Grf Andrea Karinthy Frigyes Gimnzium, Budapest Description of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

gr f andrea karinthy frigyes gimn zium budapest
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Grf Andrea Karinthy Frigyes Gimnzium, Budapest Description of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Grf Andrea Karinthy Frigyes Gimnzium, Budapest Description of motions PHYSICS GEOGRAPHY Choice of reference Idea of reference frame frame emphasized. not addressed. But inertial frames used "Natural" reference


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Gróf Andrea Karinthy Frigyes Gimnázium, Budapest

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Description of motions PHYSICS

  • Choice of reference

frame emphasized.

  • But inertial frames used

exclusively.

  • Students corrected by

teacher if they talk about centrifugal force.

GEOGRAPHY

  • Idea of reference frame

not addressed.

  • "Natural" reference frame is

non-inertial.

  • Explanations refer to

centrifugal and Coriolis forces.

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. Survey on the understanding of

the physics behind geography

  • 2. A possible introduction to inertial

forces: merry-go-round example treated quantitatively

  • 3. Applications in physics and

geography

 ! 

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 1. Survey on the physics (mechanics) behind

geography

MCQ questions on timekeeping, the shape of the Earth, motions of air and the seas, tides, etc. 215 students (16 and 17-year olds) Background: 1 year of physical geography and 1 year of physics

slide-5
SLIDE 5

A.Fcentrifugal << Fcentripetal for fast rotations 11%

  • B. Fcentrifugal only exists for astronomical sizes

10%

  • C. Observer does/does not rotate along

17% D.Fcentrifugal always present, therefore not felt 49% (no answer 13%) Questions involving inertial forces

Q A

Geography: oblate Earth explained in terms of the centrifugal force. Physics problems on rotating objects: such forces not considered. What is the difference?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

N

?

Q

slide-7
SLIDE 7

S

? ?

Q

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A.South clockwise, north counterclockwise 56%

  • B. North clockwise, south counterclockwise

21%

  • C. Same sense

8% D.Anything may happen 10% (no answer 5%)

A

slide-9
SLIDE 9

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4llVfoDuVlw

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

s m 14 . 3 3 5 . 1 2 2        T r v

2 2 2

s m 58 . 6    r r v a  N 132 68 . 5 20     ma F

A B

  • 2. Describing motions on a playground

roundabout

The motion of A as seen by B:

slide-12
SLIDE 12

s m 64 . 3 5 . 14 . 3    N 177 . 84 . 8 02 .

merry net

     ma F F

2 2 2

s m 84 . 8 5 . 1 64 . 3 ) (     r u v a

Tangential motion as described by the inertial observer B For rotating observer A:

, s m 17 . 5 . 1 5 .

2 2 2

   r u a 0.177N N 003 . 17 . 02 .

net

     ma F

What other force is there?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fcf Fcoriolis

Fmerry= 0.177N

N 003 .

net

  F

N 132 .

cf 

F

N 042 . 132 . 177 . 003 .     

N 177 .

merry

  F

(inwards) (inwards) (outwards) needed: (outwards)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

r u v m ma F F

2 merry net

) (     r mu r mvu r mv

2 2

2    r mvu r mv F r mu 2

2 merry 2

  

0.003 N = 0.177 N – 0.132 N – 0.042 N.

u m u r v m r mvu        2 2 2

N 042 . 5 . 1 5 . 14 . 3 02 . 2       ma Fnet

For B For A Algebraically:

Fcf Fcoriolis

Fmerry= 0.177N

slide-15
SLIDE 15

For B

a = 0

A B

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ω

The same motion as seen by A:

Radial speed constant Tangential speed increases

t r v   

t 

t       t r s       t r t a      

2

) ( 2 1 v t r a        2 2

t  t  t 

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Latitude of Budapest: φ = 47.5º (a) Magnitude and direction of the centrifugal acceleration in Budapest. (b) Magnitude and direction of the acceleration of free fall in Budapest?

mg Fgrav Ω Fcf

(local) vertical

Which way is "down"? Sports events?

(a) Gravitational, centrifugal acceleration and free fall acceleration at the Equator? (b) Athlete can jump to 8 metres at the poles. How far can he jump on the Equator?

  • 3. Applications: Inertial forces
  • n the rotating Earth
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Coriolis force at the Equator

Air moving at u = 20 m/s towards the west. Magnitude of acceleration towards the centre of the Earth? (a) according to an inertial observer? (b) according to an Earth-based observer? (c) What is the magnitude and direction of the Coriolis acceleration?

 

6 2 6 5 2

10 38 . 6 20 ) 10 38 . 6 )( 10 29 . 7 ( ) (        

R u R a

2

m/s 0369 . 

