HIGH SPEED UK ..connecting the Midlands Colin Elliff BSc CEng MICE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

high speed uk
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HIGH SPEED UK ..connecting the Midlands Colin Elliff BSc CEng MICE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HIGH SPEED UK ..connecting the Midlands Colin Elliff BSc CEng MICE Civil Engineering Principal, HSUK Quentin Macdonald BSc(Eng) CEng FIRSE MIET Systems Engineering Principal, HSUK www.highspeeduk.co.uk Transport STOKE DERBY For Most


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

HIGH SPEED UK

..connecting the Midlands

Colin Elliff BSc CEng MICE Civil Engineering Principal, HSUK Quentin Macdonald BSc(Eng) CEng FIRSE MIET Systems Engineering Principal, HSUK

www.highspeeduk.co.uk

slide-3
SLIDE 3 LEICESTER NOTTINGHAM DERBY STOKE Rugby BIRMINGHAM COVENTRY NORTHAMPTON Worcester Redditch Kidderminster Stafford Lichfield Burton on Trent Loughborough Leamington Tamworth Nuneaton Stratford
  • n Avon
BHX Wolverhampton Walsall EMA Solihull

Transport For Most Midlanders

By motorway & trunk road

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • The HS2 ‘Y’
  • Fast links to London

& Birmingham

  • Greater capacity
  • Heathrow spur
  • Link to HS1

BUT ... .

  • No Transpennine link
Diagram taken from HS2 Ltd presentation 2013

HIGH SPEED 2 :

ORIGINAL CONCEPT

slide-5
SLIDE 5 CF BS LO BI NG SH MA LI LS NE ED GL LHR The World EU
  • Stations remote/

disconnected

  • No integration strategy
  • No CO2 reductions
  • Only 2 tracks in stem
  • Huge environmental

issues in Chilterns AONB & other sensitive areas

HS2 2010/12

slide-6
SLIDE 6 CF BS LO BI NG SH MA LI LS NE ED GL LHR

HS2 2015

  • HS3 / Northern Powerhouse
  • Incomplete interregional links
  • Poor BCR @ 2.3 – or lower??
  • Heathrow spur cancelled
  • HS1 link ‘deferred’
  • ‘No economic case’

for link to Scotland

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HIGH SPEED 2

  • Doesn’t deliver

what it promised

Diagram taken from HS2 Ltd presentation 2013
slide-8
SLIDE 8

REVIEW OF HS2 REMIT

HS2 REMIT – KEY POINTS 1 Make proposals for a high speed line from London to the West Midlands 2 Advise on development of HSL to ‘Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, the North East & Scotland’ 3 Select a London terminal 4 Consider intermediate parkway between London and West Midlands 5 Build an interchange with GWML / Heathrow / CrossRail services 6 Connect to HS1 and the existing network
slide-9
SLIDE 9 Source data : HS2 predicted services, Table 23, pp91/92 KPMG Report; HS3 links as per Northern Powerhouse report; Note: Toton not accepted as HS station for Nottingham or Derby London Enhanced direct intercity or airport link created by intervention of HS2/3 M.Keynes Birmingham Other links not categorised Leicester Nottingham Derby Stoke Sheffield Manchester Liverpool Leeds Darlington Newcastle Edinburgh Glasgow Heathrow LN MK BI LE NG DE ST SH MA LI LS DL NE EH GL LHR

HS2 and HS3

  • ffer improved direct
journeys for only 34 of 119 possible connections

HS2+HS3 : Not a Network!!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

HS2+HS3 : Degraded Network

HS2+HS3 68 171 349

Journeys improved Journeys made worse Not improved

Considering

528

possible journeys between

33

major UK centres...

289

slide-11
SLIDE 11 Source data : HS2 predicted services, Table 23, pp91/92 KPMG Report; HS3 links as per Northern Powerhouse report; Classic network services, Table 23, pp91/92 KPMG Report London Enhanced direct intercity or airport link created by intervention of HS2/3 M.Keynes Birmingham Link degraded by HS2/3 intervention Leicester Other links uncategorised Nottingham Derby Stoke Sheffield Manchester Liverpool Leeds Darlington Newcastle Edinburgh Glasgow Heathrow LN MK BI LE NG DE ST SH MA LI LS DL NE EH GL LHR

HS2 and HS3

degrade 33 of 119 possible connections on the existing network

HS2+HS3 : Degraded Network

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HIGH SPEED 2

Diagram taken from HS2 Ltd presentation 2013
  • Doesn’t deliver

what it promised

  • Doesn’t work

efficiently as a UK intercity railway

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 1. How do you reconcile HS2’s carbon-neutral

performance with the 80% CO2 reduction target of the 2008 Climate Change Act?

