Governance Body Meeting Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:00 P.M. 1:00 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

governance body meeting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Governance Body Meeting Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:00 P.M. 1:00 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Governance Body Meeting Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M. ET This meeting will be recorded for note-taking purposes only FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY January 10 th , 2019 UPDATE PENDING FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY January 10 th


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Governance Body Meeting

Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:00 P.M.– 1:00 P.M. ET This meeting will be recorded for note-taking purposes only

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

UPDATE PENDING

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Meeting Agenda

Time Agenda Item 12:00 PM Call to order – John Lumpkin 12:03 PM Agenda review and approval – John Lumpkin 12:05 PM Consent agenda – John Lumpkin 12:10 PM Risk log

  • eCR Implementation progress – Laura Conn

12:30 PM Action – John Lumpkin

  • Legal Workgroup Charge – Walter Suarez

12:35 PM Discussions – Bob Harmon and Michael Iademarco

  • Preliminary eCR recommendations

12:50 PM In-person meeting expectations and preparation – Charlie Ishikawa 12:57 PM Announcements – Jelisa Lowe and Charlie Ishikawa 1:00 PM Adjournment – John Lumpkin

Purpose:

The purpose of this meeting is to work toward a common vision for exchanging actionable information between health care and public health.

Consent Agenda

  • Workgroup updates

Risk Log

  • Implementation progress update

For Action

  • Charge: Legal Workgroup

For Discussion

  • eCR Transition Preliminary Recommendations
  • In-person meeting agenda and expectations

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Consent Agenda | January 2019

John Lumpkin (Chair)

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Governance Meeting Consent Agenda

Protocol

1. Pre-meeting:

a. Chair places items that are believed to be non-controversial or routine b. Items should be received with sufficient review time

2. Start of meeting:

a. Chair asks if any member wishes to move an item into regular discussion b. All items left on the consent agenda are documented as approved by governance body c. Any item removed will be discussed during the meeting

January 2019 Consent Agenda Items

1. Workgroup updates: a. eCR Implementation Workgroup b. Evaluation Committee

  • CSTE Presentation Abstract

c. Pilot Participation Workgroup d. Transition Workgroup

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Risk Log: eCR Implementation Progress

Laura Conn and Kirsten Hagemann (eCR Implementation Taskforce Co-Chairs), Rob Brown (Digital Bridge PMO)

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-7
SLIDE 7

eCR Implementation Update

Laura Conn & Kirsten Hagemann (eCR Implementation Taskforce Co-Chairs), Rob Brown (Digital Bridge PMO)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Update: eCR Implementation Workgroup

  • The Houston site went live on November 14, 2018
  • Reportability Responses were returned to Houston

Methodist for all eICRs

  • Challenges uncovered in testing with Houston
  • Epic product does not trigger from diagnosis fields,

diagnosis trigger codes are being triggered out of problem list

  • Used production environment for testing
  • Lab tests were not coded as LOINC at HM– APHL TA

provided support for mapping local codes to LOINC codes

  • The Utah site went live on December 20, 2018
  • Initial connectivity issues preventing the RR from getting

to Intermountain have been resolved

  • Intermountain had a lapse in sending case reports

between 12/26/2018 – 1/4/2019

  • Challenges uncovered in testing with Utah
  • Generation of new test patients was more time and

resource intensive than originally anticipated

  • Timing of how eICRs are generated within the EHR to

minimize duplicate eICRs is being revisited

  • Intermountain test environments and interfaces have

been up and down preventing from testing and creation

  • f some test patients

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

Implementation WG:

  • Kirsten Hagemann has returned as co-chair
  • The Technical Specifications is going through a revision
  • Site engagement and preparation for implementation continues
  • Most active sites include California and New York
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Jan 2019 Feb 2019 Mar 2019 Apr 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 Aug 2019 Sept 2019 Oct 2019 Nov 2019 Dec 2019

Digital Bridge eCR Implementation Timeline Estimate- 2019 DRAFT

New York State Site Production New York State Site Connectivity/Onboarding/Testing Potential Interested Implementation Sites:

  • Allscripts
  • Delaware
  • Health & Hospitals
  • Illinois
  • Iowa
  • Kentucky
  • Maryland
  • MDLand
  • Minnesota
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • South Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Wisconsin

