hip arthroscopy for the painful hip arthroplasty
play

Hip Arthroscopy for the Painful Hip Arthroplasty Victor M - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hip Arthroscopy for the Painful Hip Arthroplasty Victor M Ilizaliturri Jr., MD National Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico Disclosure Victor M. Ilizaliturri Jr. MD. Consulting income from: Conmed-Linvatec DePuy Synthes Zimmer


  1. Hip Arthroscopy for the Painful Hip Arthroplasty Victor M Ilizaliturri Jr., MD National Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico

  2. Disclosure • Victor M. Ilizaliturri Jr. MD. – Consulting income from: – Conmed-Linvatec – DePuy Synthes – Zimmer Biomet – Research support from: – Conmed-Linvatec. – DePuy Synthes.

  3. Introduction • Up to 4.3% of the patients with anterior hip pain after THR may be due to iliopsoas impingement. • Posterior hip pain must study offset reconstruction, HO, probable isquiofemoral impingement. • Iliopsoas impingement after THR constitutes a differential diagnosis. • Cup must be stable. • Infection must be ruled out. • MARS MR and/or Ion level analysis. • Metal on metal ion levels. • Taper corrosion. Dora, JBJS, Br, 2007

  4. Diagnosis • Persistent anterior hip pain after THR. • Tenderness in groin. • Pain in activities that require hip flexion. • Climb stairs. • Exit a car. • Pain relief after US guided injections.

  5. US Guided Iliopsoas Injection

  6. Imaging • AP Pelvis View. • Lateral acetabular view. Chalmers, JBJS, 2017

  7. Imaging • CT Dora, JBJS, Br, 2007

  8. Treatment • Dora et al. JBJS Br 2007. • Psoas impingement after THR, conservative vs cup revision vs open tenotomy • 29 patients, 30 hips. • 8 conservative treatment (All failed no symptom improvement one cup revision) mean F/U 41 months. • 22 operative treatment. • Revision 14. High incidence of complications, 1 trochanteric non-union, 1 anterior dislocation, 1 superficial infection, 5 troch bursitis, 1 unexplained neuropathic pain, multiple revisions and deep infection (resection arthroplasty). • Tenotomy 6. All patients improved at three months, one patient presented HO and symptom recurrence after 18 months. Mean f/U 36 months.

  9. Treatment

  10. Treatment • Dora et al, JBJS Br 2007.

  11. Treatment • Jerosch, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2013. • Psoas impingement after THR. • 35 patients, supine endoscopic release, anterior capsulotomy, traction. • 12 resurfacing, 11 screw in uncemented cups and 12 uncemented pressfit cup. • 15 cases secondary to DDH. • 3 cases protrusion of the anterior cup was only identified at arthroscopy.

  12. Treatment • 32 of 35 patients presented immediate pain relief after endoscopic release of the iliopsoas. • One patient had pain relief at 6 weeks and one remained symptomatic but referred improvement over preoperative status

  13. Treatment • Batailler el al, Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (in press). • Cup revision for iliopsoas impingement after THR. • Multicentre retrospective study (10 surgeons, 4 centres), 46 patients. • Anterior cup un-coverage at foux profile and CT. • 11 had also release of the iliopsoas because of tendon injury or protrusion of the new cup (lack of anterior wall).

  14. Treatment • Mean hospital stay after cup revision 6 nights (4-15). • 40 patients full weight bearing, 6 toe touch because of suboptimal stability of new cup. • Mean F/U 21 months (6 months to 6 years). • 39 were satisfied at last F/U with significant improvement of Oxford Hip Score. • 4 Failures because of recurrent pain. • 1 full improvement after endoscopic iliopsoas release at lesser trochanter. • Other 3 accepted to live with slight pain. • Complications in 3 patients. • 1 deep vain thrombosis, 1 anterior dislocation (revised through anterior approach) and 1 deep infection (2 stage revision).

  15. Treatment • Chalmers et al, JBJS 2017. • Retrospective analysis of patients with diagnosis of painful THR due to iliopsoas impingement (hemispherical uncemented cup and PE bearing). • 49 patients included, 21 cup revision, 8 tenotomies and 20 non operative. Mean F/U 4 years. • Measurements of acetabular prominence was done in true lateral x rays. • 10 patients were successful in non operative group (50%). • With les than 8mm anterior cup prominence tenotomy was successful in 5 of 5 patients. • More than 8mm anterior cup prominence cup revision was successful in 12 of 13 patients and tenotomy in one of 3 patients.

  16. Treatment Chalmers, JBJS, 2017

  17. My approach • Release at the lesser trochanter. • Access portals for iliopsoas bursa. • No traction, lateral position. • No implant assessment. • Fluoro navigation to lesser trochanter. • RF retrograde release at lesser trochanter.

  18. Treatment, Iliopsoas Release • Protruding cup anteriorly (<8mm). • Lateralized cup. • Large cup. • Slight retroversion without instability. • No metal on metal implant.

  19. Treatment Acetabular Revision. • Grossly malposition of implant. • Protruding more than 8mm. • DDH (anterior wall deficient). • Very large or very lateralized). • Retroverted. • Implant impingement. • Dislocation. • Metal on metal implants increased ion levels or poor track record.

  20. Treatment • Iliopsoas impingement with anterior uncemented cup prtrusion. • 1 mal positioned ring. • Endoscopic release at lesser trochanter. • 16 patients. • 1 failure.

  21. Summary • Psoas impingement is a differential diagnosis. • Anterior hip pain after THR. • Not loose not infected. • US guided injections. • Focal anterior protrusion of less than 8mm maybe a good option for iliopsoas release. • Endoscopic release is a great option (lesser trochanter). • Grossly mal-positioned implants require cup revision. • Cup revision has more morbidity than tenotomy.

  22. Gracias vichip2002@yahoo.com.mx

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend