Fundamental Symmetries - l
Vincenzo Cirigliano Los Alamos National Laboratory
HUGS 2018 Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA May 29- June 15 2018
Fundamental Symmetries - l Vincenzo Cirigliano Los Alamos National - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
HUGS 2018 Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA May 29- June 15 2018 Fundamental Symmetries - l Vincenzo Cirigliano Los Alamos National Laboratory Goal of these lectures Provide an introduction to exciting physics at the Intensity/Precision
Vincenzo Cirigliano Los Alamos National Laboratory
HUGS 2018 Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA May 29- June 15 2018
PEN Nab Majorana nEDM
Qweak muon g-2
precision measurements or the study of rare processes at low energy
Provide an introduction to exciting physics at the Intensity/Precision Frontier
Mu2e
While remarkably successful in explaining phenomena over a wide range
No Matter, no Dark Matter, no Dark Energy
1/Coupling M vEW
Unexplored
1/Coupling M vEW
Unexplored
1/Coupling M vEW
Energy Frontier
(direct access to UV d.o.f)
1/Coupling M vEW
Precision Frontier
(indirect access to UV d.o.f) (direct access to light d.o.f.) WIMP DM A’
1/Coupling M vEW
Energy Frontier
(direct access to UV d.o.f)
Precision Frontier
(indirect access to UV d.o.f) (direct access to light d.o.f.)
dynamics: structure, symmetries, and parameters of LBSM
1/Coupling M vEW
Energy Frontier
(direct access to UV d.o.f)
Precision Frontier
(indirect access to UV d.o.f) (direct access to light d.o.f.)
Nuclear Science Fundamental Symmetry experiments play a prominent role at the Precision Frontier
neutral current (Parity Violating Electron Scattering).
Lepton Number violation and neutrino-less double beta decay.
that after we have done it, it looks the same as it did before” (Feynman paraphrasing Weyl) **An object or a physical law
Translational symmetry Rotational symmetry
Images from
“Symmetry”. Princeton University Press, 1952
that after we have done it, it looks the same as it did before” (Feynman paraphrasing Weyl) **An object or a physical law
not change the results of possible experiments” (Weinberg)
Translational symmetry Rotational symmetry
Images from
“Symmetry”. Princeton University Press, 1952
unchanged (equations of motion invariant)
unchanged (equations of motion invariant)
existence of identity and inverse transformation, composition rule
unchanged (equations of motion invariant)
U(1)
Dirac matrices
U(1)
Dirac matrices
SU(2) - isospin (if mn = mp)
U(1) U(1) ?
U(1) U(1) Leftover piece:
U(1) U(1)
state, transformed of the evolved = evolved of the transformed
state, transformed of the evolved = evolved of the transformed
[US, H] = 0 |<a |US† US |b> |2 = |<a|b>|2
state, transformed of the evolved = evolved of the transformed
Symmetry Conservation law Time translation Energy Space translation Momentum Rotation Angular momentum U(1) phase Electric charge … …
Emmy Noether
Symmetry Conservation law Time translation Energy Space translation Momentum Rotation Angular momentum U(1) phase
#particles - #anti-particles
… …
Emmy Noether
state, transformed of the evolved = evolved of the transformed
state, transformed of the evolved = evolved of the transformed
Emmy Noether
state, transformed of the evolved = evolved of the transformed
e- ν D P
Simple problem: in polarized nuclear beta decay, which of the correlation coefficients a,b,A,B signals parity violation?
deduce C-transformation of π0
, T and C transformations are symmetries
ηA= phases r = spin label b (d) = (anti)particle annihilation operator Srr’ reverses spin
, T and C transformations are symmetries
Scalar field Vector field Spin 1/2:
, T and C transformations are symmetries
, T and C transformations are symmetries
whether they leave action invariant
, and T are not necessarily symmetries, but CPT is!
, T and C transformations are symmetries
whether they leave action invariant
, and T are not necessarily symmetries, but CPT is! CPT invariance! CP violation is equivalent to T violation CPT theorem: hermitian & Lorentz invariant Lagrangian transforms as
spectrum (Goldstone Bosons)
(sound waves) in solids; spin waves in magnets; pions in QCD
anti-baryon production
evolution requires the concurrence of three conditions:
Sakharov ‘67
anti-baryon production
evolution requires the concurrence of three conditions:
Sakharov ‘67
(symmetry restoration at hight T: 1st order phase transition?)
evolution requires the concurrence of three conditions:
are tied to all known mechanisms of symmetry breaking:
Sakharov ‘67
<ϕ> ≠ 0 ⇒ SU(2)L×U(1)Y → U(1)EM
E.Wigner
E.Wigner
requires the existence of spin-1 particles (the gauge bosons)
Yang “Symmetry dictates dynamics”
conserved current associated with global U(1)
transforming as
transforming as
covariant derivative
transforming as
conserved currents associated with global G symmetry
QED of charged scalar boson U(1) spontaneously broken
model: in a gauge theory with SSB, Goldstone modes appear as longitudinal polarization of massive spin-1 gauge bosons
Spin 0 Spin 1/2 Spin 1
Six anti-symmetric generators ωμν: real parameters