STEM • Considerable variation within & between 2 nd & 3 rd cycles • diversity of professional & vocational masters degrees • blurring of distinctions – inclusion of research in professional • Often vocational and professional degrees NOT the major programs, more ‘coursework’ in research programs focus of graduate schools • ‘demand driven’ programs – industry, government, business, students… • Maybe Graduate Research Education would be better? • ‘just in time’ programs – often for limited periods • variation in tuition fees & level of scholarship support • In general trends in masters and doctoral programs similar across most countries with mature education systems ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008

  2. Mobility between degrees & streams Patterns of change Doctoral degrees Given this diversity… • the most ‘international’ degree – collaboration, exchange, • more flexible approach needed to allow movement co-supervision, international examiners between 2nd & 3rd cycles • broadening of the PhD – increase in professional, vocational, applied research programs • increasing need for mobility between streams – • increasing pressure for academic/research, professional & vocational - mobility of students, international recognition of programs • need clarity, flexibility & clear standards – ‘ equivalence ’ & - quality assurance - accountability (funders), equity (students), efficiency, effectiveness & transparency (in procedures) ‘ adequate preparation ’ are useful concepts - interdisciplinarity, global relevance • need policy & procedures in place to ensure BOTH quality - joint degrees & nimbleness - improving the ‘student’ experience • demands from employers & funding agencies for • need to anticipate the environment – 5 yrs, 10 yrs ahead professional development & transferable skills ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 The value of networks • Graduate education is seen increasingly as a shared & global & in developing educational systems enterprise - working together to provide the best! • The balance is shifting from institutional independence (the silo approach) to national and international cooperation • quality of 1 st & 2 nd cycles improving through effective collegial networks – especially the research doctorate – the most international of degrees • There is a need to develop partnerships in 2 nd & 3 rd cycle programs • For example – CGS (US), CAGS (Canada), UKCGE (UK), Aus DDOGS (Australia), Universitas 21 DDOGS (international network), EUA- CDE (Europe) – the newest – launched this year • Special purpose meetings & workshops – e.g. like this & the Banff/ Florence ‘Strategic Leaders’ meetings ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008

  3. A fundamental tension for Graduate Schools A fundamental tension for Graduate Schools ‘ Ontogeny’ of Grad Schools … (to paraphrase Louis Maheu 2008) Graduate schools are most effective when they are • BOTH a central unit AND a Faculty – administrative & History has shown us that academic • when they are new, lots of important quality work to do • ALWAYS different and need to be • leads to considerable improvement in equity, efficiency, • funding is also different effectiveness, transparency & consistency of quality • some universities recognise the dual role • then Faculties start to want to resume control (sometimes due to misguided ideas about $$s) & graduate dean also a vice provost (or equivalent) • and then transparency and Quality Assurance slowly declines…. ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ….at the workshop My philosophy on Graduate Schools…. • unashamedly student focussed • Any / all of the above….. and • must be value adding • Canada - similarities & differences • talk and listen to everyone • The big issues in Canada (& elsewhere) • develop carefully – do it once – get it right • Grad schools - grad programs - grad policy - effective roles & goals, quality, quality assurance, • it’s about quality, transparency, equity & consistency accountability….. • routinely evaluate & feedback for improvement ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008

  4. The Workshop Improving graduate education – • Canada - some similarities & differences national & international collaboration • The big issues in Canada (& elsewhere) The Workshop • Grad schools - grad programs - grad policy - effective roles and goals Dr. Barbara Evans - quality, quality assurance Dean of Graduate Studies - accountability….. etc. The University of British Columbia Canada ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 Canada Canada • no national quality or regulatory oversight - more • graduate school oversight usually doesn’t include independent than Aus & UK, less so than US professional degrees • program structures similar to the US – some aspects akin to • BUT well established graduate schools & an effective UK, e.g. require an external examiner for PhD national network – CAGS • graduate funding largely provincial (& institutional) rather • more welcoming to overseas students e.g…. than federal • tuition fees tend to be low by international comparisons • funding based on enrolments rather than completions • diverse strategies across Canada for both graduate • visas easier, can work, can stay after two years (don’t even programs & student support (less consistent than Aus but check if attending classes ? cf. Aus ) more than US) ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008

  5. Like many other countries, Canada has The big issues • seen an increase in graduate enrolments in recent years In Canada (& elsewhere) • particularly in professional and vocational masters • acceptability of ‘three-year degrees’ as preparation for entry • set challenging growth targets for graduate education in to graduate (masters) study (e.g. York & AUCC) face of declining ‘pipeline’ of students coming through • completion rates & times • a concentration of graduate research education in a small • provision of transferable skills training – Tri-agency proportion of ‘top’ RI universities statement on transferable skills; plus ethics, integrity & • need for increased student financial support to become plagiarism internationally competitive • mobility between different graduate programs (masters, • declining public funding of universities research doctoral and professional degrees) ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 The big issues Graduate School Roles Key roles for graduate schools include: • no oversight, quality assurance & accountability at a national level, but CAGS – > good practice (cf. Aus & UK) • proactive policy development & procedural oversight (10+ years time frame) • growth – recruitment & admission – domestic & international • being international & interdisciplinary – why & how? • ensuring transparency, efficiency, consistency & equity in • Joint PhDs graduate administrative procedures • indigenous participation – not great at the graduate level • program approval & review • funding – needs to be equitable, internationally competitive, • often NOT responsible for professional or vocational liveable masters/’doctorates’ • what about post-docs? ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008 ID-E Workshop - Berlin October 2008

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend