Findings for IANDA / Cost of the Diet in Ghana WFP, 2017 Linear - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

findings for ianda cost of the diet in ghana wfp 2017
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Findings for IANDA / Cost of the Diet in Ghana WFP, 2017 Linear - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Findings for IANDA / Cost of the Diet in Ghana WFP, 2017 Linear optimization (Cost of the Diet, developed by SC-UK) determines the least expensive nutritious diet using locally available foods Least expensive nutritious diet adjusted to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Findings for IANDA / Cost of the Diet in Ghana WFP, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Locally available food items Least expensive nutritious diet Possible diets meeting all nutrient requirements of the household

Linear optimization (Cost of the Diet, developed by SC-UK) determines the least expensive nutritious diet using locally available foods

Least expensive nutritious diet adjusted to include two servings of preferred staple per day (SNUT)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Brong Afaho Ashanti Western Central Eastern Greater Accra Northern Upper West Upper East

The Cost of the Diet analysis has been conducted for 2 Regions: Northern & Brong Afaho

Volta

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Number of foods in the analysis

SNUT – Original food list (Oct 2015 prices) SNUT – Original food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017 prices) SNUT – IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017 prices)

38 56 + 6 vegetables + 4 fruits/legumes + 5 fish/meat + 3 others

The Cost of the Diet analysis has been conducted with different sets of data

SNUT also REACHED in the BA region Note: SNUT NOT REACHED in the BA region

slide-5
SLIDE 5

New locally produced fortified products, which were designed for Ghanaian market, were also added to the list of foods

Source: http://obaasimaghana.com/home.php

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The cost of the Nutritious diet (SNUT) is 30% less expensive using a broader food dataset - Northern Region

0.30 0.60 0.36 1.21 1.24 1.12 6.99 5.5 2.76 2.21 1.83 1.76 3.89 4.01 3.16 14.60 13.18 9.17 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 SNUT - orginial food list (Oct 2015) SNUT - orginial food list (Nov 2016-Jan 2017) SNUT - IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016-Jan 2017)

Cost of the SNUT per individual (GH¢)

Woman, 30-59y, 45kg, moderatly active (lactation, semester average) Man, 30-59y, 50kg, moderatly active Adolescent girl 14-15y Child 6-7 years Child 12-23 months Household

SNUT – Original food list (Oct 2015) SNUT – Original food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017)

SNUT – IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017)

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

slide-7
SLIDE 7

0.36 0.55 1.12 1.64 1.76 2.63 3.16 4.00 2.76 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Northern Brong Afaho

AVERAGE DAILY COST (GHC)

Adolescent girl 14-15y Woman, 30-59y, 45kg, moderatly active (lactation, semester average) Man, 30-59y, 50kg, moderatly active Child 6-7 years Child 12-23 months

The cost of the Nutritious diet (SNUT) is 29% more expensive in the BA than in the Northern region

Northern

Brong Afaho

+ 29 % cost

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

Adolescent girl 14-15 years Woman, 30-59y, 45kg, moderately active (lactation, semester average) Child 6-7 years Child 12-23 months Man, 30-59y, 50kg, moderately active

slide-8
SLIDE 8

814 810 805 321 790 775 437 102 69 375 646 119 168 1178 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 SNUT - orginial food list (Oct 2015) SNUT - orginial food list (Nov 2016-Jan 2017) SNUT - IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016-Jan 2017)

Quantity of foods per HH per day (g)

Roots and tubers Legumes, nuts and seeds Fish, seafood, amphibians and invertebrates Eggs and egg products Vegetables and vegetable products

SNUT – Original food list (Oct 2015) SNUT – Original food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017) SNUT – IANDA expanded food list (Nov 2016 – Jan 2017)

A broader variety of vegetables reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of the Household – Northern region

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

From SNUT-Original (Nov2016-Jan2017)  SNUT – IANDA (Nov2016-Jan2017) + 1178g of vegetable daily (instead of 0) 5.5 times less animal source protein Leads to a 30 % cost reduction of the Nutritious diet for the Household

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Key findings

  • Between 2015 and 2016, the cost of the nutritious diet decreased by 10%, based only
  • n price variation (same foods list)
  • Having a broader list of foods including nutritious vegetables and legumes decreased

the cost of the nutritious diet by 30 %

  • The cost of the nutritious diet for a 4 member household is 29% more expensive in

the BA region than in the Northern region.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Key targeted groups Child 12-23months

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Kidifeed, Super Cerealplus and LNS-SQ reduce the cost of the child’s Nutritious diet (SNUT) the most - Northern region

0.36 0.15 0.11 0.28 0.06 0.17 0.10 0.07 0.10 0.29 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 SNUT SQ-LNS (GrowNut) (voucher) SQ-LNS (iLiNS) (voucher) Koko plus (voucher) Kidifeed (voucher) Ceresoy (voucher) SC+ (voucher) SC+ (CHAI) (voucher) SC (voucher) Maisoy Forte (voucher)

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

SNUT

SQ-LNS GrowNut (voucher) SQ-LNS iLiNS (voucher) Koko plus (voucher) Kidifeed (voucher) Ceresoy (voucher) SC+ (voucher) SC+ (CHAI) (voucher) SC (voucher) Maisoy Forte (voucher) Source: WFP

analysis, 2017

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Kidifeed, Super Cereal plus and LNS-SQ reduce the cost of the child’s Nutritious diet (SNUT) the most - BA region

0.55 0.23 0.15 0.36 0.08 0.32 0.19 0.09 0.19 0.38 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 SNUT SQ-LNS (GrowNut) (voucher) SQ-LNS (iLiNS) (voucher) Koko plus (voucher) Kidifeed (voucher) Ceresoy (voucher) SC+ (voucher) SC+ (CHAI) (voucher) SC (voucher) Maisoy Forte (voucher)

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

SNUT

SQ-LNS GrowNut( voucher) SQ-LNS iLiNS (voucher) Koko plus (voucher) Kidifeed (voucher) Ceresoy (voucher) SC+ (voucher) SC+ (CHAI) (voucher) SC (voucher) Maisoy Forte (voucher) Source: WFP

analysis, 2017

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Key targeted groups Adolescent girl

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Comparison of the Average Cost of the Diet of a Adolescent Girl with different interventions - Northern region

2.76 2.03 2.27 2.67 2.46 2.48 2.19 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 SNUT Fruit and egg (voucher) Obaasima products (voucher) TomVita (voucher) lola Milk Biscuit (voucher) Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher) AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

Source: WFP analysis, 2017 OFSP (voucher)

SNUT

Fruit & eggs (voucher) Obaasima products (voucher) TomVita (voucher) Lola Milk Biscuit (voucher) Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

3.78 2.44 3.07 2.83 3.31 3.10 4.02 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 SNUT Fruit & eggs (voucher) Obaasima products (voucher) TomVita (voucher) Lola Milk Biscuit (voucher) Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher)

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

SNUT

Fruit & eggs (voucher) Obaasima products (voucher) TomVita (voucher) Lola Milk Biscuit (voucher) Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher) Source: WFP analysis, 2017

Comparison of the Average Cost of the Diet of a Adolescent Girl with different interventions - Brong Afaho region

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Key targeted groups Lactating woman

slide-17
SLIDE 17

3.16 1.78 1.80 1.80 2.72 3.19 2.91 2.95 2.59 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 SNUT SC & fortified oil (voucher) SC (voucher) SC+ (voucher) Obaasima products (voucher) TomVita (voucher) lola Milk Biscuit (voucher) Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher)

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

SNUT

SC & Fortified oil (voucher) Source: WFP

analysis, 2017

Comparison of the Average Cost of the Diet of a lactating woman with different interventions - Northern region

SC (voucher) SC+ (voucher) Obaasima products (voucher) TomVita (voucher) Lola Milk Biscuit (voucher) Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Comparison of the Average Cost of the Diet of a lactating woman with different interventions - Brong Afaho region

4 1.73 2.04 2.02 2.66 3.27 3.03 3.57 3.73 3.2 2.61 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 SNUT SC & Fortified

  • il (voucher)

SC (voucher) SC+ (voucher) Obaasima products (voucher) TomVita (voucher) Lola Milk Biscuit (voucher) Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher) Fruit & Fish (voucher) Fruit & egg (voucher)

AVERAGE DAILY COST (GHC)

(voucher)

SNUT

Fortified

  • il & SC

(voucher) SC (voucher) SC+ (voucher) Obaasima products (voucher) TomVita (voucher) Lola Milk Biscuit (voucher) Samba Shito (voucher) OFSP (voucher) Fruit & egg (voucher) Fruit & Fish (voucher)

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Key findings

  • For the child (6-23 months) provision of locally produced Kidifeed (voucher), Super

Cerealplus and SQ-LNS (Grownut) (voucher) were the most effective in reducing the cost of a nutritious diet, by an average in both regions of 84%, 82% and 60%, respectively, indicating that they are very good sources of essential nutrients.

  • For the adolescent girl, the fresh food voucher for eggs and green leafy vegetables

was the most cost-effective (average of 30% cost reduction in both regions), which is explained by their relatively high content of calcium, iron and B12, which are limiting nutrients.

  • For lactating women, SC interventions (SC, SC+ and SC with fortified oil) were the

most cost-effective and even more so when SC was modelled added to a diet that included one serving of staple. On average, provision of SuperCereal for free (using a voucher) reduced the cost of a nutritious diet for lactating women by 50% in both regions.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Obaasima modelling

slide-21
SLIDE 21

3.32 3.24 2.55 2.56 2.42 2.28 3.32 2.87 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Market price voucher Market price Subsidies price (50 %) voucher Market price voucher SNUT (Maize, Cassava) TomVita lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

Lola milk Biscuit reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of lactating women by 23% even at market price - Northern region

SNUT TomVita Lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito SNUT

  • 23%

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Lola milk Biscuit reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of the Adolescent girl by 11% when modelled at zero cost - Northern region

2.76 2.75 2.67 2.70 2.58 2.46 2.76 2.48 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Market price voucher Market price Subsidies price 50 % voucher Market price voucher SNUT TomVita lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

TomVita Lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito SNUT

  • 11%
slide-23
SLIDE 23

4.00 3.99 3.27 3.31 3.17 3.03 4.00 3.43 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Market price voucher Market price Subsidies price (50 %) voucher Market price voucher SNUT (Maize, Cassava) TomVita lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

Lola milk Biscuit reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of lactating women by 17% even at market price & 24% at zero cost - BA region

  • 24%
  • 17%

TomVita Lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito SNUT

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Lola milk Biscuit reduces cost of Nutritious diet of adolescent girl by 17% even at market price & 25% at zero cost - BA region

3.78 3.75 3.07 3.11 2.97 2.83 3.76 3.31 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 snut Market price voucher Market price Subsidies price 50 % voucher Subsidies price 50 % voucher SNUT TomVita Lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

TomVita Lola Milk Biscuit Samba Shito SNUT SNUT

  • 17%
  • 25%
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Obaasima & Super Cereal Sensitivity Analysis

slide-26
SLIDE 26

SNUT – IANDA 2 staples SNUT – IANDA 1 staples

50 %

Energy intakes (%RNI)

Sensitivity analysis: replacing the daily portion of cassava (one

  • f the staple) by a portion of TomVita or Super Cereal

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

100 %

1 portion 1 portion

Other foods

1 portion

Other foods

Or

Other foods

Or Or

Other foods

Or

slide-27
SLIDE 27

3.16 2.67 1.80 3.16 3.14 2.49 2.31 1.44 2.49 2.48 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 SNUT SC (market price) SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SNUT SC (market price) SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) 2 Staples 1 Staples

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

Super cereal when modelled at zero cost reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of lactating women by 43% (2 staples) & 42% (1 staple) - Northern region

TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SC (market price) SNUT SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SC (market price) SNUT SC (voucher)

1 Staple 2 Staples

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

  • 43%
  • 42%
slide-28
SLIDE 28

2.76 2.63 2.11 2.75 2.67 2.38 2.07 1.50 2.38 2.28 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 SNUT SC (market price) SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SNUT SC (market price) SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) 2 Staples 1 Staples

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

Super cereal when modelled at zero cost reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of adolescent girl by 24% (2 staples) & 37% (1 staple) - Northern region

TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SC (market price) SNUT SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SC (market price) SNUT SC (voucher)

1 Staple 2 Staples

TomVita (market price) TomVita (market price)

  • 24%
  • 37%
slide-29
SLIDE 29

4.00 2.91 2.04 3.99 3.27 3.92 2.89 2.02 3.92 3.16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 SNUT SC (market price) SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SNUT SC (market price) SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) 2 Staples 1 Staples

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

Super cereal when modelled at zero cost reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of lactating women by 49% (2 staples) & 48% (1 staple) - BA region

TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SC (market price) SNUT SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SC (market price) SNUT SC (voucher)

1 Staple 2 Staples

TomVita (market price) TomVita (market price) TomVita (market price)

  • 49%
  • 48%
slide-30
SLIDE 30

3.78 3.42 3.10 3.75 3.07 3.67 3.06 2.51 3.65 2.95 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 SNUT SC (market price) SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SNUT SC (market price) SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) 2 Staples 1 Staples

AVERAGE DAILY COST GHC

Source: WFP analysis, 2017

Super cereal when modelled at zero cost reduces the cost of the Nutritious diet of adolescent girl by 18% (2 staples) & 32% (1 staple) - BA region

TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SC (market price) SNUT SC (voucher) TomVita (market price) TomVita (voucher) SC (market price) SNUT SC (voucher)

1 Staple 2 Staples

TomVita (market price) TomVita (market price) TomVita (market price)

  • 18%
  • 32%
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Key findings

  • For the Obaasima products, the analysis found them to be less cost-effective to meet

nutrient requirements compared to other options, which is due to the fact that their content of specific nutrients, including pantothenic acid, iron and vitamin B12, was lower than that of the other fortified options (SC, SC+, SC/oil) included in the model.

  • Among the three products, the Lola Milk Biscuit performed better, indicating that it was

a more cost-effective source of essential nutrients. Besides nutrient content and cost, acceptability and actual amount consumed by the intended targeted group are also important determinants of whether a specific food will be able to make a good contribution to improving nutrient intake.

  • Consumption of Obaasima products is likely to make a meaningful contribution to

meeting nutrient intake requirements even when it has a lower content of certain micronutrients than other foods that consumers may or may not prefer over those

  • products. Nevertheless, it would be good to consider increasing the content of the

specific micronutrients for which content is relatively low.

  • Note, CotD software aims to meet full requirements of energy, protein and 13 MNs
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Many thanks for Your Attention !