identify strategies that prevent and mitigate rear ended
play

Identify strategies that prevent and mitigate rear ended and side - PDF document

9/16/2015 Strategies to Prevent, Reduce, and Mitigate Bus Collisions Status Report Sept. 16, 2015 Florida Transit Safety Network Meeting Ft. Myers Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Study Objective


  1. 9/16/2015 Strategies to Prevent, Reduce, and Mitigate Bus Collisions Status Report Sept. 16, 2015  Florida Transit Safety Network Meeting Ft. Myers Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Study Objective • Identify strategies that prevent and mitigate rear ‐ ended and side impact collisions – Collision documentation and reporting – Risk mgt. practices to managed liability – Training, policies, procedures – Rear end bus treatments – Paint schemes and graphics 2 1

  2. 9/16/2015 Tasks • Task 1: Online Survey – 17 transit agencies responded – Questions related to record retention, documentation and reporting • Task 2: Case Studies – Site Visits to 17 agencies • Task 3 Synthesis and Results 3 Agencies Visited Already Visited To Be Visited RTS LYNX VOTRAN Indian River StarMetro St. Johns PSTA SCAT (Brevard) JTA MDT BCT Palm Tran MCAT LeeTran SCAT (Sarasota) HART PCPT 4 2

  3. 9/16/2015 Topic Areas Discussed • Accident investigation process • Determination of preventability • Use of video footage • Sharing of accident data w/in agency • Use of accident data for training • GIS mapping of accidents 5 6 3

  4. 9/16/2015 7 This study is like… 8 4

  5. 9/16/2015 I ’d like to accuse… It was the rookie bus driver, Colonel Mustard, and he was rear ‐ ended on rainy day by a out of state tourist while driving a bus with lots of advertising on the back, and he forgot to turn on his 4 ‐ way flashers. 9 How ever, no sm oking gun so far 10 5

  6. 9/16/2015 Seasonal Variation of Accidents 2 0 0 9 -2 0 1 3 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Winter Spring Summer Fall All Collisions Rear ‐ ended Collisions SideCollision/Side Swipe 11 W eather Conditions All Collisions Clear Cloudy Foggy Clear, 86% Raining Rear ‐ ended Collisions Side Impact Collisions Clear, Clear, 87% 86% 12 6

  7. 9/16/2015 No geographic trends Source: Regional Transit System 13 Som e correlation to revenue m iles 140 This means revenue R² = 0.4337 miles account for 120 about 43% of the variation in rear ‐ ended 100 collisions. The Rear ‐ ended Collisions remaining 57% is due 80 to other factors. 60 40 20 0 ‐ 50,000,000 100,000,000 150,000,000 200,000,000 Revenue Miles 14 7

  8. 9/16/2015 Som e correlation to revenue m iles 70 This means revenue R² = 0.5787 miles account for 60 about 58% of the variation in side impact 50 collisions. The Side Impact Collisions remaining 42% is due 40 to other factors. 30 20 10 0 ‐ 50,000,000 100,000,000 150,000,000 200,000,000 Revenue Miles 15 No correlation to rear advertising Rear ‐ Ended Collisions per 100,000 Miles SCAT .02 MDT .02 16 8

  9. 9/16/2015 No correlation to rear advertising Rear ‐ Ended Collisions per 100,000 Miles SCAT .02 LeeTran .14 17 No correlation to operator’s years of experience Years of No. of Rear ‐ Percent Experience ended Collisions Less than 2 Years 21 27% 2 to 5 Years 10 13% More than 5 Years 48 61% Total 79 100% Source: BCT; data was compiled from 8/2014 to 7/2015. 18 9

  10. 9/16/2015 Observations from the Site Visits • Collision investigation process is very similar across agencies. • Variation in preventability assessment – HART: Mgr. of Safety and Security – Sarasota: 4 ‐ person committee (2 from mgt. and 2 from union) – LeeTran: Deputy Director and Senior Ops Supervisor 19 Observations from the Site Visits • Most rear ‐ ended collisions occurred when the bus was already stopped. • “I didn’t see the bus,” most common excuse heard by supervisors. • Video footage standard part of investigation – Not all agencies have telemetry with videos – No agency has rear facing cameras that could capture moment of impact 20 10

  11. 9/16/2015 Observations from the Site Visits • All agencies report monitoring collision trends to inform training and adjusting stops. • Communication is key – PSTA places samples of broken equipment in the drivers’ room with the price tag – RTS and SCAT has periodic “all hands” meeting with the director – RTS has FYI form drivers can use to inform mgt. about any unsafe conditions 21 Observations from the Site Visits • LeeTran reported many rear ‐ ended collisions occur in less urban parts of service area where speed limits are higher. – Worth investigating further. • Need to address distracted driving – CUTR has received feedback from agencies in support of statewide campaign 22 11

  12. 9/16/2015 Statew ide Cam paign? We already have… Why not a similar campaign for buses? 23 Next Steps • Complete last 4 site visits by Oct. 16 (tentative) – LYNX – Indian River – St. Johns – SCAT (Brevard) • Draft Final Report by Dec. 25, 2015 • Final Report by March 25, 2016 24 12

  13. 9/16/2015 Contact I nform ation Brian Pessaro, AICP Senior Research Associate Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida (813) 974 ‐ 5113 pessaro@cutr.usf.edu 25 Accident 1 26 13

  14. 9/16/2015 Accident 2 27 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend