First Draft M aps presentation City of Davis
Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Districting from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous – districts should not hop/ jump • M aintain “ communities of interest ” • Follow city/county/ local government lines • Keep districts compact – appearance/ function
Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Districting from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous – districts should not hop/ jump • M aintain “ communities of interest ” • Follow city/county/ local government lines • Keep districts compact – appearance/ function
Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Districting from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous – districts should not hop/ jump • M aintain “ communities of interest ” • Follow city/county/ local government lines • Keep districts compact – appearance/ function
Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Districting from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous – districts should not hop/ jump • M aintain “ communities of interest” • Follow city/county/ local government lines • Keep districts compact – appearance/ function
Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Districting from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous – districts should not hop/ jump • M aintain “ communities of interest ” • Follow city/ county/ local government lines • Keep districts compact – appearance/ function
Traditional Redistricting Principles Preventing a Districting from becoming a Gerrymander There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts. • Relatively equal size - people, not citizens • Contiguous – districts should not hop/ jump • M aintain “ communities of interest ” • Follow city/county/ local government lines • Keep districts compact – appearance/ function
City of Davis Preliminary Findings Census population is 65,622 based on the 2010 Census. This population is used for the determination of the target size of a district, and the “equal population” calculations that cannot exceed 10% from the largest to smallest District. M edian Population: 13,124
City of Davis Public Engagement Workshop A map drawing workshop was held on a Saturday to allow for more public engagement. This workshop included two presentations and map-drawing exercises. As a result, we obtained several mapping submissions which were then helpful in informing the drafting of map options before the council today.
Neighborhoods and Streets
Renter Population
Latino Citizen Voting Age Population
Asian Citizen Voting Age Population
Five District Option 1
Five District Option 1 Total Population - Decennial Census Population Deviation Latino Asian Black White District 1 13,107 (17) -0.1% 1,414 11% 2,782 21% 294 2% 8,742 67% District 2 13,145 21 0.2% 1,610 12% 2,950 22% 256 2% 8,593 65% District 3 13,123 (1) 0.0% 1,929 15% 2,172 17% 319 2% 8,972 68% District 4 13,120 (4) 0.0% 1,679 13% 3,422 26% 328 3% 7,927 60% District 5 13,127 3 0.0% 1,540 12% 3,029 23% 331 3% 8,337 64% ESTIM ATED Population - American Community Survey Estimated Population Est. Growth Latino Asian Black White District 1 13,347 240 2% 1,478 11% 3,049 23% 209 2% 8,645 65% District 2 13,218 73 1% 1,779 13% 3,098 23% 204 2% 8,104 61% District 3 12,278 (845) -6% 2,075 17% 1,934 16% 173 1% 8,275 67% District 4 14,187 1,067 8% 2,383 17% 3,698 26% 677 5% 8,150 57% District 5 13,635 508 4% 1,989 15% 2,697 20% 212 2% 8,928 65% ESTIM ATED Citizen Voting Age Population - American Community Survey CVAP Population 2015_US_H18+ 2015_US_Wht18+ 2015_US_Blk18+ 2015_US_Asn18+ District 1 10,209 953 9% 6,713 66% 129 1% 2,014 20% District 2 9,828 1,173 12% 5,818 59% 164 2% 2,233 23% District 3 8,735 1,304 15% 5,854 67% 159 2% 1,078 12% District 4 9,826 1,076 11% 5,340 54% 389 4% 2,608 27% District 5 10,866 1,299 12% 6,996 64% 138 1% 1,769 16% Houses - American Community Survey Households Built 2010+ M ulti-Unit Renter Homeowner District 1 5,099 110 2% 2,406 46% 2,989 59% 2,110 41% District 2 5,045 2 0% 2,038 39% 2,451 49% 2,594 51% District 3 4,719 124 3% 1,381 28% 2,101 45% 2,618 55% District 4 4,800 35 1% 2,021 40% 2,883 60% 1,917 40% District 5 5,210 38 1% 3,012 55% 3,750 72% 1,460 28%
