Management Plan (HIAMP) Page 153 Agenda Item 6 Code of Practice - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

management plan hiamp
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Management Plan (HIAMP) Page 153 Agenda Item 6 Code of Practice - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Highways Infrastructure Asset Management Plan (HIAMP) Page 153 Agenda Item 6 Code of Practice Revision Lincolnshire Highways Asset Management Key Documents Highways Asset Management Policy Page 154 Highways Asset Management Strategy


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Highways Infrastructure Asset Management Plan (HIAMP)

Code of Practice Revision

Page 153

Agenda Item 6

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Lincolnshire Highways Asset

Management Key Documents

Highways Asset Management Policy Highways Asset Management Strategy Highways Asset Management Plan

Page 154

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background to the HIAMP

  • “Well Maintained Highways” – Code of Practice

(July 2005)

  • Prescriptive document
  • “Highways Maintenance Plan” prior to 2015
  • 2015 review produced Highways Asset

Management Plan to align with Policy and Strategy

  • New Code of Practice “Well Managed Highway

Infrastructure” introduced in October 2016

Page 155

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Review

  • Adjusting the Highways Asset Management

Plan to match Central government requests and maintain Local Best practice

– Align to DfT funding streams – Full Risk based approach (where appropriate) – Legal Relevance and Repercussions – Full Risk based approach (where appropriate)

Page 156

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Priority Areas

Adoption of a Risk-Based Approach A Network Hierarchy Review Engagement and Communication with Stakeholders Consistency with Other Authorities Page 157

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Code of Practice Structure

  • Overarching Principles
  • Highways
  • Structures
  • Street Lighting

Page 158

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Risk-based Approach

  • The management of current and future risks

associated with assets should be embedded within the approach to asset management. Strategic, tactical and operational risks should be included as should appropriate mitigation measures (HIAMG Recommendation 11 - Risk Management).

  • ‘Prevention is better than Cure’

Page 159

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Hierarchy Review

Current Carriageway Hierarchies

  • Hierarchy 1 - some of the busiest A roads
  • Hierarchy 2 - some A roads, some B roads
  • Hierarchy 3 - some B roads, some C roads
  • Hierarchy 4/5 - some C roads, all unclassified

roads

Page 160

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Hierarchy Review

LCC Local Standard National Standard Major Road Network Strategic Route Hierarchy 1 Strategic Route Hierarchy 2 Main Distributor Hierarchy 3 Secondary Distributor Hierarchy 4 Link Roads Hierarchy 5 Link Roads Hierarchy 6 Local Access Road Hierarchy 7 Minor Roads Hierarchy 8 Minor Roads

Proposed new Hierarchies

Page 161

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Hierarchy Review

  • Base of our defect

repair regime and

  • ur inspection

regime

  • Align to a risk-based

approach

  • Major Route

Network

Page 162

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hierarchy 4

Page 163

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Hierarchy 5

Page 164

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Hierarchy 6

Page 165

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Hierarchy 7

Page 166

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Hierarchy 8

Page 167

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Inspection Frequencies

Hierarchy Carriageway Inspections per annum MRN, 1 12 2 4 3 4 4, 5, 6 1 7 Once every three years 8 Once every five years (un-metalled carriageways)

Page 168

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Response Times

Carriageways*

Categories (mm = depth/height) Major Road Network Hierarchy 1 Hierarchy 2 Hierarchy 3 Hierarchy 4 Hierarchy 5 Hierarchy 6 Hierarchy 7 Hierarchy 8 Ironwork collapsed / missing / broken 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours Ironwork raised / sunken greater than 25mm adjacent a hierarchy 1 and 2 footways 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 90 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Ironwork raised / sunken greater than 40mm 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 90 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Ironwork raised/sunken less than 25mm Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Pothole greater than 25mm adjacent a hierarchy 1 or 2 footway 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 28 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Pothole greater than 40mm 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 28 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Pothole less than 40mm Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Other abrupt level difference greater than 40mm 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 28 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Edge damage greater than 40mm breaking edge white line 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 90 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Edge damage greater than 40mm encroaching more than 100mm into metalled surface (no white line) 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 90 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Edge damage less than 40mm Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Missing/Defective road studs Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Severe loss of chippings on carriageway surface Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Surface issues (non-winter maintenance) Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme

Page 169

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Response Times

Pothole greater than 40mm 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 28 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Pothole less than 40mm Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Other abrupt level difference greater than 40mm 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 28 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Edge damage greater than 40mm breaking edge white line 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 90 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme Edge damage greater than 40mm encroaching more than 100mm into metalled surface (no white line) 24 hours 24 hours 7 days 7 days 28 days 90 days 90 days Potential Planned Programme Potential Planned Programme

Categories (mm = depth/height) Major Road Network Hierarchy 1 Hierarchy 2 Hierarchy 3 Hierarchy 4 Hierarchy 5 Hierarchy 6 Hierarchy 7 Hierarchy 8

Page 170

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Response Times

  • New 90 Day response
  • (de-)Escalation Process
  • Risk Matrix

Probability → Impact ↓ Very Low (1) Low (2) Medium (3) High (4) Negligible (1) 1 2 3 4 Low (2) 2 4 6 8 Noticeable (3) 3 6 9 12 High (4) 4 8 12 16 Response Category 2 (L) Category 2 (M) Category 2 (H) Category 1

Page 171

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Street Lighting

  • Acceptance inspections
  • Increase corrugated

steel pipe and concrete pipe inspections

  • Evidencing their risk-

based approach

  • Little change bar
  • perational

recommendations from Scrutiny Review

Structures & Street Lighting

Structures

Page 172

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Adjacent Authorities & Stakeholders

  • Internal understanding and appreciation
  • External consultation through various working

groups around the East Midlands and nationally

  • Consultation with adjacent Authorities
  • Consistency across Boundaries

Page 173

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Outstanding actions Completion

Develop Carriageways Hierarchies

October 2019

Develop Footway Hierarchies

January 2019

Boundary Alignment

October 2018

Adjust Inspection Regime

October 2018

Response Times Development

October 2018

Adapting the Winter Service Plan

October 2018

Resilient Network

October 2018

Standards and Enforcement Plan

April 2019

Adjust Safety/service inspections

April 2019

Develop a data management Strategy

October 2019

Drainage Asset collation

April 2019

Street Lighting

April 2019

Update Highways Asset Management Policy & Strategy

April 2019

Page 174

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Conclusion

  • Proactive Asset maintenance
  • Risk-based approach
  • Summary of Changes document
  • Deadline of October 2018 to implement Code
  • f Practice Changes

Page 175

slide-24
SLIDE 24

This page is intentionally left blank