gbcc oral presentation
play

GBCC Oral Presentation PROGNOSIS AND EFFECT OF ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GBCC Oral Presentation PROGNOSIS AND EFFECT OF ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN IN SMALL, NODE(-), HER2(+) BREAST CANCER Wonju Severance Christianity Hospital Seungtaek Lim Background The prognosis of HER2+ early breast cancer has been improved by


  1. GBCC Oral Presentation PROGNOSIS AND EFFECT OF ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN IN SMALL, NODE(-), HER2(+) BREAST CANCER Wonju Severance Christianity Hospital Seungtaek Lim

  2. Background • The prognosis of HER2+ early breast cancer has been improved by adjuvant trastuzumab, but evidence is lacking for small(<1cm), node (-) disease Future Oncol. (2015) 11(24), 3261-3271

  3. Background • Although outcomes of T1abN0 HER2+ tumors vary among observational studies, there is 10-20% risk of recurrence at 5 or more years. • Netherland Cancer registry • Retrospective data of 3512 patients with T1N0M0 HER2 (+) disease • 385 (11%) T1a, 800 (23%) T1b, 2327 (66%) T1c

  4. Netherland Cancer Registry (2006~2012) All pT1a pT1 pT1c b • Limitation • Only Overall Survival Data • >90% patients received adjuvant Trastuzumab with Chemotherapy BCRT 2016

  5. Purpose • We intend to investigate • The overall prognosis of Small (<1cm), Node (-), HER2 (+) breast cancer patients after curative surgery • Treatment patterns for the patients and difference according to pT stage (T1a vs. 1b), Receptor (HR+ vs. HR-) • The effect of adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, and/or trastuzumab) in the population

  6. Methods • Inclusion criteria • Curative surgery for breast cancer • Diagnosed at Jan 2005~July 2016 • Yonsei Cancer center, Gangnam Severance, Wonju Severance • pT1a or T1b (<1cm), node (-) • HER2 (+) • Exclusion criteria: neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, Tis, bilateral case • We collected data regarding • Baseline demographics • Histology and Receptor status (ER, PR) • Surgical methods (mastectomy vs. BCS) • Adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and trastuzumab)

  7. Baseline Characteristics of all patients pT1b (N=254) pT1a (N=267) Characteristics Total (N=254) Characteristics Total (N=267) Age (years, median, range) 51 (22~80) Age (years, median, range) 51 (30~74) ER status ER status NO 70 (27.6%) NO 122 (45.7%) Yes Yes 184 (72.4%) 145 (54.3%) PR status PR status No No 126 (49.6%) 166 (62.2%) Yes 128 (50.4%) Yes 100 (37.5%) HR status HR status No 62 (24.4%) No 77 (28.8%) Yes 192 (75.6%) Yes 190 (71.2%) OP OP BCS BCS 151 (59.4%) 118 (44.32%) MRM 103 (40.6%) MRM 149 (55.8%) Histology type Histology type Ductal carcinoma 240 (94.5%) Ductal carcinoma 248 (92.9%) Lobular carcinoma 8 (3.1%) Lobular carcinoma 15 (5.6%) Others Others 6 (1.4%) 4 (1.5%) Histology grade Histology grade 1 64 (29.0%) 1 58 (21.7%) 2 116 (52.5%) 2 119 (44.6%) 3 33 (14.9%) 3 23 (8.6%) Unknown 8 (3.6 %) Unknown 67 (25.1%) Nuclear grade Nuclear grade 1 1 24 (11%) 27 (10.1%) 2 2 114 (52.1%) 87 (32.6%) 3 3 48 (21.9%) 38 (14.2%) Unknown 33 (15.1%) Unknown 115 (43.1%) Trastuzumab Trastuzumab No 229 (90.2%) No 55 (95.5%) Yes Yes 25 (9.8%) 12 (4.5%) Adjuvant Chemotherapy Adjuvant Chemotherapy No No 234 (87.6%) 139 (54.7%) Yes 33 (12.4%) Yes 115 (45.3%)

  8. Baseline Characteristics of pT1a, Node (-), HER2 (+) patients (N=267) Characteristics No CTx (N=234) CTx (N=33) P Age (years, median, range) 51.2 47.6 0.021 Sex Female 234(100%) 33 (100%) NA ER status NO 103 (84.4%) 19 (15.6%) 0.143 Yes 131 (90.3%) 14 (9.7%) PR status No 0.191 142 (85.5%) 24 (14.5%) Yes 91 (91.0%) 9 (9.0%) HR status No 65 (84.4%) 12 (15.6%) 0.308 Yes 169 (88.9%) 21 (11.1%) OP BCS 101 (85.6%) 17 (14.4%) 0.366 MRM 133 (89.3%) 16 (10.7%) Histology type Ductal carcinoma 217 (87.5%) 31(12.5%) 0.748 Lobular carcinoma 13 (86.7%) 2 (13.3%) Others 4 (100.0%) 0 (0%) Histology grade 1 49 (84.5%) 9 (15.5%) 2 103 (86.6%) 16 (13.4%) 0.541 3 20 (87.0%) 3 (13.0%) Unknown 62 (92.5%) 5 (7.5%) Nuclear grade 1 26 (96.3%) 1 (3.7%) 2 73 (83.9%) 14 (16.1%) 0.372 3 33 (86.8%) 5 (13.2%) Unknown 102 (88.7%) 13 (11.3%) Trastuzumab No 234 (91.8%) 21 (8.2%) <0.001 Yes 0 (0.0%) 12 (100.0%)

  9. Baseline Characteristics of pT1b, Node (-), HER2 (+) patients (N=254) Characteristics No CTx (N=139) CTx (N=115) P Age (years, median, range) 52.8 48.7 0.001 Sex Female 115(100%) 85 (100%) NA ER status NO 20 (28.6%) 50 (71.4%) <0.001 Yes 119 (64.7%) 65 (35.3%) PR status No 0.03 61 (48.4%) 65 (51.6%) Yes 78 (60.9%) 50 (39.1%) HR status No 18 (29.0%) 44 (71.0%) <0.001 Yes 121 (63.0%) 71 (37.0%) OP BCS 93 (61.6%) 58 (38.4%) 0.006 MRM 46 (44.7%) 57 (55.3%) Histology type Ductal carcinoma 127 (52.9%) 113 (47.1%) 0.026 Lobular carcinoma 8 (100.0%) 0 (0%) Others 4 (66.7%) 2 (33.3%) Histology grade 1 51 (70.8%) 21 (29.2%) 2 67 (51.5%) 63 (48.5%) <0.001 3 9 (23.1%) 30 (76.9%) Unknown 8 (100%) 0 (0%) Nuclear grade 1 20 (83.3%) 4 (16.7%) 2 70 (61.4%) 44 (38.6%) <0.001 3 15 (31.3%) 33 (68.8%) Unknown 16 (48.5%) 17 (51.5%) Trastuzumab No 139 (60.7%) 90 (39.3%) <0.001 Yes 0 (0%) 25 (100%)

  10. Prognosis of whole patients pT1a Patients Recur pattern (N=521) Local or regional 4 N 3Yr DFS 5Yr DFS 5Yr OS 10 Yr OS Distant recurrence 7 267 98% 96% 100% 89% Bone 3 Liver 2 pT1b Lung 1 Distant LN 1 N 3Yr DFS 5Yr DFS 5Yr OS 10 Yr OS 254 97% 91% 97% 82%

  11. Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1a patients CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 234 98% 95% 100% 89% Yes 33 100% 100% 97% 97% Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 255 98% 95% 100% 89% Yes 12 100% NA 100% NA Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1a, HR (+), patients CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 169 100% 100% 100% 85% Yes 21 100% 100% 99% NA Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 184 100% 100% 99% 85% Yes 6 100% NA 100% NA Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1a, HR (-), patients CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 65 92% 84% 100% 100% Yes 12 100% 100% 100% NA Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 71 93% 85% 100% 100% Yes 6 100% NA NA NA

  12. Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1b patients P=0.237 P=0.838 CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7Yr OS rate No 139 95% 93% 96% 96% Yes 115 99% 88% 100% 100% P=0.691 P=0.454 Trastuzuamb N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 229 99% 97% 97% 97% Yes 25 100% 100% 100% 100%

  13. Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1b, HR(+) patients P=0.346 P=0.160 CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 121 97% 97% 96% 96% Yes 71 98% 80% 100% 100% P=0.645 P=0.612 Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 180 99% 96% 97% 97% Yes 12 100% 100% 100% 100%

  14. Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1b, HR(-) patients OS not calculated (no event occurred) P=0.005 CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 18 87% 58% 100% 100% Yes 44 100% 100% 100% 100% OS not calculated P=0.42 (no event occurred) Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 49 95% 87% 100% 100% Yes 13 100% 100% 100% NA

  15. Conclusion • Our result showed • Overall prognosis and treatment patterns of small(<1cm), node (-), and HER2+ breast cancer • Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to patients with • pT1b>T1a, HR-, Higher HG, NG • Adjuvant chemotherapy might be effective in patients with pT1b and HR(-) disease • Limitation: small sample size, retrospective data • Subsequent study with large sample size is warranted.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend