Vivienne Durham GSA Chief Executive
viviennedurham@gsa.uk.com
GSA Chief Executive viviennedurham@gsa.uk.com The triumvirate at - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Vivienne Durham GSA Chief Executive viviennedurham@gsa.uk.com The triumvirate at the heart of school leadership: Head, Bursar and Chair of Governors. The Triumvirate Remember, the Governing Body, working closely with the Head,
viviennedurham@gsa.uk.com
“The Head is expected to articulate the vision and objectives of the school and may be perceived as the leadership figure at the top of the staff hierarchy, responsible for all school issues and required to be all things to all people. Parents and staff look to the Head as the figurehead providing a confident steer over all aspects of school leadership and management. The Head certainly has an overview but… given the diverse and high expectations of a Head’s performance, it makes sense that real success requires cooperation and the sharing
areas mitigated by those who have complementary strengths.”
(Tony Little, former Head of Eton College)
bursar or an estates bursar and so on
to help with practicalities and even then the outgoing Head should be kept informed.
meetings should involve the Head. You should not be presented with a fait accompli.
as the Chair before being published.
the Head well before it is finalised.
at a meeting which you do not know about, indeed the Clerk should always resist any attempt to circumvent the Head.
Head.
school
charity law, child protection, companies, competition, construction, consumer credit, education, employment, Data Protection, discrimination, Health and Safety, intellectual property, planning and transport and so on.
Part 8 Para 416 The DfE has advised that any material failure to meet the independent school standards, should lead to consideration by inspectors of whether there has been a commensurate failing of leadership (including governance) and management. Materiality in this context is to be judged primarily by reference to the effect of the failing on pupils, or the potential for effect on pupils whether or not any detriment is evident at the time of the inspection. Safeguarding deficiencies, in particular, are likely to be considered ‘material’ unless purely administrative, and to lead to corresponding reporting in relation to Part 8.
How does the Board ensure proper oversight of safeguarding, including the identity of the board-level lead for safeguarding and arrangements for reviewing the school’s child protection policies and procedures annually? Oversight of safeguarding, including arrangements for reviewing policies and procedures. Part 3 Para 112 – A ‘board-level lead’ should be designated to take a lead in relation to responsibility for the safeguarding arrangements. Schools should appoint a member of the proprietorial body to take this role, but should bear in mind that the safeguarding duties remain the responsibility of the proprietorial body as a whole.
Part 3 Para 113 A review of the school’s child protection policies must take place at least annually, including an update and review of the effectiveness of procedures and their
inter-agency liaison through effective communication and good co-operation with local agencies. KCSIE indicates that the proprietor should draw on the expertise
KCSIE is now intentionally silent about the means for the review and the mechanism for the review; these are matters for the proprietorial body to decide. Part 3 Para 114 The implementation of the policy provisions will be checked through discussion with proprietors and DSL, and by scrutiny of available evidence underpinning the review (e.g. any written report or information to support the review, minutes of meetings, training records, referral information in respect of requests for help and support for individual children, issues and themes which may have emerged in the school and how these have been handled, contribution the school is making to multiagency working in individual cases or local discussions on safeguarding matters).
troublesome governors, either directly or indirectly.)
individuals as the chairmen of committees.
committed people; ensures succession planning for all governors.
relationships rather than weak complementary ones is key. Having a Chair who challenges the Head is vital. In a non-complementary relationship a Chair seeks to smooth things over, fails to face up to important issues, gives undue praise and acts in a polite or distant
bad outcomes, such as board members becoming competitive. They may also trigger a crisis of confidence in those outside of the
party involving a number of parents was critical of the Head’s handling of an issue and suggests that the Head should themself invite these parents into school to discuss the issue. What do you do?
made aware of all pastoral incidents that might damage the school’s reputation. What do you do?
Development Director who, yet again, has flouted school procedures. The Development Director complains to the Governor who chairs the relevant committee, who also happens to be a friend, about this and threatens to resign. The Governor concerned phones the Bursar and requests that she take action to prevent the resignation and also phones the Chair of Governors who then phones the Head to suggest that the Head should intervene also. What do you do?
unfair and that in future the Governors should decide who will receive bursaries, rather than the Head and Bursar making this decision? What do you do?
did not want to miss. One of your Governors asks to meet with you and with the Chair and takes you to task for this absence. What do you do?
make a presentation on his work as a fundraiser. You are unable to be present. The decision then has to be made about whether or not to hire this man. What do you do?
Their replacement is the woman who had been the previous Chair but who does not know you and you do not know her. She does not agree with a number of your approaches to school issues. What do you do?
Chair and the Chair of the finance committee out for a drink after a Governors’ meeting but has not included you. You only find out
each other for a number of years. What do you do?
them to a Christmas party. The invitations are in your name but this has not been discussed with you, the new Head. You are unaware