geometry of radon measures via h older parameterizations
play

Geometry of Radon measures via H older parameterizations Matthew - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Geometry of Radon measures via H older parameterizations Matthew Badger Department of Mathematics University of Connecticut Geometric Measure Theory Warwick, United Kingdom July 1014, 2017 Research Partially Supported by NSF DMS


  1. Geometry of Radon measures via H¨ older parameterizations Matthew Badger Department of Mathematics University of Connecticut Geometric Measure Theory Warwick, United Kingdom July 10–14, 2017 Research Partially Supported by NSF DMS 1500382, 1650546

  2. Decomposition of Measures Let µ be a measure on a measurable space ( X , M ). Let N ⊆ M be a family of measurable sets. ◮ µ is carried by N if there exist countably many sets Γ i ∈ N such that µ ( X \ � i Γ i ) = 0. ◮ µ is singular to N if µ (Γ) = 0 for every Γ ∈ N . Exercise (Decomposition Lemma) If µ is σ -finite, then µ can be written uniquely as µ N + µ ⊥ N , where µ N is carried by N and µ ⊥ N is singular to N . ◮ e.g. N = { A ∈ M : ν ( A ) = 0 } : µ = σ + ρ where σ ⊥ ν and ρ ≪ ν ◮ Proof of the Decomposition Theorem is abstract nonsense. Identification Problem : Find measure-theoretic and/or geometric characterizations or constructions of µ N and µ ⊥ N ?

  3. PSA: Don’t Think About Support Three Measures. Let a i > 0 be weights with � ∞ i =1 a i = 1. Let { x i : i ≥ 1 } , { ℓ i : i ≥ 1 } , { S i : i ≥ 1 } be a dense set of points, unit line segments, unit squares in the plane. µ 0 = � ∞ µ 1 = � ∞ µ 2 = � ∞ i =1 a i L 1 i =1 a i L 2 i =1 a i δ x i ℓ i S i ◮ µ 0 , µ 1 , µ 2 are probability measures on R 2 ◮ spt µ is smallest closed set carrying µ ; spt µ 0 = spt µ 1 = spt µ 2 = R 2 ◮ µ i is carried by i -dimensional sets (points, lines, squares) ◮ The support of a measure is a rough approximation that hides underlying structure of a measure

  4. Rectifiable Measures: Identification Problem Solved for Absolute Continuous Measures Let 1 ≤ m ≤ n − 1 integers. A Radon measure µ on R n is m -rectifiable if µ is carried by images of Lipschitz maps [0 , 1] m → R n . µ is purely m -unrectifiable if µ is singular to Lipschitz images of [0 , 1] m Theorem (Azzam, Mattila, Preiss, Tolsa, Toro) Assume that µ ≪ H m ( ⇔ lim r ↓ 0 µ ( B ( x , r )) < ∞ µ -a.e.) TFAE: r m 1. µ is m-rectifiable µ ( B ( x , r )) > 0 , Tan ( µ, x ) ⊆ { c H m V : V ∈ G ( n , m ) } µ -a.e. 2. lim r ↓ 0 r m µ ( B ( x , r )) 3. lim r ↓ 0 > 0 µ -a.e. r m � � µ ( B ( x , r )) µ ( B ( x , r )) − µ ( B ( x , 2 r )) 4. lim r ↓ 0 > 0 , lim r ↓ 0 = 0 µ -a.e. r m r m (2 r ) m � 1 µ ( B ( x , r )) 0 β 2 ( µ, B ( x , r )) 2 dr 5. lim r ↓ 0 > 0 , r < ∞ µ -a.e., where r m β 2 ( µ, B ( x , r )) records “flatness” of µ in B ( x , r ) Earlier contributions: Besicovitch, Federer, Marstrand, Morse, Randolph

  5. The study of rectifiability is not done because... Theorem (Garnett-Killip-Schul 2010) There exist Radon measures µ on R 2 with spt µ = R 2 such that µ is 1 -rectifiable, µ ⊥ H 1 , and µ is doubling ( µ ( B ( x , 2 r )) � µ ( B ( x , r )) ). µ ( B ( x , r )) ◮ lim r ↓ 0 = ∞ µ -a.e. r � 1 � − 1 dr � µ ( B ( x , r )) r < ∞ µ -a.e. ◮ r 0 (see B-Schul 2016) ◮ µ (Γ) = 0 whenever Γ = f ([0 , 1]) and f : [0 , 1] → R 2 is bi-Lipschitz ◮ Nevertheless there exist Lipschitz maps f i : [0 , 1] → R 2 such that � ∞ � R 2 \ � µ f i ([0 , 1]) = 0 i =1

  6. The study of rectifiability is not done because... Theorem (Garnett-Killip-Schul 2010) There exist Radon measures µ on R 2 with spt µ = R 2 such that µ is 1 -rectifiable, µ ⊥ H 1 , and µ is doubling ( µ ( B ( x , 2 r )) � µ ( B ( x , r )) ). µ ( B ( x , r )) ◮ lim r ↓ 0 = ∞ µ -a.e. r � 1 � − 1 dr � µ ( B ( x , r )) r < ∞ µ -a.e. ◮ r 0 (see B-Schul 2016) ◮ µ (Γ) = 0 whenever Γ = f ([0 , 1]) and f : [0 , 1] → R 2 is bi-Lipschitz ◮ Nevertheless there exist Lipschitz maps f i : [0 , 1] → R 2 such that � ∞ � R 2 \ � µ f i ([0 , 1]) = 0 i =1

  7. The study of rectifiability is not done because... Theorem (Garnett-Killip-Schul 2010) There exist Radon measures µ on R 2 with spt µ = R 2 such that µ is 1 -rectifiable, µ ⊥ H 1 , and µ is doubling ( µ ( B ( x , 2 r )) � µ ( B ( x , r )) ). µ ( B ( x , r )) ◮ lim r ↓ 0 = ∞ µ -a.e. r � 1 � − 1 dr � µ ( B ( x , r )) r < ∞ µ -a.e. ◮ r 0 (see B-Schul 2016) ◮ µ (Γ) = 0 whenever Γ = f ([0 , 1]) and f : [0 , 1] → R 2 is bi-Lipschitz ◮ Nevertheless there exist Lipschitz maps f i : [0 , 1] → R 2 such that � ∞ � R 2 \ � µ f i ([0 , 1]) = 0 i =1

  8. The study of rectifiability is not done because... Theorem (Garnett-Killip-Schul 2010) There exist Radon measures µ on R 2 with spt µ = R 2 such that µ is 1 -rectifiable, µ ⊥ H 1 , and µ is doubling ( µ ( B ( x , 2 r )) � µ ( B ( x , r )) ). µ ( B ( x , r )) ◮ lim r ↓ 0 = ∞ µ -a.e. r � 1 � − 1 dr � µ ( B ( x , r )) r < ∞ µ -a.e. ◮ r 0 (see B-Schul 2016) ◮ µ (Γ) = 0 whenever Γ = f ([0 , 1]) and f : [0 , 1] → R 2 is bi-Lipschitz ◮ Nevertheless there exist Lipschitz maps f i : [0 , 1] → R 2 such that � ∞ � R 2 \ � µ f i ([0 , 1]) = 0 i =1

  9. The study of rectifiability is not done because... Theorem (Garnett-Killip-Schul 2010) There exist Radon measures µ on R 2 with spt µ = R 2 such that µ is 1 -rectifiable, µ ⊥ H 1 , and µ is doubling ( µ ( B ( x , 2 r )) � µ ( B ( x , r )) ). µ ( B ( x , r )) ◮ lim r ↓ 0 = ∞ µ -a.e. r � 1 � − 1 dr � µ ( B ( x , r )) r < ∞ µ -a.e. ◮ r 0 (see B-Schul 2016) ◮ µ (Γ) = 0 whenever Γ = f ([0 , 1]) and f : [0 , 1] → R 2 is bi-Lipschitz ◮ Nevertheless there exist Lipschitz maps f i : [0 , 1] → R 2 such that � ∞ � R 2 \ � µ f i ([0 , 1]) = 0 i =1

