five years of the right to be forgotuen
play

Five years of the Right to be Forgotuen Kurt Thomas, with Theo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Five years of the Right to be Forgotuen Kurt Thomas, with Theo Bertram, Elie Bursztein, Stephanie Caro, Hubert Chao, Rutledge Chin Feman, Peter Fleischer, Albin Gustafsson, Jess Hemerly, Chris Hibbert, Luca Invernizzi, Lanah Kammourieh Donnelly,


  1. Five years of the Right to be Forgotuen Kurt Thomas, with Theo Bertram, Elie Bursztein, Stephanie Caro, Hubert Chao, Rutledge Chin Feman, Peter Fleischer, Albin Gustafsson, Jess Hemerly, Chris Hibbert, Luca Invernizzi, Lanah Kammourieh Donnelly, Jason Ketover, Jay Laefer, Paul Nicholas, Yuan Niu, Harjinder Obhi, David Price, Andrew Strait, and Al Verney Security and Privacy Group

  2. Right to be Forgotuen (RTBF) Delist “ inaccurate, inadequate, irrelevant, or excessive ” information surgaced by search queries containing the name of the requester. Security and Privacy Group

  3. Balancing between individual privacy, public interest Security and Privacy Group

  4. Balancing between individual privacy, public interest Decision made by search provider via manual review Security and Privacy Group

  5. Example of balancing test Request A former politician requested to delist 3 URLs from Google Search reporuing on his recent deparuure from politics in connection with a drug scandal. Outcome Google delisted the 3 URLs as they disclosed the politician’s private home addresses, not just information about the scandal. Security and Privacy Group

  6. Example of balancing test Request A former politician requested to delist 3 URLs from Google Search reporuing on his recent deparuure from politics in connection with a drug scandal. Outcome Google delisted the 3 URLs as they disclosed the politician’s private home addresses, not just information about the scandal. Security and Privacy Group

  7. Over the last fjve years then... 3M 45% 502,000 Requested URLs URLs delisted Requesters Security and Privacy Group

  8. Our measurement study Types of sites Information Entities creating requested present on site requests Security and Privacy Group

  9. Provider greater transparency around how the RTBF is applied in practice Security and Privacy Group

  10. Review process & dataset Security and Privacy Group

  11. Data present in a request Email address URLs to delist Country Timestamp Security and Privacy Group

  12. Manual annotations added during review Type of site Social, directory, news, government records Information on page Personal information, professional information, crime, political, self-authored ... Requesting entity Minor, government offjcial, corporate entity... Security and Privacy Group

  13. Five years of data, since implementation 47,000 Average URLs per month Security and Privacy Group

  14. Average time to arrive at a decision 85 days 6 days 2014 2019 Security and Privacy Group

  15. Average time to arrive at a decision 85 days 6 days 2014 2019 Security and Privacy Group

  16. Which sites are requested for delisting? Security and Privacy Group

  17. Two dominant intents for delistings 16% 13% 19% 2% Directory Social media News Government Personal information Legal history Security and Privacy Group

  18. Infmuenced by regional privacy atuitudes and local norms France Italy Spain 42% 33% 10% Directory, Social media News Government (vs. 29% across Europe) (vs. 19% across Europe) (vs. 2% across Europe) Security and Privacy Group

  19. Delisting rates refmect public interest balancing 19% 35% 53% Government News Directory, Social media Security and Privacy Group

  20. Increasing share of requests to news Examples include: dailymail.co.uk ouest-france.fr telegraph.co.uk repubblica.it Security and Privacy Group

  21. Declining share of requests to social media Examples include: facebook.com twituer.com youtube.com plus.google.com instagram.com Security and Privacy Group

  22. Infmuence of GDPR on directory requests Afuer GDPR, only 55% of the top 500 requested directory sites remain online. Examples include: 118712.fr societe.com 192.com Security and Privacy Group

  23. What information is requested for delisting? Security and Privacy Group

  24. Professional activities, contact Professional & personal information most common info, addresses, medical status, and more. Professional information Predominantly on directory sites. Personal information Sensitive personal information 2% 24% 8% Professional activities, contact information, 34% of all phone numbers, and mailing addresses. requested URLs Security and Privacy Group

  25. Criminal records and negative reviews also common Crime Professional wrongdoing 9% 8% 24% Convictions, acquitals, 17% of all or negative reviews. requested URLs Security and Privacy Group

  26. Remaining types of common information Political Self-authored Name not found 24% 20% 9% 4% 24% 33% of requested URLs Security and Privacy Group

  27. Affjnity of types of information to difgerent sites News Professional information 18% Personal information 3% Crime 22% Professional wrongdoing 22% Self authored 5% Name not found 10% ... Security and Privacy Group

  28. Affjnity of types of information to difgerent sites News Social Media Professional information 18% 8% Personal information 3% 5% Crime 22% 3% Professional wrongdoing 22% 2% Self authored 5% 33% Name not found 10% 29% ... Security and Privacy Group

  29. Delisting rates refmect public interest Criticism of platgorm Personal addresses, or activities contact info, photos 3% 48% 97% Political Crime Personal information Security and Privacy Group

  30. Who makes delisting requests? Security and Privacy Group

  31. Majority of requested URLs come from private individuals 6% 4% 4% 2% 84% Minor Public fjgure Politician Corporate entity Private individual Security and Privacy Group

  32. Small number of requesters make heavy use of RTBF 34% Requested URLs from just 10K requesters Security and Privacy Group

  33. Long tail of hundreds of thousands of requesters 29% Requested URLs from 400K requesters 34% Requested URLs from just 10K requesters Security and Privacy Group

  34. Requester activity varies by country URLs requested per 1000 Internet users 12 France 7 Italy 3 Greece Security and Privacy Group

  35. Decreasing number of new requesters 6,800 Average new requesters per month Security and Privacy Group

  36. Relationship between requester’s origin and audience Origin of requester, by volume of requested URLs News Site Belgium Germany Spain France UK hln.be 89% 0% 0% 1% 2% nieuwsblad.be 93% 0% 0% 0% 0% Over 89% of requests to top Belgian news sites come from local requesters Security and Privacy Group

  37. Relationship between requester’s origin and audience Origin of requester, by volume of requested URLs News Site Belgium Germany Spain France UK hln.be 89% 0% 0% 1% 2% nieuwsblad.be 93% 0% 0% 0% 0% bild.de 0% 96% 0% 1% 2% elmundo.es 0% 1% 96% 1% 1% elpais.com 0% 0% 97% 1% 0% Security and Privacy Group

  38. Relationship between requester’s origin and audience Origin of requester, by volume of requested URLs News Site Belgium Germany Spain France UK hln.be 89% 0% 0% 1% 2% nieuwsblad.be 93% 0% 0% 0% 0% bild.de 0% 96% 0% 1% 2% elmundo.es 0% 1% 96% 1% 1% elpais.com 0% 0% 97% 1% 0% ouest-france.fr 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% lefjgaro.fr 0% 0% 0% 99% 0% bbc.co.uk 0% 0% 0% 0% 97% dailymail.co.uk 0% 1% 0% 2% 92% Security and Privacy Group

  39. Conclusion Nuanced, dynamic Challenge in providing usage of the RTBF transparency without over last fjve years. de-anonymizing specifjc requesters. Infmuenced in paru by local privacy concerns and media norms. Security and Privacy Group

  40. Research now refmected in Transparency Reporu htup://transparencyreporu.google.com/eu-privacy/ Security and Privacy Group

  41. Thanks! kuruthomas@google.com Security and Privacy Group

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend