Implementing the NACTO USDG Lessons from Oakland Jamie Parks, City - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

implementing the nacto usdg
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Implementing the NACTO USDG Lessons from Oakland Jamie Parks, City - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Implementing the NACTO USDG Lessons from Oakland Jamie Parks, City of Oakland October 16, 2014 Latham Square Iconic Intersection Intersection of prominent corridors Historic architecture Cathedral Building Rotunda Building Gateway


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lessons from Oakland

Jamie Parks, City of Oakland October 16, 2014

Implementing the NACTO USDG

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Latham Square – Iconic Intersection

Intersection of prominent corridors Historic architecture

– Cathedral Building – Rotunda Building

Gateway to Uptown

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Latham Square – Confusing Intersection

Complex turning movements Poor pedestrian connectivity Usable pedestrian space limited

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Initial Design

Under design 2004-2012

– Many compromises along the way

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Large offset traffic signal

Initial Design

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Some new pedestrian space

Initial Design

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Latham Square – Re-imagined

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Pilot Plaza

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Pilot Plaza

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Design Vehicle

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Design Vehicle

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Design Vehicle

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Final Design

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Final Design

Consolidated pedestrian space

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Final Design

New crosswalk

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Final Design

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Telegraph Avenue Complete Street

Bicycle Crashes (2007-2011)

  • 66 total crashes

Pedestrian Crashes (2007-2011)

  • 68 total crashes

Severe Injury Crashes (2007-2011)

  • 16 severe injuries
  • 5 fatalities
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Multiple-Threat Crash Risk

slide-19
SLIDE 19

No Bike Facilities

Bicycling up 300% in past 15 years (130 bicycles per hour)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

5 lanes to 4 lanes

Minimum bike lane widths Continued multiple threat risk No speeding reduction No more center left-turn lane

slide-21
SLIDE 21

5 lanes to 4 lanes

Minimum bike lane widths Continued multiple threat risk No speeding reduction No more center left-turn lane

What about 3 lanes!?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Design Year = Today

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Evaluation - Transit

Maintain existing speeds through far-side stops

– Effective use of existing signal priority equipment

Eliminate bus-bike conflicts Improve stop amenities Reduce friction through buffered (not protected) bike lanes

slide-24
SLIDE 24

3-Lane Section

Buffered or protected bike lanes

– Remove travel lane in each direction

Transit boarding islands Right turn lanes at major intersections

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Transit Boarding Islands

Eliminate bus-bike weaving Provide space for shelters and benches

slide-26
SLIDE 26

What are these sharrows doing?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Making Tough Decisions

More congestion (and transit delay)? Remove on-street parking?

Location # of Spaces Percent Change 20th – 34th

  • 28
  • 15%

34th – 44th

  • 12
  • 8%

44th – 51st

  • 2
  • 3%

51st – 57th

  • 43
  • 40%

Total

  • 85
  • 16%

Estimated change in parking supply

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Implementing the Guide

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Step1: Write a Letter

Necessary but insufficient

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Step 2: Staff Training

Attend webinars Cities for Cycling Road Show

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Step 2: Staff Training

Talk about real-life projects and issues

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Step 3: Integrate into Standards

Revise standard details Specific (and strong) policy language Make it easy!

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Questions?

Thank you!

Jamie Parks Complete Street Program Manager City of Oakland (510) 238-6613 jparks@oaklandnet.com