  • 2. What railway engineering assessment was

made of the M1 corridor & why was Chiltern route & ‘Y-network’ chosen?

  • 3. Why has no timetable been developed to

show how HS2/HS3 and the existing network will work in harmony?

  • 4. Why have HS2 & HS3 not been designed as

an integrated national high speed network?

Questions for HS2 Ltd

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • HS2 has been

specified & designed as a stand-alone high speed line

  • But everyone

expects it to perform as an integrated network

THE HS2 CONTRADICTION

Diagram taken from HS2 Ltd presentation 2013
slide-15
SLIDE 15

The £60bn question....

How do we design high speed rail to form an integrated national network??

slide-16
SLIDE 16

High Speed UK

(formerly known as High Speed North)

HSUK

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities

HSUK Design Principles

HSUK

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities

  • 2. Connect with local networks

HSUK Design Principles

HSUK

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities

  • 2. Connect with local networks
  • 3. Connect with HS1 & airports

HSUK Design Principles

HSUK

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities

  • 2. Connect with local networks
  • 3. Connect with HS1 & airports
  • 4. Coordinate with railfreight strategy

HSUK Design Principles

HSUK

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities

  • 2. Connect with local networks
  • 3. Connect with HS1 & airports
  • 4. Coordinate with railfreight strategy
  • 5. Offer optimum connectivity, capacity,

journey time, resilience etc

HSUK Design Principles

HSUK

slide-22
SLIDE 22

HSUK Design Principles

  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities

  • 2. Connect with local networks
  • 3. Connect with HS1 & airports
  • 4. Coordinate with railfreight strategy
  • 5. Offer optimum connectivity, capacity,

journey time, resilience etc

  • 6. Comply with all relevant public policy

HSUK

slide-23
SLIDE 23 Cardiff Bristol London Birmingham Nottingham Sheffield Manchester Liverpool Leeds Newcastle Edinburgh Glasgow Heathrow

Principal hubs of UK high speed rail network?

  • 12 primary cities
  • 1 hub airport

HIGH SPEED UK HSUK

slide-24
SLIDE 24 CF BS LO BI NG SH MA LI LS NE ED GL LHR DL LE DE ST MK EU The World

High speed line running north from London?

  • 15 primary cities
  • 1 hub airport LHR
  • BHX, MAN, EDI?
  • Link to Europe

HIGH SPEED UK HSUK

slide-25
SLIDE 25 LO BI NG SH MA LI LS NE ED GL LHR DL LE DE ST MK The World EU s

HSUK primary routes:

  • London-Glasgow

high speed spine

  • Avoids Chilterns AONB
  • 4 tracks to Sheffield
  • Transpennine spur to

Manchester/Liverpool

  • Link to Heathrow
  • Link to HS1

HIGH SPEED UK HSUK

slide-26
SLIDE 26 M1 HSUK HSUK HSUK in a 4.1 km tunnel under Luton & Dunstable conurbation HS2 No tunnels shown M1 J11 J10 HS2 No tunnels shown

HSUK

HSUK : Avoidance of Chilterns AONB

4.5 km HSUK tunnel under Luton/ Dunstable HS2 tunnel full length from Euston to Wendover??

slide-27
SLIDE 27 LO BI NG SH MA LS ED NE GL DL STDE LE MK LHR LI The World EU

Major upgrades in West & East Mids:

  • Coventry – International

– B’ham New St 4-track

  • Soho-Tame Bridge link
  • Derby–New St 4-track
  • Potteries main line

4-track through Stoke

Top 16 fully linked!

HIGH SPEED UK HSUK

slide-28
SLIDE 28 LGW LO BI NG SH MA LI LS NE ED GL DL STDE LE MK BS CF EU LHR

Full integration with existing network:

  • >50 links between HSUK

& existing network

  • HSUK accesses

city centre stations in all UK primary cities

  • HSUK accesses LHR

+ BHX, MAN, EDI & LTN

  • HSUK Gatwick link??

HSUK

HIGH SPEED UK

slide-29
SLIDE 29 London Enhanced intercity or airport link created by intervention of new HSL, all direct journeys M.Keynes Birmingham Leicester Nottingham Derby Stoke Sheffield Manchester Liverpool Leeds Darlington Newcastle Edinburgh Glasgow Heathrow LN MK BI LE NG DE ST SH MA LI LS DL NE EH GL LHR improves 119 out of 119 possible journeys data : HSUK Source data : HSUK timetable based on HSUK route mapping

HSUK : Fully interlinked network

slide-30
SLIDE 30 London Enhanced intercity or airport link created by intervention of new HSL, all direct journeys M.Keynes Birmingham Leicester Nottingham Derby Stoke Sheffield Manchester Liverpool Leeds Darlington Newcastle Edinburgh Glasgow Heathrow LN MK BI LE NG DE ST SH MA LI LS DL NE EH GL LHR improves 119 out of 119 possible journeys data : HSUK Source data : HSUK timetable based on HSUK route mapping

HSUK : Fully interlinked network

slide-31
SLIDE 31 London Enhanced intercity or airport link created by intervention of new HSL, all direct journeys M.Keynes Birmingham Leicester Nottingham Derby Stoke Sheffield Manchester Liverpool Leeds Darlington Newcastle Edinburgh Glasgow Heathrow LN MK BI LE NG DE ST SH MA LI LS DL NE EH GL LHR improves 119 out of 119 possible journeys data : HSUK Source data : HSUK timetable based on HSUK route mapping

HSUK : Fully interlinked network

slide-32
SLIDE 32 ,

33 centres examined in

HSUK timetable

  • 10 primary cities

GL,ED,NE,LS,LI,MA,SH,NG,BI,LO

  • Heathrow Airport (LHR)

HSUK

HIGH SPEED UK

slide-33
SLIDE 33 ,

33 centres examined in

HSUK timetable

  • 10 primary cities

GL,ED,NE,LS,LI,MA,SH,NG,BI

  • Heathrow Airport (LHR)
  • 10 second tier cities

fully interlinked

DL,YO,SK,ST,WV,DE,LE,NN,MK,OX

HSUK

HIGH SPEED UK

slide-34
SLIDE 34 ,

33 centres examined in

HSUK timetable

  • 10 primary cities

GL,ED,NE,LS,LI,MA,SH,NG,BI

  • Heathrow Airport (LHR)
  • 10 second tier cities

fully interlinked

DL,YO,SK,ST,WV,DE,LE,NN,MK,OX
  • 12 other cities
HU,DN,BD,HD,PR,WA, CH,CW,WS,CV,LU,PE

HSUK

HIGH SPEED UK

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Enhanced National Network

Considering 528 possible journeys between 33 major UK centres...

HSUK HS2+HS3 68 488 171 349

40 Journeys improved Journeys made worse Not improved Journeys improved Not improved

HSUK

No journeys made worse with HSUK

289

slide-36
SLIDE 36 Source data : HS2 predicted services, Table 23, pp91/92 KPMG Report; HS3 links as per Northern Powerhouse report; Classic network services, Table 23, pp91/92 KPMG Report London Enhanced direct intercity or airport link created by intervention of HS2/3 M.Keynes Birmingham Link degraded by HS2/3 intervention Leicester Other links uncategorised Nottingham Derby Stoke Sheffield Manchester Liverpool Leeds Darlington Newcastle Edinburgh Glasgow Heathrow LN MK BI LE NG DE ST SH MA LI LS DL NE EH GL LHR

HS2 and HS3

degrade 33 of 119 possible connections on the existing network

HS2+HS3 : Degraded Network

slide-37
SLIDE 37 data : HSUK timetable based on HSUK route mapping Source data : HSUK timetable based on HSUK route mapping London 4 Enhanced intercity or airport link created by intervention of new HSL, showing number of trains per hour M.Keynes 2 Birmingham 4 2 Leicester 4 3 2 Nottingham 2 1 2 3 Derby 2 1 3 3 2 Stoke 3 1 2 1 1 1 Sheffield 4 2 2 3 2 4 1 Manchester 3 1 2 1 1 1 4 3 Liverpool 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 5 Leeds 3 1 2 3 1 3 1 4 3 2 Darlington 3 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 4 Newcastle 3 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 4 4 Edinburgh 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 4 5 5 Glasgow 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 4 4 5 Heathrow 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LN MK BI LE NG DE ST SH MA LI LS DL NE EH GL LHR improves 119 out of 119 possible journeys

HSUK : Fully interlinked network

slide-38
SLIDE 38

HSUK : Cost-effective solution

HSUK’s more efficient network configuration requires 195km fewer kilometres of new-build high speed line than HS2. HSUK’s routes along existing transport corridors are located in easier, more accessible and less sensitive topography. HSUK’s superior routeing strategy requires 109km less tunnel than HS2.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

HSUK : Cost-effective solution

HSUK’s more efficient network configuration requires 195km fewer kilometres of new-build high speed line than HS2. HSUK’s routes along existing transport corridors are located in easier, more accessible and less sensitive topography. HSUK’s superior routeing strategy requires 109km less tunnel than HS2.

This is why HSUK will be billion cheaper to build than HS2 £20

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Journey Time Savings

High Speed UK’s scheme for new high speed lines at the core of a fully integrated UK high speed rail network will enable

>45% journey time savings

across the national intercity network.

This is proved by the timetable that we have developed.

HSUK

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Eurogauge UK freight network

  • Eurogauge UK - ‘Prime User’ freight network

along existing routes, parallel to HSUK

  • High speed passenger traffic diverted to high

speed line & other routes

  • Extends to same conurbations as HSUK
  • Lines upgraded to UIC-C Continental Gauge
  • Continental wagons via Channel Tunnel?
  • ‘Piggyback’ operation ie 45-foot 3-axle

articulated semi-trailers on rail wagons?

  • Transpennine lorry shuttles via Woodhead

HSUK

slide-42
SLIDE 42 ECML

Brent Cross HSUK Gatwick

HSUK high speed services access Heathrow via Compass Point Network & continue to Gatwick?? GWML

Heathrow London

Dedicated Heathrow-Gatwick high speed link catering for landside access transit passengers luggage & cargo transfers

HSUK :

Alternative London airport strategy

London’s

hub airport is the UK’s hub airport

Cambridge
slide-43
SLIDE 43

HSUK

The CO2 Challenge

CO2

emissions 1958 2008 2050

2008 Climate Change Act

80%

reduction

slide-44
SLIDE 44

HSUK

The CO2 Challenge

Living standards

1958 2008 2050

CO2

emissions
slide-45
SLIDE 45

HSUK

The CO2 Challenge

CO2

emissions 1958 2008 2050

Living standards Angle of decouple

slide-46
SLIDE 46 x-factor BEHAVIOURAL SHIFT Cars 52.5% LGVs 15.2% HGVs 19.8% 140 MT

??

MT

??

MT TECHNO SHIFT y-factor z-factor MODAL SHIFT Cars LGVs HGVs 28 MT Rail Bus Rail 1.7% Air 1.5% Domestic aviation virtually eliminated Bus 5.0-reduction factor x y z * *

HSUK

2015 2050?

Behavioural shift

UK Emissions Reductions Roadmap to 2050??

Modal shift

Technological shift

slide-47
SLIDE 47

HSUK

UK Emissions Reductions Roadmap to 2050??

Essential prerequisites for a railway solution:

  • Step change capacity increase
  • Step change connectivity increase
  • Full integration / follow existing corridors
  • National transport strategy
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Step-change CO2 reductions

  • HSUK will transform most UK intercity journeys
  • HSUK will increase average interregional

intercity speeds from 70kph to 140kph

  • HSUK will enhance local service capacity in

Leeds, Birmingham, Manchester & other cities

  • HSUK’s freight strategies will transfer HGV flows

to rail on most long-distance routes

  • HSUK will deliver step-change modal shift
  • This is why we predict that HSUK will cut CO2

emissions by >500 million tonnes over 40 years

HSUK

slide-49
SLIDE 49

High Speed UK’s  Restored Woodhead route,   ll aspects of the Government’s

HSUK Northern Pow

Between:

Manche – Leeds Manche – Sheffield Manche – Liverpool Sheffield – Leeds Leeds – – –

LEEDS CITY SHEFFIELD VICTORIA MANCHESTER PICCADILLY MANCHESTER AIRPORT LIVERPOOL LIME ST STOCKPORT STOKE WOODHEAD TUNNEL NEWCASTLE HULL

HSUK Northern Powerhouse HSUK

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Aberdeen Perth Inverness Edinburgh Glasgow

Edinburgh Airport Forth Bridge Glenfarg Route restored Strathmore Route restored English Cities

Dundee

HSUK Scottish Powerhouse

HSUK

slide-51
SLIDE 51 Wolver- hampton Sandwell & Dudley

Birmingham

Birmingham International Airport Coventry Rugby Northampton

Nottingham

East Midlands Airport Lough- borough

Leicester Derby

Burton Lichfield Hawthorns Walsall

THE MIDLANDS RING

HSUK Midlands Powerhouse HSUK

slide-52
SLIDE 52 LEICESTER NOTTINGHAM DERBY STOKE Rugby BIRMINGHAM COVENTRY NORTHAMPTON Worcester Redditch Kidderminster Stafford Lichfield Burton on Trent Loughborough Leamington Tamworth Nuneaton Stratford
  • n Avon
BHX Wolverhampton Walsall EMA Solihull

Midlands Road Network

slide-53
SLIDE 53 NOTTINGHAM ST WR BIRMINGHAM RD KI SF LF BT LB NG DE LE RB NN LM TW NU SA BI WV WS CV BHX EMA SH

Midlands Rail Network

Passenger Freight only

slide-54
SLIDE 54 NOTTINGHAM ST WR BIRMINGHAM RD KI SF LF BT LB NG DE LE RB NN LM TW NU SA BI WV WS CV BHX EMA SH

Midlands Rail Network WCML MML

slide-55
SLIDE 55 NOTTINGHAM ST WR BIRMINGHAM RD KI SF LF BT LB NG DE LE RB NN LM TW NU SA BI WV WS CV BHX EMA SH

Midlands Rail Network Xcountry

slide-56
SLIDE 56 NOTTINGHAM ST WR BIRMINGHAM RD KI SF LF BT LB NG DE LE RB NN LM TW NU SA BI WV WS CV BHX EMA SH

# #

Midlands Rail Network HS2 # - link to

exg network

slide-57
SLIDE 57 CURZON STREET T.H.

BIRMINGHAM STATIONS

GJR L&B

1838

Cath.

Birmingham Rail Development (1)

slide-58
SLIDE 58 CURZON STREET LAWLEY STREET

BIRMINGHAM STATIONS

B&DJR B&G

1842

Birmingham Rail Development (2)

slide-59
SLIDE 59 SNOW HILL CURZON STREET LAWLEY STREET

BIRMINGHAM STATIONS

GWR

1852

Birmingham Rail Development (3)

slide-60
SLIDE 60 SNOW HILL NEW STREET

1854

BIRMINGHAM STATIONS

LNWR MR MR LNWR

Birmingham Rail Development (4)

slide-61
SLIDE 61 SNOW HILL NEW STREET MOOR STREET

1909

BIRMINGHAM STATIONS

LNWR MR MR LNWR

Birmingham Rail Development (5)

slide-62
SLIDE 62 NEW STREET MOOR STREET

c.1980

BIRMINGHAM STATIONS

LNWR MR MR LNWR

Birmingham Rail Development (6)

slide-63
SLIDE 63 SNOW HILL NEW STREET MOOR STREET

2015

BIRMINGHAM STATIONS

WCML XCML Cross
  • City
Chiltern XCML Cross
  • City

Birmingham Rail Development (7)

slide-64
SLIDE 64 SNOW HILL NEW STREET MOOR STREET

2027??

BIRMINGHAM STATIONS

WCML XCML Cross
  • City
Chiltern XCML HS2 CURZON STREET Cross
  • City

Birmingham Rail Development (8)

slide-65
SLIDE 65
  • Curzon St./Moor St. almost contiguous
  • 3 radial routes within West Midlands
  • 16 local stations within M42/M6(T) ring
  • Walking transfer to LNW/Midland network

focussed upon New Street

  • Walking link for onward CrossCountry

routes

  • No proposals for improved heavy rail links

to Moor St./Curzon St. – just trams

Integrate with Moor Street?

slide-66
SLIDE 66
  • New Street primary regional hub
  • Onward HS routes to satellite centres eg

Wolverhampton, Walsall & Coventry

  • 7 radial routes within West Midlands
  • 40 local stations within M42/M6(T) ring
  • Walking transfer to GWR network focussed

upon Moor Street??

  • 10 radial routes with existing links to GW

network

  • Network integrity maintained & enhanced
  • BUT....................................

