ICAO Operations Panel RNAV / Ground-based Charting Symbol Hierarchy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

icao operations panel rnav ground based charting symbol
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ICAO Operations Panel RNAV / Ground-based Charting Symbol Hierarchy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ICAO Operations Panel RNAV / Ground-based Charting Symbol Hierarchy OVERVIEW NEED FOR CHARTING SYMBOL HIERARCHY HISTORY OF U.S. DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS CURRENT U.S. CHARTING HIERARCHY ICAO PANEL COORDINATION TO DATE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ICAO Operations Panel RNAV / Ground-based Charting Symbol Hierarchy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OVERVIEW

  • NEED FOR CHARTING SYMBOL HIERARCHY
  • HISTORY OF U.S. DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS
  • CURRENT U.S. CHARTING HIERARCHY
  • ICAO PANEL COORDINATION TO DATE
  • DISCUSSION
slide-3
SLIDE 3

NEED FOR CHARTING SYMBOL HIERARCHY

  • Uses standard symbols on all charts to distinguish fixes
  • riginally defined using ground-based NAVAIDs
  • Harmonizes paper chart and electronic symbols
  • Shows non-RNAV capable aircraft the fixes they can

define with ground-based NAVAIDs

  • Provides greater utility and flexibility for Air Traffic

Control, especially in the enroute environment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

HISTORY of U.S. DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS

  • Aeronautical Charting Forum (RNAV Transition

Group) began study in 2001

  • ALPA, FedEx pilot unions endorse new chart

symbols

  • RNAV Transition Group presents Charting

Hierarchy to Aeronautical Charting Forum (2002)

  • U.S. government and industry charting agencies

adopt symbology on charts in (month? 2002?)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Current U.S. Charting Hierarchy

  • Triangle = Fix
  • NAVAID = NAVAID symbol
  • 4-pointed STAR = RNAV

waypoint

  • Open = “on request” reporting

point

  • Filled = “compulsory” reporting

point

  • Circle = Fly-over
  • No circle = Fly-by
  • No nested symbols (unlike

current use in Annex 4)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Example Departure Chart (U.S.)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Same Example Chart (Annex 4)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ICAO Panel Coordination

  • Working paper presented to OCP and discussed

extensively

– OCP-13 recommended review by multidisciplinary group

  • ANC agreed and Secretariat referred paper to

AISMAPSG

  • Working paper presented to AISMAPSG

– AISMAPSG did not review in detail because it felt OPSP should review first and make recommendation

  • Working paper prepared for OPSP WHL-3
slide-9
SLIDE 9

DISCUSSION

  • Working paper recommends changes to Annex 4 for

enroute and instrument procedure chart symbols

  • Paper also recommends use of hierarchy to identify

ground-based fixes and NAVAIDs without use of waypoint symbol

  • OCP and AISMAPSG awaiting recommendation of

OPSP on use of charting hierarchy

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ICAO Operations Panel RNAV / Ground-based Charting Symbol Hierarchy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Recommended Electronic Symbols

  • Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE ARP

5289) recommended electronic symbols: – Triangle for an intersection – Four-pointed star for a waypoint – No specific symbol for “reporting point.”

  • RTCA SC-181 adopted SAE electronic symbol

set for inclusion in DO 257