GBCC Oral Presentation PROGNOSIS AND EFFECT OF ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

gbcc oral presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

GBCC Oral Presentation PROGNOSIS AND EFFECT OF ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GBCC Oral Presentation PROGNOSIS AND EFFECT OF ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN IN SMALL, NODE(-), HER2(+) BREAST CANCER Wonju Severance Christianity Hospital Seungtaek Lim Background The prognosis of HER2+ early breast cancer has been improved by


slide-1
SLIDE 1

GBCC Oral Presentation

Wonju Severance Christianity Hospital Seungtaek Lim PROGNOSIS AND EFFECT OF ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN IN SMALL, NODE(-), HER2(+) BREAST CANCER

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • The prognosis of HER2+ early breast cancer has been

improved by adjuvant trastuzumab, but evidence is lacking for small(<1cm), node (-) disease

Future Oncol. (2015) 11(24), 3261-3271

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Although outcomes of T1abN0 HER2+ tumors vary

among observational studies, there is 10-20% risk

  • f recurrence at 5 or more years.
  • Netherland Cancer registry
  • Retrospective data of 3512 patients with T1N0M0 HER2

(+) disease

  • 385 (11%) T1a, 800 (23%) T1b, 2327 (66%) T1c

Background

slide-4
SLIDE 4

All

pT1a pT1 b pT1c

BCRT 2016

Netherland Cancer Registry (2006~2012)

  • Limitation
  • Only Overall Survival Data
  • >90% patients received adjuvant Trastuzumab with Chemotherapy
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Purpose

  • We intend to investigate
  • The overall prognosis of Small (<1cm), Node (-), HER2 (+)

breast cancer patients after curative surgery

  • Treatment patterns for the patients and difference

according to pT stage (T1a vs. 1b), Receptor (HR+ vs. HR-)

  • The effect of adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy,

and/or trastuzumab) in the population

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methods

  • Inclusion criteria
  • Curative surgery for breast cancer
  • Diagnosed at Jan 2005~July 2016
  • Yonsei Cancer center, Gangnam Severance, Wonju Severance
  • pT1a or T1b (<1cm), node (-)
  • HER2 (+)
  • Exclusion criteria: neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, Tis, bilateral case
  • We collected data regarding
  • Baseline demographics
  • Histology and Receptor status (ER, PR)
  • Surgical methods (mastectomy vs. BCS)
  • Adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and

trastuzumab)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Baseline Characteristics of all patients

pT1a (N=267)

Characteristics Total (N=267) Age (years, median, range) 51 (30~74) ER status NO 122 (45.7%) Yes 145 (54.3%) PR status No 166 (62.2%) Yes 100 (37.5%) HR status No 77 (28.8%) Yes 190 (71.2%) OP BCS 118 (44.32%) MRM 149 (55.8%) Histology type Ductal carcinoma 248 (92.9%) Lobular carcinoma 15 (5.6%) Others 4 (1.5%) Histology grade 1 58 (21.7%) 2 119 (44.6%) 3 23 (8.6%) Unknown 67 (25.1%) Nuclear grade 1 27 (10.1%) 2 87 (32.6%) 3 38 (14.2%) Unknown 115 (43.1%) Trastuzumab No 55 (95.5%) Yes 12 (4.5%) Adjuvant Chemotherapy No 234 (87.6%) Yes 33 (12.4%)

pT1b (N=254)

Characteristics Total (N=254) Age (years, median, range) 51 (22~80) ER status NO 70 (27.6%) Yes 184 (72.4%) PR status No 126 (49.6%) Yes 128 (50.4%) HR status No 62 (24.4%) Yes 192 (75.6%) OP BCS 151 (59.4%) MRM 103 (40.6%) Histology type Ductal carcinoma 240 (94.5%) Lobular carcinoma 8 (3.1%) Others 6 (1.4%) Histology grade 1 64 (29.0%) 2 116 (52.5%) 3 33 (14.9%) Unknown 8 (3.6 %) Nuclear grade 1 24 (11%) 2 114 (52.1%) 3 48 (21.9%) Unknown 33 (15.1%) Trastuzumab No 229 (90.2%) Yes 25 (9.8%) Adjuvant Chemotherapy No 139 (54.7%) Yes 115 (45.3%)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Baseline Characteristics of pT1a, Node (-), HER2 (+) patients (N=267)

Characteristics No CTx (N=234) CTx (N=33) P Age (years, median, range) 51.2 47.6 0.021 Sex Female 234(100%) 33 (100%) NA ER status 0.143 NO 103 (84.4%) 19 (15.6%) Yes 131 (90.3%) 14 (9.7%) PR status 0.191 No 142 (85.5%) 24 (14.5%) Yes 91 (91.0%) 9 (9.0%) HR status 0.308 No 65 (84.4%) 12 (15.6%) Yes 169 (88.9%) 21 (11.1%) OP 0.366 BCS 101 (85.6%) 17 (14.4%) MRM 133 (89.3%) 16 (10.7%) Histology type 0.748 Ductal carcinoma 217 (87.5%) 31(12.5%) Lobular carcinoma 13 (86.7%) 2 (13.3%) Others 4 (100.0%) 0 (0%) Histology grade 1 49 (84.5%) 9 (15.5%) 0.541 2 103 (86.6%) 16 (13.4%) 3 20 (87.0%) 3 (13.0%) Unknown 62 (92.5%) 5 (7.5%) Nuclear grade 1 26 (96.3%) 1 (3.7%) 0.372 2 73 (83.9%) 14 (16.1%) 3 33 (86.8%) 5 (13.2%) Unknown 102 (88.7%) 13 (11.3%) Trastuzumab No 234 (91.8%) 21 (8.2%) <0.001 Yes 0 (0.0%) 12 (100.0%)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Baseline Characteristics of pT1b, Node (-), HER2 (+) patients (N=254)

Characteristics No CTx (N=139) CTx (N=115) P Age (years, median, range) 52.8 48.7 0.001 Sex Female 115(100%) 85 (100%) NA ER status <0.001 NO 20 (28.6%) 50 (71.4%) Yes 119 (64.7%) 65 (35.3%) PR status 0.03 No 61 (48.4%) 65 (51.6%) Yes 78 (60.9%) 50 (39.1%) HR status <0.001 No 18 (29.0%) 44 (71.0%) Yes 121 (63.0%) 71 (37.0%) OP 0.006 BCS 93 (61.6%) 58 (38.4%) MRM 46 (44.7%) 57 (55.3%) Histology type 0.026 Ductal carcinoma 127 (52.9%) 113 (47.1%) Lobular carcinoma 8 (100.0%) 0 (0%) Others 4 (66.7%) 2 (33.3%) Histology grade 1 51 (70.8%) 21 (29.2%) <0.001 2 67 (51.5%) 63 (48.5%) 3 9 (23.1%) 30 (76.9%) Unknown 8 (100%) 0 (0%) Nuclear grade 1 20 (83.3%) 4 (16.7%) <0.001 2 70 (61.4%) 44 (38.6%) 3 15 (31.3%) 33 (68.8%) Unknown 16 (48.5%) 17 (51.5%) Trastuzumab No 139 (60.7%) 90 (39.3%) <0.001 Yes 0 (0%) 25 (100%)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Prognosis of whole patients

N 3Yr DFS 5Yr DFS 5Yr OS 10 Yr OS 267 98% 96% 100% 89%

pT1a pT1b

N 3Yr DFS 5Yr DFS 5Yr OS 10 Yr OS 254 97% 91% 97% 82% Recur pattern Patients (N=521) Local or regional 4 Distant recurrence 7 Bone 3 Liver 2 Lung 1 Distant LN 1

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1a patients

CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 234 98% 95% 100% 89% Yes 33 100% 100% 97% 97% Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 255 98% 95% 100% 89% Yes 12 100% NA 100% NA CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 169 100% 100% 100% 85% Yes 21 100% 100% 99% NA Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 184 100% 100% 99% 85% Yes 6 100% NA 100% NA

Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1a, HR (+), patients Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1a, HR (-), patients

CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 65 92% 84% 100% 100% Yes 12 100% 100% 100% NA Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 10 Yr OS rate No 71 93% 85% 100% 100% Yes 6 100% NA NA NA

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1b patients

CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7Yr OS rate No 139 95% 93% 96% 96% Yes 115 99% 88% 100% 100% P=0.838 P=0.237 Trastuzuamb N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 229 99% 97% 97% 97% Yes 25 100% 100% 100% 100% P=0.454 P=0.691

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1b, HR(+) patients

P=0.160 P=0.346 CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 121 97% 97% 96% 96% Yes 71 98% 80% 100% 100% P=0.612 P=0.645 Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 180 99% 96% 97% 97% Yes 12 100% 100% 100% 100%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

OS not calculated (no event occurred)

Adjuvant Treatment effect In pT1b, HR(-) patients

P=0.005 CTx N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 18 87% 58% 100% 100% Yes 44 100% 100% 100% 100% OS not calculated (no event occurred) Trastuzumab N 3Yr DFS rate 5Yr DFS rate 5Yr OS rate 7 Yr OS rate No 49 95% 87% 100% 100% Yes 13 100% 100% 100% NA P=0.42

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusion

  • Our result showed
  • Overall prognosis and treatment patterns of small(<1cm),

node (-), and HER2+ breast cancer

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to patients with
  • pT1b>T1a, HR-, Higher HG, NG
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy might be effective in patients

with pT1b and HR(-) disease

  • Limitation: small sample size, retrospective data
  • Subsequent

study with large sample size is warranted.