Generation Sequencing Implementation for Precision Oncology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

generation sequencing implementation for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Generation Sequencing Implementation for Precision Oncology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Case Study: Next- Generation Sequencing Implementation for Precision Oncology Testing Brian Piening, PhD Assistant Member Earle A Chiles Research Institute Providence Cancer Center Associate Director Clinical Genomics Providence St.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Case Study: Next- Generation Sequencing Implementation for Precision Oncology Testing

Brian Piening, PhD

Assistant Member Earle A Chiles Research Institute Providence Cancer Center Associate Director – Clinical Genomics Providence St. Joseph Health Providence Portland Medical Center Portland, OR USA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Learning Objectives

  • Describe the decision making process in deciding

whether to implement next-generation sequencing in a clinical pathology lab setting

  • Identify the variety of testing strategies and

chemistries available

  • Review example case studies where NGS is

uniquely suited to provide novel clinical insights

slide-3
SLIDE 3

4

  • Serves a community hospital system (now 50+

hospitals)

  • Also serving a cancer research institute (Earle A Chiles

Research Institute)

Bac ackground ab about ou

  • ur lab

lab

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Our molecular genomics laboratory:

  • Began NGS testing in

2015

  • Housed within the

larger clinical testing laboratory

  • Affiliated with our

Pathology Department

Bac ackground

slide-5
SLIDE 5

50 gene solid tumor panel 50-gene heme malignancy panel 170-gene DNA/RNA panel 363-gene DNA/RNA solid tumor panel Sanger-based tests Real-time PCR- based tests 50-gene hybrid DNA and RNA solid tumor panel

Lab Lab se services have evolved over ti time

Whole-exome sequencing Whole-genome sequencing RNA-seq Single-cell RNA sequencing TCR-Seq microbiome ATAC-Seq CITE-Seq

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Breast carcinoma Cancer, other Cholangiocarcinoma Colorectal carcinoma Duodenal adenocarcinoma Endometrial carcinoma Ependymoma Esophageal carcinoma Gastric carcinoma Glioblastoma Glioma Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) Lung adenocarcinoma Lung squamous cell carcinoma Melanoma Meningioma Ovarian serous carcinoma Pancreatic carcinoma Prostate carcinoma Renal cell carcinoma Salivary gland carcinoma Testicular cancer Thymoma Thyroid carcinoma Urothelial carcinoma Uterine carcinoma

Distribution of tumors tested: 363-gene panel

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Why NGS testing for

  • r so

somatic can ancer?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Lin and Shaw, Trends Cancer 2016

Top

  • p th

therapeutic mutation tar argets s in in lu lung can ancer.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Th The growing fie field of

  • f im

immuno-oncology is is in intrinsically lin linked to

  • genomics

Response to anti-PD1 in Lung Cancer for TMB High, Medium and Low cases Carbone et al NEJM 2017

  • Th

The suc success of

  • f Tumor

r Mu Mutatio ional Bur Burden (T (TMB; ; # # of

  • f mut

utations s per per meg egabase) as as a a bio biomarker r for

  • r I-O the

therapy.

  • Th

These suc successes es ha have also also req equired an an expansio ion in in the the pe percent of

  • f the

the gen enome we e tes est.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Th The goo

  • od news:

: se sequencing has as never been more affordable

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Why bri ring NGS in in-house versus s ext xternal testing providers

  • Com
  • mpl

plete fl flexib ibil ilit ity over er the the con

  • ntent (gene list,

che chemis istry ry, , methodolo logy, rep eportin ing).

  • Acce

ccess to

  • com
  • mple

lete da datasets for

  • r res

esearch an and rea eanaly lysis is (fas astqs, , bam bams etc.) .).

  • NGS

GS is s an an integral l pa part of

  • f res

esearch biom biomedic icin ine. .

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Which se

sequencing pla

latform should I I ch choose?

?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Co Considerations s whe hen ch choosing NGS pla platform(s) 1. What is your expected patient test volume? 2. Percentage of the genome that your test(s) will interrogate (e.g. number of Mb per sample)? 3. How fast can you deliver results? Solid answers to these questions can help to narrow down the platform of choice.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ok, you’ve generated data. So now what?

Bio Bioinformatics!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Lo Lots of

  • f op
  • ptio

ions here as as well ll

  • En

End-to to-end vendor pip ipelines

  • Bu

Build your own pip ipelines

  • Lo

Local storage and compute vs clo cloud

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Th The fin final l pie iece: : In Interpretation an and Reporting

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Summary ry:

  • It

It has never been easier to brin ring NGS testi ting on-line in in your lab lab/institute.

  • New targeted th

therapy and im immune-

  • ncology developments

ts will furt further inc increase th the valu lue of f th these results for

  • ncology pati

tients.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Case study: A prototypical NGS application

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Case study - 50 y.o. female

  • Presented to clinic with a range of symptoms

▪ Facial numbness ▪ Partial hearing loss ▪ Persistent cough

  • Brain MRI, chest CT were performed
  • Diagnosis of primary lung cancer with brain

metastasis

  • Median survival for this diagnosis historically has

been 5-6 months (Ali et al. Curr. Oncol. 2013).

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Case study (continued):

  • Lung biopsy was performed.
  • Tissue preserved in formalin, embedded in paraffin

wax (FFPE).

  • Sections cut and affixed to microscope slides for

review by pathologist.