Integrate with New Street?

slide-67
SLIDE 67
  • New Street too short for 400m long trains
  • New Street approaches & platforms too

tight for HS2 ‘fat trains’

  • New Street already full

All so far taken as showstoppers... How much of this really matters?? Integrate with New Street?

slide-68
SLIDE 68 PLATFORM 1 PLATFORM 12 BRISTOL WOLVERHAMPTON COVENTRY DERBY LNW PLATFORMS (1-7) MIDLAND PLATFORMS (8-12)

Birmingham New Street – a quart into a pint point??

slide-69
SLIDE 69
  • 12 through platforms – 5 Midland, 7 LNW
  • 47 trains per hour (tph)
  • 31tph running through
  • 15tph terminating
  • 1tph reversing
  • Passenger handling facilities transformed

with £500M Gateway project

  • Station unchanged at track level

New Street : Facts & Figures

slide-70
SLIDE 70
  • Station largely unchangeable at track

level, in terms of civils & Pway

  • Can operating pattern be changed

instead?

  • Can signalling system be improved?

New Street : The Challenge

slide-71
SLIDE 71 NOTTINGHAM ST WR BIRMINGHAM RD KI SF LF BT LB NG DE LE RB NN LM TW NU SA BI WV WS CV BHX EMA SH

Midlands Rail Network HSUK

showing only 4-track north-south trunk route

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Midlands Rail Network HSUK

Upgraded Restored New build

# - link to

exg network

NOTTINGHAM ST WR BIRMINGHAM RD KI SF LF BT LB NG DE LE RB NN LM TW NU SA BI WV WS CV BHX EMA SH

# # # # # # # # #

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Midlands Rail Network HSUK

Eurogauge freight network

NOTTINGHAM ST WR RD KI SF LF BT LB NG DE LE RB NN LM TW NU SA BI WV WS CV BHX EMA SH TOTON BESCOT
slide-74
SLIDE 74

Midlands Rail Network HSUK

Midlands Ring regional passenger network

NOTTINGHAM ST WR BIRMINGHAM RD KI SF LF BT LB NG DE LE RB NN LM TW NU SA BI WV WS CV BHX EMA SH
slide-75
SLIDE 75 PLATFORM 1 PLATFORM 12 BRISTOL WOLVERHAMPTON COVENTRY DERBY LNW PLATFORMS (1-7) MIDLAND PLATFORMS (8-12)

Birmingham New Street – a quart into a pint point??

slide-76
SLIDE 76
slide-77
SLIDE 77 Clearance Point Typically less than 100 yards Treadle Train Stop System – 0 mph Different distances for each application

TPWS with Virtual ROL

slide-78
SLIDE 78 Clearance Point Typically less than 100 yards Treadle Train Stop System – 0 mph Different distances for each application

TPWS with Virtual ROL

slide-79
SLIDE 79 Wolver- hampton Sandwell & Dudley

Birmingham

Birmingham International Airport Coventry Rugby Northampton

Nottingham

East Midlands Airport Lough- borough

Leicester Derby

Burton Lichfield Hawthorns Walsall

THE MIDLANDS RING

HSUK Midlands Powerhouse HSUK

slide-80
SLIDE 80

HSUK Midlands Powerhouse HSUK

Stafford Direct train linking community pair 78 x4 312 Walsall RY GB Connection for community pair link 51 x3 153 Wolverhampton BI BI Connection via Birmingham New St 40 x2 80 Sandwell&Dudley BI BI Walking connection via Birmingham 36 x1 36 Hawthorns BI BI GB GB 2 changes of trains required 26 x0 Birmingham Total connections/connectivity score 231 581 International BI BI Coventry BI BI Number of connections Rugby BI CV CV BI Weighting factor Northampton BI CV CV BI Weighted connectivity score Leicester NU BI BI BI BI BI NU NU NU Loughborough Connectivity index = 581 2.5 East Mids Airport 231 Nottingham TW BI BI BI BI BI BI TW TW Derby TW BI BI BI BI BI BI TW TW Burton on Trent TW BI BI BI BI BI BI TW TW DE DE DE Lichfield AS BI BI BI BI NU NU TW TW TW Tamworth BI BI BI BI BI NU NU DE DE Nuneaton BI BI BI BI CV LE LE LE LE TW Leamington BI CV CV BI BI BI BI CV Solihull BI BI GB GB BI LM BI BI BI BI BI BI BI BI BI Kidderminster BI BI GB GB GB GB BI BI BI BI BI BI BI BI BI SF WS WV SD HT BI BHX CV RB NN LE LB EM NG DE BT LF TW NU LM SH KI

Existing Regional Connectivity

Connectivity Index (CI)

=2.5

slide-81
SLIDE 81

HSUK Midlands Powerhouse HSUK

Stafford Direct train linking community pair 147 x4 588 Walsall WV GB Connection for community pair link 64 x3 192 Wolverhampton BI Connection via Birmingham New St 10 x2 20 Sandwell&Dudley BI BI Walking connection via Birmingham 10 x1 10 Hawthorns GB 2 changes of trains required x0 Birmingham Total connections/connectivity score 231 810 International Coventry Number of connections Rugby CV Weighting factor Northampton BI CV CV CV Weighted connectivity score Leicester NU BI Loughborough RB CV Connectivity index = 810 3.5 East Mids Airport RB CV 231 Nottingham LF CV Derby LF BI Burton on Trent LF BI TW Lichfield BI Tamworth LF LF BI LF BI NU NU DE DE Nuneaton LF LF BI LF CV LE LE LE LE TW Leamington CV CV CV CV CV CV CV BI CV Solihull HT HT GB GB BI LM BI BI BI BI BI HT HT HT HT BI BI Kidderminster HT HT GB GB GB GB HT HT HT HT HT HT HT HT HT BI BI SF WS WV SD HT BI BHX CV RB NN LE LB EM NG DE BT LF TW NU LM SH KI

HSUK Enhanced Regional Connectivity

Connectivity Index (CI)

=3.5

slide-82
SLIDE 82
  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities

  • 2. Connect with local networks
  • 3. Connect with HS1 & airports
  • 4. Coordinate with railfreight strategy
  • 5. Offer optimum connectivity, capacity,

journey time, resilience etc

  • 6. Comply with all relevant public policy

HSUK

HSUK Design Principles

slide-83
SLIDE 83

The New Exam Questions

  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities?

  • 2. Connect with local networks?
  • 3. Connect with HS1 & airports?
  • 4. Coordinate with railfreight strategy?
  • 5. Offer optimum connectivity, capacity,

journey time, resilience etc?

  • 6. Comply with all relevant public policy?

HSUK

slide-84
SLIDE 84

HSUK

HSUK PASS

  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities?

  • 2. Connect with local networks?
  • 3. Connect with HS1 & airports?
  • 4. Coordinate with railfreight strategy?
  • 5. Offer optimum connectivity, capacity,

journey time, resilience etc?

  • 6. Comply with all relevant public policy?

The New Exam Questions

slide-85
SLIDE 85

HSUK

HSUK PASS

HS2 FAIL

  • 1. Perform optimally as intercity network,

interlinking all primary cities?

  • 2. Connect with local networks?
  • 3. Connect with HS1 & airports?
  • 4. Coordinate with railfreight strategy?
  • 5. Offer optimum connectivity, capacity,

journey time, resilience etc?

  • 6. Comply with all relevant public policy?

The New Exam Questions

slide-86
SLIDE 86

HIGH SPEED UK Challenge

We challenge the Government and HS2 Ltd to demonstrate that:

  • HS2 (& HS3) offers the best outcome

for UK intercity travel

  • HS2 complies with public policy (cost,

CO2 emissions, land use, inclusivity etc)

  • HS2 has been developed with all

necessary due process

HSUK

slide-87
SLIDE 87

HSUK Technical Challenge

HS2 & HS3 must deliver best outcomes

  • But HSUK superior on any comparator
  • No logical counter-argument to HSUK

ever advanced

  • All arguments from Government are for

the principle of high speed rail

  • The detail of HS2 doesn’t conform with

HS2 Ltd’s own stated principles & remit

Independent public inquiry essential

HSUK

slide-88
SLIDE 88

HSUK Public Policy Challenge

Conformance with public policy essential for joined-up Government But HS2 fails on multiple counts:

  • CO2 emissions
  • AONB issues
  • Inclusivity

Independent public inquiry essential

HSUK

  • Planning policy
  • Integrated transport
  • Budgetary restraint
slide-89
SLIDE 89

HSUK Due Process Challenge

Due Process??

Logical & structured process of:

  • Remit formulation
  • Option selection
  • Design development
  • Public consultation

Essential to ensure optimum outcome

  • f UK high speed rail project

HSUK

slide-90
SLIDE 90

HSUK Due Process Challenge

Outcome of Due Process Review:

  • Evidence from HS2 remit,

HS2 Ltd reports & official consultation indicates prima-facie failure of due process at all levels.

  • We challenge HS2 Ltd to provide

an alternative narrative. Independent public inquiry essential

HSUK

slide-91
SLIDE 91

We will accept a challenge from:

  • Any MP
  • Any County / District / Met Council
  • Any Unitary Authority

to show that HSUK delivers far greater benefits than HS2/3 to their locale. We will demonstrate that HSUK

  • utperforms HS2/3 in every way.

