henryford
play

HenryFord Nuclear Engr & Rad. Science Health System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NERS/BIOE 481 Lecture 05 Radiographic Image Formation Michael Flynn, Adjunct Prof HenryFord Nuclear Engr & Rad. Science Health System mikef@umich.edu mikef@rad.hfh.edu RADIOLOGY RESEARCH IV - General Model xray imaging Xrays are


  1. NERS/BIOE 481 Lecture 05 Radiographic Image Formation Michael Flynn, Adjunct Prof HenryFord Nuclear Engr & Rad. Science Health System mikef@umich.edu mikef@rad.hfh.edu RADIOLOGY RESEARCH

  2. IV - General Model – xray imaging Xrays are used to examine the interior content of objects by recording and displaying transmitted radiation from a point source. DETECTION DISPLAY (A) Subject contrast from radiation transmission is (B) recorded by the detector and (C) transformed to display values that are (D) sent to a display device for (E) presentation to the human visual system. 2 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  3. IV.A – Geometric projection (9 charts) A) Geometric Projection 1) Transmission geometry 2) Magnification 3) Focal spot blur 4) Object resolution 3 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  4. IV.A.1 – Transmission geometry The radiographic image formation process projects the properties of the object along straight lines from a point- like source to various positions on a detector surface. • The recorded signal Flat detector reflects material properties encounted along each ray path. • Distortion of the object Object can occur if the detector surface is oblique Point-like source The radiographic projection is a ‘perspective transmissive projection’ from the point of view of the source. Object features close to the source are magnified as are visual objects close to the viewer eye. 4 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  5. IV.A.2 – Magnification, M The diverging path of source the x-rays caused the recorded signal, S, in relation to detector position, x d , to be d so magnified relative to the object size, x i . d sd object x i d  d od sd M d so     d d d so od so detector d   S 1 od d x d so 5 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  6. IV.A.3 – Focal spot blur Penumbral blur: The size of the focal Focal spot f emission spot emission area causes points and edges to be blurred. d so Blur for detector dimensions: d      od B f f M 1 d od fd d so Blur scaled to object dimensions:       M 1 1     B fd B fo f f 1   M M 6 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  7. IV.A.4 – Object resolution In general, the detector will further blur the position of incident radiation. Blur scaled to object dimensions: do  B B M d If the focal spot and the detector blur have Gaussian distributions, they convolve to a Gaussian system resolution, scaled to the object, B d with width, B o .   2 2 2 B B B o do fo 2 2      B 1   2     d f 1     M M 7 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  8. IV.A.4 – Object resolution Large focal spot size f = 1.0 mm B d = 0.5 mm 1.4 B o (M) 1.2 B fo (M) B do (M) Blur, B mm 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 M 8 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  9. IV.A.4 – Object resolution Small focal spot size f = 0.2 mm B d = 0.5 mm 1.4 B o (M) 1.2 B fo (M) Blur, B mm 1 B do (M) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 M 9 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  10. IV.A.4 – Object resolution In general, for a given focal spot size and detector blur, there is a magnification that produces minimal resolution in object dimensions. This can be found by setting the derivative of B O with respect to M equal to 0. dB dB dB      2 2 2 fo B B B o do 2 B 2 B 2 B 0 o do fo o do fo dM dM dM   B   dB B   d  B do d do   M 2 dM M    dB 1 f     fo B f 1 fo   2 M dM M 10 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  11. IV.A.4 – Object resolution         B B 1 f         d d f 1 0       2 2 M M M M Substituting the  2    B 1 expressions from the prior   2   d f 1 0   page and rearranging M M   yields the simple solution     2 2 B f M 1 0 d that the best object 2   resolution is obtained when B       d M 1 the magnification is equal   f to 1.0 plus the square of 2   B     the ratio of the detector d M 1   f blur to the focal spot size. Bd = 0.5 mm, f = 0.2 mm  M = 7.25 Bd = 0.5 mm, f = 1.0 mm  M = 1.25 11 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  12. IV.A.4 – Example, magnification image Agricultural Imaging http://www.faxitron.com/life-sciences-ndt/agricultural.html Faxitron X-ray Corp • MX-20 Digital • 20 m m focal spot • 5X magnification “Ultra-high resolution x-ray imaging is an important tool in seed and plant inspection and analysis. “ Sunflower Seed 12 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  13. IV.B – Primary Signal (10 charts) B) Primary Signal - Radiography 1) Attenuation 2) The projection integral 3) Ideal detector a) photon counting b) energy integrating 13 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  14. IV.B.1 – projection nomenclature To mathematically describe signal and noise, we will consider the signal associated with projection vectors, p , whose directions are defined by detector coordinates, (u,v) , or source angles (q,f) . u ^ p v (f,q ) 14 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  15. IV.B.2 – projection path variable Radiation traveling along the projection p enters the ^ object and will travel a distance T before exiting the object and striking the detector. We will consider a pathlength variable, t , which is 0 at the object entrance and T at exit. T 0 t dt ^ p 15 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  16. IV.B.2 – projection integral Radiation traveling through an object along the projection vector p will be subject to attenuation by various material encountered along the path t . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 n = f o f    t e 3 T        ( t ) dt  t n             t t t  e 1 e 2 e 3 e n e 0  o 16 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  17. IV.B.2 – the Radon transform    T         P r ( , ) ln ( ) t dt  • The argument of the   0 o exponential factor describing the attenuation through an y object path is known as the Radon transform. t • It’s form is that of a r q generalized pathlength x integral of a density function. m (x,y) • The inverse solution to the Radon transform, i.e. m (x,y) as a function of P(r, q ) , is used in computed tomography. In the Radon transform equation above, the attenuation shown as a function of the projection path variable, m (t) , is more formally written as m (r ,q) or m (x,y) The line integral of m (t) , P(r, q ) , is referred to a a ‘Projection Value’. The set of all values obtained in one exposure is called a ‘Projection View. 17 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  18. IV.B.3 – Energy dependant incident fluence • The x-ray fluence on the detector will vary as a function of x-ray energy. T    ( , ) t E dt    P P e 0 ( E ) ( E ) o • The energy dependence of the linear attenuation coefficient effects the shape of the differential energy spectrum presented to the detector. 18 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  19. IV.B.3 – Spectrum incident on object 100 kV, tungsten target, NO tissue 19 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  20. IV.B.3 – Spectrum incident on detector 100 kV, tungsten target, 20 cm tissue 20 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  21. IV.B.3 – ‘ideal’ versus actual detectors • The signals recorded by actual detectors are determined in a complex manner by the energy dependant absorption in the target and background materials and the energy dependant absorption in the detector. • We consider now signals recorded by ‘ideal’ detectors. Later we will examine actual detectors 21 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  22. IV.B.3 – Ideal image detector – counting type • An ideal photon counting detector will accumulate a record of the number of photons incident on the detector surface. • The detected signal for an ideal photon counting detector, Sc, can be written as: E max    S A t dE ( E ) c d 0 Where is the exposure time, sec • t • f is the photon fluence rate, photons/mm 2 /sec, • A d is the effective area of a detector element. 22 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  23. IV.B.3 – Ideal image detector – energy integrating type • An ideal energy integrating detector will record a signal equal to the total energy of all photons incident on the detector surface. • The detected signal for an ideal energy integrating detector, Se , can be written as: E max    S A t E dE ( E ) e d 0 Where is the exposure time, sec • t • f is the photon fluence rate, photons/mm 2 /sec, • A d is the effective area of a detector element. The majority of actual radiographic detectors are energy integrating; however, they are not ‘ideal’. 23 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  24. IV.C – Radiation Noise & Stats (14 charts) C) Radiation Detection Noise - Statistical principles 1) Radiation counting & noise 2) Poisson/Gaussian distributions 3) Propagation of error 24 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

  25. IV.C.1 - Radiation Counting A simple radiation detector may be used to make repeated measurements of the number of radiation quanta striking the detector in a specified time period. Radiation Radiation Detector source 25 NERS/BIOE 481 - 2019

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend