(GLUP) Study Plus Long Range Planning Committee (LRPC) December 11, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

glup study plus
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

(GLUP) Study Plus Long Range Planning Committee (LRPC) December 11, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Shirlington Village Special General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Study Plus Long Range Planning Committee (LRPC) December 11, 2019 Tonights Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Parking Utilization Report 3. LRPC Discussion 4. Results from Community


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Shirlington Village Special General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Study Plus

Long Range Planning Committee (LRPC) December 11, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tonight’s Agenda

1. Introduction 2. Parking Utilization Report 3. LRPC Discussion 4. Results from Community Forum/Online Survey 5. LRPC Discussion 6. Next Steps

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Transportation Updates

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Existing Parking

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Off-Street Parking Inventory Summary

June 2019

5

Parking Facility Reserved Spaces Shared Spaces Unrestricted Spaces Special Retail Spaces Residential Total

Quincy St. Garage

62 152 23 237

Arlington Mill Surface Lot

3 92 18 113

4250 Campbell

  • Ave. Garage

81 298 158 250 787

2850 S. Randolph

  • St. Garage

23 539 182 744

2901 S. Randolph

  • St. Garage

35 628 164 827

WETA Garage

224 91 315

All Facilities

428 1,410 759 176 250 3,023

slide-6
SLIDE 6

On-Street Parking Inventory Summary

June 2019

6

Street Side of Street (North, South, East, West) Theoretical Capacity Campbell Ave. North + East 37 South + West 35

  • S. Randolph St.

East 8 West 21

  • S. Quincy St.

East 12 West 16

Total

129

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Conclusions of Parking Study

– 3,023 off-street parking spaces with restrictions by use and time of day – Each of the parking facilities reach their peak at different days and times – Adequate parking supply, but the restrictions limit use – 137 on-street parking spaces – On-street parking is highly utilized at most times with parking, deliveries and shared ride users

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Existing Level of Service Spring 2019

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LRPC Discussion

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results from Community Forum/Online Survey

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Top 5 Functional/Aesthetic Characteristics

11

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Pedestrian walkability Outdoor dining Tree-lined streets Access to parking garages Variety of retail experience Mature tree canopy Active store front Dog friendly Public gathering spaces Casual seating Night life Mix of new and old architecture Bike friendly Pedestrian pathways Biophilic elements Night lighting Historic Art Deco detailing Access to surface parking Street parking Characteristic brick paving Public art Campbell Avenue fountain Signature architecture Combination of pedestrian and utility corridors Lighting features Streetscape materials - granite curbs Wayfinding and signage

  • ~300 respondents
  • Includes results from the online

survey and community forum

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What Defines Shirlington

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Increase in Density and Height

The requested change in land use and zoning would allow for an increase in building density and height. Should Shirlington grow more dense and taller? If so, where should additional height be placed?

13

*Includes results from the online survey and community forum

64% of respondents

support additional height and density

41% 23% 36% Along the edges In the center Not at all Some respondents noted the desire for additional height & density across Shirlington

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Feedback on Scenarios

Scenarios

  • Scenario 1. Existing Conditions + New Density Up to

2.5 FAR

  • Scenario 1a. As Above with Density Transfers from

Block to Block

  • Scenario 2. Hypothetical Full Scrape/Redevelopment

at 2.5 FAR

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Scenario 1

15 33% 19% 16% 11% 22%

Very Comfortable Fairly Comfortable Not Sure Might Be Comfortable Not Comfortable

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Scenario 1a

16 31% 16% 10% 14% 30%

Very Comfortable Fairly Comfortable Not Sure Might Be Comfortable Not Comfortable

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Scenario 2

17 28% 12% 10% 10% 41%

Very Comfortable Fairly Comfortable Not Sure Might Be Comfortable Not Comfortable

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Input on Draft Principles

18 Guiding Principle Very Important Fairly Important Not Sure Might Be Important Not Important Retain a mix of uses 81% 13% 4% 2% 0% Focus lower heights along the core and heigher heights along the periphery 39% 21% 19% 9% 11% Ensure appropriate transitions to existing/future residential development 38% 26% 25% 6% 5% Retain, enhance, and, where appropriate, add pedestrian connections 75% 17% 6% 2% 1% Retain, enhance, and, where appropriate, add public gathering spaces 58% 22% 13% 7% 1% Consider the historic features, buildings, scale, etc. 47% 13% 17% 12% 11% Preserve mature trees to the extent possible 71% 12% 10% 5% 3% Incorporate sustainability into any redevelopment 59% 19% 16% 1% 4% Look for opportunities to green Shirlington 48% 27% 15% 8% 2% Accommodate additional above-grade parking in certain circumstances 45% 17% 16% 10% 12% Retain alleys for loading and service functions 63% 16% 13% 5% 3%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LRPC Discussion

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Next Steps

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Proposed Process Outline

LRPC Meeting Potential Topics Meeting #1 (June 25, 2019) ▪ Overview of the Special GLUP Study Plus process ▪ Background information on the site ▪ Preliminary site analysis ▪ Discussion and refinement of process and scope ▪ Define the full and core study boundaries ▪ Define GLUP scenarios to be modeled Meeting #2 (July 23, 2019) ▪ Walking tour with staff presentations ▪ Discussion of opportunities, constraints, assumptions to inform scenario modeling, etc. ▪ LRPC discussion and direction Meeting #3 (September 25, 2019) ▪ Staff responses to questions raised at previous meetings ▪ Emerging guiding principles ▪ Presentation of scenarios ▪ Presentation of historical overview ▪ LRPC discussion and direction Community Forum (November 13, 2019) ▪ Community input on modeling and preliminary principles Meeting #4 (December 11, 2019) ▪ Presentation of parking utilization report ▪ Summary of Community Forum/online survey results ▪ LRPC discussion and direction Meeting #5 (January 21, 2020) ▪ Building heights/density discussion ▪ Presentation of refined modeling scenarios ▪ LRPC discussion and direction

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusion

The End

22