gaussian deconvolution filter
play

Gaussian Deconvolution Filter Michael Mooney Brookhaven National - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Gaussian Deconvolution Filter Michael Mooney Brookhaven National Laboratory ProtoDUNE-SP DRA Meeting June 8 th , 2017 Introduction Introduction In ProtoDUNE-SP reconstruction, currently a 1D deconvolution is utilized, along with


  1. Gaussian Deconvolution Filter Michael Mooney Brookhaven National Laboratory ProtoDUNE-SP DRA Meeting – June 8 th , 2017

  2. Introduction Introduction ♦ In ProtoDUNE-SP reconstruction, currently a “1D” deconvolution is utilized, along with a Wiener filter • 1D deconvolution: not taking into account signal induction on wires neighboring the wire closest to ionization electrons • Wiener filter: deconvolution filter that gives maximal peak-to-peak separation (“sharpness” of image) ♦ Most ideal to use 2D deconvolution (FFT over both time domain and wire domain, then remove 2D response) • BNL group (Xin et al.) has agreed to bring this technique to ProtoDUNE-SP • First releasing/tuning for MicroBooNE (~August) so this will come later for ProtoDUNE-SP (by end of the year?) ♦ Until 2D deconvolution ready, since we use GaussHitFinder, we should move to a Gaussian filter – focus of this talk 2

  3. MicroBooNE SP Public Note MicroBooNE SP Public Note ♦ MicroBooNE has released public note documenting signal processing techniques useful for LArTPC experiments • See public note here: MICROBOONE-NOTE-1017-PUB ♦ This note describes 2D deconvolution technique • Technique improved since public note – paper forthcoming • Nature of detector response different than current assumption that only closest wire matters (see below figure) • Worst for MicroBooNE (3 mm spacing), still important for PD-SP 3

  4. MicroBooNE SP Public Note MicroBooNE SP Public Note ♦ MicroBooNE has released public note documenting signal processing techniques useful for LArTPC experiments • See public note here: MICROBOONE-NOTE-1017-PUB ♦ This note describes 2D deconvolution technique • Technique improved since public note – paper forthcoming • Nature of detector response different than current assumption that See Backup Slides only closest wire matters (see below figure) For 2D Deconvolution Examples at MicroBooNE • Worst for MicroBooNE (3 mm spacing), still important for PD-SP 4

  5. Signal Processing Concepts Signal Processing Concepts ♦ Also detailed in the note is the importance of a deconvolution filter – prevents noise blow-up when dividing out response Deconvolution Wiener Filter ♦ Wiener filter gives optimal peak-to-peak separation, but we are fitting to Gaussians (GaussHitFinder) → problems! 5

  6. MicroBooNE U Plane MicroBooNE U Plane 6

  7. MicroBooNE V Plane MicroBooNE V Plane 7

  8. MicroBooNE Y Plane MicroBooNE Y Plane 8

  9. Discussion Discussion ♦ If fitting post-deconvolution signal with Gaussians (GaussHitFinder), would overestimate charge with Wiener filter (peaks of integral plots) – for MicroBooNE (273 V/cm): • U Plane : overestimate charge by ~14% • V Plane : overestimate charge by ~19% • Y Plane : overestimate charge by ~18% ♦ Advantages of Gaussian filter: • Minimal bias charge extraction when using Gaussian fits • Better goodness of fit • Uniformity of dQ/dx vs. angle of track w.r.t. anode plane • No noise hits from “side bumps” associated with Wiener signal ♦ Simple to switch in code (.fcl file parameters) • First need to study/optimize for ProtoDUNE-SP 9

  10. BACKUP SLIDES 10

  11. 2D Deconv. Example 1 2D Deconv. Example 1 11

  12. 2D Deconv. Example 2 2D Deconv. Example 2 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend