HTTP and the Dynamic Web HTTP and the Dynamic Web How does the Web - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
HTTP and the Dynamic Web HTTP and the Dynamic Web How does the Web - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
HTTP and the Dynamic Web HTTP and the Dynamic Web How does the Web work? How does the Web work? The canonical example in your Web browser Click here here is a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) http://www-cse.ucsd.edu It names the location
How does the Web work? How does the Web work?
The canonical example in your Web browser
Click here
“here” is a Uniform Resource Locator (URL)
http://www-cse.ucsd.edu
It names the location of an object on a server.
[courtesy of Geoff Voelker] voelker@cs.ucsd.edu
In Action… In Action…
Client Server
http://www-cse.ucsd.edu
- Client uses DNS to resolves name of server (www-cse.ucsd.edu)
- Establishes an HTTP connection with the server over TCP/IP
- Sends the server the name of the object (null)
- Server returns the object
HTTP
[Voelker]
Naming and URLs Naming and URLs
How should objects be named?
- URLs name objects and the virtual locations for those objects.
Location is a DNS name, so there’s two more levels of naming and indirection under there. Before hypertext we used to worry about access transparency.
- Object name interpretation is up to the server, but it’s often a
location in the local file tree. If an object moves, the URL breaks (dangling reference).
Location-independent names seem like the obvious way to go
- Why don’t we use them (e.g., URNs)?
- How do we make them work, esp. in the face of mobility?
[from Voelker, with additions]
Protocols Protocols
What kind of transport protocol should the Web use? HTTP 1.0
- One TCP connection/object
- Complaints: inefficient, slow, burdensome…
HTTP 1.1
- One TCP connection/many objects (persistent connections)
- Solves all problems, right? Huge amount of complexity
Clients, proxies, servers
How do they compare?
- Protocol differences [Krishnamurthy99], performance comparison
[Nielsen97], effects on servers [Manley97], overhead of TCP connections [Caceres98]
HTTPS: HTTP with encryption
[Voelker]
HTTP in a Nutshell HTTP in a Nutshell
HTTP supports request/response message exchanges of arbitrary length. Small number of request types: basically GET and POST, with supplements.
- bject name, + content for POST
- ptional query string
- ptional request headers
Responses are self-typed objects (documents) with various attributes and tags.
- ptional cookies
- ptional response headers
- Client
Server(s)
Scalable Servers Scalable Servers
Server
- Of course, you are not the only person accessing the server…
Web Caching Web Caching
- Gee, is there some way to offload those busy servers?
- Use caches to exploit reference locality among clients
Clients Proxy Cache Servers [Voelker]
Caching Caching
How should we build caching systems for the Web?
- Seminal paper [Chankhunthod96]
- Proxy caches [Duska97]
- Akamai hack [Karger99]
- Cooperative caching [Tewari99, Fan98, Wolman99]
- Popularity distributions [Breslau99]
[Voelker]
Issues for Web Caching Issues for Web Caching
- binding clients to proxies, handling failover
manual configuration, router-based “transparent caching”, WPAD (Web Proxy Automatic Discovery)
- proxy may confuse/obscure interactions between server and client
- consistency management
At first approximation the Web is a wide-area read-only file service...but it is much more than that. caching responses vs. caching documents deltas [Mogul+Bala/Douglis/Misha/others@research.att.com]
- prefetching, scale, request routing, scale, performance
Web caching vs. content distribution (e.g., Akamai) A few weeks from now...
HTTP 1.1 HTTP 1.1
Specification effort started in W3C, finished in IETF....much later.
A number of research works influenced the specification. HTTP 1.0 shows the importance of careful specification.
- performance
persistent connections with pipelining range requests, incremental update, deltas
- caching
cache control headers
- negotiation of content attributes and encodings
- content attributes vs. transport attributes
transport encodings for transmission through proxies
- Trailer header and trailer headers
Persistent Connections Persistent Connections
There are three key performance reasons for persistent connections:
- connection setup overhead
- TCP slow start: just do it and get it over with
- pipelining as an alternative to multiple connections
And some new complexities resulting from their use, e.g.:
- request/response framing and pairing
- unexpected connection breakage
Just ask anyone from Akamai...
- large numbers of active connections
How long to keep connections around?
These motivations and issues manifest in HTTP, but they are fundamental for request/response messaging over TCP.
Cookies Cookies
HTTP cookies (RFC2109) have brought us a better Web.
- S optionally includes arbitrary state as a cookie in a response.
- Cookie is opaque to C, but C saves the cookie.
- C sends the saved cookie in future requests to S, and possibly to
- ther servers as well.
- Allows stateful servers for sessions, personalized content, etc.
But: cookies raise privacy and security issues.
- What did S put in that cookie? Can anyone else see it? How much
space does it take up on my disk that I paid soooo much for?
- Cookies may allow third parties who are friends of S1,..., SN to
- bserve C’s movements among S1,..., SN.
Unverifiable transactions, e.g., DoubleClick and other ad services.
Unverifiable Transactions Unverifiable Transactions
- Users may not know that they are interacting with DoubleClick.
Amazon and MyCFO trust DoubleClick, but client is ignorant.
- The user visits pages at many sites that reference DoubleClick.
- DoubleClick’s cookie allows it to associate all the requests from a given user.
- If the browser sends Referer headers, DoubleClick may gather information
about all the sites the user visits that reference DoubleClick. mycfo.com Client doubleclick, akamai, etc.
GET x GET y GET ad Referer mycfo.com
amazon.com
ad, cookie c ad GET ad, cookie c Referer amazon.com/x
Web Cache Consistency Web Cache Consistency
“Requirements of performance, availability, and disconnected operation require us to relax the goal of semantic transparency.”
- HTTP 1.1 specification
Any caching/replication framework must take steps to ensure that the cache does not deliver old copies of modified objects. Issues for cache consistency in the Web:
- large number of clients/proxies
- most static objects don’t change very often
- weaker consistency requirements
Stale information might be OK, as long as it is “not too stale”.
Cache Expiration and Validation Cache Expiration and Validation
HTTP 1.0 cache control
- Origin server may add a “freshness date” (Expires) response header.
...or the cache could determine expiration time heuristically.
- Proxy must revalidate cache entry if it has expired.
Last-Modified and If-Modified-Since
- Whose clock do we use for absolute expiration times?
Clients Proxy Origin Server
GET x GET x GET x GET x GET x If-Modified-Since m x, Last-Modified m Expires t 304: Not Modified
Expiration and Validation in HTTP 1.1 Expiration and Validation in HTTP 1.1
HTTP 1.1 cache control allows origin server to:
- use relative instead of absolute expiration times (max-age);
- issue opaque validators (ETag for entity tag) instead of timestamps;
Origin server may specify which of several cached entries to use.
Clients Proxy Origin Server
GET x GET x GET x GET x GET x If-None-Match v x, ETag v max-age t 304: Not Modified, ETag v Age < t Age = 0
Other 1.1 Cache Control Features Other 1.1 Cache Control Features
- Client may specify that no caching is to occur.
private or no-store
- Vary headers allow server to specify that certain request headers
must also match if the proxy deems a cached response valid. language, character set, etc.
- Server may specify that a response is not cacheable.
Pragma: no-cache header since HTTP 1.0
- Client may explicitly request the proxy to validate the response.
Pragma: no-cache
- Proxy may/should/must tell client the age of a cached response.
Age header
- Proxy may/should/must tell client that it could not validate a non-
fresh cached response with the origin server. Warning header
The Dynamic Web The Dynamic Web
HTTP began as a souped-up FTP that supports hypertext URLs. Service builders rapidly began using it for dynamically-generated content. Web servers morphed into Web Application Servers. Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Java Servlets and JavaServer Pages (JSP) Microsoft Active Server Pages (ASP) Microsoft ASPs are not to be confused with Application Service Providers (ASPs).
- Client
Server(s)
- execute
program
Multi Multi-
- tier Services
tier Services
Web application server relational databases Clients
HTTP
file servers
e.g., component “middleware” transaction monitors
middle tiers
HTTP RPC, RMI IIOP DCOM, EJB, CORBA, etc. JNDI, JDBC,SQL HTML+forms, applets, JavaScript, etc.
From Servers to Servlets From Servers to Servlets
Servlets are dynamically loaded Java classes/objects invoked by a Web server to process requests.
- Servlets are to servers as applets are to browsers.
- Servlet support converts standard Web servers into extensible
“Web application servers”.
- designed as a Java-based replacement for CGI
Web server acts as a “connection manager” for the service body, which is specified as pluggable servlets. interface specified by JavaSoft, supported by major servers
- Servlets can be used in any kind of server (not just HTTP).
Invocation triggers are defined by server; the servlet does not know or care how it is invoked.
Anatomy of a Servlet Anatomy of a Servlet
Servlet
ServletContext
init(ServletConfig config) String getServletInfo() service(....) destroy()
network service
(servlet container)
String getServerInfo() Object getAttribute(name) String getMimeType(name)
getResource*(name)
log(string)
ServletConfig
String getInitParameter(name) ServletContext getServletContext() Enumeration getInitParameterNames()
GenericServlet
(implements)
Invoking a Servlet Invoking a Servlet
Servlet
service(ServletRequest, ServletResponse)
ServletRequest
getContentLength, getContentType, getRemoteAddr, getRemoteHost, getInputStream, getParameter(name), getParameterValues(name), network service
ServletInputStream
readline(...)
ServletResponse
setContentType(MIME type) getOutputStream()
ServletOutputStream
print(...) println(...) ???
HTTP Servlets HTTP Servlets
HttpServlet
service(...) doGet() doHead() doPost()...
HttpServletRequest
getCookies(), getRemoteUser(), getAuthType(), getHeader(name), getHeaderNames(), HttpSession getSession()
HttpServletResponse
addCookie(), setStatus(code, msg), setHeader(name, value), sendRedirect(), encodeUrl() GenericServlet ServletResponse ServletRequest
HelloWorld Servlet HelloWorld Servlet
import java.io.*; import javax.servlet.*; public class HelloWorld extends GenericServlet { public void service(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException { ... } public String getServletInfo() { return “Hello World Servlet"; } }
HelloWorld Servlet (continued) HelloWorld Servlet (continued)
public void service(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException { ServletOutputStream output = response.getOutputStream(); String fromWho = request.getParameter(“from"); response.setContentType(“text/html"); if (fromWho == null) {
- utput.println(“<p>Hello world!");
} else {
- utput.println(“<p>Hello world from <em>"
+ fromWho + “</em>"); } }
Example 1: Invoking a Servlet by URL Example 1: Invoking a Servlet by URL
Most servers allow a servlet to be invoked directly by URL.
- client issues HTTP GET
e.g., http://www.yourhost/servlet/HelloWorld
- servlet specified by HTTP POST