gradient gibbs measures with disorder
play

Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Codina Cotar University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Codina Cotar University College London April 16, 2015, Providence Partly based on joint works with Christof Klske Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Outline 1


  1. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Codina Cotar University College London April 16, 2015, Providence Partly based on joint works with Christof Külske

  2. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Outline 1 The model 2 Questions 3 Known results Results: Strictly Convex Potentials Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials Results: Non-convex potentials 4 New model: Interfaces with Disorder Model A Model B Results for gradients with disorder Non-convex potentials with disorder 5 Some new tools 6 Sketch of proof

  3. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder The model Interface — transition region that separates different phases Λ ⊂ Z d finite , ∂ Λ := { x / ∈ Λ , || x − y || = 1 for some y ∈ Λ } Height Variables (configurations) φ x ∈ R , x ∈ Λ Boundary condition ψ , such that φ x = ψ x , when x ∈ ∂ Λ . tilt u = ( u 1 , . . . , u d ) ∈ R d and tilted boundary condition ψ u x = x · u , x ∈ ∂ Λ . Gradients ∇ φ : η b = ∇ φ b = φ x − φ y for b = ( x , y ) , || x − y || = 1

  4. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder The model The finite volume Gibbs measure on R Λ Λ ( φ ) := 1 ν ψ � � exp ( − β V ( φ i − φ j )) d φ i , Z ψ Λ i , j ∈ Λ ∪ ∂ Λ i ∈ Λ | i − j | = 1 where φ i = ψ i for i ∈ ∂ Λ . V : R → R + , V ∈ C 2 ( R ) , satisfies: symmetry: V ( x ) = V ( − x ) , x ∈ R V ( x ) ≥ Ax 2 + B , A > 0 , B ∈ R , for large x ∈ R . Finite volume surface tension (free energy) σ Λ ( u ) : macroscopic energy of a surface with tilt u ∈ R d . 1 β | Λ | log Z ψ u σ Λ ( u ) := Λ .

  5. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder The model For GFF If V ( s ) = s 2 , then ν ψ Λ is a Gaussian measure, called the Gaussian Free Field (GFF). If x , y ∈ Λ n cov ν 0 Λ n ( φ x , φ y ) = G Λ n ( x , y ) , where G Λ n ( x , y ) is the Green’s function, that is, the expected number of visits to y of a simple random walk started from x killed when it exits Λ n . GFF appears in many physical systems, and two-dimensional GFF has close connections to Schramm-Loewner Evolution (SLE).

  6. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Questions Questions (for general potentials V ): Existence and (strict) convexity of infinite volume surface tension σ ( u ) = lim Λ ↑ Z d σ Λ ( u ) . Existence of shift-invariant infinite volume Gibbs measure Λ ↑ Z d ν ψ ν := lim Λ Uniqueness of shift-invariant Gibbs measure under additional assumptions on the measure. Quantitative results for ν : decay of covariances with respect to φ , central limit theorem (CLT) results, large deviations (LDP) results.

  7. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Results: Strictly Convex Potentials Outline 1 The model 2 Questions 3 Known results Results: Strictly Convex Potentials Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials Results: Non-convex potentials 4 New model: Interfaces with Disorder Model A Model B Results for gradients with disorder Non-convex potentials with disorder 5 Some new tools 6 Sketch of proof

  8. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Results: Strictly Convex Potentials Known results for potentials V with 0 < C 1 ≤ V ′′ ≤ C 2 : Existence and strict convexity of the surface tension for d ≥ 1. Gibbs measures ν do not exist for d = 1 , 2. We can consider the distribution of the ∇ φ -field under the Gibbs measure ν . We call this measure the ∇ φ -Gibbs measure µ . ∇ φ -Gibbs measures µ exist for d ≥ 1. (Funaki-Spohn: CMP 1997) For every u = ( u 1 , . . . , u d ) ∈ R d there exists a unique shift-invariant ergodic ∇ φ - Gibbs measure µ with E µ [ φ e k − φ 0 ] = u k , for all k = 1 , . . . , d . Decay of covariance results, CLT results, LDP results Important properties for proofs: shift-invariance, ergodicity and extremality of the infinite volume Gibbs measures Bolthausen, Brydges, Deuschel, Funaki, Giacomin, Ioffe, Naddaf, Olla, Sheffield, Spencer, Spohn, Velenik, Yau

  9. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials Outline 1 The model 2 Questions 3 Known results Results: Strictly Convex Potentials Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials Results: Non-convex potentials 4 New model: Interfaces with Disorder Model A Model B Results for gradients with disorder Non-convex potentials with disorder 5 Some new tools 6 Sketch of proof

  10. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials For 0 < C 1 ≤ V ′′ ≤ C 2 : Brascamp-Lieb Inequality: for all x ∈ Λ and for all i ∈ Λ 1 Λ ( φ i ) ≤ 1 var ˜ Λ ( φ i ) ≤ var ν ψ var ˜ Λ ( φ i ) , ν ψ ν ψ C 2 C 1 ν ψ Λ is the Gaussian Free Field with potential ˜ V ( s ) = s 2 . ˜ More generally, for any real convex function F bounded below, we have Λ ( F ( v · ( φ − µ ( φ ))) ≤ 1 Λ ( F ( φ )) , ∀ v ∈ R | Λ | . E ν ψ E ˜ ν ψ C 1

  11. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials (cont.) Random Walk Representation Deuschel-Giacomin-Ioffe (PTRF-2000): Representation of Covariance Matrix in terms of the Green function of a particular random walk. GFF: If x , y ∈ Λ Λ ( φ x , φ y ) = G Λ ( x , y ) , cov ν 0 where G Λ ( x , y ) is the Green’s function, that is, the expected number of visits to y of a simple random walk started from x killed when it exits Λ . General 0 < C 1 ≤ V ′′ ≤ C 2 : C 0 ≤ cov ν ψ Λ ( φ x , φ y ) ≤ ] | x − y | [ d − 2 , | cov µ ρ Λ ( ∇ i φ x , ∇ j φ y ) | ≤ C ] | x − y | [ d − 2 + δ

  12. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials (cont.) The dynamic: SDE satisfied by ( φ x ) x ∈ Z d √ d φ x ( t ) = − ∂ H 2 dW x ( t ) , x ∈ Z d , ( φ ( t )) dt + ∂φ x where W t := { W x ( t ) , x ∈ Z d } is a family of independent 1-dim Brownian Motions.

  13. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Results: Non-convex potentials Outline 1 The model 2 Questions 3 Known results Results: Strictly Convex Potentials Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials Results: Non-convex potentials 4 New model: Interfaces with Disorder Model A Model B Results for gradients with disorder Non-convex potentials with disorder 5 Some new tools 6 Sketch of proof

  14. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Results: Non-convex potentials Why look at the case with non-convex potential V ? Probabilistic motivation: Universality class Physics motivation: For lattice spring models a realistic potential has to be non-convex to account for the phenomena of fracturing of a crystal under stress. The Cauchy-Born rule: When a crystal is subjected to a small linear displacement of its boundary, the atoms will follow this displacement. Friesecke-Theil: for the 2-dimensional mass-spring model, Cauchy-Born holds for a certain class of non-convex potentials. Generalization to d -dimensional mass-spring model by Conti, Dolzmann, Kirchheim and Müller.

  15. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Results: Non-convex potentials Results for non-convex potentials Funaki-Spohn: The surface tension σ ( u ) is convex as a function of u ∈ R d . Existence of infinite volume ∇ φ -Gibbs measure µ with expected tilt E µ [ φ e k − φ 0 ] = u k , k = 1 , 2 , . . . d . Hariya (2014): Brascamp-Lieb inequality in d = 1. Brascamp-Lieb inequality for d ≥ 2 and 0-boundary condition holds for a class of potentials at all temperatures n p i e − k i s 2 e − V ( s ) = � � 2 , p i = 1 . i = 1 i Conjecture: Brascamp-Lieb holds for ψ ≡ 0 for all V with V ( x ) ≥ Ax 2 + B , A > 0 , B ∈ R , and V ′′ ≤ C 2 .

  16. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Results: Non-convex potentials For the potential � 1 / 4 � k 1 e − V ( s ) = pe − k 1 s 2 2 +( 1 − p ) e − k 2 s 2 2 , β = 1 , k 1 << k 2 , p = k 2 V(s) s 0 Biskup-Kotecký: (PTRF 2007) Existence of several ∇ φ -Gibbs measures with expected tilt E µ [ φ e k − φ 0 ] = 0 , k = 1 , 2 , . . . d , but with different variances.

  17. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder Known results Results: Non-convex potentials Results (cont) Cotar-Deuschel-Müller (CMP 2009)/ Cotar-Deuschel (AIHP 2012 ): Let 0 ≤ C 2 , g ′′ < 0 . V = V 0 + g , C 1 ≤ V ′′ If C 0 ≤ g ′′ < 0 and � β || g ′′ || L 1 ( R ) small ( C 1 , C 2 ) . then we prove uniqueness of ∇ φ -Gibbs measures µ such that E µ [ φ e k − φ 0 ] = u k for all k = 1 , 2 , . . . , d . Our results includes the Biskup-Kotecký model, but for different range of choices of p , k 1 and k 2 . Adams-Kotecký-Müller (in preparation): Strict convexity of the surface tension for small tilt u and large β .

  18. Gradient Gibbs measures with disorder New model: Interfaces with Disorder Model A Outline 1 The model 2 Questions 3 Known results Results: Strictly Convex Potentials Techniques: Strictly Convex Potentials Results: Non-convex potentials 4 New model: Interfaces with Disorder Model A Model B Results for gradients with disorder Non-convex potentials with disorder 5 Some new tools 6 Sketch of proof

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend