Health System Preparedness of Six EU Countries for a Future - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

health system preparedness of six eu countries for a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Health System Preparedness of Six EU Countries for a Future - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Health System Preparedness of Six EU Countries for a Future Alzheimers Innovation AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting 2019 Washington, D.C. June 2019 Jakub Hlvka, Soeren Mattke, Jodi Liu Why focus on Alzheimers treatment now?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting 2019 Washington, D.C. June 2019 Jakub Hlávka, Soeren Mattke, Jodi Liu

Health System Preparedness of Six EU Countries for a Future Alzheimer’s Innovation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why focus on Alzheimer’s treatment now?

  • Currently no treatment, but therapies in clinical trials
  • Guarded optimism for new Alzheimer’s innovation currently being

development

  • Shifting earlier (to the left) in the disease paradigm

– Estimated 20 million people in the EU have mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Objective: Quantify the potential mismatch between supply and demand for the delivery of a future Alzheimer’s treatment in Europe.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Alzheimer’s disease progression and clinical pathway

3

Screen Evaluate Treat

Assume intervention to reduce the risk of transitioning from MCI to dementia

Test

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Limitations

  • Highly stylized clinical pathway that simplifies actual care patterns
  • Uncertainty about market entry, efficacy, and dosing of the therapy

– Model assumes intravenous therapy, but same constraints can be applied to oral or subcutaneous therapies with the exception of treatment delivery – Published model assumed therapy available in 2020, screening would have started 2019

  • Assumptions about start of screening and transition probabilities

– Reliance on expert input for several assumptions related to patient uptake

  • Assumptions about theoretical capacity

– Reliance on historical trends for capacity projections

  • Combination of data from different sources to implement model

4

Results illustrate magnitude of the problem but may not predict actual numbers precisely

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Conceptual framework

Assume treatment reduces relative risk of progression by 50 percent

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Snapshot of potential number of people in 2019 (millions)

6

Constraint 1: dementia specialists Constraint 2: biomarker testing Constraint 3: infusion centers

NOTE: The expected number of people at each step are from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Some EU countries have more specialists than others

7

Neurologists Geriatricians Geriatric or old- age psychiatrists Specialists per 100,000 population France 2,571 1,756

  • 6.7

Germany 6,607 2,149 10,943 24.0 Italy 6,508 1,415 1,578 16.0 Spain 2,719 970 735 9.5 Sweden

  • 450

1,349 18.2 United Kingdom 1,755 1,332 1,761 7.3 United States 17,408 7,560 1,953 8.0 Sources: Eurostat (2017), European Geriatric Medicine Society (2018), Liu et al. (2017)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

We expect no wait for biomarker testing and varying waits for infusion delivery

8

  • Availability of CSF biomarker test in EU avoids most PET scans
  • Assume 10% of people with early‐stage AD require amyloid PET scan, mostly

for anatomical reasons and anticoagulation

  • Assume (theoretical) capacity for lumbar punctures unconstrained
  • Infusion capacity is estimated to range between 54% (UK) and 137%

(Germany) of U.S. capacity (Liu et al., 2017)

  • Based on a general health care system capacity index as no data were

available for infusion capacity constraints in Europe

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Projected average wait times in months, by country

Dementia specialist visits Infusion therapy

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Projected average wait times in months, by country

10

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044

France Germany Italy Spain Sweden United Kingdom United States

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Wait times vary countries

11

Maximum waiting time, months First year with no wait times Potentially avoidable new Alzheimer’s dementia cases

