identity and streams
play

Identity and Streams Washington DC, Martin Thomson requestIdentity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

W3C stuff 2014-05 Interim, Identity and Streams Washington DC, Martin Thomson requestIdentity Reminder: RTCConfiguration parameter with three values: yes, ifconfigured, no. Originally included in support of


  1. W3C stuff 2014-05 Interim, � Identity and Streams Washington DC, � Martin Thomson

  2. requestIdentity ❖ Reminder: RTCConfiguration parameter with three values: “yes”, “ifconfigured”, “no”. � ❖ Originally included in support of browsers having IdP configuration � ❖ We don’t need this, does anyone else?

  3. Stream Isolation ❖ A receiver should soon be able to distinguish between streams that are isolated at the source and regular streams Sending Receiving peerIdentity Browser Browser isolation too encrypted, � isolated peer authenticated

  4. Isolation Scope ❖ gUM scopes the peerIdentity property to all tracks in the resulting stream � ❖ Tracks can be separated, but they retain the property � ❖ RTCPeerConnection scope is all tracks � ❖ Any isolated track causes a peer to negotiate isolation on all DTLS connections in the PC � ❖ All remote tracks created by that RTCPeerConnection - on both sides - will therefore be isolated � ❖ Alternative: scope to the track or the DTLS connection � ❖ Both create protocol-layer challenges, not recommended

  5. Problem ❖ What do we do when tracks aren’t all isolated? � � ❖ Option 1: fail to create a session � � ❖ Option 2: force all streams on the remote side to become isolated too

  6. Option 1 ❖ Fail if there are both isolated and non-isolated tracks � ❖ A mismatch causes DTLS to fail to negotiate Browser Browser peerIdentity A B not isolated isolated Session failure

  7. Advantages of Option 1 ❖ All or nothing: either all tracks are isolated, or all tracks are not isolated � ❖ Enables authenticated provenance for media based solely on isolation properties � ❖ If media is isolated, we can say that it comes from the authenticated peer and no one else � ❖ Without this, any non-isolated media can’t be identified as such at the receiving end

  8. Additional Proposal for Option 1 ❖ Request that the IETF WG create a marker in the SDP that would allow the API to detect a failure � ❖ …where one side has isolation and the other does not � ❖ If isolation is in the remote SDP and we aren’t isolated, either: � ❖ A) Fail setRemoteDescription (easy) � ❖ B) Check if local streams can be isolated, and isolate them, otherwise, fail setRemoteDescription (bleargh)

  9. Option 2 ❖ Make all tracks isolated if any track is isolated � ❖ A mismatch permits DTLS to negotiate in isolated mode isolated not isolated Browser Browser A B isolated isolated Session created

  10. Advantages of Option 2 ❖ No failures

  11. Isolation Timing ❖ Tracks can be added after establishing a session � ❖ An isolated track, added to a non-isolated RTCPeerConnection MUST send black/silence/null � ❖ Tracks can change isolation properties � ❖ A track that becomes isolated after RTCPeerConnection is opened MUST send black/silence/null

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend