Impact of C3 on transplant
- utcome
Impact of C3 on transplant outcome Steven Sacks MRC Centre for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Impact of C3 on transplant outcome Steven Sacks MRC Centre for Transplantation King s College London Ancient origin of C3 -450m -350m Fujita, Nature Rev. Immunol. 2002 ..well conserved thiol group C3a C3a C3 C3 S C = O C3b C3b
Fujita, Nature Rev. Immunol. 2002
C3 C3
C3a C3a
C3b C3b C = O S C = O NH SH
Activating surface Activating surface
APC APC
C3b
Bacterium Bacterium C3
C3a
MACRO
OPSONISATION OPSONISATION
C3b
Bacterium Bacterium C3
C3a
PMNL
INFLAMMATION & IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION & IMMUNITY
C3b
Bacterium Bacterium C3
C5b-9
C5,6,7,8,9
C3a
LYSIS LYSIS
C5a
C3b C5b iC3b
C3d
C3b
Host cell Host cell INACTIVATION OF C3 INACTIVATION OF C3
Factor I
Host cell Host cell
C5 C5b-9
C6,7,8,9
FAILURE TO INACTIVATE C3 FAILURE TO INACTIVATE C3
C5a
PMNL
Regulator of complement
Donor Transplanted organ Donor organ 300x 1000x
Tliney - rat Naesens 2009 Dammans 2010
C3 mRNA Complement Tubule necrosis
5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 12 50 10 0 15 0 W T - W T (n=6 ) C 3d e f - W T (n =6)
Native nephrectomy ** p < 0 .0 5 * p < 0 .0 5 Day post-transplantation
Creatinine ( µmol/L)
Farrar, FASEB J 2006
7 50 100 C3+/+ donor (n=10) 8 10 12 14 C3-/- donor (n=10) 20 40 60 80 100 Days after transplantation % Animal Survival
B6 donor kidney into B10.BR recipients* or BALB/c recipients+
*Nat Med 2002; +Lin 2006
2 4 6 8 10 *** 3H TdR (cpm x 10
4)
5 10 15 20 25 WT C5aR-/- ** Donor strain DC IFN-γ (ng/ml)
J Immunol 2006 Blood 2006 & 2009 Mol Immunol 2011
C3a, C5a Antigen-presenting cell of the donor
C3aR/C5aR
Mouse: J Immunol 2006 Blood 2006, 2009 *Lalli, Blood 2008 Human: Mol Immunol 2011
complement components by activated APC
complement components by activated APC
activation
activation
signalling increases IL-12, MHC II, CD40, CD80
signalling increases IL-12, MHC II, CD40, CD80
expansion/survival and cytokine release*
expansion/survival and cytokine release*
H-2b mouse anti H-2k IgG response
Marsh, Transplantation 2001
Fang 1998 Dempsey 1996
Contribution of C3
Peritubular C5b-9 correlates with chronic kidney disease C3F/S polymorphism associates with chronic allograft nephropathy Capillary C4d associates with chronic antibody mediated rejection
Wild type (C3) Wild type (HE) C3 deficient (HE)
Sheerin, FASEBJ 2008
Donor Recipient
DAF C3 or receptor CR1 analogue C3a or C5a Anti-C5
Donor organ
Reducing the expression of C3 mRNA in renal tissue reduces
ischaemia reperfusion injury and offers a new therapeutic
Zheng, Transplantation 2006
Epithelial sheet
Native CR1 Cloned fragment Tailed Membrane- inserted
C3b
Reduces post-transplant acute renal failure Reduces chronic vascular damage to 20wks Donor organs are less immunogenic at 2wks Increases organ viability after prolonged ischaemia
Patel JASN 2006
10 20 30 20 40 60 80 100 A PT 07 0 (n= 22) C
19) p = .0 3 63.6% 26.3%
D ays post tx
% Graft survival
Days post transplant
Recovery after 16h cold ischaemia
Donor organ treatment with Mirococept (APT070) or control No safety issues (10mg dose) No antibodies against APT070 Small amounts of serum APT070 No systemic inhibition of complement (C3, C4, CH50)
n=2 n=2 n=12 n=4
Baseline-adjusted creatinine AUC (d1-14) Molecular Immunology 2007
Efficacy of Mirococept for Preventing Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Allografts MRC funded 2011 Double-blind randomized Phase II study of Mirococept v. perfusion control 280 patients in each of treatment and control arms Main endpoint: incidence of Delayed Graft Function Adaptive design to explore dose-response over a range of 5 to 25mg Multi-centre study in the UK Likely to recruit first patients in 2012
C1q C1r C1s
Antibody
Cell surface
MBL/ficolin MASP1 MASP2
Mannose
Cell surface
C4 C4 C2 C2 C3 C3
Classical pathway Lectin pathway
Antigen
(Heart and bowel: PNAS 2011)