Impacts of replacing a fixed transit line by a Demand Responsive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
impacts of replacing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Impacts of replacing a fixed transit line by a Demand Responsive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 25, 2023 246 likes •446 views

Impacts of replacing a fixed transit line by a Demand Responsive Transit system Felipe Coutinho Niels van Oort Zoi Christoforou Mara Alonso-Gonzlez Oded Cats Serge Hoogendoorn @Niels_van_Oort #Thredbo16 1 Contribution to the

slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Impacts of replacing a fixed transit line by a Demand Responsive Transit system

Felipe Coutinho Niels van Oort Zoi Christoforou María Alonso-González Oded Cats Serge Hoogendoorn

@Niels_van_Oort #Thredbo16

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Contribution to the optimal mix?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Objectives

  • What’s in it for passenger and society?
  • Wider impacts : 5xE

Van Oort et al. (2017)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

DRT in NL: BrengFLEX

Alonso-Gonzalez et al. (2018)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Understanding and learning

  • f DRT impacts

Understanding -> Predicting - > Improving Supply ánd demand perspective

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

(Potential) user perspective

LC 1:

MaaS-ready individuals LC 2: Mobility neutrals

LC 3: Technological car lovers

LC 4:

Multimodal PT supporters

LC 5:

Anti new-mobility individuals

Alonso-Gonzalez et al. (2019) Bronsvoort et al. (2020)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

DRT pilot Amsterdam: Mokumflex

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

December 2017-December 2018

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

60 min prior booking 15 min +- pick up

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Impacts

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Ridership and (estimated) costs

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

0,01 0,08 0,71 0,88 1,59 1,62

Veh*km/ pass * km

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Population’s and user perception

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

NB

  • Noise
  • Traffic safety
  • Space occupation
  • Etc.

Other impacts

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Conclusion/discussion

  • Evaluation of actual replacement of fixed transit by DRT
  • Evaluation of wider impacts
  • Ridership drop
  • Efficiency increase -> costs and societal impacts

Failure or success? Lessons learnt

  • Not black and white results
  • Supporting discussions of objectives
  • DRT is more cost-efficient, but sufficiently?

Contribution to optimal mix?

  • Modal shift?
  • Social exclusion?

Discussion

  • DRT specific vs. Specific operations?
  • Sustainable business case? Rural vs Urban
  • Is DRT suitable for dealing with (very) low demand?
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Alonso-González, M. J., Liu, T., Cats, O., Van Oort, N., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2018). The Potential of Demand-Responsive Transport as a Complement to Public Transport: An Assessment Framework and an Empirical Evaluation. Transportation Research Record, 2672(8), 879–889. Alonso Gonzalez M.J., Hoogendoorn-Lanser S., van Oort N., Cats O., and Hoogendoorn S. (2019) “Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service – A Latent Class Cluster Analysis of attitudes”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice (under review) Bronsvoort, K., M.J. Alonso-González, N. Van Oort, E. Molin, S. Hoogendoorn (2020), Preferences towards Bus Alternatives in Rural Areas of the Netherlands: a Stated Choice Experiment, TRB annual meeting (submitted) Van Oort, N., R.A.J. vd Bijl, F.C.A. Verhoof (2017), The wider benefits of high quality public transport for cities, European Transport Conference, Barcelona.

Literature

http://nielsvanoort.weblog.tudelft.nl/

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

N.vanOort@TUDelft.nl Presentations and papers: http://nielsvanoort.weblog.tudelft.nl/ www.smartPTlab.tudelft.nl

Questions / Contact