IAAC Meeting JUNE 2020 Agenda Messages from NILOA Excellence in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
IAAC Meeting JUNE 2020 Agenda Messages from NILOA Excellence in Assessment Designation Submission Assessment Reporting Update IPAR Website Wrap up of 2018-19 Reporting SACSCOC Update Current status for
JUNE 2020
Messages from NILOA
Assessment Reporting Update
Wrap up of 2018-19 Reporting
Current status for educational programs
I-ARC Process for Fall 2020
General Education Assessment Update
Modifications to the GE Humanities data collection
Fine Arts Results
Excellence in Assessment Designation Submission
IPAR Website
SACSCOC Update
QEP
Institutional Effectiveness: Strategic Planning
Surveys and Course Evaluations
This is not a test of online education. This is
a triage situation of survival entailing an emergency move to distance or remote instruction.
Compassion not compliance should drive
decisions at this time. Our decisions in support of students should drive the guidance, regulatory response, and policy decisions – not the other way around.
Listen to students and be flexible. Learning
is compromised and the semester/term has an asterisks next to it for everyone – faculty and staff as well as students. It’s not about learning online; it’s about learning in a global pandemic crisis.
What from this term will students need to apply in the summer and fall and how are we setting them up for learning success in rethinking those courses and assignments? Return to Basics: What are the learning outcomes that students need from this course that they will apply elsewhere? Why does this course even exist? What learning that has occurred prior can we build upon? How can we consider this a flipped semester or a flipped summer – where students learn about a concept over the summer and then apply and practice it when they return. (Labs for instance) How can we think about learning from a program perspective? Where does this fit into overall curriculum?
Units report by May/June 15, Aug 1 IARC completes reviews by Oct 15 Feedback sent to IAAC reps, dept chairs and units Updates in Nuventive Improve by Dec 15 IA reruns 2019-20 reports; archived for SACS in January
We are here. But we are going to start back here!
89 units were reviewed by either the I-
ARC or COB ARC
We calculated the percentage of No
responses by unit (Number of Nos divided by possible number of Nos).
Range from 0% No to 93% No. Grouped units: 18 units with less than 10% No. 14 of these units did not need to
make any updates.
37 units with more than 40% No –
Received a targeted email with request to meet for consultation.
37 units were targeted for consultation. IA met with 24 (65%) of the targeted group. Meetings were in person and/or by phone. Met multiple times with some units. IA had consultations with 8 other units not in the target group. 32 units received consultations based on the Fall 2019 reviews.
Category 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 No changes needed 14% 18% 28% 20% 16% Changes made based on feedback 42% 52% 60% 61% 66% No changes made 36% 29% 9% 9% 18% Changes made unrelated to feedback 8% 1% 3% 8% 0% Percentage of units with either no changes needed or changes made based on the feedback has increased slightly from 81% in 2018 to 82% in 2019.
In 2019, sixteen units (18%) did not
make changes to their reports based
Six of these were in the “target for
consultation” group.
Two units had consultations.
New UACs who had no knowledge of
how previous UAC completed report. Only wanted to focus on new assessment plan.
UAC agreed to update report after
consultation but did not.
Four units did not have a consultation
after multiple attempts to contact UAC.
37 out of the 89 units reviewed (42%) ended up in the “target for consultation” group, which was a large number of units for IA to follow up with.
Action plan: Since this was the first year we were targeting units for consultations, we used a natural breakpoint in the distribution of the % No reviews to put units in the consultation group (>40% No). Next year, as we will look at the distribution to determine a reasonable cut off point for who should get a consultation, we will consider (1) that we are adding in support units to the review process and may need to consult with some of them as well and (2) what is a realistic number of units to provide consultations.
Due to change to I-ARC structure, reviews were completed by October 31, rather than October
Action plan: Reviews of 2019-20 reports should be back to October 15 deadline which will give more time to schedule consultations.
For the 4 units we didn’t have a consultation with, but should have, multiple email contacts were made.
Action plan: Work with IAAC representatives more closely when having trouble reaching units.
Units report by May/June 15, Aug 1 IARC completes reviews by Oct 15 Feedback sent to IAAC reps, dept chairs and units Updates in Nuventive Improve by Dec 15 IA reruns 2019-20 reports; archived for SACS in January
We are back here.