  • Genomic sequencing was ordered.
  • DNA and RNA were extracted from tissue sample

and sequenced.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Case study (continued):

TUMOR SAMPLE NEGATIVE CONTROL EGFR

Chromosome 7

Sequencing result:

  • EGFR c.2573T>G: p.L858R
slide-22
SLIDE 22

EGFR – epidermal growth factor receptor

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Case study (continued):

  • Patient was put on a therapy

targeting EGFR L858R.

  • Erlotinib is a tyrosine kinase

inhibitor (TKI).

  • Tumors exhibited rapid

reduction in size.

  • Patient still alive ~2 years later.

Park et al. Biochem. Journal 2012

slide-24
SLIDE 24

TKI drug Conventional chemo

Zhou et al. Lancet Oncol. 2011

Survival in patients with EGFR-activating mutations (Phase III Data)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Back to our case study:

  • At ~2 year mark, new scans revealed that patient

tumors now progressing again.

  • Sequencing of new biopsy sample reveals the presence
  • f EGFR T790M mutation.
  • T790M is a common acquired resistance mechanism

for TKI therapies.

  • What to do now? Immunotherapy?
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Case study: The atypical case

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Case study 2 – 38 y.o. female

  • Stage IIIA triple negative metastatic breast cancer.
  • Due to family history and age of diagnosis, patient was

referred to genetic counseling.

  • Identification of pathogenic germline PALB2 4-bp

frameshift deletion.

  • Carboplatin added to treatment plan; tumor exhibited

resistance to carbo.

  • Tumor and germline whole exome sequencing

performed.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

PALB2 forms complex with BRCA1/2 in DNA repair.

Buisson and Masson, PNAS 2012

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Tumor Germline

Confirmation of 4-bp PALB2 frameshift deletion in both germline and carbo-resistant tumor. Formal HGVS indication: PALB2 c.172_175delTTGT:p.Gln60fs

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Identification of novel 5’ 8-bp deletion in tumor only.

  • Deletion restores PALB2

reading frame in the tumor.

Formal HGVS indication: PALB2 c.172_175delTTGT:p.Gln60fs PALB2 c.[146_153del; c.172_175del]: p.Lys49_Cys57delinsSerArgArgThrArg

Tumor Germline

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Restoring mutations have been identified as mechanism for resistance in other BRCA complex genes.

Nature 2008 Cancer Res. 2008

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The original pre-carbo core biopsy was obtained and exome sequencing was performed.

  • Secondary PALB2

reversion mutation is

  • nly detected in the

post-carboplatin sample.

  • PALB2 frame

restoration likely

  • ccurred as resistance

mechanism to carbo.

Pre-carbo Post-carbo

slide-33
SLIDE 33

The frameshift and reversion are present in the RNA-seq data as well. RNA-seq data also confirm LOH in original PALB2 frameshift.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Follow-up for PALB2 restoration case:

  • Patient unlikely to benefit from PARP

inhibitor therapy

  • Patient considering immunotherapy

trials

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Case study: Immunotherapy considerations

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Metastatic melanoma patient – 71 y.o. male

  • Patient with history of metastatic

melanoma (primary lesion not known).

  • Prior lesions:
  • 15 years ago: right upper back

lesion

  • 8 years ago: new back lesion distal

site

  • Current lesion: adrenal resection
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Metastatic melanoma case - initial 50-gene targeted hotspot panel sequencing results

  • BRAF inhibitor therapy an option
  • Patient also considering immunotherapy trials
  • Larger sequencing panel was utilized.
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Sequencing with 363-gene panel and whole exome

  • 43 mutations found in the NGS panel, 8 of known

clinical significance.

  • Tumor mutational burden analysis on exome is

clear TMB-high (>30 mut/Mb).

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Extensive sequencing panel revealed frameshift mutation in the B2M gene (Beta-2- Microglobulin)

  • B2M a requirement for MHC class I

antigen presentation

2017 sample 2004 sample

slide-40
SLIDE 40

2017 sample 2004 sample

B2M frameshift also detected in RNA

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Loss of B2M a recently discovered immunotherapy evasion mechanism in melanoma. Patient unlikely to benefit from immunotherapy

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Summary ry:

  • Extended sequencing panels can have

a significant impact on treatment decisions

  • Routine WES, WGS, RNA-seq likely

not far off in clinical practice

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Thermo Fisher Scientific and its affiliates are not endorsing, recommending, or promoting any use or application of Thermo Fisher Scientific products presented by third parties during this seminar. Information and materials presented or provided by third parties are provided as-is and without warranty of any kind, including regarding intellectual property rights and reported results. Parties presenting images, text and material represent they have the rights to do so.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

PS PSJH JH Genom

  • mics La

Lab: Carl rlo

  • Bifu

ifulc lco Ma Mary ry Campbell ll Brady Bern rnard Joh

  • hn Welle

lle Rog

  • gan Ra

Rattray Robe

  • bert Citek

Joe

  • e Sl

Slagel Ma Mari rina Puk ukay Venkatesh Ra Rajamanickam Patrick Clouser Cali Ricks Xiaohua Wang Paul Tittel Brian Wilkinson Nancy Frisco Pathology Support Team Histology Team

Acknowledgements

Immunogenomics Lab/EACRI/Collaborators: Alexa Dowdell John Cha Walter Urba Bernie Fox Eric Tran Rom Leidner Ali Conlin Brendan Curti Will Redmond Raina Tamakawa Melissa Pomeroy Julie Cramer