2 5 6 2 2

m/s 10 27 . 6 10 38 . 6 20

     R u a down) y (verticall m/s 10 92 . 2 20 ) 10 29 . 7 ( 2 2

2 3 5  

        u a C

slide-19
SLIDE 19

P P A 2π·sinφ

Coriolis force elsewhere

Foucault pendulum, Paris: φ = 48.8° What is the local angular speed?

  sin  

v a C      sin 2

φ φ A P

Paris

http://enggar.net/page/12/?s/

slide-20
SLIDE 20

     

3 . 11 rad 197 . 3600 10 49 . 5

5

t 

In Paris: φ = 48.8° One period of the Panthéon pendulum is 16.4 sec. (a) How much does it turn in an hour? (b) Displacement between two successive swings

  • n a circle of radius 3 m?

rad 10 01 . 9 4 . 16 10 49 . 5

4 5  

     t 

mm 7 . 2 3 10 01 . 9

4

    

r t 

s / 10 49 . 5 8 . 48 sin 10 29 . 7 sin

5 5  

          

slide-21
SLIDE 21

r = 2 cm, v = 10 cm/s (a) Find the acceleration towards the centre. (b) What is the contribution of the Coriolis force to this?

2 2 2

m/s 5 . 02 . 1 .    r v a  sin 2   v a C

2 5 5

m/s 10 1 5 . 47 sin ) 10 3 . 7 ( 1 . 2

 

      

Is the Coriolis force important?

No No

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Find (a) radius of spot 1° corresponds to ≈ 9° means r ≈ 1.1·107 m (b) acceleration of gas (c) Coriolis acceleration

m 10 2 . 1 360 10 4 . 1 360 2

6 8

      R

Jupiter: T = 9.8 hours, R = 71 900 km (equatorial) Great Red Spot φ = 22° (S), wind v ≈ 100 m/s

2 4

s m 10 9

  a

2 4 C

s m 10 3 . 1

  a

Ye Ye s

www.celestiamotherlode.net/catalog/jupiter.php

slide-23
SLIDE 23

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/06/18/national/shinkansen-tops-list-100-innovative-postwar-technologies/#.Va84VPkmHpE

Shinkansen train v = 200 km/h Tokyo to Osaka, both N55°

        

35 sin 10 3 . 7 6 . 3 200 2 sin 2

5

 v a C g 0005 . s m 0047 .

2 

No No

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Golfer in Scotland (N55°) can hit the ball to 300 m at 45° angle. What is the deviation of the ball

  • wing to the Coriolis force?

g v t  sin 2 

   g v g v v     cos sin 2 sin 2 cos

2

m 300 8 . 9 8 . 9 2 1 2 1 2

2 2

      v v , s m 54 8 . 9 300    v

s t 7 . 8 8 . 9 45 sin 54 2    

       cos sin 2

C

v a

2 5

s m 0046 . 45 cos 54 55 sin 10 3 . 7 2         

cm 17 7 . 8 0046 . 2 1 2 1

2 2 C

     t a d

No No

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Artillery missile, N50°, v0 = 700 m/s towards the East, at 45° angle. Deviation owing to the Coriolis force?

    g v g v v     cos sin 2 sin 2 cos Range

2

km 50 8 . 9 2 1 2 1 700 2

2

   

               

2 2 C

sin 2 ) cos sin 2 ( 2 1 2 1 g v v t a d   

        cos sin sin 4

2 3 2

v g m 280 45 cos 45 sin 700 8 . 9 50 sin 10 3 . 7 4

2 3 2 5

         

Ye Ye s

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Frictionless and horizontal ice rink, 30 m wide, Puck given an initial velocity. Coriolis force only: circular motion Find: (a) speed needed in Budapest (N47.5°) Note: (b) What is the radius if the speed is 1 m/s? At 10° latitude? At 80°?

v r v     sin 2

2 local

2 sin 2      r v s mm 61 . 15 5 . 47 sin 10 3 . 7 2 sin 2

5

         

r v  km) 7.0 km, (39 km 3 . 9 5 . 47 sin 10 3 . 7 2 1 sin 2

5

       

 v r

An interesting kind of motion

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Buoy in the Baltic Sea, SE of Stockholm, N57°

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Design a space station:

  • Cylindrical shape
  • Artificial gravity is provided

by centrifugal force owing to spinning about the axis.

  • Coriolis force on crew walking

at 1 m/s is no greater than 0.05mg .

g r 

2

2

s m 10 05 . s m 1 2          

s 1 25 .    m 160 25 . 10

2 2

    g r

http://www.astronautix.com/craft/span1984.htm

Both forces to consider

slide-29
SLIDE 29

References Anders O. Persson The Coriolis Effect: Four centuries of conflict between common sense and mathematics, History

  • f Meteorology 2 (2005)
slide-30
SLIDE 30

THE END

Thank you for your attention