  10. The study of rectifiability is not done because... Theorem (Garnett-Killip-Schul 2010) There exist Radon measures µ on R 2 with spt µ = R 2 such that µ is 1 -rectifiable, µ ⊥ H 1 , and µ is doubling ( µ ( B ( x , 2 r )) � µ ( B ( x , r )) ). µ ( B ( x , r )) ◮ lim r ↓ 0 = ∞ µ -a.e. r � 1 � − 1 dr � µ ( B ( x , r )) r < ∞ µ -a.e. ◮ r 0 (see B-Schul 2016) ◮ µ (Γ) = 0 whenever Γ = f ([0 , 1]) and f : [0 , 1] → R 2 is bi-Lipschitz ◮ Nevertheless there exist Lipschitz maps f i : [0 , 1] → R 2 such that � ∞ � R 2 \ � µ f i ([0 , 1]) = 0 i =1

  11. Identification Problem Solved for 1-Rectifiable Measures Let 1 ≤ m ≤ n − 1 integers. A Radon measure µ on R n is 1 -rectifiable if µ is carried by rectifiable curves (images of Lipschitz maps [0 , 1] → R n ) µ is purely 1 -unrectifiable if µ is singular to rectifiable curves Theorem (B, Schul 2017) Assume that µ is a Radon measure on R n . TFAE: 1. µ is 1 -rectifiable µ ( B ( x , r )) 2. lim r ↓ 0 > 0 µ -a.e. and r 2 ( µ, 3000 Q ) 2 diam Q � β ∗ µ ( Q ) χ Q ( x ) < ∞ µ -a.e. , Q ∈ ∆ where β ∗ 2 ( µ, 3000 Q ) records “flatness” of µ in large dilate of a dyadic cube “nonhomogeneously” and “anisotropically” One new ingredient: L 2 extension of Jones’ traveling salesman theorem that works with non-doubling measures . Also see Martikainen and Orponen.

  12. What about m -rectifiable measures for m ≥ 2? Recent preprints by Azzam-Schul, Edelen-Naber-Valtorta, Ghinassi based on the Reifenberg algorithm give some partial results, but a characterization of 2-rectifiable Radon measures is currently out of reach. Missing a good characterization of subsets of Lipschitz images of squares. In fact, even the following basic question is wide open. Open: Find extra metric, geometric, and/or topological conditions which ensure a compact, connected set K ⊆ R n with H 2 ( K ) < ∞ is contained in the image of a Lipschitz map f : [0 , 1] 2 → R n . A basic enemy: Let C be the planar four corner Cantor set of dimension 1. Then K = ([0 , 1] 2 × { 0 } ) ∪ ( C × [0 , 1]) ⊂ R 3 is connected, compact, and 0 < H 2 ( K ) < ∞ , but the subset K ′ = C × [0 , 1] is purely 2-unrectifiable.

  13. Current Project (w/ Vellis): Non-integral Dimensions older curves in R n , For each s ∈ [1 , n ], let N s denote all (1 / s ) -H¨ older continuous maps f : [0 , 1] → R n . i.e. all images Γ of (1 / s )-H¨ Decomposition: Every Radon measure µ on R n can be uniquely written as µ = µ N s + µ N ⊥ s , where ◮ µ N s is carried by (1 / s )-H¨ older curves ◮ µ N ⊥ is singular to (1 / s )-H¨ older curves s Notes ◮ Every measure µ on R n is carried by (1 / n )-H¨ older curves (space-filling curves). ◮ If µ is m -rectifiable, then µ is carried by (1 / m )-H¨ older curves. ◮ A measure µ is 1-rectifiable iff µ is carried by 1-H¨ older curves. ◮ Mart´ ın and Mattila (1988,1993,2000) studied this concept for measures µ of the form µ = H s E , where 0 < H s ( E ) < ∞

  14. Essential Examples “Rectifiable s -sets” ◮ Let Γ be a generalized von Koch curve of Hausdorff dimension s . Then there exists a (1 / s )-H¨ older map [0 , 1] ։ Γ. ◮ µ = H s Γ is carried by (1 / s )-H¨ older curves “Purely unrectifiable s -sets” Theorem (Mart´ ın and Mattila 1993) Let K ⊆ R n be a self-similar Cantor set of Hausdorff dimension s. Then µ = H s K is singular to (1 / s ) -H¨ older curves. ◮ This extends a result of Hutchinson (1981) who showed self-similar Cantor sets of Hausdorff dimension m are purely m -unrectifiable. Open Problem (Identification Problem for s -sets) Let s ∈ (1 , n ). Characterize s -sets E ⊆ R n such that µ = H s E is carried by (1 / s )-H¨ older curves. (This is even open when s = 2.)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend