How Oil Dispersants Work How Oil Dispersants Work Kenneth Lee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how oil dispersants work how oil dispersants work
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How Oil Dispersants Work How Oil Dispersants Work Kenneth Lee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How Oil Dispersants Work How Oil Dispersants Work Kenneth Lee Photos\Lee_Ken\IMG_0530_ppt.JPG Kenneth Lee Kenneth Lee Centre for Offshore Oil, Gas and Energy Research (COOGER) Centre for Offshore Oil, Gas and Energy Research (COOGER)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Kenneth Lee

Photos\Lee_Ken\IMG_0530_ppt.JPG

Kenneth Lee Kenneth Lee

Centre for Offshore Oil, Gas and Energy Research (COOGER) Centre for Offshore Oil, Gas and Energy Research (COOGER) Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Bedford Institute of Oceanography Bedford Institute of Oceanography Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Canada B2Y 4A2 Canada B2Y 4A2 Ken.Lee@dfo Ken.Lee@dfo-

  • mpo.gc.ca

mpo.gc.ca

How Oil Dispersants Work How Oil Dispersants Work

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What Are Dispersants?

  • Dispersants are liquid solutions of detergent-like surfactants

dissolved or suspended in solvent

  • The surfactants have two ends: one attracted to oil (lipophilic) and

another attracted to water (hydrophilic)

Water-compatible (Hydrophilic) Oil-compatible (Lipophilic)

  • The solvent enables the surfactants (active ingredients) to be

applied and helps get them through the oil film to the water interface

  • At the interface the surfactants reduce the surface tension

allowing the oil to enter the water as tiny droplets which are degraded by natural bacteria

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Dispersant (surfactant)

Hydrophilic Hydrophobic Dispersant sprayed onto oil slick Oil Surfactant locates at interface Oil slick broken into droplets by mixing energy The droplets dispersed by turbulence leaving low oil concentrations Surfactant-stabilized

  • il droplet (micelles)

Activity of Chemical Dispersants

Surfactant reduces the oil-water interfacial tension by orienting the interaction of hydrophilic groups with the water phase and the hydrophobic groups with oil Reduced oil-water interfacial tension facilitates the formation of a large number of small oil droplets that can be entrained in the water column

slide-4
SLIDE 4

B xxxxxxxxxx

A

x Surfactant coated dispersed

  • il droplet

Oil phase

B A A = sorbitan monooleate (a.k.a, Span 80; HLB ~ 4.3) B = ethoxylated (E20) sorbitan monooleate (a.k.a, Tween 80; HLB ~ 15) HLB (hydrophile-lipophile balance) Predominantly hydrophilic surfactants (HLB >7) will favour oil-in water dispersions (entrained oil droplets in a water body) B

Orientation of surfactants at oil water interface in dispersed oil droplets

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Chemical Constituents (Dispersant – Corexit)

CAS # Name Common Day-to-Day Use Examples 1338-43-8 Sorbitan, mono-(9Z)-9-

  • ctadecenoate

Skin cream, body shampoo, emulsifier in juice 9005-65-6 Sorbitan, mono-(9Z)-9-

  • ctadecenoate, poly(oxy-1,2-

ethanediyl) derivs. Baby bath, mouth wash, face lotion, emulsifier in food 9005-70-3 Sorbitan, tri-(9Z)-9-octadecenoate, poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) derivs. Body/Face lotion, tanning lotions 577-11-7 * Butanedioic acid, 2-sulfo-, 1,4- bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester, sodium salt (1:1) Wetting agent in cosmetic products, gelatin, beverages 29911-28-2 Propanol, 1-(2-butoxy-1- methylethoxy) Household cleaning products 64742-47-8 Distillates (petroleum), hydrotreated light Air freshener, cleaner 111-76-2 ** Ethanol, 2-butoxy Cleaners

* Contains 2-Propanediol ** Ethanol, 2-butoxy-) is absent in the composition of COREXIT 9500

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Dispersant Activity

t = 40 ms t = 14 ms t = 28 ms t = 38 ms t = 0 ms t = 42 ms t = 46 ms t = 48 ms 5 mm

Extracted images from cinematic digital holography of turbulent break-up of crude oil mixed with dispersants into microdroplets Gopalan, B. and J. Katz (2010) Physical Review Letters 104, 054501

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Oil Droplet Size Distribution

Mean Diameter (μm) 10 100 0.0 0.5 Particle Concentration (μl/L) 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 t = 1 min t = 10 min t = 30 min t = 60 min Mean Diameter (μm) 10 100 0.0 0.5 Particle Concentration (μl/L) 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 t = 1 min t = 10 min t = 30 min t = 60 min

  • Dispersant

+ Dispersant

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Small Oil Droplets Rise Slower than Large Oil Droplets

STOKES LAW

∆h / t = D2(ρw – ρo)g 18ηw

Where: ∆h / t = rise velocity D = drop diameter ρw = aqueous density ρo = oil density g = gravitational constant ηw = aqueous viscosity

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Dispersion of Oil

In the open sea currents distribute oil over a large area 1st Hour 2-5 Hours

Top 10 meters

  • f the

Water Column

2 – 180 ppm Less than 1 ppm

Oil is diluted to concentrations below toxicity threshold limits

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fate of Oil Components in Oil Droplets Entrained in the Water Column

20µm oil droplet surrounded by surfactant molecules (Area 5x103 Volume 3.3x104) 2000µm entrained oil droplet (Area 5x107 Volume 3.3x1010)

Rate of loss of volatile and water soluble components (chemical partitioning) and microbial degradation are influenced by surface-to-volume ratios Sphere surface area: 4 π r2 Sphere volume: 4/3 π r3 For two orders of magnitude Increase in diameter: Surface area increases by 10,000x Volume increases by 1,000,000x

Solubles Solubles

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fate of Dispersed Oil Droplets

Source: http://www.response.restoration.noaa.gov

Applying Dispersant Initial Dispersion Bacterial colonization of dispersant and dispersed oil droplets 1-2 days Bacterial degradation

  • f oil and dispersant

Colonization of bacterial aggregates by protozoans and nematodes 4 weeks

S E A S U R F A C E

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Application of Oil Dispersants

  • In addition to (mechanical recovery techniques

(skimming and booming) and in situ burning, oil dispersants were used to prevent landfall of the oil in the Deepwater Horizon Spill

  • Beginning in early May responders began injecting

dispersants at the source of the release (~1500m depth) to reduce oil from reaching the surface

  • Advantages of subsurface injection:
  • Reduced VOCs (volatile organic compounds)
  • Reduced Oil Emulsification
  • Volume of dispersant needed
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Dispersant Monitoring and Assessment for Subsurface Dispersant Application

  • Directive issued by US EPA and USCG required BP to implement a

monitoring and assessment plan for subsurface and surface use

  • f dispersants
  • Shutdown Criteria
  • Significant reduction in dissolved oxygen (< 2 mg/L)
  • Rotifer acute toxicity tests
  • Later addenda to implement SMART Tier 3 Monitoring Program
  • Droplet size distribution (LISST)
  • CTD instrument equipped with CDOM fluorometer
  • Discreet sample collection to measure fluorometry (FIR)
  • Eliminate surface application altogether
  • Subsea limited to < 15,000 gpd
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Working group of scientists from EPA, NOAA, OSTP and

DFO

  • Analyze an evolving database of sub-surface
  • ceanographic data by BP, NOAA, and academic

scientists

  • Near term actions:
  • Integrate the data
  • Analyze the data to describe the distribution of oil and

the oceanographic processes affecting its transport

  • Issue periodic reports

Joint Analysis Group (JAG) for Surface and Subsurface Oceanographic, Oil, and Dispersant Data

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Vertical Profile of O2 Depressions Coincident with Fluorescence Peaks

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Distance from wellhead, m 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Brooks McCall Walton Smith Ocean Veritas Gordon Gunter Thomas Jefferson

Normalized CDOM Fluorescence

Normalized Mean CDOM Fluorescence (1000-1300 m) vs. Distance from Wellhead

aaa

CDOM (Colored Dissolved Organic Matter Fluorescence)

a

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Preliminary Conclusions

  • Fluorometry shows recurring anomaly at 1000 to 1300 m
  • Strongest near wellhead, decreases with distance
  • Trending WS to NE direction consistent with water movement

along isobath isobath

  • Natural Organic Matter contribute to fluorescence signal
  • Spatial and temporal variability in fluorometric anomalies
  • Active natural seeps mapped ~12 km SW and 17 km NE of

wellhead

  • Minimum detection limit of CDOM fluorometers ~1 ppm oil
  • CTD DO anomalies seen at 1000 to 1300 m
  • Interpretation to be refined and data validated by Winkler O2

titrations against electronic sensor data