If you collected data from students to assess student learning in the fall or early spring semesters, please report as you normally would by May 15 for 9-month faculty and June 15 for 12-month
If you are unable to collect data from students in the spring semester as described in your current assessment plan, you can report:
Actions Taken - curricular and pedagogical actions that were taken (including but not limited to moving content
Results - document data collection was interrupted due to the COVID-19 Pandemic;
Analysis of Results – leave blank; and
Actions Planned - briefly describe data that will be collected along with the curricular and pedagogical actions to be implemented, if applicable.
Specialized accrediting agencies may have different recommendations, so we encourage those programs to contact the appropriate agency for guidance.
Educational Programs
Total Count Number Complete Percentage Complete
Academic Affairs 1 1 100% Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences 74 52 70% College of Business 19 10 53% College of Education 33 28 85% College of Fine Arts and Communication 12 11 92% College of Health and Human Performance 32 24 75% College of Engineering and Technology 15 8 53% Brody School of Medicine 8 2 25% College of Allied Health Sciences 21 6 29% College of Nursing 4 1 25% School of Dental Medicine 1 0% TOTAL 220 143 65%
Deadlines
educational programs
I-ARC will review:
1/3 of Academic Affairs educational programs 1/2 of Health Sciences educational programs 1/2 of support units
Online training Potential Reviewers:
Work with IAAC rep to identify
Educational Programs Support Units
Updates to reports typically due in Nuventive Improve by Dec 15. Will that
work given changes to academic calendar (semester ends Wed. Nov 25?)
Humanities The original plan was to collect data in
Spring 2020 semester
Departments have been given the
postpone to the Fall 2020 semester
Data collection completed Classics (Fall 19 & Spring 2020) Philosophy (Spring 2020) Data collection not complete Religious Studies: collected one
course data in the Spring 2020, will collect more data in Fall 2020
Foreign Language and
Literature: Fall 2020
English: Fall 2020
More information please visit: http://www.ecu.edu/cs-acad/ipar/generaleducation.cfm
Fall 2016 – Spring 2017 Fall 2017 – Spring 2018 Fall 2018 – Spring 2019 Fall 2019 – Spring 2020
Data Collection Mathematics Written Communication Data Collection Natural Sciences Health Promotion/Physical Activity Data Collection Social Sciences Fine Arts Data Collection Humanities Review & Action Plan Mathematics Written Communication Review & Action Plan Natural Sciences Health Promotion/Physical Activity Review & Action Plan Social Sciences Fine Arts Implementation of Action Plan Mathematics Written Communication Implementation of Action Plan Natural Sciences Health Promotion/Physical Activity Departmental Reporting Mathematics Written Communication
Year 1 Fall: Orientation Spring: Submission of Syllabi and Student Artifacts Year 2 Summer/Fall: Data Analysis and Dissemination of Results Spring: Submission of Departmental Action Plan Year 3 Implementation of Action Plan Year 4 Submission of Departmental Progress Report
SLO 1: Apply knowledge of an area in the fine arts to describe specific artists, works, movements and creative processes and their significance to the human condition.
SLO 2: Analyze diverse genres, styles, and techniques in their appropriate cultural and historical context.
SLO 3: Apply discipline specific knowledge in the fine arts to evaluate the relevance of the fine arts to cultural and personal growth.
Results have been
shared with Deans and Directors
Exam Item Mapped to SLO Miss 1 Miss 2 Miss 3 Miss 4 Miss 5 Miss 6
2 50% 3 67% 4 75% 50% 5 80% 60% 6 83% 67% 7 86% 71% 8 88% 75% 9 89% 78% 67% 10 90% 80% 70% 11 91% 82% 73% 12 92% 83% 75% 67% 13 92% 85% 77% 69% 14 93% 86% 79% 71% 15 93% 87% 80% 73% 16 94% 88% 81% 75% 69% 17 94% 88% 82% 76% 71% 18 94% 89% 83% 78% 72% 19 95% 89% 84% 79% 74% 20 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70%
Percentages of Students Scoring 70% or Better on Closed-ended Questions or Scoring Proficient or above
Percentages of Students Scoring 70% or Better on Closed-ended Questions or Scoring Proficient or above
Percentages of Students Scoring 70% or Better on Closed-ended Questions or Scoring Proficient or above
NILOA’s Extended Deadline July 1, 2020 Applications notified of Embargoed Designation Results
July 31, 2020
Public announcement of designees
August 19, 2020
EIA Designation Application Working Group Thank you for your feedback and support!
