FLOU OURISH RISH Governan ernance ce Struct cture re El - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FLOU OURISH RISH Governan ernance ce Struct cture re

El Elevat ator

• r Speech

eech

2

Gu Guid idelines elines for

• r En

Enga gagi ging ng

• In

Invitation ation to be prese sent nt

• Co

Confid identia entiality lity

• Open-minded

minded

• St

Streng engths ths-based based

• List

sten n to eac ach h ot

• ther

er

3

Mor

• re

e Gu Guid idelines elines for

• r En

Enga gagi ging ng

• Mutual

ual Respect ct

• In

Intent nt vs. Im Impact act

• Aware

warenes ess s of Persp specti ectives es & Bia iases es

• In

Inquiry vs. . Ad Advocacy cacy

• Honesty

esty in in fe feedbac ack

• Honesty

esty of perspe specti ctives es

• Encou
• urage

rage oth

• ther

ers s to engage ge & share re their r opin inions ions

• Assum

ume goodw dwill ll

• Remem

embe ber r why we we are here

4

ROADM DMAP AP

5

Roa

• admap

map – What at Is Is It It?

• Hypot
• thesi

hesis, s, testi ting g in intuiti ition

• n, how
• w to cause

se change nge

• Uncover

ering ing assump sumption tions s

• Flo

low w chart t of activi viti ties, es, outcom come, e, activ iviti ties, es, outcome come, , end of the ro road

6

En End of

• f th

the Roa

• ad
• Big

ig pic icture ture – not

• t pro

rogram rammat atic c leve level – help lp us prio iori riti tize ze and foc focus us – how

• w to

rall lly the communi unity ty in in wa ways s it it is is not

• t now
• w rall

llying ing

The he St.

• St. Lo

Louis is re region ion wi will ll ac achie hieve e a a su subs bstantial tantial an and sus d sustained tained re redu duct ction ion in inf in infant ant mor

• rtality

tality.

7

Precondit econditions ions for

• r the En

End of

• f th

the Roa

• ad
• For us to achie

ieve e the end of the ro road, what t has to happen en for for this is to occur? ur? What has to be in place and what’s different than now?

8

Precondit econditions ions for

• r the Big

ig Boxes es

9

Hypothes pothesis is Rega garding rding the Order der

10

The Pat ath to P

• Prog

rogress ress

Collaboration and leadership is established Our region’s challenges and needs are better understood Policies are changed Systems are changed to help families support their health Service delivery is accessible and at max effectiveness Physical and built environment supports healthy families

11

Community-wide understanding and support increases The region aligns around a path forward

Roa

• ad Map

ap

Please answer the following questions for your portion of the Road Map:

What at mi migh ght we se see e that at wou

• uld

ld demons monstrat trate e this is? What at do

• we need

ed to k

• know ab

abou

• ut

t this is now?

Please make notes on your flip chart paper.

12

Com

• mmunity

munity Li List stenin ening g Session ession - Approa

• ach

ch

• Host series of mini

listening sessions with partners

• Host one general session -
• pen to public
• Reach 100 people to

attend public sessions

13

Com

• mmunity

munity Li List steni ening ng Sessions essions - Go Goal als

1.

• 1. Establish

blish foundation ation of building ding commu munity nity own wnership hip 2.

• 2. Shape/inf

/influ luenc ence e kn knowl wledg edge of relevant ant issues ues and priority ity-setting etting for Flour urish ish St.

• St. Louis

is 3.

• 3. Identify

ify emerging ging trends s and assets ts - increase ase common

• n

underst stand anding ing of data and pertine nent nt community unity needs 4.

• 4. Draw

w attention ion and build d public ic awareness ess of issu sues es 5.

• 5. In

Incre rease ase pot

• tent

ntial ial media ia cover erag age e of In Initiativ tiative

14

GOVE VERN RNANCE ANCE AND ND ST STRUC UCTURE URE

15

“In spite of current ads and slogans, the world doesn’t change one person at a time. It changes as networ etworks ks of

• f r

relati ationsh

• nships

ips for form amon

• ng peop
• ple

le who ho d disco cover er the hey y sha hare e a co common

• n ca

cause and vision of what’s possible.”

• Marga

gare ret t Whea eatl tley y and Debor

• rah

ah Freize

16

Col

• lla

laborativ borative e Go Governan vernance ce St Structur ructure

17

• Defi

finition nition of stru ructure cture

• Unde

derlying rlying assump umpti tions ns

• Key attribut

ributes

18

Col

• lla

laborativ borative e St Structure ructure Next xt St Steps eps

• Clarific

rificati ation n of Cabi binet et stru ructur cture

• Reinforce

ce connecti nection

• n wi

with ot

• ther

r initiati iatives s

• Ide

dentify fy wh when strat rategy gy and d ope pera rations ions teams s are re neede ded

• MCFH

FHC de devel velopi ping g pa pathways ys for for engaging aging new w community unity liaisons ns

• Cre

reate Thi hink nk Tank nk

19

Why y Thin ink k Tan ank? k?

Condi ditions ions of collectiv ective impa pact ct hinge on be becoming ing da data dr driven ven

Common

• n agenda

da is is not

• t a coll

llec ecti tive e set et of solu luti tions ns stakeh ehol

• lde

ders s can agree e upon, it is not about creating solutions at all, instead a common agenda is…. 1) common

• n underst

standing nding of the pro roblem em 2) agree eeing ing to jo join int t goals ls to addre ress ss the pro roblem em 3) arrivi ving ng at common

• n in

indic icat ator

• rs

s to whic ich h the coll llec ecti tive e set et of in involved ed actor

• rs

s wil ill l hold ld themselves es accoun

• unta

table e in in making ng pro rogre ress ss

20

Why y Thin ink k Tan ank? k?

Opp pportunity unity to engage age more re pe peopl ple a and d di diver versity ity

• f thought,

t, sector, , expe peri rience nce in FL FLOURISH RISH Opp pportunity unity to bu build d a sustainable ainable stru ructure cture for for sha hari ring ng and nd using ng da data

21

Thin ink k Tan ank k Dis iscus cussion ion

1.

• 1. Full Cabi

binet et engage ged d in cre reati ation

• n of Think

k Tank 2.

• 2. Ad

Ad Ho Hoc grou roup p to en engage age in cre reati ation n of Think k Tank nk and d re repo port ba back to Cabi binet 3.

• 3. St

Staff f to impl plement nt cre reati ation n of Think k Tank k and d re repo port ba back to Ca

• Cabi

binet net Pros ros and nd Con

• ns of
• f ea

each? h?

22

Thin ink k Tan ank What’s important to us about the work of the Thin ink k Tan ank? k?

23

Next xt Meeting ing

• Crea

reating ing cr crit iteria eria for

• r go

good

• d so

solu lutio tions ns

24