SLIDE 1
How do we compare the compactness of two plans? Measuring District - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
How do we compare the compactness of two plans? Measuring District - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
How do we compare the compactness of two plans? Measuring District Compactness: Reock Score Measuring District Compactness: Polsby-Popper Score State Courts: 1) Obligated to follow federal law 2) Obligated to enforce state laws Federal Courts:
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Measuring District Compactness: Polsby-Popper Score
SLIDE 4
State Courts: 1) Obligated to follow federal law 2) Obligated to enforce state laws
SLIDE 5
Federal Courts: 1) Obligated to follow federal law 2) Not empowered to enforce state laws
SLIDE 6
Equal Protection Clause (Article I, Section 19): “No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws.” “these clauses provide significant constraints against governmental conduct that disfavors certain groups of voters or creates barriers to the free ascertainment and expression of the will of the People…” (Common Cause v. Lewis 2019)
SLIDE 7
Free Speech Clause (Article I, Section 14): “Freedom of speech and of the press are two of the great bulwarks of liberty and therefore shall never be restrained…” “[T]he North Carolina Constitution affords a direct cause of action for damages against government officers in their official capacity for speech violations, even though federal law does not” (Common Cause
- v. Lewis 2019)
SLIDE 8
Free Election Clause (Article I, Section 10): “All elections shall be free.” Common Cause v. Lewis (2019): “Elections are not free when partisan actors have tainted future elections by specifically and systematically designing the contours of the election districts for partisan purposes and a desire to preserve power.”
SLIDE 9
SLIDE 10
SLIDE 11
Partisan Intent: Thomas Hofeller’s Draft Plans
SLIDE 12
Partisan Intent: Thomas Hofeller’s Draft Plans
SLIDE 13
Thousands of Non-Partisan Computer-Simulated Maps:
SLIDE 14
Computer Simulation Algorithm:
SLIDE 15
SLIDE 16
SLIDE 17
SLIDE 18
SLIDE 19
SLIDE 20
Common Cause v. Lewis (2019)
July 15-26, 2019: Trial in Raleigh, North Carolina September 3, 2019: Court strikes down House and Senate District Maps; Orders Legislature to draw new non-partisan maps September 10, 2019: Legislature draws new maps by randomly selecting from Chen computer-simulated districting maps
SLIDE 21
Legislature Uses Lottery Machine to Randomly Select Computer-Simulated Maps
SLIDE 22
Legislature’s New Remedial House Map (Sept. 2019)
SLIDE 23
Why did the NC General Assembly use a lottery machine?
SLIDE 24
League of Women Voters of Michigan v. Ruth Johnson (2018)
SLIDE 25
League of Women Voters of Michigan v. Ruth Johnson (2018)
SLIDE 26
League of Women Voters of Michigan v. Ruth Johnson (2018)
SLIDE 27
League of Women Voters of Michigan v. Ruth Johnson (2018)
SLIDE 28
Redistricting Reform in Michigan:
- Michigan referendum process: Initiated Constitutional
Amendment
- Voters Not Politicians writes Proposal 2
Gather 315,654 signatures within 180 days, at least 120 days before Nov 2018 election (10% of electorate in Gubernatorial election) Voters approved Proposal 2 by 61% - 39% in Nov 2018
SLIDE 29
Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission:
- 13 Michigan voters (4 Republicans, 4 Democrats, 5
independents)
- Commission draws Michigan’s Congressional, House, and
Senate maps
- Commission must follow constitutional criteria in drawing
districts
SLIDE 30
Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission:
SLIDE 31
Example of how California’s Redistricting Commission Solicited Public Feedback on Communities of Interest (2011):
SLIDE 32
Using Crowdsourced Maps to Describe Communities of Interest:
SLIDE 33