Garden Grove Freeway Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) Project Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Garden Grove Freeway Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) Project Update (SR-22) Project Update OCTA Board of Directors OCTA Board of Directors March 14, 2005 March 14, 2005

Days Worked = 174 Days Worked = 174 Days Remaining = 626 Days Remaining = 626

A Little History A Little History • Partnership between OCTA, Caltrans, FHWA, Cities • Partnership between OCTA, Caltrans, FHWA, Cities of Orange, Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Westminster, of Orange, Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Westminster, Seal Beach and Los Alamitos. Seal Beach and Los Alamitos. • OCTA Board Approved Design-Build Oct 2001 • OCTA Board Approved Design-Build Oct 2001 • Request for Qualifications Issued July 2002 • Request for Qualifications Issued July 2002 • Environmental Clearance Mar 2003 • Environmental Clearance Mar 2003 • Request for Proposals Issued Sept 2003 • Request for Proposals Issued Sept 2003 • BAFO Received May 2004 • BAFO Received May 2004 • Contract Award Aug 2004 • Contract Award Aug 2004 • Begin Work Sept 2004 • Begin Work Sept 2004 • Roadway Improvements Complete Nov 2006 • Roadway Improvements Complete Nov 2006

Measure M Makes It Happen Measure M Makes It Happen Measure M $321.4 M CMAQ 21% CMAQ $101.3 M Measure M TCRP $ 56.3 M 66% Cities $ 11.0 M TCRP Total $490.0 M 11% Cities 2%

Project Partners Project Partners Parsons

OCTA SR-22 Organization OCTA SR-22 Organization OCTA Board of Directors RPAH Committee CEO Exec. Dir. Const and Eng SR-22 Program Manager

OCTA SR-22 Project Organization OCTA SR-22 Project Organization Program Manager Safety Manager External Freeway Project Design Const Const Affairs ROW Contracts Service Controls Oversight Seg 1 Seg 2 Manager Patrol Acquisition Utilities Environ.

Project Improvements Project Improvements • HOV lane in each direction • Auxiliary lanes between various interchanges • Continuous Aux lane between City Dr and Beach Blvd • Separate structure from SR-57 connector W/B SR-22 • A collector-distributor road on E/B SR-22 at City Drive • Various interchange improvements, construction of additional soundwalls, replacement planting, and aesthetic enhancements.

Project Details Project Details • 35 bridges to wide, build or replace • 88 retaining walls (640,000 SF) • Import 700,000 tons select backfill • 240,000 cy Concrete Pavement • 60,000 lf new drainage pipe/culverts • 170,000 tons new asphalt pavement

Project Segments Project Segments Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment 1A Segment 1B Segment 1A Segment 1B 2A 2C 2A 2C Segment Segment 2B 2B

Typical Section Typical Section Existing 3 Lanes Each Direction

CITY DRIVE

CITY DRIVE Re-Aligned Local Steet and Ramps New Freeway Connector Elimination of Critical Weave

BEACH BLVD.

BEACH BLVD.

Schedule Control Schedule Control

Schedule Control Schedule Control

Project Status Project Status • Geotechnical Investigation Complete • Right-of-Way Activities Nearly Complete • Design 50% complete • Early work underway – Metropolitan Improvements – Vegetation removal – Excavation/embankment – Material fabrication – Utility relocation – Bridge Demo • Wall and bridge work started last month • Public Outreach in full swing

Project Challenges Project Challenges • 1 ST Design-Build on an active freeway • Working together w/ different entities and agencies • Working together w/ satellite entities • Recognizing the pace of the project • Weather this fall/winter • Resources in this extremely active region • Minimize disruptions

Public Awareness Effort Public Awareness Effort • Construction alerts delivered to 7,000 residents and businesses to date • SR-22 Webpage established – 5,000 hits monthly • Received/answered 120 Helpline calls • More than 1,800 contacts in our database • First “100-day” postcard mailed to 32,000 residents • 6 Open Houses held • Collateral pieces developed • 25 Neighborhood Meetings held since November

Upcoming Board Items Upcoming Board Items April 11 • Approval of maintenance work contained in specifications • Consideration for adding deleted aesthetic treatments back into project April 25 • Review of staff plans for project subcontracts