high n steady state scenarios
play

high N , steady-state scenarios 5 W.W. (Bill) Heidbrink 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Alfvn eigenmodes (AE) degrade fast-ion confinement in high N , steady-state scenarios 5 W.W. (Bill) Heidbrink 1 Amplitude with J. Ferron, 2 C. Holcomb, 3 M. Van Zeeland 2 , E. Bass 4 , X. Chen 2 , C. Collins 1 , A. Garofalo 2 , X. Gong 5 ,


  1. Alfvén eigenmodes (AE) degrade fast-ion confinement in high β N , steady-state scenarios 5 W.W. (Bill) Heidbrink 1 Amplitude with J. Ferron, 2 C. Holcomb, 3 M. Van Zeeland 2 , E. Bass 4 , X. Chen 2 , C. Collins 1 , A. Garofalo 2 , X. Gong 5 , N. AE Gorelenkov 6 , B. Grierson 6 , C. 0 Petty 2 , M. Podestà 6 , D. Spong 7 , 250 L. Stagner 1 , Y. Zhu 1 ~ Fast-ion Transport 200 Fast-Ion Div.Flux 1 University of California, Irvine 150 2 General Atomics 3 Lawrence Livermore National 100 Laboratory 4 University of California, San Diego 50 5 Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Science 0 6 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory -50 7 Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2 4 6 8 10 P NBI (MW)

  2. Steady-state Advanced Tokamak (AT) scenarios often have elevated values of safety factor q • Projections predict a stable β N =5 steady-state scenario in DIII-D with increased ECCD and off-axis NBI 1) Poli, NF 54 (2014) J.M. Park, APS (2013) 2) Garofalo, NF 54 (2014) 3) Kessel, FED 80 (2006)

  3. Many DIII-D discharges with q min >2 have poor global confinement Uses Thermal + Fast Ion Stored Energy 2.6 Is degraded fast- ( 2.7 < N < 3.9, 4.5 < q 95 < 6.8) ion confinement H 89 = E 2.4 the culprit? 89 2.2 Typical H- 2.0 mode level 1.8 1.6 1.5 2.0 2.5 1.0 q min Ferron, PoP 20 (2013) 092504

  4. Outline 1. AEs degrade fast-ion confinement in many steady-state scenario discharges 2. Degradation of fast-ion confinement can account for the overall degradation in global confinement 3. Physical mechanism of fast-ion transport: critical gradient behavior due to many wave- particle resonances 4. Outlook

  5. Use TRANSP to quantify the degradation in fast-ion signals (10 15 n/s) #154406 • Use spatially uniform 1.2 C lassical P rediction ad hoc fast-ion 0.8 ONS diffusion D f in TRANSP 0.4 M easured S UTR as an empirical Variable D f P rediction ignal NE measure of 0.0 degraded fast-ion (b) S ignal /C 3 lassical 1.0 confinement 2 0.67 • Alternatively, use Variable D f (m 2 /s) 1 0.33 ratio of signal to 0 0 “classical” prediction 2.4 onfinement “H89” (c) G lobal C • Global confinement 2.0 varies with fast-ion 1.6 confinement 1.2 2 3 4 5 6 TIME ( s )

  6. The qmin~2 discharge has more AEs and worse confinement than the qmin~1 discharge

  7. Many Alfvén Eigenmodes are Observed & Expected Calculated Unstable TAE Measured Simultaneous Modes #152932 @ 2.962 s (a) 113 k Hz 10 (ECE) Amp (eV) 8 6 4 2 0 20 (b) 137 kHz Amp (eV) 15 GYRO 10 5 0 10 (c) 153 kHz Amp (eV) 8 6 4 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 MINOR R ADIUS Typical toroidal mode numbers: 2-5

  8. q min ~1 data agree with predicted fast-ion signals qmin ~ 1 FIDA (10 16 ph/s-sr-m 2 ) 2.0 Classical 1.0 0 180 200 220 MAJORR ADIUS (cm) Ratio of signal to calculated predictions Classical Neutrons 89% W f ast 100%

  9. q min ~1 data agree with predicted fast-ion signals but q min ~2 data do not qmin ~ 2 qmin ~ 1 FIDA (10 16 ph/s-sr-m 2 ) 2.0 1.0 0 180 200 220 MAJORR ADIUS (cm) Ratio of signal to calculated predictions * Classical Classical Neutrons 89% 61% W f ast 100% 72%

  10. Assuming fast-ion diffusion of 1.3 m 2 /s gives approximate agreement with qmin~2 data Ratio of signal to calculated predictions W f ast 100% 72% 108% * Classical Classical D f Neutrons 89% 61% 91%

  11. Degraded fast-ion signals correlate with increasing Alfvén eigenmode activity • Every diagnostic that is sensitive to co-passing fast ions measures reductions • The “AE Amplitude” is the average amplitude of coherent modes in the TAE band (from interferometer signals) • Data from quasi- stationary portion of steady-state scenario discharges

  12. Outline 1. AEs degrade fast-ion confinement in steady- state scenario discharges 2. Degradation of fast-ion confinement can account for the overall degradation in global confinement 3. Physical mechanism of fast-ion transport: critical gradient behavior due to many wave- particle resonances 4. Outlook

  13. Enhanced fast-ion transport can explain the apparent reduction in thermal confinement at high qmin • Compare two 2.6 actor matched 2.4 qmin~1 discharges: onfinement F 2.2 qmin ~ 1 & qmin ~ 2 2.0 1.8 qmin~2 H89 C 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 qmin

  14. Enhanced fast-ion transport can explain the apparent reduction in thermal confinement at high qmin 2.6 • Compare actor power balance 2.4 qmin~1 in qmin ~ 2 shot: AE E ffect onfinement F 2.2 Classical vs. 2.0 D f =1.3 m 2 /s • Reduced fast- 1.8 ion stored qmin~2 H89 C 1.6 energy • Less power 1.4 delivered to 1.2 thermal plasma 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 qmin  Thermal diffusivities like qmin ~1 discharge

  15. Outline 1. AEs degrade fast-ion confinement in many steady-state scenario discharges 2. Degradation of fast-ion confinement can account for the overall degradation in global confinement 3. Physical mechanism of fast-ion transport: critical gradient behavior due to many wave- particle resonances 4. Outlook

  16. Different combinations of on-axis & off-axis beams vary the fast-ion gradient that drives AEs CLAS S ICAL BE AM PR OFILE S 5 TY (10 12 cm -3 ) Use L-mode plasma in (On-axis) Beam Mix=0.0 #146102 @ 550 ms 0.22 current ramp: 4 0.45 • Low AE threshold 3 I 0.72 NS • Well diagnosed T-ION DE 1.0 (Off-axis) 2 1 AS F 0 On-axis injection 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 NOR MALIZE D MINORR ADIUS

  17. As predicted by linear AE stability theory, a steeper gradient drives more AE activity CLAS S ICAL BE AM PR OFILE S 5 TY (10 12 cm -3 ) Beam Mix=0.0 #146102 @ 550 ms 0.22 4 0.45 3 I 0.72 NS T-ION DE 1.0 2 1.0 2.0 1 AS F 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 AEAmplitude NOR MALIZE D MINORR ADIUS 1.5 • Growth rate from TAEFL gyrofluid n=2 Growth rate 1.0 0.5 code n=3 Growth rate • GYRO gyrokinetic 0.5 code gives similar results 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 On axis Off axis BE AM MIX

  18. Stronger AE activity causes a larger fast-ion deficit CLAS S ICAL BE AM PR OFILE S 5 TY (10 12 cm -3 ) Beam Mix=0.0 #146102 @ 550 ms 0.22 4 0.45 3 I 0.72 NS T-ION DE 1.0 2 1.0 2.0 1 AS F AEAmplitude Neutron/Classical 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 NOR MALIZE D MINORR ADIUS 1.5 • The measured neutron rate 1.0 0.5 approaches the classical prediction for off- 0.5 axis injection 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 On axis Off axis BE AM MIX

  19. The measured fast-ion profile is nearly the same for all angles of injection! CLAS S ICAL BE AM PR OFILE S 5 TY (10 12 cm -3 ) Beam Mix=0.0 #146102 @ 550 ms 0.22 4 0.45 3 I 0.72 NS T-ION DE 1.0 2 1 AS F 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Beam mix = 0.0 NOR MALIZE D MINORR ADIUS 0.45 0.72 3 • Suggests the fast-ion 1.0 transport is “stiff” FIDA Density • The linear stability 2 threshold acts (approximately) as a 1 “critical gradient” 0 Of course, in quiet plasmas, the 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 profiles differ. Major R adius (m)

  20. A critical gradient model* reproduces the observed trend CLAS S ICAL BE AM PR OFILE S 0.8 5 TY (10 12 cm -3 ) Beam Mix=0.0 #146102 @ 550 ms 0.22 ATE 4 0.45 3 ONR I 0.72 NS T-ION DE 1.0 0.7 2 Theory UTR 1 AS F 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 D NE NOR MALIZE D MINORR ADIUS 0.6 MALIZE E xperiment 0.5 NOR 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Off-axis On-axis BE AM MIX *Ghantous, Phys. Pl. 19 (2012) 092511. Gorelenkov TH/P1-2

  21. Recent Data Supports Critical Gradient Model of Alfven Eigenmode (AE) Induced Fast Ion Transport • Beam power scan varies AE AE Power (a.u.) amplitude • Modulated off-axis beam allows measurement of incremental fast- SSNPA ~ Fast-ion Density ion flux P NBI-mod • Local fast-ion density ceases to rise above certain input power/ AE amplitudes – SSNPA Neutral particle analyzer -> fast- ion density localized in phase space

  22. Above threshold, the modulated signal is strongly distorted by AE transport Classical ignal (a.u.) 0.05 2.1 MW(T otal P ower) Modulated S 9.3 MW 0.00 • Conditionally average the modulated signal -0.05 • At low power, the signal agrees P NBI-mod well with a classical model • Classically, the amplitude of the 0 10 20 30 40 50 TIME (ms) modulated signal should increase at high power

  23. Infer the fast-ion transport from a continuity equation for the measured “density” Weight Function • Define a “density” that incorporates the phase-space sensitivity W in its definition Distribution Function “Flux” • Linearize. Obtain a continuity equation for 1 st order (modulated) quantities • When the AEs are absent, the transport term is negligible  measure source in a low-power shot • With AEs, use the measured n to infer the divergence of the fast-ion flux

  24. Divergence of fast-ion flux abruptly increases above an AE threshold  critical gradient behavior 5 Amplitude AE Power (a.u.) AE 0 250 SSNPA ~ Fast-ion Density 200 Fast-Ion Div.Flux 150 100 50 0 -50 2 4 6 8 10 P NBI (MW)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend