Feasibility Study for the Feasibility Study for the Integration of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

feasibility study for the feasibility study for the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Feasibility Study for the Feasibility Study for the Integration of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feasibility Study for the Feasibility Study for the Integration of Trigeneration Integration of Trigeneration for The New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility for The New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility John Shaw


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 1

Feasibility Study for the Feasibility Study for the Integration of Trigeneration Integration of Trigeneration

for The New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility for The New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility

John Shaw Mechanical Option

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 2

Introduction Introduction

Background The Problem Proposed Solution Results and Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 3

Project Background Project Background

Location –

Independence, Ohio

114,330 sqft Secondary

Education & Community Use Facility

Funded through public

bonds

Total Project Cost

– $33 million

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 4

Project Background Project Background -

  • Who

Who

Project Team Owners:

– City of Independence (property) – Independence Schools District (facility)

Project Design Professionals:

– Sear-Brown (S,A,S,M,E) – Then Design Architects Ltd (Interiors)

Project Constructors:

– Turner Construction (CM) – 22 Multiple Prime Contractors

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 5

Project Background Project Background -

  • Site

Site

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 6

Project Background Project Background

Plan

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 7

Project Background Project Background

Plan

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 8

A Different Viewpoint A Different Viewpoint

Building as an inefficient fossil fuel

energy consumer

Building as environment polluter

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 9

The Problem The Problem

Typical building fuel energy sources

– Electricity

  • Coal Combustion
  • Nuclear
  • Hydrology/Wind Misc

– Thermal Energy

  • Natural Gas Combustion
  • Fuel Oil Combustion
slide-10
SLIDE 10

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 10

The Problem The Problem

Building Energy

Production Efficiency

– Thermal energy

  • 80%-95% equipment efficiency
  • 1%-2% system losses

– 79%-94% thermal energy available for building

– Electric Energy

  • 34% generation efficiency
  • 2% Transmission and

transformer losses – 32% electric energy available for building

Source: Energy Information Administration

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 11

National Energy Production National Energy Production Pollution Emissions Pollution Emissions

4.7

Million tons NOx

979

Metric tons CO2

9.9

Million tons SO2

  • Source: Energy

Information Administration

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 12

Reasons to Consider Alternate Energy Reasons to Consider Alternate Energy Production/Consumption Strategies Production/Consumption Strategies

No New Generation

power plants for 10-15 years

Utilities indicate the

need for new transmission infrastructure

  • 2003 Blackout
  • Brownouts
  • Source: 2001 Bush Administration

National Energy Policy

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 13

Reasons to Consider Alternate Energy Reasons to Consider Alternate Energy Production/Consumption Strategies Production/Consumption Strategies

Continued need to reduce environment air

pollution

Less dependence on national grid

– Few generating plants make great terrorist targets

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 14

Reasons to Consider Alternate Energy Reasons to Consider Alternate Energy Production/Consumption Strategies Production/Consumption Strategies

Former Vice President of ASHRAE, Mr.

Peterson set the goal:

– “…. Zero energy [buildings] by 2020.”

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 15

Proposed Redesign Goals Proposed Redesign Goals

Reduce building total fossil fuel

energy consumption

Reduce total environment emissions Increase building energy operating

efficiency

– Defined as

  • Total Energy Output (Elec & Thermal)

Total Energy Input (Fuel Source)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 16

Proposed Solution Proposed Solution -

  • Trigeneration

Trigeneration

Evolution of cogeneration

– Conversion of one chemical energy fuel source into 2 primary alternate energy forms

  • Electricity
  • Hot Water or Steam

Trigeneration

– Conversion of thermal primary energy into 1 secondary alternate energy form.

  • Chilled Water
slide-17
SLIDE 17

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 17

Cogeneration Equipment Cogeneration Equipment

Microturbines

– Combustion Turbine Engines

  • Multiple fuel sources, typically Natural Gas

– natural gas

  • Higher reliability, lower maintenance

Reciprocating Engines

  • Multiple fuel sources, typically Natural Gas

– natural gas

  • High reliability, higher maintenance, higher

thermal output

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 18

Proposed Solution Proposed Solution -

  • Trigeneration

Trigeneration

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 19

Proposed Solution Proposed Solution -

  • Trigeneration

Trigeneration

http://www.hessmicrogen.com/products_ how_cogen.html# http://www.century.co.kr:8888/product/in_ wa_absorption.asp

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 20

Trigeneration Design Strategies Trigeneration Design Strategies

Independent power/thermal production:

– Electric Utility on Standby (automatic transfer switch)

Excess electric & thermal production

– Sell excess electric back to utility – Use excess thermal for district heating/cooling needs

Load Shaving

– Interconnection with electric Utility

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 21

Existing Building Operating Conditions Existing Building Operating Conditions

YEARLY WEEKDAY KW DEMAND

100 200 300 400 500 600 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 HOUR K W JAN TOTAL KW WKDY FEB TOTAL KW WKDY MAR TOTAL KW WKDY APR TOTAL KW WKDY MAY TOTAL KW WKDY JUN TOTAL KW WKDY JUL TOTAL KW WKDY AUG TOTAL KW WKDY SEP TOTAL KW WKDY OCT TOTAL KW WKDY NOV TOTAL KW WKDY DEC TOTAL KW WKDY

Elliot Unit Base Load Hess Microgen Unit

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 22

Existing Building Operating Conditions Existing Building Operating Conditions

YEARLY WEEKDAY THERMAL DEMAND

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 HOUR MB H JAN TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY FEB TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY MAR TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY APR TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY MAY TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY JUN TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY JUL TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY AUG TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY SEP TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY OCT TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY NOV TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY DEC TOTAL THERMAL MBH WKDY

Elliot Unit Base Load Hess Microgen Unit

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 23

Proposed Proposed Trigeneration Trigeneration

Replace 1 chiller with HW absorption

chiller using HW from Cogeneration Equipment

Replace All Hot Water Boilers except two

for backup extra hw production for chiller

VFD Primary/Secondary Pumping

Remains

Interconnect power production with

building electric distribution

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 24

Proposed Equipment Proposed Equipment

Proposed Equipment Base load

– Elliot Model 100 – 100Kw output w/ 0.8 lead/lag PF correction – 587Mbh Thermal output – 75% Equipment efficiency

Proposed Equipment Occupied load

– HessModel 375 – 375Kw output w/ 0.8 lead/lag PF correction – 1900Mbh Thermal output – 83% Equipment efficiency

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 25

Proposed Equipment Proposed Equipment

Proposed

Cooling Equipment

– Cention HW absorption Chiller Model 350

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 26

Electric Interconnection Electric Interconnection

Governed by IEEE standard 1547 Electric utility companies

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 27

Electrical Interconnection Electrical Interconnection

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 28

Constructability Issues Constructability Issues

16-18 week equipment Lead Times 8ftx5ft equipment Footprint

  • Can reuse boiler battery location, combustion air and

exhaust ducts

Sound output level no louder than a

typical central station airhandler (75dba)

Weigh on the order of 10,000lbs for the

footprint

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 29

Maintenance Issues Maintenance Issues

Relatively intense regularly

scheduled maintenance

–Typically by contract with MFR OR trained contractor/maintenance staff –Down times minimal –Refer to report for detailed maintenance schedules/tasks

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 30

Energy, Emissions, & Cost Summary Energy, Emissions, & Cost Summary

ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED Max Therm/hr Demand Weekday Max Kwh demand Weekday typ 1,691,194 1,691,194 Max Kw demand Weekday typ 525 for 3 months at 4 hours 475 variable with load EMISSIONS Particulates 1,315.7 lbs SO2 1,5288.4 lbs NOx 8,861.9 lbs 5,718.2 lbs CO2 2,570,619 lbs 2,514,120 lbs COSTS First Costs $ 455,000 $ 1,145,200 Annual Maint. Costs $ 2,000 $ 74,754 Annual Electric Costs $ 148,243 $ small amount for Design Day Annual Nat Gas Costs $ 28,312 $ 114,760 TOTAL $ 633,555 $ 1,334,714

slide-31
SLIDE 31

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 31

Conclusions/Comments Conclusions/Comments

Reduced dependence on the

National Electric Grid

Converted the combusted fossil

fuel energy into alternate energy forms more efficiently

Reduced environment air

pollution

slide-32
SLIDE 32

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 32

Conclusions/Comments Conclusions/Comments

More expensive for equipment and

maintenance, HOWEVER

Federal State grants are available Natural Gas companies sometimes offer

reduced prices

Is a growing market Manufacturers are increasing Displaces the national electric grid

demand and thus future increased electric prices

slide-33
SLIDE 33

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 33

Conclusions/Comments Conclusions/Comments

Using this strategy in conjunction

with:

– DOAS/Radiant Heating/Cooling – Daylighting – Variable Frequency Drive

We might reach the Zero Energy

buildings goal since we produce the energy at the building

slide-34
SLIDE 34

2003-2004 AE Thesis-New Independence High School/Shared Use Facility 34

QUESTIONS QUESTIONS