Huntingtons Disease An Update on Latest Research HD Center of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

huntington s disease
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Huntingtons Disease An Update on Latest Research HD Center of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Huntingtons Disease An Update on Latest Research HD Center of Excellence HD Treatment g Current treatments are symptomatic. g Several compounds have delayed onset and slowed progression in mouse models. g Question remains to translate


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HD Center of Excellence

Huntington’s Disease

An Update on Latest Research

slide-2
SLIDE 2

HD Center of Excellence

HD Treatment

gCurrent treatments are symptomatic. gSeveral compounds have delayed onset

and slowed progression in mouse models.

gQuestion remains to translate

discoveries for human cures.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

HD Center of Excellence

Developing HD Treatments

Cellular level Animal models Biomarker studies Clinical trials

slide-4
SLIDE 4

HD Center of Excellence

RNAi

X

X

Trafficking defects

slide-5
SLIDE 5

HD Center of Excellence

The Development of RNAi

http://www.macalester.edu/~montgomery/RNAi.html

g When this system is activated, it causes an enzyme to

chop up the RNA to find the relevant section of code.

g It then binds that relevant section, containing the gene

that we are trying to eliminate, and travels around the cell “looking” for other RNA that matches the code of that section.

g When it finds the same code in other RNA it binds to

these “target” RNA’s effectively blocking the production of harmful proteins.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

HD Center of Excellence

What does this mean?

gIt means, at the most simple level,

that by “interfering” in the translation of certain genes into protein, RNAi may be able to offer a means to stop the progression of a disease in its tracks.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HD Center of Excellence

Davidson and Henry L Paulsen (2004).Molecular Medicine for the brain: silencing of disease genes with RNA interference. The Lancet, Neurology Vol 3 pp145-149.

g Targets the defective Huntington's gene, leaving the healthy

version of the same gene to carry out its vital duties.

g Mice who were given the RNAi treatment did not develop

the symptoms seen in untreated mice. Nor did the treated mice show any signs of suffering from toxic side-effects, indicating that the technique is safe.

g

The first clinical trials are likely to begin within the next five years provided there are no signs that the technique is dangerous in humans.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

HD Center of Excellence

CLINICAL TRIALS

TREND-HD 2CARE ATOMOXETINE CITALOPRAM CREST-E PREQUEL

slide-9
SLIDE 9

HD Center of Excellence

TREND-HD

g

Participants consume 1g bid ethyl-EPA (i.e., Miraxion) vs. placebo

g

Unique protocol design allows all participants exposure to ethyl-EPA (minimizing exposure to placebo)

g

Hypothesis: May offer neuronal mitochondria

  • protection. May decrease chorea.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

HD Center of Excellence

2CARE

g Participants consume 1200mg bid coenzyme Q10

(i.e., CoQ-10)

g 60 month study design. Includes participants aged 16

and 17, as well adults.

g Hypothesis: Participants taking CoQ-10 vs. placebo

will prevent (or minimize) functional decline. CoQ-10 may prevent tissue degradation, improving neuronal health

slide-11
SLIDE 11

HD Center of Excellence

ATOMOXETINE

g Participants consume 40mg bid atomoxetine vs. placebo g Unique protocol design, allowing all participants exposure

to atomoxetine (i.e., crossover design)

g Hypothesis: Participants taking atomoxetine vs. placebo

will demonstrate an improvement in executive functions and motor functions. Participants taking atomoxetine vs. placebo will also experience a decrease in psychiatric impairment.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HD Center of Excellence

CITALOPRAM

g Participants consume 20mg qd citalopram vs. placebo g Unique study design: Two week single-blind placebo run-in g Hypothesis: Participants taking citalopram vs. placebo will

experience an increase in their executive function capabilities and a decrease in psychiatric impairment. Interestingly, improvement in motor symptoms is not expected.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

HD Center of Excellence

CREST-E

g Participants consume 30g qd Creatine vs. placebo

for 36 months

g Simple study design. Parallel groups, 1:1 ratio. g Hypothesis: Participants taking Creatine vs.

placebo will maintain (or increase) their total functional capacity from baseline.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

HD Center of Excellence

PREQUEL

g Presymptomatic participants consume 1200mg qd or

2400mg qd coenzyme Q10 vs. placebo

g Unique protocol design: Participants are

  • presymptomatic. Participants are enrolled for 18

months.

g Objective: To establish treatment tolerability aspects

(i.e., 1200mg vs. 2400mg) in presymptomatic

  • participants. To assess the feasibility of implementing

a preventative therapeutic trial.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

HD Center of Excellence

Research to Detect HD As Soon As Possible

g Movement-Motor measures g Thinking measures g Mood measures g Brain measures g Potential blood measures? g Potential genetic markers?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

HD Center of Excellence

Measures for clinical trials in HD

PET Imaging Paper and Pencil Assessment MRI fMRI Computerized Cognitive Assessment High Cost and Time Low Cost and Time NP Test

slide-17
SLIDE 17

HD Center of Excellence

Clinical Trials: Model of Intervention in HD

Diagnostic (Motor) Threshold 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Age Neurobiological marker CAG ≥ 39 Treated presymptomatically CAG ≥ 39 Untreated Diagnostic (Motor) Threshold 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Age Neurobiological marker CAG ≥ 39 Untreated CAG ≥ 39 Treated at diagnosis

slide-18
SLIDE 18

HD Center of Excellence

Possible Biomarkers: Cross-Sectional Data from Predict

  • 35
  • 30
  • 25
  • 20
  • 15
  • 10
  • 5

Estim ated Years From Diagnosis

24 26 28 30

Total Correct (out of 36)

W ord List Learning

  • 35
  • 30
  • 25
  • 20
  • 15
  • 10
  • 5

Estim ated Years From Diagnosis

2 4 6 8 10 12

Total Severity Score

M otor Exam Score

  • 35
  • 30
  • 25
  • 20
  • 15
  • 10
  • 5

Estim ated Years From Diagnosis

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

cubic cm

Striatal Volum e

  • 35
  • 30
  • 25
  • 20
  • 15
  • 10
  • 5
0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030

Tapping Consistency(1/SD, in msec-1)

Self-Tim ed Finger Tapping

Estim ated Years From Diagnosis

slide-19
SLIDE 19

HD Center of Excellence

Striatum (caudate & putamen): the brain region most affected in HD

Unaffected Patient with HD

Caudate Putamen

slide-20
SLIDE 20

HD Center of Excellence

Uses of Markers in Clinical Trials

g Closer to clinical diagnosis? g Near transition to period of more rapid

decline?

  • 35
  • 30
  • 25
  • 20
  • 15
  • 10
  • 5

Estimated Years From Diagnosis

2 4 6 8 10 12

Total Severity Score

Motor Exam Score

Paulsen et al. Predict baseline curves paper, in review (2007)

  • 35
  • 30
  • 25
  • 20
  • 15
  • 10
  • 5

Estimated Years From Diagnosis

0.0036 0.0038 0.0040 0.0042 0.0044 0.0046 0.0048 0.0050 0.0052

Tapping Rate (taps/msec)

Speeded Finger Tapping

  • 35
  • 30
  • 25
  • 20
  • 15
  • 10
  • 5

Estimated Years From Diagnosis

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

cubic cm

Striatal Volume

slide-21
SLIDE 21

HD Center of Excellence

slide-22
SLIDE 22

HD Center of Excellence

Acknowledgments

Study Investigators Henry Paulson, M.D., PhD Bev Davidson, M.D., PhD Leigh Beglinger, PhD Research Assistants Elizabeth Penziner, M.A., M.P.H. William Adams, B.A. Stacie Vik, B.A. Special thanks to the faculty and staff of the Paulsen Neuropsychology Lab at The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine