Greens Functions Theory for Quantum Many - Body Systems Many - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

green s functions theory for quantum many body systems
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Greens Functions Theory for Quantum Many - Body Systems Many - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Greens Functions Theory for Quantum Many - Body Systems Many ny-Body ody Green ens Function ons Contacts: Carlo Barbieri Theoretical Nuclear physics Laboratory RIKEN, Nishina Center At RIKEN: RIBF , Room 405


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Green’s Functions Theory for Quantum Many-Body Systems

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Contacts:

Carlo Barbieri

Theoretical Nuclear physics Laboratory RIKEN, Nishina Center At RIKEN: RIBFビル, Room 405 電話番号: 048-462-111 ext. 4324 Email: 名前@riken.jp, 名前=barbieri Lectures website: http://ribf.riken.jp/~barbieri/mbgf.html

==

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Many-Body Green’s Functions

Many-body Green's functions (MBGF) are a set of techniques that

  • riginated in quantum field theory but have then found wide

applications to the many-body problem. In this case, the focus are complex systems such as crystals, molecules, or atomic nuclei. Development of formalism: late 1950s/ 1960s  imported from quantum field theory 1970s – today  applications and technical developments…

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Purpose and organization

Many-body Green’s functions are a VAST formalism. They have a wide range of applications and contain a lot of information that is accessible from experiments. Here we want to give an introduction:

  • Teach the basic definitions and results
  • Make connection with experimental quantities  gives insight into

physics

  • Discuss some specific application to many-bodies
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Purpose and organization

Most of the material covered here is found on

  • W. H. Dickhoff and D. Van Neck, Many-Body Theory Exposed!,

(covers both formalism and recent applications very large  700+ pages) I will provide:

  • notes on formalism discussed (partial)
  • the slides of the lectures

 Download from the website: http://ribf.riken.jp/~barbieri/mbgf.html

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Literature

Books on many-body Green’s Functions:

  • W. H. Dickhoff and D. Van Neck, Many-Body Theory Exposed!, 2nd ed.

(World Scientific, Singapore, 2007)

  • A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Physics,

(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971)

  • A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gorkov and I. E. Dzyaloshinski, Methods of Quantum

Field Theory in Statistical Physics (Dover, New York, 1975)

  • R. D. Mattuck, A Guide to Feynmnan Diagrams in the Many-Body Problem,

(McGraw-Hill, 1976) [reprinted by Dover, 1992]

  • J. P. Blaizot and G. Ripka, Quantum Theory of Finite Systems, (MIT Press,

Cambridge MA, 1986)

  • J. W. Negele and H. Orland, Quantum Many-Particle Systems, (Benjamin,

Redwood City CA, 1988)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Literature

Recent reviews:

  • F. Aryasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, arXiv:cond-mat/9712013.  GW method
  • G. Onida, L. Reining and A. Rubio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601 (2002).  comparison of

TDDTF and GF

  • H. Mϋther and A. Polls, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45, 243 (2000).

 Applications to

  • C.B. and W. H. Dickhoff, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 52, 377 (2004). nuclear physics

(Some) classic papers on formalism:

  • G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961).
  • G. Baym, Phys. Rev. 127, 1391 (1962).
  • L. Hedin, Phys. Rev. 139, A796 (1965).
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Schedule (4 weeks)

Da Date Time me Conte tent ( t (te tenta tativ tive) 4/6(月) 15:00-16:30 second quantization (review), definitions of GF 4/9(木) 14:00-15:30 Basic properties and sum rules 4/9(木) 16:00-17:30 Link to experimental quantities 4/13(月) 15:00-16:30 Equation of motion method, expansion of the self-energy 4/16(木) 13:30-15:00 Introduction to Feynman diagrams 4/16(木) 15:30-17:00 Self-consistency and RPA week break Basics and link to spectroscopy Advanced formalism

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Schedule (4 weeks)

Da Date Time me Conte tent ( t (te tenta tativ tive) 4/27(月) 15:00-16:30 RPA and GW method 4/27(木) 13:30-15:00 Particle-vibration coupling, applications for atoms and nuclei 4/27(木) 15:30-17:00 Systems of bosons Golden week break 5/14(木) 13:30-15:00 Superfluidity, BCS/BEC cross over 5/14(木) 15:30-17:00 Cold atoms 5/18(月) 15:00-16:30 Finite temperature/nucleonic matter (time permitting) Practical calculations for fermions Bosons and

  • ther

applications

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns
  • Green’s functions
  • Propagators

names for the same objects

  • Correlation functions
  • Many-body Green’s functions  Green’s functions applied to the

MB problem

  • Self-consistent Green’s functions (SCGF)  a particular

approach to calculate GFs

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

GFM GFMC と MBGF GF の違い は 何 ですか?? ??

In Green’s Function Monte Carlo one starts with a “trial” wave function, and lets it propagate in time: Better to break the time in many little intervals Δt,  For t-i∞, this goes to the gs wave function! Green’s function (GF) Monte Carlo integral (MC) GFMC is a method to compute the exact wave function. (typically works for few bodies, A ≤ 12 in nuclei).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

GFM GFMC と MBGF GF の違い は 何 ですか?? ??

MBGF is a method that DO NOT compute the wave function: It assumes that the system is in its ground state and attempts at calculating simple excitation on from it directly

  • Large N (number of particles)
  • The N-body ground state plays the role of vacuum (of excitations)
  • Degrees of freedom are a few particles (or holes) on top of this

vacuum

  • It is a microscopic method (and capable of “ab-initio” calculations)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

GFM GFMC と MBGF GF の違い は 何 ですか?? ??

Don’t get confused: Green’s function Monte Carlo (GFMC) and Many-body Green’s Functions are NOT the same method!!!!!!

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Em [MeV]

σred ≈ S(h)

10-50

0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2

One-hole spectral function -- example

correlations  distribution of momentum (pm) and energies (Em)

independent particle picture

Saclay data for 16O(e,e’p) [Mougey et al., Nucl. Phys. A335, 35 (1980)]

− −

− − 〉 Ψ Ψ 〈 =

n A n A m A p A n m m h

E E E c E p S

m

)) ( ( | | ) , (

1 2 1 ) (

| |

δ

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Examples of quasiparticles – Nuclei-I

The nuclear force has strong repulsive behavior at short distances

The short range core is:

  • required by elastic NN

scattering

  • supported by high-energy

electron scattering (Jlab)

  • and supported by Lattice-QCD

(Ishii now in 東大)

Repulsive core: 500 - 600 MeV Attractive pocket: about 30 MeV Yukawa tail ∝ e-mr/r

[From N. Ishii et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 022001 (2007)]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Examples of quasiparticles – Nuclei-II

Nucleons attract themselves at intermediate distances and scatter like billiard balls:  Naively, nuclei cannot be treated as orbits structures “BAD” model of a nucleus “GOOD” model of a nucleus

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Examples of quasiparticles – Nuclei-III

…BUT, understanding binding energies and magic number DOES require a shell structure!!!  Single particle orbits?

  • M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 75, 1969 (1949)
  • O. Haxel, J. H. D. Jensen and
  • H. E. Suess, Phys. Rev. 75, 1766 (1949)

 Nobel p prize ( (1 963) 963)!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Examples of quasiparticles – ions in liquid

Ions in a liquid screen each other’s charge and interact weakly

[Picture adapted form Mattuck]

+ + + + + + + + + + +

  • +
  • +
  • +

+

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Examples of quasiparticles – ions in liquid

Ions in a liquid screen each other’s charge and interact weakly

[Picture adapted form Mattuck]

+ + + + + + + + + + +

  • +
  • +
  • +

+

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Examples of quasiparticles – ions in liquid

Ions in a liquid screen each other’s charge and interact weakly

[Picture adapted form Mattuck]

+ + + + + + + + + + +

  • +
  • +
  • +

+

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Examples of quasiparticles – electron in gas

[Picture adapted form Mattuck]

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Second quantization

Choose an orthonormal single-particle basis {α} and use it to build bases for the many-body states. E.g., Need states of different particle number N  use the Fock space: It must include the vacuum state:

=1 for fermions = ∞ for bosons

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Second quantization

Basis states for bosons are constructed as creation and annihilation operators give Commutation rules:

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Second quantization

Basis states for fermions are constructed as creation and annihilation operators give with: Commutation rules:

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Pictures in quantum mechanics

Consider an N-body system in a state at time t=t0. The time evolution operator is Schrödinger pict. Heisenberg pict.

time evolution equation: solutions: does not evolve for a time-indep. OS same time!

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Propagating a free particle

Consider a free particle with Hamiltonian h1 = t + U(r) the eigenstates and egienenergies are The time evolution is  with: wave fnct. at t=0 wave fnct. at time t

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Green’s function (=propagator) for a free particle:

Propagating a free particle

position time r1 r1’ r2’ r3’ r2 r3

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Green’s function (=propagator) for a free particle:  states  energies

Propagating a free particle

Fourier transform

  • f the eigenspectrum!

The spectrum of the Hamiltonian is separated by the FT because the time evolution is driven by H:

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Definitions of Green‘s functions

Take a generic the Hamiltonian H and its static Schrödinger equation We evolve in time the field operators instead of the wave function by using the Heisenberg picture ( creation/annihilation of a particle in r at time t)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Definitions of Green‘s functions

The one body propagator (≡Green’s function) associated to the ground state is defined as with the time ordering operator Expand t-dep in operators: 

(+ for bosons,

  • for fermions)

aadds a particle removes a particle

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Definitions of Green‘s functions

With explicit time dependence: r r’ t’ t r r’ t t adds a particle removes a particle

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Definitions of Green‘s functions

Green’s function can be defined in any single-particle basis (not just r or k space). So let’s call {α} a general

  • rthonormal basis with wave functions {uα(r)}

The Heisenberg operators are: and

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Definitions of Green‘s functions

In general it is possible to define propagators for more particles and different times:

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Definitions of Green‘s functions

Graphic conventions:

time

≡ gαβ(t>t’)

(quasi)particle

≡ gαβ(t’>t)

(quasi)hole

α β α

β

α

gαβ,γδ

4-pt

δ γ β

t1’ t2’ t1 t2

p; (N+1)-body p; (N+1)-body 2p (N+2)-body

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Definitions of Green‘s functions

Graphic conventions:

time

≡ gαβ(t>t’)

(quasi)particle

≡ gαβ(t’>t)

(quasi)hole

α β α

β

α

gαβ,γδ

4-pt

δ γ β

t1’ t2’ t1 t2

p; (N+1)-body h; (N-1)-body ph N-body

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Definitions of Green‘s functions

With explicit time dependence: r‘ r t’ t r’ r t t adds a particle removes a particle

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Lehmann representation and spectral function

Expand on the eigenstates of N±1  Fourier transform to energy representation…

(- bosons, + fermions)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Lehmann representation and spectral function

The Lehman representation of gαβ(ω) is: Poles  energy absorbed/released in particle transfer Residues: particle addition particle ejected

 (quasi)particles  (quasi)holes

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Lehmann representation and spectral function

The Lehman representation of gαβ(ω) is: To extract the imaginary part:

 (quasi)particles  (quasi)holes

(- bosons, + fermions)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Lehmann representation and spectral function

The spectral function is the Im part of gαβ(ω)  Contains the same information as the Lehmann rep.  (quasi)particles  (quasi)holes

(- bosons, + fermions)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Many ny-Body

  • dy Green’

en’s Function

  • ns

Lehmann representation and spectral function

gαβ(ω) is fully constrained by its imaginary part: