GSI Ratio Method for Determining Total Fraser Chum Escapement
Albion-based estimate of total Fraser River Chum Salmon escapement using GSI at Albion and enumeration of Chilliwack River Chum Salmon escapement,
- r
GSI Ratio Method for Determining Total Fraser Chum Escapement or - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
GSI Ratio Method for Determining Total Fraser Chum Escapement or Albion-based estimate of total Fraser River Chum Salmon escapement using GSI at Albion and enumeration of Chilliwack River Chum Salmon escapement, Background Fraser River
mixed stock Chum fisheries occurring in Johnstone Strait (Canadian Areas 12 & 13) and US Areas 7 & 7A
stock
River is not enumerated
spawning sites are annually surveyed
escapement
Harrison and Stave rivers, are surveyed annually
enumerated for many years
be genetically different from the Fraser aggregate
comprised ~20% of the assessed Chum escapement to the Fraser River (range: 2% - 42%)
escapement by:
Chilliwack River Chum salmon escapement with
Chum captured in the Albion Test Fishery
be determined using GSI on tissue from scale samples
conduct of the test fishery
to all aspects of Fraser River Chum salmon management including:
Chum Technical Committee initiative supported by the PSC Southern Panel)
Chum Model)
were met
Panel, the Chum Technical Committee and the DFO in pre- and post-season management processes
estimate Chinook escapement to the Skeena River in northern BC (CTC 2015)
place within the Chilliwack River watershed (highlighted below)
Stave River Pitt River Chilliwack Lake
linked to Albion Test Fishery data (highlighted below)
ALBION CHILLIWACK RIVER
APPLICATION
Bridge)
lower end to ensure even distribution/mixing throughout watershed
Top of canal Denim Pool KW Bridge Hoogies Lickman Giesbrecht Teskies
Chilliwack River Watershed
MAIN APPLICATION SITES
Vedder Bridge Chilliwack Hatchery
Peach Creek Hopedale Slough Street Creek Sweltzer Creek Vedder Bridge KW Bridge
RECOVERY
Mainstem and side channels
(Keith Wilson Bridge to Hatchery) Lower Chilliwack River Tributaries
Lower River tribs
Upper River tribs
1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 03-Oct 05-Oct 07-Oct 09-Oct 11-Oct 13-Oct 15-Oct 17-Oct 19-Oct 21-Oct 23-Oct 25-Oct 27-Oct 29-Oct 31-Oct 02-Nov 04-Nov 06-Nov 08-Nov 10-Nov 12-Nov 14-Nov 16-Nov 18-Nov 20-Nov 22-Nov 24-Nov 26-Nov 28-Nov 30-Nov 02-Dec 04-Dec 06-Dec 08-Dec 10-Dec 12-Dec 14-Dec
2016 Chilliwack River Water Levels (m)
~ 1.0m to 1.4m ideal for mainstem application
1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 03-Oct 05-Oct 07-Oct 09-Oct 11-Oct 13-Oct 15-Oct 17-Oct 19-Oct 21-Oct 23-Oct 25-Oct 27-Oct 29-Oct 31-Oct 02-Nov 04-Nov 06-Nov 08-Nov 10-Nov 12-Nov 14-Nov 16-Nov 18-Nov 20-Nov 22-Nov 24-Nov 26-Nov 28-Nov 30-Nov 02-Dec 04-Dec 06-Dec 08-Dec 10-Dec 12-Dec 14-Dec
2016 Chilliwack River Water Levels (m)
~ 1.4m to 2.0m mainstem application becomes difficult
1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 03-Oct 05-Oct 07-Oct 09-Oct 11-Oct 13-Oct 15-Oct 17-Oct 19-Oct 21-Oct 23-Oct 25-Oct 27-Oct 29-Oct 31-Oct 02-Nov 04-Nov 06-Nov 08-Nov 10-Nov 12-Nov 14-Nov 16-Nov 18-Nov 20-Nov 22-Nov 24-Nov 26-Nov 28-Nov 30-Nov 02-Dec 04-Dec 06-Dec 08-Dec 10-Dec 12-Dec 14-Dec
2016 Chilliwack River Water Levels (m)
~ >2.0m mainstem application very difficult
Secondary Mark (1L/2L) & DNA Sex & Fork Length Data (cm) Other Metrics Recorded at Application:
Peterson Disc
water events
20 40 60 80 100 120 03-Oct 05-Oct 07-Oct 09-Oct 11-Oct 13-Oct 15-Oct 17-Oct 19-Oct 21-Oct 23-Oct 25-Oct 27-Oct 29-Oct 31-Oct 02-Nov 04-Nov 06-Nov 08-Nov 10-Nov 12-Nov 14-Nov 16-Nov 18-Nov 20-Nov 22-Nov 24-Nov 26-Nov 28-Nov 30-Nov
Tags Applied by Date - Male vs. Female
Female Male
13 Oct – 19 Dec (47 day overlap w/ Application)
564 (286 Male; 266 Female; 12 Sex NK)
45,051
1 6 2 2 43 51 9 5 23 26 3 1 4 12 9 5 7 44 38 21 9 2 40 32 8 9 58 50 8 1 3 11 11 2 6 1 1
10 20 30 40 50 60 TAGGED RECOVERIES
2 5 4 6 7 11 7 30 224 862 34 78 958 605 473 296 93 561 1802 865 1166 914 1122 3851 2110 2330 1189 534 1505 2385 3308 951 2775 1263 2905 1379 1053 620 1873 986 1134 475 1209 200 143 75 109
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
13-Oct 15-Oct 17-Oct 19-Oct 21-Oct 23-Oct 25-Oct 27-Oct 29-Oct 31-Oct 02-Nov 04-Nov 06-Nov 08-Nov 10-Nov 12-Nov 14-Nov 16-Nov 18-Nov 20-Nov 22-Nov 24-Nov 26-Nov 28-Nov 30-Nov 02-Dec 04-Dec 06-Dec 08-Dec 10-Dec 12-Dec 14-Dec 16-Dec 18-Dec
UNTAGGED RECOVERIES
Higher proportions of tagged recoveries @ main application sites Lower proportions of tagged recoveries in upper segments
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15
# RECOVERED TAG INCIDENCE
CHUM CARCASSES
BIOSAMPLING
914 (452 Male; 450 Female; 12 sex NK)
779 (385 Male; 394 Female)
56.8cm (Male 57.8cm; Female 55.5cm)
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70+
Proportion of Total Sampled
Size (cm)
Proportionate Length Comparison
% MALE % FEMALE
M (total marks applied) = 1,867 R (total marks rec) = 564 C (total carcasses rec) = 44,487
recapture data
(by sex and age)
Chum escapement
Note: Proponents have applied to the PSC Southern Fund to repeat project in 2017/18