Huntingtons Disease An Update on Latest Research HD Center of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Huntingtons Disease An Update on Latest Research HD Center of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Huntingtons Disease An Update on Latest Research HD Center of Excellence HD Treatment g Current treatments are symptomatic. g Several compounds have delayed onset and slowed progression in mouse models. g Question remains to translate
HD Center of Excellence
HD Treatment
gCurrent treatments are symptomatic. gSeveral compounds have delayed onset
and slowed progression in mouse models.
gQuestion remains to translate
discoveries for human cures.
HD Center of Excellence
Developing HD Treatments
Cellular level Animal models Biomarker studies Clinical trials
HD Center of Excellence
RNAi
X
X
Trafficking defects
HD Center of Excellence
The Development of RNAi
http://www.macalester.edu/~montgomery/RNAi.html
g When this system is activated, it causes an enzyme to
chop up the RNA to find the relevant section of code.
g It then binds that relevant section, containing the gene
that we are trying to eliminate, and travels around the cell “looking” for other RNA that matches the code of that section.
g When it finds the same code in other RNA it binds to
these “target” RNA’s effectively blocking the production of harmful proteins.
HD Center of Excellence
What does this mean?
gIt means, at the most simple level,
that by “interfering” in the translation of certain genes into protein, RNAi may be able to offer a means to stop the progression of a disease in its tracks.
HD Center of Excellence
Davidson and Henry L Paulsen (2004).Molecular Medicine for the brain: silencing of disease genes with RNA interference. The Lancet, Neurology Vol 3 pp145-149.
g Targets the defective Huntington's gene, leaving the healthy
version of the same gene to carry out its vital duties.
g Mice who were given the RNAi treatment did not develop
the symptoms seen in untreated mice. Nor did the treated mice show any signs of suffering from toxic side-effects, indicating that the technique is safe.
g
The first clinical trials are likely to begin within the next five years provided there are no signs that the technique is dangerous in humans.
HD Center of Excellence
CLINICAL TRIALS
TREND-HD 2CARE ATOMOXETINE CITALOPRAM CREST-E PREQUEL
HD Center of Excellence
TREND-HD
g
Participants consume 1g bid ethyl-EPA (i.e., Miraxion) vs. placebo
g
Unique protocol design allows all participants exposure to ethyl-EPA (minimizing exposure to placebo)
g
Hypothesis: May offer neuronal mitochondria
- protection. May decrease chorea.
HD Center of Excellence
2CARE
g Participants consume 1200mg bid coenzyme Q10
(i.e., CoQ-10)
g 60 month study design. Includes participants aged 16
and 17, as well adults.
g Hypothesis: Participants taking CoQ-10 vs. placebo
will prevent (or minimize) functional decline. CoQ-10 may prevent tissue degradation, improving neuronal health
HD Center of Excellence
ATOMOXETINE
g Participants consume 40mg bid atomoxetine vs. placebo g Unique protocol design, allowing all participants exposure
to atomoxetine (i.e., crossover design)
g Hypothesis: Participants taking atomoxetine vs. placebo
will demonstrate an improvement in executive functions and motor functions. Participants taking atomoxetine vs. placebo will also experience a decrease in psychiatric impairment.
HD Center of Excellence
CITALOPRAM
g Participants consume 20mg qd citalopram vs. placebo g Unique study design: Two week single-blind placebo run-in g Hypothesis: Participants taking citalopram vs. placebo will
experience an increase in their executive function capabilities and a decrease in psychiatric impairment. Interestingly, improvement in motor symptoms is not expected.
HD Center of Excellence
CREST-E
g Participants consume 30g qd Creatine vs. placebo
for 36 months
g Simple study design. Parallel groups, 1:1 ratio. g Hypothesis: Participants taking Creatine vs.
placebo will maintain (or increase) their total functional capacity from baseline.
HD Center of Excellence
PREQUEL
g Presymptomatic participants consume 1200mg qd or
2400mg qd coenzyme Q10 vs. placebo
g Unique protocol design: Participants are
- presymptomatic. Participants are enrolled for 18
months.
g Objective: To establish treatment tolerability aspects
(i.e., 1200mg vs. 2400mg) in presymptomatic
- participants. To assess the feasibility of implementing
a preventative therapeutic trial.
HD Center of Excellence
Research to Detect HD As Soon As Possible
g Movement-Motor measures g Thinking measures g Mood measures g Brain measures g Potential blood measures? g Potential genetic markers?
HD Center of Excellence
Measures for clinical trials in HD
PET Imaging Paper and Pencil Assessment MRI fMRI Computerized Cognitive Assessment High Cost and Time Low Cost and Time NP Test
HD Center of Excellence
Clinical Trials: Model of Intervention in HD
Diagnostic (Motor) Threshold 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Age Neurobiological marker CAG ≥ 39 Treated presymptomatically CAG ≥ 39 Untreated Diagnostic (Motor) Threshold 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Age Neurobiological marker CAG ≥ 39 Untreated CAG ≥ 39 Treated at diagnosis
HD Center of Excellence
Possible Biomarkers: Cross-Sectional Data from Predict
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
- 5
Estim ated Years From Diagnosis
24 26 28 30Total Correct (out of 36)
W ord List Learning
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
- 5
Estim ated Years From Diagnosis
2 4 6 8 10 12Total Severity Score
M otor Exam Score
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
- 5
Estim ated Years From Diagnosis
12 13 14 15 16 17 18cubic cm
Striatal Volum e
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
- 5
Tapping Consistency(1/SD, in msec-1)
Self-Tim ed Finger Tapping
Estim ated Years From Diagnosis
HD Center of Excellence
Striatum (caudate & putamen): the brain region most affected in HD
Unaffected Patient with HD
Caudate Putamen
HD Center of Excellence
Uses of Markers in Clinical Trials
g Closer to clinical diagnosis? g Near transition to period of more rapid
decline?
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
- 5
Estimated Years From Diagnosis
2 4 6 8 10 12
Total Severity Score
Motor Exam Score
Paulsen et al. Predict baseline curves paper, in review (2007)
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
- 5
Estimated Years From Diagnosis
0.0036 0.0038 0.0040 0.0042 0.0044 0.0046 0.0048 0.0050 0.0052Tapping Rate (taps/msec)
Speeded Finger Tapping
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
- 5
Estimated Years From Diagnosis
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
cubic cm
Striatal Volume