Five District Option 2
Five District Option 2 Total Population - Decennial Census Population Deviation Latino Asian Black White District 1 12,948 (176) -1.3% 1,423 11% 2,832 22% 282 2% 8,547 66% District 2 13,435 311 2.4% 1,558 12% 3,430 26% 335 2% 8,253 61% District 3 13,488 364 2.8% 1,798 13% 2,194 16% 280 2% 9,407 70% District 4 13,071 (53) -0.4% 1,756 13% 2,536 19% 304 2% 8,778 67% District 5 12,680 (444) -3.4% 1,637 13% 3,363 27% 327 3% 7,586 60% ESTIM ATED Population - American Community Survey Estimated Population Est. Growth Latino Asian Black White District 1 12,962 14 0% 1,642 13% 2,949 23% 233 2% 8,279 64% District 2 13,467 32 0% 1,663 12% 3,657 27% 184 1% 7,709 57% District 3 13,403 (85) -1% 2,090 16% 2,185 16% 203 2% 9,472 71% District 4 12,981 (90) -1% 1,949 15% 2,035 16% 180 1% 8,733 67% District 5 13,852 1,172 9% 2,360 17% 3,650 26% 675 5% 7,909 57% ESTIM ATED Citizen Voting Age Population - American Community Survey CVAP Population 2015_US_H18+ 2015_US_Wht18+ 2015_US_Blk18+ 2015_US_Asn18+ District 1 10,022 1,134 11% 6,390 64% 164 2% 1,940 19% District 2 10,595 1,215 11% 6,047 57% 138 1% 2,632 25% District 3 10,583 1,269 12% 7,331 69% 117 1% 1,339 13% District 4 8,732 1,124 13% 5,833 67% 173 2% 1,213 14% District 5 9,532 1,063 11% 5,120 54% 387 4% 2,578 27% Houses - American Community Survey Households Built 2010+ M ulti-Unit Renter Homeowner District 1 4,988 101 2% 2,425 47% 2,974 60% 2,014 40% District 2 4,883 16 0% 2,104 41% 2,713 56% 2,170 44% District 3 5,667 48 1% 3,132 52% 3,914 69% 1,753 31% District 4 4,730 109 2% 1,241 25% 1,866 39% 2,864 61% District 5 4,605 35 1% 1,956 41% 2,707 59% 1,898 41%
Five District Option 3
Five District Option 3 Total Population - Decennial Census Population Deviation Latino Asian Black White District 1 13,334 210 1.6% 1,438 11% 2,660 20% 295 2% 9,077 68% District 2 13,207 83 0.6% 1,612 12% 2,953 22% 256 2% 8,652 66% District 3 12,667 (457) -3.5% 1,833 14% 1,999 16% 298 2% 8,778 69% District 4 13,868 744 5.7% 1,827 13% 3,744 27% 362 3% 8,198 59% District 5 12,546 (578) -4.4% 1,462 12% 2,999 24% 317 3% 7,866 63% ESTIM ATED Population - American Community Survey Estimated Population Est. Growth Latino Asian Black White District 1 13,452 118 1% 1,525 11% 3,146 23% 196 1% 8,605 64% District 2 13,278 71 1% 1,788 13% 3,108 23% 207 2% 8,141 61% District 3 12,213 (454) -4% 1,954 16% 1,805 15% 193 2% 8,258 68% District 4 14,621 753 5% 2,603 18% 3,809 26% 672 5% 8,454 58% District 5 13,101 555 4% 1,834 14% 2,608 20% 207 2% 8,644 66% ESTIM ATED Citizen Voting Age Population - American Community Survey CVAP Population 2015_US_H18+ 2015_US_Wht18+ 2015_US_Blk18+ 2015_US_Asn18+ District 1 10,267 1,016 10% 6,676 65% 135 1% 2,030 20% District 2 9,879 1,181 12% 5,849 59% 165 2% 2,241 23% District 3 8,747 1,203 14% 6,061 69% 179 2% 940 11% District 4 10,069 1,223 12% 5,363 53% 384 4% 2,715 27% District 5 10,502 1,182 11% 6,772 64% 116 1% 1,776 17% Houses - American Community Survey Households Built 2010+ M ulti-Unit Renter Homeowner District 1 5,053 101 2% 2,369 45% 2,814 56% 2,239 44% District 2 5,072 2 0% 2,061 39% 2,454 48% 2,618 52% District 3 4,681 124 3% 1,454 30% 2,249 48% 2,432 52% District 4 4,984 35 1% 2,012 39% 2,889 58% 2,095 42% District 5 5,083 47 1% 2,962 55% 3,768 74% 1,315 26%
Seven District Option 1
Seven District Option 1
Seven District Option 2
Recommend
More recommend