Our ur Re Remainin ing Ta Tasks Website Links Final Revisions/Edits of Narrative
IPAR Website: www.ipar.ecu.edu
Class of 2023 Deliverables
Certification report
enhancement plan (QEP)
requested
33
Reaffirmation Self- Study Off-site Review Focused Report QEP Onsite Review
Response
Report
SACSCOC
Decision
Activities Development Timeline Due Date ECU developing a compliance certification and collecting evidence Summer 2020 –
Early Sept. 2022 ECU developing a new QEP Fall 2020 – Jan. 2022 6 weeks before
SACSCOC off-site review
ECU developing a focused report to provide additional compliance information identified in off-site review
2023 6 weeks before
SACSCOC on-site review
2023 ECU developing a response report to on-site findings, if requested
Early Sept. 2023 Reaffirmation decision made by SACSCOC Board
1. Principle of Integrity 2. Mission 3. Basic Eligibility Standard (3 standards) 4. Governing Board (9) 5. Administration and Organization (7) 6. Faculty (7) 7. Institutional Planning & Effectiveness (3) 8. Student Achievement (4) 9. Educational Program Structure and Content (7)
35
Academic Council
Org. Mission BOT CEO Entities Faculty & Staff Adequacy Qualifications Evaluations Planning & Assessment Edu Programs Content Structure Policies Practices Resources & Services Library IT Academic Support Student Support Finance Financial Resources Physical Resources Institutional Environment Transparency DE Policy Compliance QEP Leadership Committee IPAR Work Group
36
Well-defined focused topic that enhances student learning Embedded in ongoing, integrated institution-wide planning & evaluation process Presents a clear, comprehensive analysis
Have broad-based participation Institutional capacity to complete Have clear timeline and assignment of responsibilities Structure established to assess goal attainment
37
Call for QEP Concept Papers: Fall 2020 (due Jan. 2021) Initial Review & Selection: Jan. – Mar. 2021 (to select 2-3 concept papers for development) QEP Proposal Development: Mar. – Aug. 2021 Campus-wide Review and Selection: Fall 2021 (to select one proposal by Dec. 2021) QEP Development and Marketing: Jan. – Dec. 2022 (due six weeks before on-site review)
38
QEP Coordinating Group (IPAR)
QEP Selection Committee QEP Development Committee QEP Proposal Development Workgroups
Pandemic.pdf
Pandemic.pdf
Assessment-During-Pandemic.pdf
Published May 13, 2020
SECTION 7: Institutional Planning and Effectiveness The institution engages in ongoing, comprehensive, and integrated research-based planning and evaluation processes that (a) focus on institutional quality and effectiveness and (b) incorporate a systematic review of institutional goals and outcomes consistent with its mission. (Institutional planning) [CR]
Paul Schwager, Chair TJ Mohammed, Academic Affairs Chris Locklear, Chancellor’s Division Michael Van Scott, REDE Sara Thorndike, Admin & Finance Michelle Brooks, Health Sciences Beth Ketterman, Health Sciences Kathy Hill, Student Affairs Chris Dyba, Advancement Carolyn Bevillard, Athletics Puri Martinez, Faculty Senate Michelle Bone, Staff Senate Tucker Robbins, SGA
June
Review and select institutional metrics
July
Review reports and provide feedback to Academic Units
August
Review reports and provide feedback to Administrative Units
Jan/Feb
Annually evaluate ECU’s progress on institutional and UNC System metrics, and provide recommendations to the Chancellor
Reports due June 30, 2020
Brody School of Medicine College Allied Health Sciences College Engineering & Technology College Fine Arts & Communication College Health & Human Performance College of Business College of Education College of Nursing Harriot College Arts & Sciences Honors College Joyner Library Laupus Library School of Dental Medicine
Annual Reports due August 1st
Chancellor's Division Division of Academic Affairs Division of Administration & Finance Division of Health Sciences Division of Research Economic Development & Engagement Division of Student Affairs University Advancement
Survey of Student Opinion of
Instruction
First summer session
Survey open June 16 – 22 Instructor reports available on June 30
11-week and second summer sessions
Survey open July 24 – 30 Instructor reports available on August 7
Graduating Senior Survey and
Graduate Student Exit Survey
2019-2020 reports coming soon Analytics Portal
Academic Program Profiles / Students /
Student Satisfaction
Surveys for summer 2020 graduates will