Anticipate discussion of how eCR onboarding will be opened up as part of eCR transition

New York City Site Production Kansas Site Production New York City Site Connectivity/Onboarding/Testing Kansas Site Connectivity/Onboarding/Testing California Site Production Michigan Site Production California Site Connectivity/Onboarding/Testing Michigan Site Connectivity/Onboarding/Testing Note: Massachusetts site currently searching for provider to participate Houston in production – 11/14/18 Utah in production 12/20/18

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th , 2019 Today

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Action: Legal Workgroup Charge

John Lumpkin (Chair)

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ACTION: Legal Workgroup Charge

Digital Bridge Workgroup Charge

Legal Workgroup

FOR GOVERNANCE BODY REVIEW AND APPROVAL Tuesday, January 8, 2019

Charge Advise, identify and define the best available legal frameworks to achieve national scale-up for eCR and recommending alternative technical approaches to make eCR more feasible from legal and regulatory perspectives. Where indicated by the Digital Bridge governance body, the Legal Workgroup may also advise on data exchange related to other use cases. Objectives

  • Review and contribute to draft Digital Bridge responses, as directed by the

governance body, for public

  • comments and requests for information from federal agencies or offices (e.g.,

Office of Civil Rights’ Request for Information on Modifying HIPAA Rules to Improve Coordinated Care) that may impact data exchange between the healthcare and public health sectors.

  • Advise on key, common elements that should be included in future agreements

to support national eCR scale-up and steady states, taking into consideration legal and policy requirements of public health agencies.

  • Review and advise as to how the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common

Agreement (TEFCA) and other trust networks may be leveraged to support national eCR scale-up and steady states.

  • Advise on a long-term legal framework roadmap for Digital Bridge initiatives.

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

Leadership: Walter Suarez, Kaiser-Permanente

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Discussion: Preliminary eCR Transition Recommendations

Bob Harmon and Michael Iademarco (Transition Workgroup Co-Chairs)

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Discussion Points

  • 1. Purpose of the report
  • 2. Highlight recommendations
  • 3. Encourage every GB member to review and comment by next Friday, 1/18
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Preliminary eCR Transition Recommendations

Question charged to answer

  • “Beyond demonstrating and evaluating eCR,

what will Digital Bridge do for general eCR adoption and to assure eCR sustainability?” Purpose

  • Share the workgroup's initial ideas with the

governance body and receive feedback to finalize recommendations for endorsement and implementation. Governance Action Schedule

  • 1. Posted on 1/7
  • 2. Comments returned no later than 1/18
  • 3. Discuss, modify and adopt by 1/23 – 1/24 (in-

person meeting)

Organization Name Designation Representing RWJF John Lumpkin – primary Hilary Heishman – alternate Member Sponsor CDC Michael Iademarco - Co-chair Bill Mac Kenzie – primary Laura Conn – alternate Member Sponsor Cerner/Epic Bob Harmon – Co-chair James Doyle – alternate Member Vendors Kaiser Permanente HealthPartners Walter Suarez – primary Richard Paskach–alternate Member Healthcare delivery ASTHO Mary Ann Cooney – primary Mylynn Tufte – alternate Member Public health APHL Scott Becker – primary Patina Zarcone – alternate Member eCR operators and public health CSTE Kathy Tuner – primary Jeff Engel – alternate Meredith Lichtenstein – tertiary Member eCR operator and public health PHII/Deloitte (PMO) Vivian Singletary – primary Andy Wiesenthal – alternate John Stinn–alternate Observer PMO FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Overarching Recommendation

By October 2019, Digital Bridge should transition its eCR demonstration work to supporting efforts led by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to scale up the eCR approach for general adoption, working with partners. For this goal, our recommendations are intended to advance two strategic objectives: (1) increase the implementation and use of eCR nationwide, and (2) set an initial technical framework for further bidirectional information exchange beyond notifiable conditions

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Highlight Recommendations (selected)

Scale-up System

System Layer Recommendation Use Case During scale-up, the focus will be to fully support electronic reporting of all Nationally Notifiable Conditions. Architecture A legal approach for DSI services other than a business associate framework with healthcare is desirable. Operations An enhancement to the current approach for RCTC distribution will be crucial for the scale-up phase. Enablers The Digital Bridge partnership that includes all three stakeholder sectors to govern eCR must continue through the scale-up phase

Transition Management

Area Recommendation Legal Conversations with trust networks should proceed with haste to assess the feasibility and the extent to which such partnerships would ease legal barriers. Opening-up On- boarding No later than mid-February 2019, a responsive strategy-based communications process must be put in place to satisfy sites with interest in being early eCR adopters. eCR Governance and eCR PMO activities Digital Bridge must prepare to transfer eCR PMO activities to other partners Advocacy For able organizations, we strongly urge them to join a CSTE and APHL initiative to educate partners for Congressional and state appropriations that will fund eCR scale-up

  • nationwide. Importantly, this is an initiative

that must be planned, organized and carried

  • ut apart from the Digital Bridge governance

body

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Review and comment using SurveyMonkey

  • Yes or No
  • Gaps?

Complete

  • Yes or No
  • Gaps?

Agreeable

slide-18
SLIDE 18

In-person meeting expectations and preparation

Charlie Ishikawa

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-19
SLIDE 19

IN-PERSON GOVERNANCE MEETING

JANUARY 23RD – 24TH, 2019

Going to scale: eCR and the Digital Bridge

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-20
SLIDE 20

In-person Governance Meeting: January 23rd – 24th, 2019

Meeting Objectives

1. Identify and document lessons learned from the eCR pilot sites 2. Determine what the Digital Bridge will do to further promote eCR adoption post-pilot work 3. Determine what sponsors and stakeholder groups to engage for the next Digital Bridge use case 4. Identify issues to consider in redesigning governance given transitional eCR and use case decisions

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Meeting Schedule (draft)

Day 1: Wednesday, 1/23

TIME AGENDA TOPIC 8:30 AM Breakfast 9:00 AM Meeting start 9:15 AM Welcome and meeting overview 9:30 AM Digital Bridge eCR Pilot implementations

During this session, the governance body will review implementation progress and identify barriers and facilitators to implementation

12:30 PM Working lunch 1:30 PM BREAK (30 MINUTES) 2:00 PM Applying lessons learned from pilots

During this session, the governance body will identify lessons learned and determine how to ensure completion of pilot work

4:00 PM Digital Bridge eCR transition

During this session, the governance body will have an opportunity to approve transition workgroup recommendations for post-pilot work

5:00 PM Day 1 wrap-up, and preview Day 2 5:30 PM End Meeting Day 1 6:15 PM DINNER RECEPTION| Location: TBD

Day 2: Thursday, 1/24

TIME AGENDA TOPIC 9:00 AM Breakfast 9:30 AM Reconvene 9:45 AM Use case transition discussion

During this session, the governance body will discuss and provide feedback on the transition workgroup's recommendations for future use cases

12:00 PM LUNCH 1:00 PM Organizational discussion

During this session, the governance body will provide input for the transition workgroup's work to recommend an organizational structure that supports the transition decisions for eCR and use case

2:00 PM Summary and next steps 2:30 PM Closing remarks 3:00 PM Meeting concludes

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Pre-Meeting Preparation

  • 1. Review and comment on the preliminary eCR Transition Recommendations
  • 2. Complete brief pre-meeting survey

1. Your expectations? 2. Use case prioritization criteria?

  • 3. Revisit the pledges made during the in-person meeting in January 2018
  • 4. Come prepared to…

1. share lessons learned from the initial use case, and 2. what your organization will do for scale-up

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Announcements

Jelisa Lowe and Charlie Ishikawa

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Communications Update

  • NACCHO Annual Conference
  • July 9-11, 2019
  • Abstract on Houston

implementation submitted

  • Minnesota eHealth Summit
  • June 13, 2019
  • Abstract in progress
slide-25
SLIDE 25

NEXT MEETING In-person, 1/23 – 1/24 No February Meeting Virtual Meeting: March, 7th, 2019, 12:00 – 1:00 PM EST Action Items

  • Review and comment on preliminary recommendations for eCR transition
  • Complete pre-meeting survey and preparation

FOR DISCUSSION USE ONLY – January 10th, 2019