  • ccurring while people wait, 2020-2044 (percent of

potentially avoidable cases) Specialists Biomarker testing Infusions Base case scenario Scenario with specialist waits but no infusion waits Germany None None <6 mo. 2030 55,000 (1%) 0 (0%) Sweden <6 mo. None 6-12 mo. 2036 12,000 (2%) 1,000 (<1%) Italy <6 mo. None 6-12 mo. 2040 146,000 (3%) 45,000 (1%) Spain 6-12 mo. None 6-12 mo. 2044 171,000 (5%) 88,000 (3%) United Kingdom >12 mo. None 6-12 mo. 2042 260,000 (7%) 171,000 (4%) France >12 mo. None <6 mo. 2033 389,000 (9%) 357,000 (8%) Total EU-6 1,033,000 (5%) 662,000 (3%) United States >12 mo. 6-12 mo. <6 mo. 2034 1,295,000 (13%) 756,000 (8%)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Action is urgently needed to reduce capacity constraints in time for potential treatments

  • Train more providers in dementia care and develop tools to make them more efficient
  • Utilize all options for infusion therapy, including the home setting
  • Ensure appropriate coverage of services and tests and limit scope and volume

restrictions

12

  • Challenge that no individual stakeholder can solve alone
  • Professional societies, policymakers, industry, advocacy groups must be involved in the

solution

  • Stakeholders must act today given the time it takes to build capacity
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary

  • An Alzheimer’s therapy would be a significant breakthrough
  • Simulation suggests that EU countries are not prepared to handle the large number of

prevalent cases, albeit to a different extent

– Germany could clear the backlog by 2030, Spain by 2044 – As many as 1 million potentially avoidable Alzheimer’s dementia cases could occur because of delays in access to treatment

  • Increasing capacity will involve payment policy, regulatory requirements, workforce

considerations, and capacity planning

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thank you!

Other studies United States, Japan, Australia, Canada Report www.rand.org/t/RR2503 Contact jakub.hlavka@usc.edu @JakubHlavka Web sites.google.com/view/JakubHlavka Funding Biogen

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Addendum

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Infrastructure challenges to address

  • Specialist shortage is most urgent issue

– Expedite development and deployment of screening tools – Qualify more providers in evaluation of MCI

  • Expansion of infusion clinics could lead to idle capacity later

– Nature of treatment could allow home infusion – Home infusion delivery could increase capacity in the short run without fixed infrastructure

  • Reimbursement and regulation could create obstacles to access

– Limited reimbursement could mean available capacity may not be devoted – Restrictions on allocation and growth of capacity can limit flexibility

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Some encouraging activities have been launched

European Joint Action on Dementia

  • Aim is to gather epidemiological data, improve the timeliness

and reliability of diagnosis, and understand support systems for behavioral and psychological symptoms

  • Calls for better evidence on improving outcomes in people

with dementia and caregivers through EU‐wide collaboration 17

The Interceptor Project

  • Project to help identify people at higher risk of developing AD

and thus the greatest likelihood of benefiting from treatment

  • Collects data on cognitive testing, CSF tests, and PET and MRI

scans to inform design of nationwide screening program

  • Goal to identify and prioritize for treatment for people at high

risk of progression

Plan Maladies Neurodégénératives 2014‐2019

  • 5‐year strategic plan to improve care for neurodegenerative

disorders

  • Emphasis on care pathways and need for screening and early

detection

  • Calls for the development of better tools for screening and

diagnosis and creation of centers of excellence

Multiple sclerosis specialist nurses

  • Specially trained nurses to administer infusion treatment for

MS in outpatient clinics

  • Can also provide disease education and training for self‐

administration

slide-18
SLIDE 18

United States

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Model blueprint to reflect patient journey

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Screening phase

50 percent of screening- positive patients seek further evaluation 80 percent of persons over 50 are screened

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Diagnostic phase

45 percent assumed to have clinically relevant amyloid burden 90 percent referred to biomarkers testing with CSF exam Evaluation for treatment eligibility 80 percent of MCI patients with amyloid plaques assumed to be treatment-eligible Confirmation of MCI, rule out of alternative explanations and contraindications

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Treatment phase

Treatment is delivered by intravenous infusion every four weeks over one year

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Outcomes phase

Treatment reduces relative risk of progression by 50 percent Untreated disease progresses

  • n waiting list