Hip Arthroscopy for the Painful Hip Arthroplasty Victor M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hip arthroscopy for the painful hip arthroplasty
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Hip Arthroscopy for the Painful Hip Arthroplasty Victor M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hip Arthroscopy for the Painful Hip Arthroplasty Victor M Ilizaliturri Jr., MD National Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico Disclosure Victor M. Ilizaliturri Jr. MD. Consulting income from: Conmed-Linvatec DePuy Synthes Zimmer


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Hip Arthroscopy for the Painful Hip Arthroplasty

Victor M Ilizaliturri Jr., MD National Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosure

  • Victor M. Ilizaliturri Jr. MD.

–Consulting income from:

–Conmed-Linvatec –DePuy Synthes –Zimmer Biomet

–Research support from: – Conmed-Linvatec. –DePuy Synthes.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

  • Up to 4.3% of the patients with anterior hip pain

after THR may be due to iliopsoas impingement.

  • Posterior hip pain must study offset reconstruction,

HO, probable isquiofemoral impingement.

  • Iliopsoas impingement after THR constitutes a

differential diagnosis.

  • Cup must be stable.
  • Infection must be ruled out.
  • MARS MR and/or Ion level analysis.
  • Metal on metal ion levels.
  • Taper corrosion.

Dora, JBJS, Br, 2007

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Diagnosis

  • Persistent anterior hip pain after THR.
  • Tenderness in groin.
  • Pain in activities that require hip flexion.
  • Climb stairs.
  • Exit a car.
  • Pain relief after US guided injections.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

US Guided Iliopsoas Injection

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Imaging

  • AP Pelvis View.
  • Lateral acetabular view.

Chalmers, JBJS, 2017

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Imaging

  • CT

Dora, JBJS, Br, 2007

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Treatment

  • Dora et al. JBJS Br 2007.
  • Psoas impingement after THR, conservative vs cup revision vs open

tenotomy

  • 29 patients, 30 hips.
  • 8 conservative treatment (All failed no symptom improvement one cup

revision) mean F/U 41 months.

  • 22 operative treatment.
  • Revision 14. High incidence of complications, 1 trochanteric non-union, 1 anterior

dislocation, 1 superficial infection, 5 troch bursitis, 1 unexplained neuropathic pain, multiple revisions and deep infection (resection arthroplasty).

  • Tenotomy 6. All patients improved at three months, one patient presented HO and

symptom recurrence after 18 months. Mean f/U 36 months.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Treatment

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Treatment

  • Dora et al, JBJS Br 2007.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Treatment

  • Jerosch, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2013.
  • Psoas impingement after THR.
  • 35 patients, supine endoscopic release,

anterior capsulotomy, traction.

  • 12 resurfacing, 11 screw in uncemented

cups and 12 uncemented pressfit cup.

  • 15 cases secondary to DDH.
  • 3 cases protrusion of the anterior cup was
  • nly identified at arthroscopy.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Treatment

  • 32 of 35 patients presented immediate pain

relief after endoscopic release of the iliopsoas.

  • One patient had pain relief at 6 weeks and
  • ne remained symptomatic but referred

improvement over preoperative status

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Treatment

  • Batailler el al, Orthopaedics &

Traumatology: Surgery & Research (in press).

  • Cup revision for iliopsoas

impingement after THR.

  • Multicentre retrospective study (10

surgeons, 4 centres), 46 patients.

  • Anterior cup un-coverage at foux

profile and CT.

  • 11 had also release of the iliopsoas

because of tendon injury or protrusion of the new cup (lack of anterior wall).

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Treatment

  • Mean hospital stay after cup revision 6 nights (4-15).
  • 40 patients full weight bearing, 6 toe touch because of suboptimal stability
  • f new cup.
  • Mean F/U 21 months (6 months to 6 years).
  • 39 were satisfied at last F/U with significant improvement of Oxford Hip

Score.

  • 4 Failures because of recurrent pain.
  • 1 full improvement after endoscopic iliopsoas release at lesser trochanter.
  • Other 3 accepted to live with slight pain.
  • Complications in 3 patients.
  • 1 deep vain thrombosis, 1 anterior dislocation (revised through anterior approach)

and 1 deep infection (2 stage revision).

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Treatment

  • Chalmers et al, JBJS 2017.
  • Retrospective analysis of patients with diagnosis of painful THR due to

iliopsoas impingement (hemispherical uncemented cup and PE bearing).

  • 49 patients included, 21 cup revision, 8 tenotomies and 20 non operative.

Mean F/U 4 years.

  • Measurements of acetabular prominence was done in true lateral x rays.
  • 10 patients were successful in non operative group (50%).
  • With les than 8mm anterior cup prominence tenotomy was successful in 5
  • f 5 patients.
  • More than 8mm anterior cup prominence cup revision was successful in 12
  • f 13 patients and tenotomy in one of 3 patients.
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Treatment

Chalmers, JBJS, 2017

slide-18
SLIDE 18

My approach

  • Release at the lesser trochanter.
  • Access portals for iliopsoas bursa.
  • No traction, lateral position.
  • No implant assessment.
  • Fluoro navigation to lesser

trochanter.

  • RF retrograde release at lesser

trochanter.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Treatment, Iliopsoas Release

  • Protruding cup anteriorly (<8mm).
  • Lateralized cup.
  • Large cup.
  • Slight retroversion without instability.
  • No metal on metal implant.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Treatment Acetabular Revision.

  • Grossly malposition of implant.
  • Protruding more than 8mm.
  • DDH (anterior wall deficient).
  • Very large or very lateralized).
  • Retroverted.
  • Implant impingement.
  • Dislocation.
  • Metal on metal implants

increased ion levels or poor track record.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Treatment

  • Iliopsoas impingement with anterior uncemented cup prtrusion.
  • 1 mal positioned ring.
  • Endoscopic release at lesser trochanter.
  • 16 patients.
  • 1 failure.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Summary

  • Psoas impingement is a differential diagnosis.
  • Anterior hip pain after THR.
  • Not loose not infected.
  • US guided injections.
  • Focal anterior protrusion of less than 8mm maybe a good option for

iliopsoas release.

  • Endoscopic release is a great option (lesser trochanter).
  • Grossly mal-positioned implants require cup revision.
  • Cup revision has more morbidity than tenotomy.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Gracias vichip2002@yahoo.com.mx