From: Robert Oshima To: Senaida Poole Cc: Joan Venticinque; Rose Marie Colbert; Lori Marx-Rubiner; Katherine McKenzie; senaida.poole@gmail.com Subject: Re: Looking for comments on Investigator-advocate collaboration timeline Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:43:45 PM Attachments: Slide suggestion RGO 11_18_16.pptx
If this curriculum is targeted for investigators, I think you may need an early “ buy in” slide before explaining how advocates are involved in the proposal process. Attached is rough idea. Somewhere else it would be great to have documentation available about concrete examples. As I mentioned in our meeting, examples of outstanding and unacceptable proposals would likely be very useful to investigators. How exacting that gets incorporated in current plans is not clear to me. Finally, if there are good examples of institutional support or organization, investigators could take those examples to their own institutes for consideration. By the way, congratulation on the success of improving the advocate involvement as indicated in the data evaluation document. Robert Oshima Professor Emeritus Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute 10901 North Torrey Pines Road La Jolla, CA 92037 rgoshima@SBPdiscovery.org 858 646 3147 On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Senaida Poole <senaida.poole@ucop.edu> wrote: Joan, is it possible to draft this type of graphic for “during funded project”? Best, Senaida
From: Joan Venticinque [mailto:jv.design@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 7:32 PM To: Senaida Poole Cc: Rose Marie Colbert; Lori Marx-Rubiner; rgoshima@SBPdiscovery.org; Katherine
McKenzie; senaida.poole@gmail.com
Subject: Looking for comments on Investigator-advocate collaboration timeline
Hello Everyone, I did a couple of quick timeline graphics for investigator-advocate collaborations
- n the LOIs and full proposals. I look forward to your comments at our Advocacy