HIGH SPEED UK Challenge HSUK

slide-92
SLIDE 92

HS2 HSUK

Top 21 centres fully connected? Serves existing city centre stations? 40% journey time reductions? 4-track stem? Direct links to Heathrow & HS1? Step-change CO2 reductions? Avoids Chilterns AONB? Regional integration strategies? Freight strategy?

HSR Project Checklist

slide-93
SLIDE 93

HS2 HSUK

Top 21 centres fully connected? Serves existing city centre stations? 40% journey time reductions? 4-track stem? Direct links to Heathrow & HS1? Step-change CO2 reductions? Avoids Chilterns AONB? Regional integration strategies? Freight strategy?

HSR Project Checklist

slide-94
SLIDE 94

HS2 HSUK

Top 21 centres fully connected? Serves existing city centre stations? 40% journey time reductions? 4-track stem? Direct links to Heathrow & HS1? Step-change CO2 reductions? Avoids Chilterns AONB? Regional integration strategies? Freight strategy?

HSR Project Checklist

slide-95
SLIDE 95

HS2 HSUK

Top 21 centres fully connected? Serves existing city centre stations? 40% journey time reductions? 4-track stem? Direct links to Heathrow & HS1? Step-change CO2 reductions? Avoids Chilterns AONB? Regional integration strategies? Freight strategy?

HSR Project Checklist

slide-96
SLIDE 96

HS2 HSUK

Top 21 centres fully connected? Serves existing city centre stations? 40% journey time reductions? 4-track stem? Direct links to Heathrow & HS1? Step-change CO2 reductions? Avoids Chilterns AONB? Regional integration strategies? Freight strategy?

HSR Project Checklist

slide-97
SLIDE 97

HS2 HSUK

Top 21 centres fully connected? Serves existing city centre stations? 40% journey time reductions? 4-track stem? Direct links to Heathrow & HS1? Step-change CO2 reductions? Avoids Chilterns AONB? Regional integration strategies? Freight strategy?

HSR Project Checklist

slide-98
SLIDE 98

HS2 HSUK

Top 21 centres fully connected? Serves existing city centre stations? 40% journey time reductions? 4-track stem? Direct links to Heathrow & HS1? Step-change CO2 reductions? Avoids Chilterns AONB? Regional integration strategies? Freight strategy?

HSR Project Checklist

slide-99
SLIDE 99

HS2 HSUK

Top 21 centres fully connected? Serves existing city centre stations? 40% journey time reductions? 4-track stem? Direct links to Heathrow & HS1? Step-change CO2 reductions? Avoids Chilterns AONB? Regional integration strategies? Freight strategy?

HSR Project Checklist

slide-100
SLIDE 100

HS2 HSUK

Top 21 centres fully connected? Serves existing city centre stations? 40% journey time reductions? 4-track stem? Direct links to Heathrow & HS1? Step-change CO2 reductions? Avoids Chilterns AONB? Regional integration strategies? Freight strategy?

HSR Project Checklist

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Thank you

HSUK

slide-102
SLIDE 102

HS2 Remit Issues

HS2 remit specified (inter alia):

  • High speed line from London to West Mids
  • Consideration of onward development to

conurbations further north

  • Heathrow/Crossrail interchange at

Old Oak Common

  • No mention of network!!

Remit biased, unbalanced and prescriptive

slide-103
SLIDE 103

HS2 Option Selection

Phase 1 option selection process:

  • Required all candidate routes to pass

through Old Oak Common in west London

  • Dismissed all M1-aligned options with no

serious consideration

  • Made multiple assertions re M1 routeing

– all either false or spurious

  • No consideration of network – only

journey time, cost & env. impact assessed

slide-104
SLIDE 104

HS2 Design Focus

All HS2 design focus on high speed line

  • minimal attention to network:
  • Phase 1 designed as London-West Mids HSL
  • Only very brief consideration of network

with subsequent phases of HS2

  • All network options predicated upon a

London-West Mids HSL via Chilterns & OOC

  • Any M1-aligned option – such as HSUK –

therefore dismissed without consideration

slide-105
SLIDE 105

HS2 Consultation Issues

All these issues have been repeatedly reported to HS2 Ltd. But...

  • No engagement with HSUK concerns
  • No counter-argument advanced
  • No change to HS2 proposals
  • No info to Parliament to report on

unresolved technical issues

So... Consultation responses ignored