Id Idaho RTI Data Based Decision Making March 2015 Welcome Elb - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

id idaho rti
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Id Idaho RTI Data Based Decision Making March 2015 Welcome Elb - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Id Idaho RTI Data Based Decision Making March 2015 Welcome Elb lbow Part rtner Dis iscussio ion What comes to min ind when you hear r the phrase Data-Based Decision Making ? Why Data-Based Decis ision Making The goal is to identify


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Id Idaho RTI Data Based Decision Making March 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Welcome

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Elb lbow Part rtner Dis iscussio ion

What comes to min ind when you hear r the phrase

Data-Based Decision Making?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why Data-Based Decis ision Making

  • The goal is to identify those who are at-risk for long-term

serious consequences.

  • RTI/MTSS is an important mechanism to enable general and

special education to work proactively and collaboratively together with the goal of preventing children from exiting school without the academic skills they need to lead successful, healthy lives.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Thin ings to Remember

  • Good data IN… Good data OUT

– Know where your data came from and the validity of that data

  • ALL instructional and curriculum decisions

should be based on DATA.

  • Keep it Simple and Efficient!
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Data-Based Decision Making: Types of f Decisions

  • Identify students who need additional assessment and

instruction

  • Evaluate effectiveness of core curriculum and instruction
  • Allocate resources
  • Evaluate effectiveness of instruction programs for target

groups (e.g., ELL, Title 1)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Data-Based Decision Making: The Basics

1. Analyze data at all levels of RTI and all levels of prevention (e.g., Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3) 2. Establish routines and procedures for making decisions including decision rules for assessing student progress 3. Use data to compare and contrast the adequacy of the core curriculum and the effectiveness of different instructional and behavioral strategies 4. Establish routines and procedures for sharing data

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Cycle of f Assessment at a Gla lance

D D U U U

Assessment Data: Universal Screening/Early Warning System Progress Monitoring Diagnostic Formative classroom assessment

D D D D

U

D School Over School begins

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Universal Screening vs. . Progress Monitoring

– Universal screening:

  • Administered to all children at all levels
  • Brief measure is useable for decision making.
  • Its use is limited; only determines who might be at-risk.

– Progress monitoring:

  • Collected frequently
  • Data is used to make decisions in determining student’s

responsiveness.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Processing Question How might the graphic that we just discussed be of assistance to refine your current cycle of data analysis and data based decision making?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ele lementary ry Data Based Decision Makin ing Meetings

What are the various types of data meetings? – District Leadership Team Meetings – School Leadership Team Data Meetings – Grade Level Team Data Meetings – Individual Student Focused Team Meetings

  • Progress Monitoring
  • Pre-referral
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Secondary ry Data Based Decision Making Meetings

What are the various types of data meetings? – District Leadership Team Meetings – School Leadership Team Meetings – Department/Cross Department Team Meetings – Individual Student Focused Team Meetings

  • Progress Monitoring
  • Pre-referral
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Purpose of f each meeting

Dis istr trict Le Leadership Team Meetings

  • Analyze the effectiveness of the system, diagnose

potential needs for adjustment and design adjustments & support needed Sch chool Le Leadership Team Meetings

  • Analyze the effectiveness of the system, diagnose

potential needs for adjustment and design adjustments & support needed

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Purpose of f each meeting

Ele lementary ry Grade le level l Team Meetin ing

  • Analyze effectiveness of core instruction and design

improvements, diagnose potential needs and design adjustments.

  • Analyze effectiveness of intervention system, diagnose

potential needs and design adjustments.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Purpose of f each meeting

Secondary ry Department/Cross Department Team Meetings

  • Analyze effectiveness of core instruction and design

strategies for improvement

  • Analyze effectiveness of intervention system, diagnose

potential needs and design adjustments.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Im Improved student outcomes

  • There is a collaboration among teachers to

search for what works in the classroom:

– More communication among teachers – Demonstrating strategies for each other – Going to look for new techniques together when a strategy isn’t effective

  • This process changes the culture of the school

in the way teachers deliver instruction.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Purpose of f meeting

– Individual Student Focused team meetings

  • Analyze the potential need for intervention
  • Analyze effectiveness of interventions
  • Consider adjustments that need to be made:

– instructionally, structurally, frequency, duration

  • Pre-referral
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Handout

In Initial Meeting Guide

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A Reminder

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Decrease group size.
  • Increase frequency or duration of sessions.
  • Change interventionist to someone with greater

expertise.

  • Break tasks into smaller steps, compared to less

intensive levels of instruction or intervention.

  • Provide concrete learning opportunities (including role

play and use of manipulatives).

  • Use explicit instruction and modeling with repetition to

teach a concept or demonstrate steps in a process.

In Intensify fying In Interventions

National Center on Intensive Intervention

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Co Consid ider tw two ty types of f in interv rventio ion change:

  • Quantitative changes

to setting or format

  • Qualitative changes

to delivery

In Intervention Adaptation/Change

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • In

Increase intervention frequency, length of sessions, or duration.

  • Decrease group size.

Try quantitative change(s) first…

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Skill level of interventionist
  • Content delivery
  • How students respond
  • The amount of adult feedback and error correction students

receive

  • Frequency/specificity of checks for retention
  • The materials, curriculum, or whole intervention

Consider qualitative changes second…

2 3

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Handout

In Intensify fying In Interv rventions Checklist

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Team Dis iscussion

Team Discussion

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Data Analy lysis Meetings: Pla lanning for Success

  • Determine the goal of the meeting
  • Action planning based on benchmark screening data
  • Monitoring of progress
  • Reflection of progress/future planning
  • Gather appropriate data
  • Ensure that all necessary contributors will be

present

  • Teachers
  • Intervention providers
  • Leadership
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Poin ints to dis iscuss wit ith data team

  • For Tier 1:

– What do the data show us? – Are all of our students where we need them to be? – What goals should be set? – What can the teachers collectively do for us to meet our goals and to make change? – How can we use our core curriculum resources and instructional strategies to make change?

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Poin ints to dis iscuss wit ith data team

  • For Tier 2, examine the individuals:

– How can we group students collectively across different sections? – What are their common needs? – How can we deliver specialized instruction as a group?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Steps aft fter analyzing screening data

  • Data team meets and identifies bottom 10th- 25th

percentile at each grade level.

  • Group students according to skill area deficits.
  • Identify intervention and progress monitoring tools to be

used, set goals, and expected growth rates.

  • Identify an interventionist for each group of students.
slide-30
SLIDE 30

An Example

slide-31
SLIDE 31

How to determine a student’s responsiveness

  • From the data collected, look at specific

information about the student:

– How long has the student been in our system? – To what extent have we been providing effective instructional practices? – What has our intervention been, and has it been showing progress?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Handout

Ask Clarify fying Questions

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Data points determine a change in in in interv rvention

An intervention needs time to work:

  • You need a minimum of 3-4 weeks and 8 data points

before you decide to abandon the intervention for a new

  • ne.

Examine the data trail:

  • Whenever we see four consecutive data points below the

goal line, research tells us that it’s highly unlikely that this student will achieve the year end goal. It’s time to make an instructional change.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Usin ing data vs. . in intuition

  • A “gut-feel” approach does not work:

– If decisions are made on an intuitive basis, you will not receive the greater outcomes achieved from using data.

  • The data gives specific information on how well

instruction is meeting the needs of students:

– This can be very encouraging and empowering.

  • The data-based approach allows for more efficient and

effective use of resources, so students get what they need when they need it.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Cir ircle of f In Inquiry ry

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Data Summit Protocol

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Sequence to consider

Decide on the right questions first Then select the reports to answer those questions

Then analyze the data

AIMSweb report handout

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Clo losing